|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2005 04:16:53 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>OK, maybe petitioner deserves that.
>
>But at least he gave it a try. Most other students have simply rolled over
>and exposed their bellies (so to speak) at the university level. I'm n
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> zzbunker wrote:
>
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>HymieGoldstein wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Doesn't the recruiting shortfall in this country (USA) indicate
>>>>something about the mission?
>>>>
>>>>If every bumper stic
|
|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2005 04:28:18 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>I've heard that the number of pro se litigants is increasing over time,
>so the courts are getting them no matter how much the self-styled
>would be gatekeepers complain.
I can't say
|
|
|
<parrthenon@cs.com> wrote in message
news:1115607269.575948.171210@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> <Not true. She went there to work in Hispanic schools under the
> encouragement of Niro and Lawrence.> Stan Booz
>
> Beatriz Marinello did not h
|
|
|
On Sun, 8 May 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> [O]ne member of the student appeals committee
> [was permitted by the institution to sit] as a
> (tenured) "faculty" member, when in fact . . . he
> is an (untenured) lecturer . . . . This member
|
|
|
Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >
h---://www.casualsexblog.com/-/google.com/search?num=30&hl=en&scoring=d&as_drrb=q&q=archimedes+plutonium&as_qdr=w&btnG=Google+Search&lr=&sa=N&tab=gw
>
> I'm almost certain I know what happen
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> forevernitefan wrote:
>
>> Let's see I am female and in your posts responding to ME you called me
>> names and made crude sexual references aboutme.
>
> Being female doesn't necessarily make one into a lady.
Ru
|
|
|
In article <kkwfe.13015$ye1.11855@okepread06>,
RazorBack <hogsrule@lycos.com> wrote:
>>
>Someday we will have good figures on the daily carnage
>in Iraq BEFORE 2003.
Implying that you have no idea what it might have been, right?
And further imply
|
|
|
<nospam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:tgos71569t96qojn7ers2aqbafc6cl9f1g@4ax.com...
> At least one news report stated that he became upset when the teacher
> snatched
> his phone away from him while his mother was still on the other end. I
> t
|
|
|
> > That's not the current law
> > and never will be. Look at it this way. Suppose you have a divorce
> > case. If you don't get custody of the kids, Ken thinks you should be
> > able to sue the judge and if you do get custody, Ken thinks your
>
|
|
|
David Martel wrote:
> Luigi,
>
> The fact that your acquaintance relinquished his rights does not mean
> that he is freed from his obligations. The child that he has chosen to avoid
> raising must still be fed and clothed. The mother in this ca
|
|
|
"Ron Tock" <rontockPANTS@yahooPANTS.com> wrote in message
news:x4Mee.9048$26.3623@chiapp18.algx.net...
> Music Lover wrote:
>
> > Re: Stanley Management. Tenants in apartment #215 vs. #115
> >
> > In the past week, my wife and I have been harass
|
|
|
"(null)" <pack@pack.eos.ucar.edu.ucar.edu> wrote in message
news:d5k0l3$vht$2@news.ucar.edu...
> In article <1115403422.584476.174780@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >"WE WANT YOU TO BE CANNON FODDER!"
>
> > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
<durtro@toke.com> wrote in message
news:1115518746.778323.107370@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> nospam wrote:
> > On 5-May-2005, "liquid hat monster" <durtro@toke.com> wrote:
> >
> > > you can buy anything you want to in mexico, without a pr
|
|
|
So what are you a professor of...'Gutter talk 101'...oh no must be 'How
to write stupid s--t on walls 101'.
:O)
|
|
|
scaredoll writes:
>
> I have been feeling left out latley... it seems everyone
> is getting sued by Ray apart from me, IT'S NOT FAIR.
>
> What tips do you guys have to help me cross that final
> bridge into true bliss?
We believe it was Paul Robi
|
|
|
At 04:28 PM 5/8/2005 -0400, stanbooz wrote:
> Sigh. It was her full time job and source of income prior to moving to Florida. Whether it took
> up 20 hours or 50 hours it was how she made a living. After becoming President and getting
> so involved
|
|
|
On Sun, 8 May 2005 14:27:55 -0400, "StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net>
wrote:
>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:427e3f54.13923250@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>> Apparently quite a few people missed this posting, which is a
>>
|
|
|
In article <L8idnU5BOLQpzOPfRVn-gQ@comcast.com> , "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Deborah Terreson" <foodNOTSPAMandart@comcast.net> wrote
>> Let the lazy die - a man who chooses to keep his freedomn only by
>> expecting
>> it from
|
|
|
- wrote:
> Suspension Reduced For Student Who Took Call From Mom In Iraq
> Public Outcry Leads District To Change Position
>
> POSTED: 12:29 pm MDT May 6, 2005
> UPDATED: 8:57 am MDT May 7, 2005
>
> COLUMBUS, Ga. -- A Georgia school district has
|
|
|
<Not true. She went there to work in Hispanic schools under the
encouragement of Niro and Lawrence.> Stan Booz
Beatriz Marinello did not have a full time job. That's a fact.
|
|
|
<bulldyke@aol.com> > "On the other hand, my son complains that he has lost
many jobs and job offers in chess because of being my son."
>
It is because he does not have a pussy that she can lick. Do like those
other scumbags and offer her your young wi
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <> Go Directly to Jail. Do not Pass Go. Do not collect $200.
>
Why don't you report it, dickless? All you ever do is point out things that
you say are illegal, and then you slide your thumb up your ass and do
nothing about it.
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:427e7b24.29234562@ca.news.verio.net...
> This part is true. Beatriz was teaching at two fancy rich-kids schools
> in New York City. In 2003 she moved to Florida to live with her
> l-lover an
|
|
|
<jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1115526145.111457.240440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Teens jailed 30 days for contempt of cop:
>
> http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=97716
>
> Let the city officials
|
|
|
At least one news report stated that he became upset when the teacher snatched
his phone away from him while his mother was still on the other end. I think
the teacher was out of line and had no right to take his phone. If she had used
common sense t
|
|
|
On 8 May 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> Petitioner -alas- does not have . . . 12 legal
> gunslingers at his disposal to help him
> defend his constitutional rights and the
> constitutional rights of his student colleagues
> at the university.
|
|
|
>We believe it was Paul Robinson who said "you're nobody until
>Gordon Roy Parker has threatened to sue you"...
And after that post, I adapted:
>>You're nobody till Ray Gordon fears you..
>>You're nobody till grp-ie spews you a threat..
>>Afr
|
|
|
On 7 May 2005 19:52:29 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>The delay [in moving for a preliminary injunction] is
> explainable by the need of the petitioner to
>"exhaust administrative remedies," by the entirely
> understandable lack of total familiar
|
|
|
"Family Guy" <lurker_4_now@remove.filter.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6bOdnZZhrcrs_uDfRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
>I am in the process of renting out a house I own in another state. I faxed
>a signed residential lease agreement to a prospective ten
|
|
|
On Sun, 8 May 2005 13:40:56 -0400, "StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net>
wrote:
>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:427e24ce.7133203@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>> It seems to me that Beatriz is a salaried employee and the USCF is
|
|
|
A petitioner brings a writ of (ordinary) mandate regarding
a student complaint to a local superior court.
University produces record after petition is filed,
specifying that one member of the student appeals committee
is sitting as a (tenured) "facu
|
|
|
On 8 May 2005 15:02:14 GMT, nolan@gw.tssi.com (Mike Nolan) wrote:
>sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) writes:
>
>>It seems to me that Beatriz is a salaried employee and the USCF is
>>required to take payroll deductions from the $350 per week she gets
|
|
|
"Bradley K. Sherman" <bks@panix.com> wrote in message
news:d5m470$bb7$1@reader1.panix.com...
> In article <kkwfe.13015$ye1.11855@okepread06>,
> RazorBack <hogsrule@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>Someday we will have good figures on the daily carnage
>>i
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 8 May 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> California Rule of Court Rule 317(d) . . . [says]
>
> No paper shall be rejected for filing on the ground
> that it was untimely submitted for filing. If the court,
> in its discretion, refuses to consid
|
|
|
QUID PRO QUOS
<If indeed the IRS permits this, without requiring that it be treated
as income, I am still left wondering how an adult person can come out
of nowhere and work a full time job for expense reimbursement, instead
of working for a living.
|
|
|
On Sun, 8 May 2005 07:07:48 -0700, "The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net>
wrote:
>It is Mill who was one of the primary architects of utilitarianism.
>I would suggest that if you quote someone that you should
>probably learn who they are and what they r
|
|
|
QUID PRO QUOS
<If indeed the IRS permits this, without requiring that it be treated
as income, I am still left wondering how an adult person can come out
of nowhere and work a full time job for expense reimbursement, instead
of working for a living.
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 May 2005 06:50:52 -0600, Gio Medici <giomedici@sumware.com>
wrote:
>
>
>>>Because Gunner is apparently intelligent and well read you'll be
>>>tempted to discover why he so tenaciously defends the enemies of what
>>>he claims to value. H
|
|
|
"Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bx0fe.8658$HL2.5849@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> <rfrego@satx.nrr.com> wrote in message
> news:o04p71lc004ohsl37tqbajgjtegv6i620f@4ax.com...
>> >Ummm... the vast majority of these
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 May 2005 11:36:26 -0400, "Deborah Terreson"
<foodNOTSPAMandart@comcast.net> wrote:
>In article <mmrp711uukdde246b0tbl0o38n6470ouq0@4ax.com> , Gunner
><gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote:
>
>> "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of thi
|
|
|
Petitioner alas has only found one attorney willing to take the case,
and that attorney knew less than the petitioner concerning
freedom of speech suits and writs of mandate.
Moreover, petitioner does not have unlimited funds with which
to fund attorn
|
|
|
Petitioner was primarily concerned about the constitutional issues
involved.
In petitioner's view, complaints brought due to alleged violations
of constitutional rights should not require wading through deep layers
of arbitrarily generated universit
|
|
|
Flag Staff wrote:
> "Sam Sloan" <> Go Directly to Jail. Do not Pass Go. Do not collect
$200.
> >
> Why don't you report it, dickless? All you ever do is point out
things that
> you say are illegal, and then you slide your thumb up your ass and do
|
|
|
The student complaint also (and primarily) involves speech codes
put into effect by the university.
Your attempts to re-frame the fundamental issues mirrors that
of the university system itself.
(Bzzt, thanks for playing.)
<nospam@isp.com> wrot
|
|
|
At 12:50 PM 5/8/2005 EDT, ChessMarketing@aol.com wrote:
> Let's give her the respect she deserves as the President and COO of the
>USCF.
Why is that? In the first place, she is not the COO. She is only the
president.
Sam Sloan
|
|
|
(california)
I just came across this and did not know what it means one way or another.
California Rules of Court Rule 317(d) (discussing moving and supporting
papers)
[Filing of late papers] No paper shall be rejected for filing on the ground
|
|
|
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> h---://www.casualsexblog.com/-/google.com/search?num=30&hl=en&scoring=d&as_drrb=q&q=archimedes+plutonium&as_qdr=w&btnG=Google+Search&lr=&sa=N&tab=gw
I'm almost certain I know what happened here. Notice that the part of th
|
|
