|
|
Luigi,
The fact that your acquaintance relinquished his rights does not mean
that he is freed from his obligations. The child that he has chosen to avoid
raising must still be fed and clothed. The mother in this case should also
be contributin
|
|
|
nd the "loving, caring" god, the invisible man in the sky stands idly by
while his catholic priests molest young boys
"Leonardo Been" <plato_world@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1115032204.230769.176200@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Addition
|
|
|
moenkopi@earthlink.net wrote:
> So, what do the American people do, re-elect the guy who got them into
> this mess!
>
> America deserves everything it gets.
Yes, the USSA deserved 9.11 without a doubt,
and likely will be on the receiving end of mo
|
|
|
Your posts are consistently nonsensical.
10 billion is completely doable within the context of a 2 trillion
dollar budget.
Our conversation is concluded.
|
|
|
On 3 May 2005 06:55:58 -0700 Neo <neo55592@hotmail.com> whittled these words:
>> What good do those domain names do you since ... ?
> You are right, absolutely none.
>> What kind of business climatic would you like to see in this world?
> A doma
|
|
|
On 3 May 2005 09:40:49 -0700 Neo <neo55592@hotmail.com> whittled these words:
>> How much effort on your part would have been required to have
>> avoided the potential infringement i.e. what is your relative
>> fault in creating the issue?
> Perhaps
|
|
|
Lee wrote:
> > The key phrase is "Closing the border with Mexico would be quite
> simple
> > indeed, with the right manpower.". I did the math one time. To put
> enough
> > people on the broder to guarantee no-one crossed we'd need a little
> in
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:uiWde.84$R67.6306@news.uswest.net...
> RazorBack wrote:
>> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
>> news:O3Vde.70$R67.4927@news.uswest.net...
>> > RazorBack wrote:
>> >
|
|
|
Hello,
I just learned that a lease I HAD to break five years ago is destroying
my credit. It is the only ding compared to multiple credit cards, house
and car that are all perfect, and the lender told me that it weighs
especially heavy on my scor
|
|
|
|
|
|
RazorBack wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:uiWde.84$R67.6306@news.uswest.net...
> > RazorBack wrote:
> > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> > > news:O3Vde.70$R67.4927@news.uswest.net...
>
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:O3Vde.70$R67.4927@news.uswest.net...
> RazorBack wrote:
>> "-" <--no-spam@.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:bGFz.fdd1dc7c135e12621f1efb872716f6ae@1115072422.nulluser.com...
>> > > Englan
|
|
|
Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> > WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans do not believe
> > it was worth going to war in Iraq, a national poll reported
> > Tuesday.
> >
> > Fifty-seven percent of those polled said they did not
> > believe it was wo
|
|
|
John D. Goulden wrote:
> > The answer is clear: Follow the Oklahoma model.
>
> Speaking from Oklahoma...my friends on the local police force assure
> me that meth lab busts are way, WAY down because of this policy. As
> far as they are concerned, it
|
|
|
RazorBack wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:O3Vde.70$R67.4927@news.uswest.net...
> > RazorBack wrote:
> > > "-" <--no-spam@.invalid> wrote in message
> > > news:bGFz.fdd1dc7c135e12621f1efb872716f6ae@1115072422.nul
|
|
|
rcunningham8820@yahoo.com wrote:
> It seems that I got the certified letter from the Attorney first. I
> just got one from my dad today too. He's a good writer so he makes it
> seem ok but when you really read between the lines its not so good for
>
|
|
|
On Tue, 03 May 2005 15:12:14 -0700, John David Galt
<jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>>> James Alexander wrote:
>>>> What you are alluding to is the idea that you should get what you paid
>>>> for, regardless of whether someone else is legally
|
|
|
"Deadrat" <none@none.non> wrote in message
news:pLQde.1451$Yg4.572@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
> I'm not advocating a moderator for this newsgroup: there already is a
> misc.legal.moderated; I'm not advocating the elimination of insults: they
>
|
|
|
"Lee" <leraconteur2002@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1115172815.226215.132260@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> >I can't find my original breakdown for the 200,000,000 number. So I'll
> back
>>off on that. But howzabout this - take the Korean DM
|
|
|
"Neo" <neo55592@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115088440.989109.109750@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I am an independent software developer. I have been developing three
> database programs and unwittingly named them XDb1, XDb2 and XDb3 which
|
|
|
"Don" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote in message
news:_AQde.36816$HR1.11265@clgrps12...
> "Deadrat" <none@none.non> wrote in message
> news:VQNde.530$s43.318@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > Here's someone who seems to know nothing about probate
> >
|
|
|
"Deadrat" <none@none.non> wrote in message
news:VQNde.530$s43.318@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>
> Here's someone who seems to know nothing about probate
> law, gets some formal notification, and is confused and worried.
> He's adopted, his mother
|
|
|
>I can't find my original breakdown for the 200,000,000 number. So I'll
back
>off on that. But howzabout this - take the Korean DMZ - 151 miles,
600,000
>South Koreans and 37,000 Americans on one side (about an even million
on the
>other side). The
|
|
|
Ed wrote:
> I have three speeding tickets in Connecticut( Which affects my
> employment) and also own a home in Massachusetts. If I apply for a
> license in Massachusetts do my speeding tickets appear on my record ?
Yes.
And you'll commit purjury
|
|
|
Dave wrote:
> What about her @$#*ing superiors? This whole mess is a disgrace. Blame
> the privates and exonerate all the officers. What a load of #@($.
You voted for them jackass.
|
|
|
RazorBack wrote:
> "-" <--no-spam@.invalid> wrote in message
> news:bGFz.fdd1dc7c135e12621f1efb872716f6ae@1115072422.nulluser.com...
> > > England pleads guilty to Abu Ghraib charges
> >
> > > FORT HOOD, Texas (CNN) -- U.S. Army Pfc. Lynndie England
|
|
|
>England pleads guilty to Abu Ghraib charges
Why would you sandniggers prefer to have your extremities lopped off
than have a girl see your lil' winkies?
How many beheadings did Lynndie perform? Not enough in my opinion.
|
|
|
itchell Holman wrote:
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42775644.7090901@it.com:
[various snips, because it's so long]
Let's see if we can't agree on what we can agree on. I would agree
that too much control over our judges is prob
|
|
|
\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
>
>>How Far Will The Army Go?
>>
>>Apr 28, 2005
>>
>>ARVADA, Colo. -- Last month the U.S. Army failed to meet its goal of
>>6,800 new troops.
"WE WANT YOU TO BE
|
|
|
This assumes the Minutemen were 100% successful in stopping everyone. Not
what I believe. I live in Phoenix & I was down in the San Pedro valley a few
weeks ago - that is some bad-ass country, for trying to see anything. I'm
betting there were still
|
|
|
What about her @$#*ing superiors? This whole mess is a disgrace. Blame
the privates and exonerate all the officers. What a load of #@($.
|
|
|
Most states have a six year statute of limitations on contracts
(leases), so you need to act soon - depending on where you are. You
should have dealt with this five years ago, not today, but if the
lawyer can clear this up for $1,000, you should jump o
|
|
|
"Neo" <neo55592@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115138449.195389.80620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Perhaps more than I would have guessed. So here I am starting over
> again. I am thinking of renaming my software to XRDB. Would this
> confli
|
|
|
I am not a lawyer, but I would suggest not signing the letter right now.
Instead, just call them up and say that you do not want to infringe on any
of their rights and you want to get the matter resolved. Tell them that 1
and 2 are fine with you, but
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:ovMde.17$PH5.1250@news.uswest.net...
> rcunningham8820@yahoo.com wrote:
> > I just got a certified letter from my dad that is a "Revocation of
> > Power of Attorney". He said several years
|
|
|
"Jack Hunter" <oldgoat_97@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:6l4d71droupc798c3eejca7c3angip60gq@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 2 May 2005 15:48:34 -0400, "ElJay" <LJ@LJLJ.LJl> wrote:
>
> >You said you want to sell both properties, but your sister wants to buy
|
|
|
In the year of our Lord Tue, 3 May 2005 06:53:54 -0700, "Tom Klem"
<thewiz@nowhere.com> wrote:
>I have taken a recording of Sam Sloan's praise of Bill Goichberg and played
>it backwards with an old victrola device. There are hidden messages in there
|
|
|
[California]
How can a petitioner in a writ of mandate case
move for an evidentiary hearing?
This is primarily an administrative mandate case
(although not explicitly-- petitioner did not strictly limit
it).
For simplicity, let's say it is an
|
|
|
Hello,
Last year, a person I know voluntarily relinquished parental rights to
his child. The mother fought but ultimately lost her rights in court.
Since parental rights were voluntarily relinquished, why is the father
still forced by the state t
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2005 14:20:48 GMT, Ron Tock
> <rontockPANTS@yahooPANTS.com> wrote:
>
>
>>rvsw@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I rear ended a car stopped at a traffic light a few days ago. Due to
>>>the impact - the car that was
|
|
|
>> James Alexander wrote:
>>> What you are alluding to is the idea that you should get what you paid
>>> for, regardless of whether someone else is legally liable for the same
>>> damages due to their wrongdoing. The fact of the matter is that a
>>>
|
|
|
rvsw@hotmail.com wrote:
> I rear ended a car stopped at a traffic light a few days ago. Due to
> the impact - the car that was hit was pushed into another car (a cab)
> in front of it.
> Though the car in front of me (and my car) was damaged - there
|
|
|
On Mon, 2 May 2005 19:40:17 -0700, "David" <caissaintp@adelphia.net>
wrote:
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:4276d004.82158593@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>>
>> On the positive side, I think it is important that I pointed out
|
|
|
What does Texas statute and case law have to say about judges
hearing cases involving donors to their political campaigns?
Thanks! For email, see below.
--
Mark Shaw moc TOD liamg TA wahsnm
===============
|
|
|
Aardvark writes:
>
> have you inquired as to booger ray's "forma pauperis" filing
> status and how much money he says he doesn't have?
That's just one of the many things that we have pointed out to the
courts. It is enough of a contradiction that
|
|
|
"Grant Perks" <> The loan will be secured by the land as well as the
building. In my opinion, the loan should be repaid as soon as feasible.
>
Are you lending Marinello your wife too? Is that part of the living
expenses?
|
|
|
en Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42775644.7090901@it.com:
> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42768B54.8040301@it.com:
>>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4275B69B.8070403@it.co
|
|
|
|
|
|
itchell Holman wrote:
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42768742.7020008@it.com:
>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4274F394.508@it.com:
>>
>> [mostly, betwixt us]
>>
>>
>>>>> We both know of cases wher
|
|
|
itchell Holman wrote:
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:42768B54.8040301@it.com:
>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4275B69B.8070403@it.com:
>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Our judges are totally unaccountab
|
|
