misc.legal

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:59:01 -0700, jamoran <john@analon.com> wrote: >have talked to about 10 different loan people all said something about >the tax lien showing on the credit.. this is from 1991, thought tht >would go away.... I am trying to buy

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:51:04 GMT, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote: >What is CSU? Is that part of the University of California? It's a different university system in California.

On 29 Apr 2005 10:33:10 -0700, "Ryan" <welziak@snet.net> wrote: > >Hi, > >As many of you are aware, personal financial advisor Suze Orman is a >major supporter or the Revocable Living Trust instead of having a Will, >has one herself and has put ou

On 29 Apr 2005 16:27:31 -0700, "Dave" <dland@mytrashmail.com> wrote: >The writers of the practice don't bother consulting anyone on the law, >but then again that would probably make for boring TV. >-Dave The writers of Law & Order aren't any bette

have talked to about 10 different loan people all said something about the tax lien showing on the credit.. this is from 1991, thought tht would go away.... I am trying to buy property thought getting a loan would be easier than it has I make plenty

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION - SECOND DEPARTMENT _______________________________________________X Sam Sloan, AFFIDAVIT Petitioner-Appellant, Index No. 2004-7739 against- Appellate Case: 2

Here is the relevant statute in California. Apparently, if you don't use the device for diagnostic purposes, you don't have to be under the guidance of a physician. As a practical matter, you would be skating on very thin ice. If you cut into th

Sorry Trucker. That is the US too. I wish it weren't so. Cheers, Sparrow Hawk

itchell Holman wrote: > Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4273A19B.60905@it.com: >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42738015.1050301@it.com: >> >> [where it matters, betwixt us] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>This is not ab

In article <1114887733.060948.153320@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Hal Womack 3-dan says... > >ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS AND VERSES Hal's stuff snipped, but i did read it. so, Hal, like what part of Northern California are you from? you don't have

I want to purchase a 4D ultrasound machine and offer a service that allows expecting mothers to see their soon-to-be baby. Can someone with no medical credentials do that? Thanks.

ou poor miserable sot. Don't you have anything better to do with your time than this tripe? -- Tom Klem "Slanders, Libels and Defamations are our business!" ---sign hanging up in the back of Spam Sloan's rusting cab. "Sam Sloan" <sloan@is

In the year of our Lord Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:31:01 GMT, sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote: LOL. One small victory for Mr. Sloan. > > 14. Mr. Sloan's statement as a candidate for the Board is >being published in the May 2005 edition of Ch

Contact the department of insurance for your state. Usually body shops are carrier approved, not adjuster approved, and I've never seen an 'inflated' damage claim approved, adjusters usually want to pay the LOWEST amount possible, not the highest.

hi, 1 answer more maybe: is he guilty before jury has decided. fabien " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> a écrit dans le message de news: 9Bg5e.74$cu2.306@news.uswest.net... > I saw Jackson having oral sex with boy, says ex-guard >

"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:kvDce.2900$zu.2678@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... > but your better bet would be against the woman herself. If she said > something that interfered with your livelihood you may be able t

On 30 Apr 2005 06:03:01 GMT, TOTE@dog-play.com wrote: >On 29 Apr 2005 21:03:50 -0700 shareyourknowledge@hotmail.com whittled these words: >> Hello- If i understand the law pertainig to my question, my employer >> can have me work 8 days in a row as l

On 29 Apr 2005 21:03:50 -0700, shareyourknowledge@hotmail.com wrote: >Hello- If i understand the law pertainig to my question, my employer >can have me work 8 days in a row as long as it overlaps into the next >pay week. He has me working Wednesday-W

"First, let's dissect the vulgar abuse of the very basic word(s)....." "The Jew" "The Jew" is not the enemy. "The Jew" is an individual. An IDEA is the enemy: the idea that any random place and it's accidental population has some divine providenc

UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION - SECOND DEPARTMENT _______________________________________________X Sam Sloan, AFFIDAVIT Petitioner-Appellant, Index No. 2004-7739 against- Appellate Case: 20

Hi L_Sternn ( vi user ), You told me: << It's sad, but good code is hard to come by these days. Many employers aren't really interested in such things and too many aren't even capable of recognizing good code. >> Sad ? I think not...

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:14:40 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote: > ><Alan Moorman@visi.com> wrote in message >news:3i2o61lp9d3nheqrjsdi50fc9i1l4dunn6@4ax.com... >> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote >>> Arif Khokar <akhokar1234@wvu.

itchell Holman wrote: > Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42738015.1050301@it.com: [where it matters, betwixt us] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>This is not about two people being nominated to be federal >>>>>>>>>>judges. It is about the whole role

What can I request of my employer and what language should I use to write it? I work for a social service association that is funded in part by the City of New York. A co-worker (who has a documented history of emotional outbursts) hit me twice on

> The key phrase is "Closing the border with Mexico would be quite simple > indeed, with the right manpower.". I did the math one time. To put enough > people on the broder to guarantee no-one crossed we'd need a little in > excess of 200,000,000.

What is CSU? Is that part of the University of California? "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote in message news:AJtce.3439$Gd7.3211@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > CSU is claiming that the Administrative Procedures Act does not apply to > it. > > However,

Sam, This is real progress! You didn't post this USCF RGCP-related nonsense to RGCC. That's great. Now, do you think that you can try even harder, and post *only* to RGCP? Mr. Richerby put it rather well, I think: this kind of thing belongs *only

"generic" <generic_republican@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1114866795.185906.220670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > You can demand election reforms all you want, but our vote counting > Corporations will NEVER let you see how it is done. It

The Trucker wrote: > "Gunner" <gunnerNOSPAM@lightspeed.net> wrote in message > news:icm471hdo5ebu3l9hvib0h1480soiobfl6@4ax.com... >>On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:33:47 -0700, "The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net> >>wrote: >> >>>>Cheers, >>>>Sparrow Hawk >>

One type of insurance scam is perpetrated by claims adjusters who accept kickbacks from body shops in exchange for approving inflated damage claims--or bribes from claimants in return for verifying false claims. Do insurance companies take measures

David Hartung wrote: > "Mitchell Holman" <ta2eneN0*Email@comcast.com> wrote in message > news:Xns964843BB393B6ta2eene2@216.196.97.131... > >> And just how do you plan to make judges "accountable", >>and who decides if they commit "malpractice" -

Mitchell Holman wrote: > Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42736B18.3020800@it.com: >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4272ADCE.4090802@it.com: >>>>Michael Ejercito wrote: >>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>>K Smythe w

"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eneN0*Email@comcast.com> wrote in message news:Xns964843BB393B6ta2eene2@216.196.97.131... > And just how do you plan to make judges "accountable", > and who decides if they commit "malpractice" - other judges? > Part of t

NSWERS TO QUESTIONS AND VERSES By Hal Womack 3-dan From: j r sherman <j...@earthlink.net> Date: 28 Apr 2005 15:23:29 -0700 In article <1114725540.217762.101...@f14g 2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, Hal Womack 3-dan says... [....] >More troubling b

en Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4273A19B.60905@it.com: > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42738015.1050301@it.com: > > [where it matters, betwixt us] > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>This is not about two peopl

Mitchell Holman wrote: > Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4272ADCE.4090802@it.com: >>Michael Ejercito wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>K Smythe wrote: >>>>>On 28 Apr 2005 09:24:04 -0700, "Michael Ejercito" >>>>><mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: >>

Sam, I know this is nitpicking, but perhaps you could correct the spelling of his name on your own web site. http://www.ishipress.com/travelin.htm <snip> I was attacked by Glen Petersen (later the Editor of Chess Life) for what I wrote. Later,

The " Judges" in Indianapolis, Indiana ~that I have Encountered so far are just Corrupt Pieces Of Shit ~so to Speak~they take "Gold Buttons" for Favorable Judgemants as in the Ruth Lilly Scandal/case/......another Case of Mismanagement of a Trust by

Deadrat wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4272ADCE.4090802@it.com... >>Michael Ejercito wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>K Smythe wrote: >>>>>On 28 Apr 2005 09:24:04 -0700, "Michael Ejercito" >>>>><mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:

"The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message news:d4uteg0eir@news4.newsguy.com... > > "Gunner" : > > Your comment is reminesent of those that defended the USSR because > > they had a Constitution modeled on the US one. Too bad that demandin

Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42738015.1050301@it.com: > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42736B18.3020800@it.com: >>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4272ADCE.4090802@it.c

? - if you're in the US and can't get a home loan you must have a really awful credit record. people only a couple years past bankruptcy can get mortages for houses. you get rid of a tax lien by paying it off. if you have something in your credit

vmsjsdo hw890b890uj 0r908crj 89gfu t90u f98j 23foj90resj c89jfiorgh 90 8b89 jefuiouy eg u98jfi9 ewigh 3v jt9ghj f fj 90 op jfweio cjg9 drj 89cr3j we90db ume90egb89k90fvbeiod ji4ej8i9f 34ei9g j9e5irjgi9 jrso b90ergui9 j3409ur90rdmd j-0vk ro-0gu weo0rug

It's not who casts the ballots-----It's those who COUNT them---------------Stalin 1926

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:44:36 -0700, American Idle <utoh@any.net> wrote: >>>>> This is >>>>>why several states refuse to instate laws requiring SRETP. >>>> >>>> Which ones? >>> >>>Virginia for one. >>> >> >>That's 1. >> >>> > >No it's not.

Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42736B18.3020800@it.com: > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4272ADCE.4090802@it.com: >>>Michael Ejercito wrote: >>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>K Smythe wrote: >>>>>>On 28 Apr 2005