|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 16:19:07 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>> Moreover, as it transpires, there was ALREADY a set of DETAILED contour
>>> maps of the area on file
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 16:09:15 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>>>> You know squat about what's really going on
|
|
|
On 30 May 2005 16:14:08 -0700, ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>The standard the prosecution has to meet in a motion hearing regarding
>the admissibility of expert testimony is very low. They don't have to
>convince the judge that Dr. Hayes's conclusions
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 16:06:40 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>>>> Quite simply, Dr. Hayes could NOT have perfo
|
|
|
"Robert J. Kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3g1i7iFa62k3U7@individual.net...
> They lost and we won. We had better weapons. If the Mexicans win the new
> Mexican American war, it is because we defaulted. We could have done with
|
|
|
On 28 May 2005 17:10:05 -0700 bay.of.arizona@gmail.com <bay.of.arizona@gmail.com> whittled these words:
> The DMV and the city of San Diego have a name,
What kind of name? Name of an indvividual, a business or? ANd they have
it in relationship to
|
|
|
"Iskandar Baharuddin" <brengsek@mcpc.net.au> wrote in message
news:429af93b$0$14873$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Sunny" <wombathouse@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:lnBme.6981$BR4.3097@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>
|
|
|
In article <ZKMme.88$bb.2651260@news.sisna.com>
Jabriol/Antonio L Santana <invalid@invalid.net> wrote:
Hey, My son Antonio L Santana Jr raped an african american
woman, and brought a new low paid worker into the Camden nj
world. im so proud of bla
|
|
|
"Twittering One" <twitteringone@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1117169311.628556.228800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> ~ * A Bon Noir ...
> ... to you,
> Too ~ !
>
> Years. An eternity."
> ~ Rocky
>
> "Fool, use your Ears ~ !
> Hear me
>
|
|
|
bot
|
|
|
n Fri, 27 May 2005 17:43:22 GMT, Stephen Horgan <stephen@horgan.REMOVETOREPLY.co.uk> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 May 2005 12:53:01 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>Stephen Horgan wrote:
>>> On 25 May 2005 23:44:03 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvi
|
|
|
"Rex" <rex7@sdjkfhksdajhfksdjahfksdjhfkjdh.net> wrote in message
news:T9qdnUtApfhHEAffRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > Scientologists Reach Behind Bars
> > "People want what we've got," she said.
>
> Except they happen to be dang
|
|
|
"Twittering One" <mournenwould@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1117142493.770317.294340@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> And the fact that she really gets to troll...@gmail.com
> Is a REAL bonus!!"
Cannot for the life of me figure out what you c
|
|
|
"sandra" <cyndibernadette@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117467167.043202.237860@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> I lost my little small dog recently. I believe he ran out into my
> apartment building hallway to play. Unfortunately, due to acc
|
|
|
Jabriol (from alt.religion.jehovahs-witn) has a new name - Reel Mckoi.
LOL!!! Set your killfiles accordingly. :-)
Message-ID: <ZKMme.88$bb.2651260@news.sisna.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:48:16 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.154.80.20 <---JABRIOL (
|
|
|
Don wrote:
>
> Don't whine if aliens from space come and take over.
If we can't beat them of if our bacteria and viruses don't kill them,
then we deserve to perish.
Evolution does not take prisoners and the last one standing is the winner.
|
|
|
"Soggy, these smores, no? What's more,
My chocolate's smudged."
~ Justin
"Justice ~ Needs shortening
Without which no biscuit is crisp."
~ Alfred
"O, here, how about a Graham, Jorie? Or,
A cracker with brie and pepper?"
~ Arrowroot
"A tad o
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d89n91tnf0tmhhmr9ubr0u1259t734re1o@4ax.com...
> On 30 May 2005 16:14:08 -0700, ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >The standard the prosecution has to meet in a motion hearing regarding
> >the admi
|
|
|
"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message
news:q56m91l1t03p4bps9iviluq4d91qm74vrj@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:01:35 +1000, Harry Snape <hsnape@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>>RHR wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:32:16 +0800, "Iskandar Baharuddi
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>> You know squat about what's really going on with the medical examiner.
>>>>> There'
|
|
|
"sandra" <cyndibernadette@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117467167.043202.237860@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I lost my little small dog recently. I believe he ran out into my
> apartment building hallway to play. Unfortunately, due to accid
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> Speaking of speed, did Lauren leave the comforts of Inspiration Point at
> running speed (or greater), yes, or no?
No. She slipped and fell.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> Would you then disagree that Dr. Hayes performed a trajectory analysis
> something similar to what I am proposing and reposting here? If so, please
> explain.
> ___ <-- edge (excess line removed) Point A
> \
>
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:429BA130.B2C78065@worldnet.att.net...
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> > No, Ted, it's apparant you are the one who doesn't understand basic
> > science. Here, I'll use your own diagra
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gv9n91po9n8rs2ifn2fekijqdrebqkfbt7@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 16:09:15 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >
> >> Theodore A. Kaldis
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:429B9E4D.E46D2D48@worldnet.att.net...
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> Kent Wills wrote:
>
> >>> I understand science quite well.
>
> >> Apparently
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
> If I couldn't counter Hayes report no better than that I wouldn't even
> insult the judge or the jury by bringing it up!!
You wouldn't recognise an insult even if it were pointed out to you. You're
an outright moron.
--
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>> [...] Wheather or not his experiments will survive defense scrutiny is
>> basically an issue of fact and one that I strongly believe must be decided
>> by a jury of 12 people.
> Ultimately that
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> The standard the prosecution has to meet in a motion hearing regarding the
> admissibility of expert testimony is very low. They don't have to convince
> the judge that Dr. Hayes's conclusions are accurate or even that hi
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Moreover, as it transpires, there was ALREADY a set of DETAILED contour
>>>> maps of the area on file at the L.A. County Department of Public Wo
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Moreover, as it transpires, there was ALREADY a set of DETAILED contour
>>> maps of the area on file at the L.A. County Department of Public Works
>>> (with the same level of detail as Dr. Haye
|
|
|
Mark Probert wrote:
> Not to my knowledge. Care to document your claim?
I was referring to tithing. "Copyright" may not be the right word, but
the concept is the same.
|
|
|
>
>The decades-long war on drugs has had two results: a bunch of
>non-violent people behind bars and a huge increase in the percentage
>of THC in marijuana. Time to declare victory.
>
The last time I partook was around 1979.
I've heard likew
|
|
|
> It sounds like you just got a lesson in dog collars and dogs in
> apartments. I don't know of any way you can prove - as the burden is
> yours - that her dog is in fact your dog. A lot of vets now offer a
> tatooing service to help ID dogs that
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 11:07:49 -0500, "arminius" <richard
norton@cybertrails.com> wrote:
>Imagine Americans fleeing to safer places in their
>> own country because of a foreign nation's citizens invading our
>> country!
Sounds a lot like what occ
|
|
|
you'd just sue for return of the animal. That in itself will probably urge
them to cough it up. Otherwise you'll have to show in court that the beast
is yours -- hopefully you have photos or witnesses to prove it. Also sue
the parents of the little
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 14:39:01 -0500, richardsfault
<richard1-nospam@richardsfault.com> wrote:
>
>Part of my website features images from my college days taken from
>1979 to 1981. Marijuana and marijuana growing was a part of the
>experience and no b
|
|
|
You should be a little, though not overly, concerned. If the DEA wanted,
they could harass you for them, but they probably won't IMHO. You would
just respond that you found them on the web and that you didn't take them.
--
Falky
San Diego, Calif
|
|
|
n Mon, 30 May 2005 08:39:55 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>>>> [sophistry]
>
>> Translated, Dane scores a lethal direct hit amidships. :)
|
|
|
On 27 May 2005 05:51:16 -0700, HadiiTowelhead@gmail.com wrote:
>Just a reminder for everyone to report this @$#*ing nasty dyke to both
>Google and AOL.
For what? Posting silly articles that make little to no
sense? I don't see it as a reportab
|
|
|
>Richard has already admitted that he grew the plants. This
>isn't at issue. Proving he grew marijuana would be easy enough.
>Proving he did it within the statute of limitations may not. I don't
>know the limits are.
>
I did not grow the plants
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 09:32:46 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>> You know squat about what's really going
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 09:25:57 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>> Quite simply, Dr. Hayes could NOT have performed any "trajectory analysis"
>
>> Yet he did. How od
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:429B9AEC.6E7E547F@worldnet.att.net...
> Dane Metcalfe wrote:
>
> > Truthfully there are a couple of legal puzzles that have intrigued me
> > regarding the tactics employed by Craig
|
|
|
"Sunny" <wombathouse@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:lnBme.6981$BR4.3097@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Iskandar Baharuddin" <brengsek@mcpc.net.au> wrote in message
> news:429ad7dd$0$14891$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
|
|
|
Sumbuny wrote:
> "L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
> news:qu6n91lhaguiss7tr30afllehcffsheeji@4ax.com...
>
>>On Mon, 30 May 2005 18:52:42 -0400, Mark Probert
>><markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>L Sternn wrote:
>>>
>>>>
|
|
|
On Tue, 31 May 2005 06:57:36 +0800, "Iskandar Baharuddin"
<brengsek@mcpc.net.au> wrote:
>"Amendment V
>
>"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
>crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except
|
|
|
L Sternn wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 18:52:42 -0400, Mark Probert
> <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>L Sternn wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 30 May 2005 09:22:04 -0400, Mark Probert
>>><markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
|
|
|
L Sternn wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 18:51:15 -0400, Mark Probert
> <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Gawd didn't copyright it. It his His word and not the word of any
>>>particular religion to copyright, is it not?
>>
>>Good point.
|
|
|
We dont support asian crime or its criminals!
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:znume.52$gi2.8737@news.uswest.net...
> Bali Nine may get government assistance
> 09:57 AEST Mon May 30 2005
> AAP
> Members of the Bali Nine co
|
