|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:mx4fe.34$R51.1419@news.uswest.net...
> zzbunker wrote:
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>> > HymieGoldstein wrote:
>> >
>> > > Doesn't the recruiting shortfall in this country (USA) indic
|
|
|
Following are some more "innocent" spam-scam-mind game
samples that I receive in my regular email over and over again for months.
Every time I click on "Report Spam" button, but they continue come as regular
mail.
1. From customersupport@ao
|
|
|
> > I did graduate from law school and pass a state bar exam, which makes
> > me every bit as much of an "expert" as you could possibly be. And as a
> > practical matter, every judge who has heard this case has a horse in the
> > race -- judges don
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:427D439B.2020202@it.com...
> MeowMeow wrote:
> >>> And who determines what is constitutional?
> >>
> >> We used to be able to trust our courts to do it, but they have become
> >>so totally cor
|
|
|
<rcunningham8820@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1115485200.022228.43010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Thank you for that. She didn't want to get married until she found out
> my Grandma was rich and stood to gain if my Dad inherited. When I
|
|
|
Hi there folks,
I'm curious to know whether the group might believe that the resulting
Order from the Court of Record (the Circuit Court) in Virginia is void?
I was charged with, and convicted of criminal contempt of court for an
alleged failure t
|
|
|
MeowMeow wrote:
>>> And who determines what is constitutional?
>>
>> We used to be able to trust our courts to do it, but they have become
>>so totally corrupt that perhaps it is high time we give the legislature
>>some kind of meaningful overs
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>
>
>>>>"If Mark Geragos represents you it means you're guilty," Kobylt said.
>>>
>>>I need to have a talk with John Kobylt (the "man with the b
|
|
|
If your company name is a federally registered trademark, you can
recover it in Federal court. See an atty. that specializes in
trademarks, copyright, etc.-Jitney
|
|
|
Teens jailed 30 days for contempt of cop:
http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=97716
Let the city officials know your opinion:
info@framingham.com
-Jitney
|
|
|
It's obvious to me that it isn't the music, bud. For some reason this
black clouded woman has cast her shadow upon you and is using the
guitar as an excuse, seems like to me. You need to find out why she is
seeing red and get your account back in the b
|
|
|
(California)
An agency responds to a petitioner's writ of mandate claiming
that it lacks specificity and demands court consideration only
under ordinary mandate rather than administrative mandate,
due to Calif. state appellate court case law (McGill
|
|
|
"The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote:
>> Ayup. I had a feeling thats where he got his "insight". Chomskyism
>> or he did a tab of Orange Sunshine.
>>
>> Gunner
>
>My "insight" comes from a lot of different places.
>Surely your "insight" mu
|
|
|
a_plutonium@hotmail.com wrote in news:1115493577.645293.219060
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
> The recent law that email must be transparent of its
> sender may apply to websites.
It does NOT. The 'CAN SPAM' act only applies to e-mail and mobile
|
|
|
Your neighbor's response to your practicing leads me to believe that she
responds similarly to noises from other tenants in the building. If she has
been pounding on her walls every time she hears noises from other apartments
(some of which you have m
|
|
|
I am in the process of renting out a house I own in another state. I faxed a
signed residential lease agreement to a prospective tenant with the
expectation that he sign it and fax it back to me. The tenant did sign the
agreement, but only faxed the
|
|
|
The delay is explainable by the need of the petitioner to
"exhaust administrative remedies," by the entirely understandable
lack of total familiarity with the law on the part of the pro-se
petitioner, requiring extra effort to file such petitions, and
|
|
|
a_plutonium@hotmail.com wrote:
> Mark Martin has pointed out earlier in this thread that the porn site
> of breastcancerrisk that uses my name when I search for Archimedes
> Plutonium under google is customized to my computer and different
> customize
|
|
|
nospam wrote:
> On 5-May-2005, "liquid hat monster" <durtro@toke.com> wrote:
>
> > you can buy anything you want to in mexico, without a prescription,
if
> > you have the right hookup.
> >
> > you can also end up in a mexican jail. it's not lik
|
|
|
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427CCF37.5060006@it.com:
> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B8526.90303@it.com:
>>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427A291F.4010406@it.com
|
|
|
en Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427CCF37.5060006@it.com:
> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B8526.90303@it.com:
>>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427A291F.4010406@it.com:
|
|
|
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Charles & Mambo Duckman" <duckman@gfy.slf>
|
|
|
By Kevin McCrea
Kressel, Devine and McCrea file suit against City Council
On Friday, May 6, 2005 Plaintiffs Shirley Kressel, Kathleen Devine and
I filed suit against the Boston City Council to enforce the Open
Meeting Law. The complaint is as follows.
|
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 16:31:13 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> news:427A2D6B.31233293@worldnet.att.net...
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wro
|
|
|
<a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115480341.630209.290270@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mark Martin wrote:
> > a_pluton...@hotmail.com wrote:
<snip>
> So this porn trick of including the name of innocent people into a porn
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Here's the problem with the suicide bomber " dedication". In any war
> the intention is to keep your soldiers alive for long enough to fight
> the enemy into defeat. Suicide bombers by definition decrease the
> fighter percenta
|
|
|
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I suspect that the fanning of hatred by hate mongers such as the author of
> this website is the PEAK of LIBEL of Websites. To place the name of some
> innocent private citizen into the headers of a Pornography website is
|
|
|
The name of my corporation is Advancit. It's been in existence since 1989. I
went to register the domain only to find someone else has it. Yet the name
of their company is not Advancit. Their domain expires on 2010. How would I
go about getting this na
|
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 08:34:34 -0700, "The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net>
wrote:
>>> http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/talks/9103-media-control.html
>>
>> Note: it is pretty much impossible to have any kind of reasonable
>> conversation with a Chomskyite.
>
|
|
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 09:08:03 -0700, "The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net>
wrote:
>
>"Gunner" <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote in message
>news:opto71t6kgc2qu5pjr01m71ihrv7rn9c70@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 06 May 2005 21:27:58 GMT, re_johnson1@hotmail.com (RJ)
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:427A2D6B.31233293@worldnet.att.net...
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>>>
>>>[F/B/O John Kobylt:
>>
>>As if Joh
|
|
|
On 6 May 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> (California)
>
> Is a motion for a preliminary injunction in a writ of
> (administrative) mandate case required to be a
> "noticed" motion-- that is, filed with the court prior to
> the hearing?
Yes.
|
|
|
On 7-May-2005, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > > > Doesn't the recruiting shortfall in this country (USA) indicate
> > > > something about the mission?
> > > >
> > > > If every bumper sticker proclaiming 'support' for the troop
|
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 20:40:47 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>(California)
>
>An agency responds to a petitioner's writ of mandate claiming
>that it lacks specificity and demands court consideration only
>under ordinary mandate rather than administ
|
|
|
Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Egbert Sousè <egbertsousè@WCF.com> wrote in
> news:pk5n7195msuooed1gfdgjmt5503ihl9mbl@4ax.com:
>>On Fri, 06 May 2005 15:32:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
itchell Holman wrote:
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B8F5D.3020501@it.com:
[betwixt us]
>>>> When have I EVER insinuated otherwise, Mitch? I have only maintained
>>>>that I'm entitled to due process of law, equal protection un
|
|
|
itchell Holman wrote:
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427B8526.90303@it.com:
>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427A291F.4010406@it.com:
>>>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in new
|
|
|
Yachaj Paye wrote:
> A good explanation about ice, which IMHO should be added to the
> wikipedia, is here:
>
>
http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/shulgin/blg/2005/04/ice-crank-speed-methamphetamine.html
>
> Yachaj Paye
>
>
> >>No, it was an inter
|
|
|
I'm looking for study material for a Michigan Building Inspectors test
in about 2 weeks. Are there any FREE practice test that are offered on
line. Is there any software that is recommended? I'll need to learn
about international codes, construction co
|
|
|
a_pluton...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Mark, you mean to say that you do not even see my name, Archimedes
> Plutonium, in the header of the website from breastcancerrisk. The
> header "info on Archimedes Plutonium"
Yes, I see the sample containing
|
|
|
On Sat, 07 May 2005 19:52:29 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>The delay is explainable by the need of the petitioner to
>"exhaust administrative remedies," by the entirely understandable
>lack of total familiarity with the law on the part of the pro-
|
|
|
On Fri, 06 May 2005 10:32:03 -0600, George <gpn@thrittle.net> wrote:
>> Another person that misses the point, about atheism. Atheism is not
>> a belief, it's simply a lack of belief in god/s. As to other beliefs,
>> each atheist has his/her own se
|
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to or.politics.]
Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.com> wrote:
> As an agnostic I think atheists are equally as silly as theists. You can't
> say that something you can't know doesn't exist, or that it's important in
> a
|
|
|
"MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net> wrote in
news:117pranp2epsp7a@corp.supernews.com:
>> > And who determines what is constitutional?
>>
>> We used to be able to trust our courts to do it, but they have
>> become
>> so totally corrupt t
|
|
|
Mark Martin has pointed out earlier in this thread that the porn site
of breastcancerrisk that uses my name when I search for Archimedes
Plutonium under google is customized to my computer and different
customized when Mark searches Archimedes Plutoniu
|
|
|
Deadrat wrote:
> <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1115480341.630209.290270@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Mark Martin wrote:
> > > a_pluton...@hotmail.com wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > So this porn trick of including the name o
|
|
|
A good explanation about ice, which IMHO should be added to the
wikipedia, is here:
http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/shulgin/blg/2005/04/ice-crank-speed-methamphetamine.html
Yachaj Paye
>>No, it was an internet site providing manufacturing met
|
|
|
The website owners have nothing against you; they're just flooding
their pages with random garbage like "Her body clenched as the warm pad
of anagram his fingers walked up over her belly, to cup woody allen and
mia farrow naked her tender breast." to g
|
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to or.politics.]
George <gpn@thrittle.net> wrote:
> The point that you're missing is that some atheists
> claim that they've "proven" it impossible for a
> god to exist. Since most atheists would deny such
> a thin
|
|
|
> I've pointed that out before. I bet that it is far more dangerous to
> drive
> your car on the highway in America than it is to serve as a soldier in
> Iraq... |
