|
|
> John Toland put it well and interpreted the war against Japan
> as the Japanese did, a racist war.
I read Mr. Toland's book and I generally admire Mr. Toland.
Mr. Toland did a good job of explain things from the Japanese side.
However he down
|
|
|
On Wed, 11 May 2005 22:25:47 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
> Yes, but it shares the cost among the 50 states, not just the 4 who bear
> the brunt of the problem. Hospitals are closing here because they can't
> afford to treat large numbers of non-p
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 May 2005 20:43:07 -0500, Paul H. Lemmen wrote:
>>
>>
>> What are the legal implications of this?
>>
>> It's clear that Bush cooked the intelligence to go to war. Does this
>> qualify as a high crime or misdeameanor? Who is empowered t
|
|
|
PTravel wrote:
> Sorry, but I can not give legal advice to non-clients, nor will any of the
> other lawyers who post to this ng. Call your local bar association and ask
> for a referral -- initial consultations are usually free.
>
> The only peop
|
|
|
L Sternn wrote:
>The problem with the 45 seconds is it's a judement call, but even if
>it were only 30 seconds, that's plenty of time for him to have seen
>and avoided you
>But he says he didn't even see you, so it sounds to me like he was
>driving t
|
|
|
John Gilmer wrote:
>>Nazi Germany declared war on the United States in December 1941. And
>>within days or weeks Nazi Germany was sinking ships of the United
>>States and killing its citizens.
>
>
> That's quite true. However, Germany didn
|
|
|
I'm trying to research a specific real estate lawyer. I want
to make sure the lawyer I am considering has no complaints against him
or is a real lawyer. Are there any resources to do the search online?
Frans Wiete Ter Haar recently gave a free re
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 May 2005 21:17:57 -0700, in misc.consumers.frugal-living The Real Bev
<bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>That's cheap. Around here it would be a lot more. You have to pay $600
>because 10 other people pay nothing. Just a guess, I have n
|
|
|
Andrew wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 22:25:47 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
>
> > Yes, but it shares the cost among the 50 states, not just the 4 who bear
> > the brunt of the problem. Hospitals are closing here because they can't
> > afford to tre
|
|
|
"Andrew" <Andrew@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:z5CdnfECpOjTRx7fRVn-gQ@giganews.com...
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:33:54 -0600, "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
>> JA wrote:
>>> MEDIA ADVISORY:
>>>
>>> Smoking Gun Memo?
>>>
>>> Iraq Bombshell G
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
>> So the law develops on a case-by-case basis. That's the way it's worked
>> under the English and American system for almost a millennium. It's the
>> way law stays relevant to the evolving needs of the cul
|
|
|
On 12 May 2005 19:20:25 -0700, "Lisa Ann" <lisa-ann@stalnaker.com>
wrote:
>Ora wrote:
>>If you were rear-ended 45 seconds (almost a minute) after you changed
>lanes,
>>what did that have to do with you changing lanes. I can't understand
>why your
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 May 2005 18:39:30 GMT, nospam@aol.com wrote:
>
>If you were rear-ended 45 seconds (almost a minute) after you changed lanes,
>what did that have to do with you changing lanes. I can't understand why your
>changing lanes would have anythi
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
>> Inductive reasoning is a messy thing.
> Only when you attempt it.
Therefore Ken doesn't.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
"Tobin" <adriangilbarco@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1115919280.556647.308230@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> >Its difficult to decide who it the bigger hypocrite Bush or Putin.
> >Bush because his family supported and financed the Nazis
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> From one who is trying to call the act of being forced to reveal
>>>>>>
|
|
|
At 10:00 AM 5/12/2005 EDT, ChessMarketing@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 5/12/2005 9:46:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, chessdon@aol.com writes:
>>I am surprised at this and question it. We can publish what we want and edit the article as we wis
|
|
|
Ora wrote:
>If you were rear-ended 45 seconds (almost a minute) after you changed
lanes,
>what did that have to do with you changing lanes. I can't understand
why your
>changing lanes would have anything to do with anything.
The only reason the l
|
|
|
>
> Nazi Germany declared war on the United States in December 1941. And
> within days or weeks Nazi Germany was sinking ships of the United
> States and killing its citizens.
That's quite true. However, Germany didn't declare war against the
|
|
|
>During one scene (I can't remember the city), detectives were shown
>running a drug selling sting operation. They had a police officer
>posing as a drug dealer and they were then basically nabbing buyers
>after they drove or walked away. Some of the
|
|
|
In this context, it means the most recently amended version of the
pleading. The original complaint was superceded by the first
amendmend complaint and so on. The 5 previously complaints are
outdated and thus not "operative". In this case, the "oper
|
|
|
On 12 May 2005 01:01:16 -0700, "Lisa Ann" <lisa-ann@stalnaker.com> wrote:
>In January, I was rear-ended on my way home from work. I was driving
>my best friend's car at the time, with the intention of buying it from
>her. The car was insured (liabi
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:46:58 GMT, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
[gibberish snipped]
petitioner files a petition.
>A week later, respondents file a full opposition, along with points and
>authorities and evidentiary objections.
[snip]
>I've nev
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:428353f2.11322937@ca.news.verio.net...
> What is clear so far is there have already been a lot of objections to
> the article and nevertheless nobody has been fired or reprimanded.
> Beatriz
|
|
|
Stevel wrote:
> Tobin wrote:
> > >Its difficult to decide who it the bigger hypocrite Bush or Putin.
A moronic statement.
> > >Bush because his family supported and financed the Nazis and is
now
> > >working to
> > >destroy American freedom a
|
|
|
Andrew wrote:
> "Prof. Jonez" blathered:
>> JA wrote:
>>> MEDIA ADVISORY:
>>> Smoking Gun Memo?
Of course not.
>>> Iraq Bombshell Goes Mostly Unreported in US Media
Because nobody gives a f***. Nor should they. There's no news here.
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2005 22:26:12 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
> wrote:
>
>>>>That's not the current law
>>>>and never will be. Look at it this way. Suppose you have a divorce
>>>>case. If you don't get custody of the k
|
|
|
John Gilmer wrote:
> "Steve Dufour" <hobbitfan111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1115911569.353674.22190@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > It killed 50 million to save the lives of 5 billion.
> FIVE BILLION?
> Are you saying that had Britain an
|
|
|
The system doesn't always work, but it's very nice to see that
sometimes justice can prevail after all. It's too bad that not all
cases that end in acquittal can have a happy ending like this one.
This may sound harsh, but I have no sympathy when the
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 9 May 2005 12:20:19 -0700, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote
[snip]
>>>"The common law is made from decisions arising out of actual cases and
>>controversies, not hypothetical ones. Each time a
|
|
|
Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427E3746.7070100@it.com:
>>Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in news:427DF7ED.6010008@it.com:
>>
>>>> [betwixt us]
[snippage]
>>>>>> From one who is
|
|
|
Big Brother
(Essay)
1. Preface
My cell phone was mysteriously captured at the moment I called to 911
emergency services and told them "I have an accident" after a traffic
accident.
The day a local newspaper published my letter about the very
|
|
|
Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in
> news:us8s71hierupc4uibefj3e6ue7mfti8hdk@4ax.com:
>>On Sun, 8 May 2005 07:11:36 -0700, "MeowMeow" <MeowMeow@scratch.net>
>>wrote:
>>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>>>news
|
|
|
"Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4282ca2f$1_1@spool9-west.superfeed.net...
> Here are some links you may be interested in:
>
> http://www.noindoctrination.org/csu_letter.shtml
>
> http://www.aaupaz.org/UAvsKay.htm
>
|
|
|
On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:33:54 -0600, "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> JA wrote:
>> MEDIA ADVISORY:
>>
>> Smoking Gun Memo?
>>
>> Iraq Bombshell Goes Mostly Unreported in US Media
>>
>> May 10, 2005
>>
>> Journalists typically condemn attempts to forc
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 May 2005 09:56:17 -0700, Kelly_Myer09 <kelly@usa.com>
wrote:
>I was watching a "cops" sort of show the other night and one of the
>scenes struck me as odd. This seemed like the most suitable place to
>ask the question.
I'd question th
|
|
|
"mjoann" <xtcmusicfan@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:4283D5F8.1040005@netscape.com...
> PTravel wrote:
>
> > Sorry, but I can not give legal advice to non-clients, nor will any of
the
> > other lawyers who post to this ng. Call your local ba
|
|
|
Tobin wrote:
> >Its difficult to decide who it the bigger hypocrite Bush or Putin.
> >Bush because his family supported and financed the Nazis and is now
> >working to
> >destroy American freedom and democracy or Putin
> >because he ignores the hor
|
|
|
Hank wrote:
> Much has been written about the White House Prayer Circle. But here is
> the reality. When President Bush is on his knees he is not really
> praying in the conventional sense. Bush is actually applying massive
> suction as he kisses thos
|
|
|
"Taylor Kingston" < Sloan has written extensively about his own sex life>
So because Sloan is a scumbag he cannot call out the USCF for doing the same
thing? That attitude is the same as claiming that a prostitute cannot be
raped, a criminal cannot b
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <> It is now Thursday, May 12. I still have not received my
Chess Life>
Dear Moron:
Considering how they hate your guts and the various USCF Klingons just rip
you on a daily basis, why do you continue supporting the USCF? Why not spend
|
|
|
"TheNakedOne" <Gooberglob@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115909394.657841.184510@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> No. War is bad.
True, no doubt, but it is also sometimes the least of the evils of choice.
jt
>
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 May 2005 14:09:59 GMT, sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan)
wrote:
>At 09:11 AM 5/12/2005 EDT, ChessMarketing@aol.com wrote:
>
>> Beatriz stated: "As a woman, I feel very offended by this article."
>
>I have yet to see any statement
|
|
|
> * "They have no lawyers among them for they consider them as a sort of
> people whose profession it is to disguise matters." - Sir Thomas Moore,
> 1516.
Saint Thomas More was a lawyer and Chancellor of England. He is the
patron saint of
|
|
|
Lisa,
Mr. Metcalfe's advice seems pretty good to me. If you decide on going with
small claims court you will probably exceed the court's limit and so may
lose out on some money. Do the math. What's the most you can collect in
small claims versu
|
|
|
>
> Listen up, you disingenuous piece of rightwing riffraff: Russia
> and the Allies were on the same side _against_ Germany.
"Disingenuous!" My, my!
It's quite true that WWII ended with Russia, the US, and the UK being on one
side
|
|
|
"cbc" <realsysLLC@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1115813473.456527.74180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Stuffed into a spending bill is the $10.5 billion
> tobacco buyout for tobacco 'allotment' holders.
>
> Tobacco farmers received beneficial
|
|
|
<<<1. Did Tim Taylor threaten a lawsuit if Chess Life did not publish
his
article unedited?>>>
ROF,L!!!! Threaten with what? Tim lives out of a gym bag (and a
little piece of me admires his life style). With what laywer? Was
possible threat cou
|
|
|
At 09:11 AM 5/12/2005 EDT, ChessMarketing@aol.com wrote:
> Beatriz stated: "As a woman, I feel very offended by this article."
I have yet to see any statement by Beatriz Marinello to this effect.
Is that a private statement made to you af
|
|
|
Might seem like a dumb question but when someone refers to "operative
pleadings," what exactly are they referring to?
In other words, what pleading is defined as "operative" when you have a
complaint and up to five amended complaints?
Thanks-
|
|
