|
|
"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
news:3lf371573h0hhsqt3a33nl6eqbdi0d7o6b@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:40:08 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thanks.com>
> wrote:
..
>>>
>>> You don't know anything about software development, do
|
|
|
On 28 Apr 2005 15:23:29 -0700, j r sherman <jrst@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>how did we know that he lived in Mississippi and we were burning #@($ in
>Georgia?
>
>it was an honest mistake.
All those southerners look alike to us.
--
A positiv
|
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:43:47 -0700, "Gaurdenman"
<m.frisch@charter.net> wrote:
>
>"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
>news:n2no61lhhjuhi2b87bhh2h0iu5sgehdef5@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:52:03 -0700, "Gaurdenman"
>> <m.frisch@
|
|
|
On 27 Apr 2005 19:47:44 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Frankly I don't care what Patty looks like.
The picture is a parody. It's not really her.
>What seems to be the core
>of the Cam Brown case is the claim by Kaldis th
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:14:03 -0700, "The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net>
wrote:
>Goggling H1B will show that Republicans like Newt Gingrich and
>Phil Graham worked tirelessly to raise H1B quotas and that almost
>all Republicans were and still are in l
|
|
|
AMEN, BROTHER! (I'm sure god will forgive me for top-posting just this
once...)
"Scott en Aztlán" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:31:21 -0700, The Real Bev
> <bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
> >keith wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18
|
|
|
You'll know pretty soon, won't you? Obviously the piece of paper means very
little, weather you get the piece of paper or not, you'll be responsible.
For example, if you were cited and the ticket was stolen, blew away, or you
shredded it, it doesn't
|
|
|
>> "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> Some lawyers will take a case on a contingency basis, though it doesn't
> happen that often in consumer cases.
You sound like a typical lawyer. SOMETIMES, MAYBE, THERES A CHANCE. blah
blah bla
|
|
|
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:40:08 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thanks.com>
wrote:
>
>"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
>news:dat2711r4aqtcrjb9iu7h0sj6qs1hslla0@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:13:27 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thank
|
|
|
"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
news:dat2711r4aqtcrjb9iu7h0sj6qs1hslla0@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:13:27 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thanks.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>news
|
|
|
My Screwdriver, my screwdriver,
my kingdom for a screwdriver.
Phillips, slotted, even hex head,
they all work well to kill her dead.
They stab, they poke, they cause such pain,
until they hit her vugular vein.
Squirt, squirt, squirt, and then she'd
|
|
|
"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
news:dat2711r4aqtcrjb9iu7h0sj6qs1hslla0@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:13:27 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thanks.com>
> wrote:
>>think that they are above such things, there really isn't much dif
|
|
|
My wife and I are co-trustees of our living trust. The trust was just
created. I have several life insurance policies and several retirement
plans.
Would you recommend changing the beneficiaries such that:
a) my spouse is the primary and the tru
|
|
|
Hal Womack 3-dan wrote:
> REPLY TO DOCKERY
>
> By Hal Womack 3-dan
> snip
You're certifiable!
You don't even have your own thoughts. Just posting the renerings of others.
|
|
|
Michael Ejercito wrote:
> Disinformation on judges
> Thomas Sowell
One could not even *imagine* a more appropriate title for this essay. :)
> April 26, 2005
>
> The future of the legal and political system of this country may be on
> the li
|
|
|
K Smythe wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2005 09:24:04 -0700, "Michael Ejercito"
> <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>This is not about two people being nominated to be federal judges. It
>>is about the whole role of judges in a self-governing republic. The
>>vo
|
|
|
nospam@isp.com> wrote in message
news:426e7bcb.2646442@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On 26 Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>
> > A petitioner files a [Calif. state court] petition for writ
> > of mandate. Opposition lawyer OL requests and receive
|
|
|
"Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:svTbe.45394$hu5.42220@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> Doesn't matter. The jury can and often does choose to believe the
> plaintiff's version of the facts.
A good lawyer would advise you that you do
|
|
|
In rec.knives RJ <re_johnson1@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Sparrow <sparrow1234@fea.st> wrote:
> > maybe Americans should become more like the Mexicans
> Being poorer and living in a more corrupt society is a good thing?
How do you measure "more corrupt"?
|
|
|
What is the definition of an administrative record (AR) for purposes of
lodging
with the court?
Let's say the a request to some administrators prior about at the time of
filing
a petition for writ of mandate results in the production of a partial
|
|
|
When Racists want to Confuse
They blame it all on The Jews
When Racists don't know the Facts
They blame it all on The Blacks
When Racists misplace their Rights
They blame it all on The Whites
Humans killed while on their knees
Humans hanging down f
|
|
|
>A friend runs a veterans support website. Access is free but the site
>accepts donations and has a simple message stating they do. The
>webmaster recently received the following message:
>
>DONATIONS TO YOUR WEB SITE ARE NOT TAX DEDUCTIBLE WHETHER TH
|
|
|
"Spamming, falsely yelling 'fire' ina crowded theater, libel, and hate
speech all hurt people."
How does "hate speech" hurt people in a way that normal insults do not?
I am suspicious of this statement you made which is quoted above.
|
|
|
We are talking about publication of knowledge, are we not?
In that case, I cannot see the relationship of your message to mine.
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> I found this on Yahoo. It is about attorneys and judges and beause it
> contains so much truth, I decided to post it on Google.
>
> Barbara Schwarz
> ===========
Posted to Google? Why I bet the bot already indexed it... Pl
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:13:27 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thanks.com>
wrote:
>
>"The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:d4mi040psl@news4.newsguy.com...
>>
>> "L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
>> news:3h1r61lpoe1g
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
Whatever happened to him, anyway? Jon Beaver's @$#*ing the
dictionary like a Kaldis, and the Cub Pwossecuta seems to think
"Miranda" was that gal from Hadassah he was dating....
> Larry wrote:
>> In article <20050428012306.
|
|
|
Josh,
This is still too open ended. How can you expect a reasonable answer to
the requirements of "Anyone who grants money"? Your wife and her lawyer
should be able to ask the SBA and the Fed, County, City what the current
rules are. The fact
|
|
|
The black helicopter should be arriving any minute to take you away in
shackles. Hide Now!
|
|
|
go with a.
-Dave
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> I found this on Yahoo. It is about attorneys and judges and beause it
> contains so much truth, I decided to post it on Google.
>
> Barbara Schwarz
> ===========
>
> Shortly after his retirement, Chief Justice Warren Burg
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:49:55 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>All in all, it's a
>>sad system. When the Democrats are in power, we get liberal judges.
>>When the Republicans are in power, we get liberal judges.
>
|
|
|
In article <1114725540.217762.101300@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, Hal Womack
3-dan says...
>
>REPLY TO DOCKERY
>
>By Hal Womack 3-dan
>
>I was born on Galveston Island in March 1945 about 80 years after
>General Sherman burned out the Womacks in
|
|
|
REPLY TO DOCKERY
By Hal Womack 3-dan
I was born on Galveston Island in March 1945 about 80 years after
General Sherman burned out the Womacks in Georgia, after which the
survivors trekked westward to the village of Whitesboro in Texas, just
South
|
|
|
"jj" <squid_66@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iIPbe.47284$Nn.23039@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> Should I try and call the plaintiff and work out a payment plan or do I
> need to respond in writing (to plaintiff and court) or should I just wait
> fo
|
|
|
"No_Spam" <no_to_spam@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114624464.369694.183620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>I want to transfer my LLC ownership from my name into another person.
> Is this possible? It will owned 100% by the new owner. How do I
|
|
|
Today I saw another car being cited for parking violation and I drove
off (I too was parked illegally on a street-sweeping hour). However,
while driving off I noticed the parking supervisor taking down my
number in his hand-held. My question is: Can
|
|
|
"The simple tableau
Is so rich with meaning that whether represented
On the mantelpiece
Or in the mind, it seems suspended, complete unto itself,
Somewhere in eternity."
~ Lucinda Franks
"Vanitas, or
Momento mori ~ ?"
~ Folly
"Ms.
Franks ~ P
|
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 03:11:02 GMT, "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
>
>> A number of years ago, the Dallas Cowboys had to pay a few hundred
>> thousand dollars (don't recall the exact amount
|
|
|
Brian,
There's probably tenants' rights organization locally which can answer
your questions.Generally, the new owner must honor the lease and is
responsible for the deposits. I'd suggest that you discuss these issues with
the new landlord.
|
|
|
|
|
|
troy wrote:
> The only basis for my saying that the car was not moving was the
> driver's assertion that it was not moving, which I was foolish enough
> to believe. When I spoke with the parking lot attendant ten days
later
> (I waited that long be
|
|
|
Thanks Gordon: Appreciate the insight. Your observations seem to
parallel mine.
|
|
|
The only basis for my saying that the car was not moving was the
driver's assertion that it was not moving, which I was foolish enough
to believe. When I spoke with the parking lot attendant ten days later
(I waited that long because I (falsely) assume
|
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:49:55 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
>In article <l46u611u35qndufnopm4fc64lnp6ksirop@4ax.com>,
> L Sternn <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote:
>
>> While that's certainly true, it's not the whole story. The rules call
>> for a s
|
|
|
On 28 Apr 2005 09:24:04 -0700, "Michael Ejercito"
<mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is not about two people being nominated to be federal judges. It
>is about the whole role of judges in a self-governing republic. The
>voters' votes mean less and
|
|
|
A friend runs a veterans support website. Access is free but the site
accepts donations and has a simple message stating they do. The
webmaster recently received the following message:
DONATIONS TO YOUR WEB SITE ARE NOT TAX DEDUCTIBLE WHETHER THEY AR
|
|
|
Disinformation on judges
Thomas Sowell
April 26, 2005
The future of the legal and political system of this country may be on
the line when two judicial nominees that the Democrats refused to let
the Senate vote on in the last Congress are being a
|
|
|
troy wrote:
> Pulling out of my parking place, I was involved in a (minor!)
> parking-lot accident with a rental car (out-of-state driver). An
> eyewitness to the accident has signed a statement to the effect that
> while I was backing out of my sp
|
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:31:21 -0700, The Real Bev
<bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>keith wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:59:16 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
>>
>> > keith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:37:41 -0700, The Real Bev wrote
|
|
|
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:49:55 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
>All in all, it's a
>sad system. When the Democrats are in power, we get liberal judges.
>When the Republicans are in power, we get liberal judges.
That's because the idea th
|
