misc.legal

HymieGoldstein wrote: > Doesn't the recruiting shortfall in this country (USA) indicate > something about the mission? > > If every bumper sticker proclaiming 'support' for the troops equaled > an enlistment, there wouldn't be enough rifles to go aro

Dave Thompson wrote: > "Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message > news:slrnd7nut9.hrl.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu... > >>On Fri, 6 May 2005 10:24:52 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Christopher A.

Otis Willie wrote: > Iraq death toll tops 200 for the week > http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/headline/world/3169754 > > {EXCERPT} Houston Chronicle, TX - 13 hours ago BAGHDAD, IRAQ - > Insurgents pressed their deadly campaign against Iraq's

legalfilings@usa.com wrote: > Dutch courts have considered the demand that President Bush be > arrested > for war crimes and human rights violations, on his visit to the > Netherlands in May 2005. > > Click here for article on legal action in the Ne

asianguyrx7@yahoo.com wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem and want to know if anyone has any suggestions, > solutions, or comments on this. My uncle owns an investment (rental) > property here in California and it still has about $20,000 mortgage >

Who specifically is the owner of that website of breastcancerrisk which turns out to be pornography? Do your computers show the owners names and addresses? A similar breastcancerrisk site has a name of Kate Andrews in Cambridge U.K. Then there is an

On Fri, 6 May 2005 10:24:52 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: > > >"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message >> Only in your bigoted ignorance. > >Well, when someone starts calling reasonable differences of opinion "b

It is the item before. It is the item with breastcancerrisk and my name is in the header itself. As if you had not noticed. Anyway I tried to find the source of breastcancerrisk and found a Kate Andrews in Cambridge UK with that website. Perhaps she

On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:42:31 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: >As an agnostic I think atheists are equally as silly as theists. You can't >say that something you can't know doesn't exist, Okay, then give me the $500 you owe me. I have

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:427A2D6B.31233293@worldnet.att.net... > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Dane Metcalfe wrote: > > > [F/B/O John Kobylt: > > As if John has time to read USE

Followup Newsgroups restored to include the one I first read the post in. On Thu, 05 May 2005 09:33:00 -0000, greg byshenk <gbyshenk@byshenk.net> wrote: >Simple 'atheism' is sometimes contrasted with 'strong atheism', >meaning the active denial of so

CWatters wrote: > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plutonium@iw.net> wrote in message (snip) > > Is your legal name so unusual that you can be sure they are referring to > you? Yes it is a targeting of me, that is why that website has only one *full*

Gee how shocking. I guess that the fine folks who manufacutre this poison don't give a #@($ about who uses it. "Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:427c5328$1_2@127.0.0.1... > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wro

Dane Metcalfe wrote: > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:LjWde.85$R67.6401@news.uswest.net... > > John D. Goulden wrote: > > > > The answer is clear: Follow the Oklahoma model. > > > > > > Speaking from Oklahoma...my frie

Dane Metcalfe wrote: > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:E0tde.329$d05.2980@news.uswest.net... > > Dane Metcalfe wrote: > > > "BananaRepublican" <georgew.k@humboldt1.com> wrote in message > > > news:georgew.k-7640C6.070057

Dave Thompson wrote: > "robpar" <robpar@airmaildelete.net> wrote in message > news:6h5n71l98he82c2u9o5989j57ctosjjtj6@4ax.com... > > On Thu, 5 May 2005 18:30:28 -0700, "Dave Thompson" > > <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: > > > > > > As you can see, there i

eorge wrote: > robpar wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 May 2005 18:30:28 -0700, "Dave Thompson" > > <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > As you can see, there is no faith involved. > > > > > > So you have managed to drone on without addressing the poi

On 6 May 2005 07:24:53 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >Why should you worry if two inmates beat the crap out of Cam? After >all, according to you, your god has his protection over Cam. > According to Ted, and we all know how

On Fri, 06 May 2005 11:00:29 GMT SniffinPopRocks <spr@hotmail.com> whittled these words: > What should I do? Anything illegal about disclosing this to my company? The ADA expressly forbids employers from making preemployment inquiries about disab

eorge wrote: > Dubh Ghall wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 May 2005 18:30:28 -0700, "Dave Thompson" > > <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: > > (snipped) > > > > Atheism may not be a belief, > > > but atheists have beliefs. > > > > I agree, but it is quite irrelev

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4278DEE6.81686F65@worldnet.att.net... > Dane Metcalfe wrote: > > > "If Mark Geragos represents you it means you're guilty," Kobylt said. > > I need to have a talk with John Kobyl

On Fri, 06 May 2005 01:47:03 -0500, Archimedes Plutonium <a_plutonium@iw.net> wrote: [...] > >A friend of mine emailed saying I should do something about the above >website that uses my name, my legal name to promote and advertize their >filthy

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:LjWde.85$R67.6401@news.uswest.net... > John D. Goulden wrote: > > > The answer is clear: Follow the Oklahoma model. > > > > Speaking from Oklahoma...my friends on the local police force as

"John D. Goulden" <jgoulden_news@goulden.org> wrote in message news:d55n4m01rfa@news4.newsguy.com... > > The answer is clear: Follow the Oklahoma model. > > Speaking from Oklahoma...my friends on the local police force assure me that > meth lab bu

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:E0tde.329$d05.2980@news.uswest.net... > Dane Metcalfe wrote: > > "BananaRepublican" <georgew.k@humboldt1.com> wrote in message > > news:georgew.k-7640C6.07005701052005@corp.supernews.com...

The Trucker <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote: > In a representative republic or a representative > democracy the wishes/opinions of the people > are paramount. In such a society knowledge and > information matter. It is unfortunate that you > and your

en Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B8526.90303@it.com: > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427A291F.4010406@it.com: >>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4279ACD4.2090109@it.com:

Hello, I have a problem and want to know if anyone has any suggestions, solutions, or comments on this. My uncle owns an investment (rental) property here in California and it still has about $20,000 mortgage left. He's getting old now and feels tha

"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message news:slrnd7nut9.hrl.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu... > On Fri, 6 May 2005 10:24:52 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: >> >> >>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net>

"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message news:slrnd7num3.hrl.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu... > On Fri, 6 May 2005 09:42:31 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.com> wrote: >>As an agnostic I think atheists are equally as sill

P.S. You might want to try also posting your question in the alt.bankruptcy newsgroup. "ElJay" <LJ@LJLJ.LJl> wrote in message news:OZKdnZVG4puRdebfRVn-qg@comcast.com... > I am not a lawyer, but as far as I know, neither the IRS nor the bankruptcy

I am not a lawyer, but as far as I know, neither the IRS nor the bankruptcy court can take your share of the property from you. Your younger sister and her husband will need to list their share of the house as an asset in the bankruptcy filing. If, i

Way Back Jack wrote: > You instilled in me the forbidden ecstasy of looking up skirts. > > You taught me how to belch and burp at will. > > You taught me the glee of a well-timed fart, like when the nun was > expounding on "the bombs bursting in a

On Fri, 06 May 2005 11:00:29 GMT SniffinPopRocks <spr@hotmail.com> whittled these words: > What should I do? Anything illegal about disclosing this to my company? It would be a bad idea to presume to disclose it if the applicant did not themselve

If the person is applying through you, and you are a representative of the company, then as a representative of the company it is already no secret that he is in a wheelchair. If he wanted to apply without anyone knowing until they met him that he was

On 5 May 2005 14:13:03 -0700, "Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote: > >Deadrat wrote: >> "Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:1115317163.039034.295130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> > Many judge

en Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B8F5D.3020501@it.com: > Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B79F1.3030404@it.com: >>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4278EB0A.5050304@it.co

On Fri, 06 May 2005 16:31:02 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote: >(California) > >Is a motion for a preliminary injunction in a writ of (administrative) >mandate case >required to be a "noticed" motion-- that is, filed with the court prior to >the hea

ave Thompson wrote: > > "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message > news:8bvm71t6algu1adq6eq6ulsr3vgoaopdbo@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 06 May 2005 08:19:23 -0600, George <gpn@thrittle.net> wrote: >> >>>Dubh Ghall wrote: >>> >>>> On

Egbert Sousè <egbertsousè@WCF.com> wrote in news:pk5n7195msuooed1gfdgjmt5503ihl9mbl@4ax.com: > On Fri, 06 May 2005 15:32:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B79F1.3030

(California) Is a motion for a preliminary injunction in a writ of (administrative) mandate case required to be a "noticed" motion-- that is, filed with the court prior to the hearing? If there are only a few days left until the hearing, is the t

n Fri, 06 May 2005 15:32:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Mitchell Holman wrote: >> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B79F1.3030404@it.com: >>>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4278EB0A.5050304@it.c

"Music Lover" <coyotes@flash.net> wrote in message news:1115365200.628230.25070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Re: Stanley Management. Tenants in apartment #215 vs. #115 > > In the past week, my wife and I have been harassed and threatened by

http://www.the-dispatch.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050506/APN/505060896&cachetime=5 May 6, 2005 Minister ex-communicates members for not backing Bush The Associated Press The minister of a Haywood County Baptist church is telling members of

itchell Holman wrote: > Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427A291F.4010406@it.com: [continued from earlier post] >>>>> Again with accusations of corruption. Does this >>>>>judge have a record of complaints about corruption >>>>>with

itchell Holman wrote: > Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B79F1.3030404@it.com: >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:4278EB0A.5050304@it.com: >> >> [betwixt us] >> When have I EVER insinuated otherwise,