Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Conditional Power of Attorney
Rat, There's no need for the bank to care which person with valid POA is withdrawing money. It isn't involved in the "unwilling or unable" scenario. It's complicated enough with two folks with POAs trying to figure out when to act. Why get the


Re: Are these normal issues with contractor's agreement?
Doc writes: > I'm in Florida working on getting post-hurricane repairs made to my > house. Replacement of the roof, drywall replacement in several rooms > and full house carpet replacement. Contracts are for the benefit of the contractor, not you.


Bushs - Bin Ladens - All in the Family
exas Connections In-Depth Special to The Dubya Report Bushs - Bin Ladens - All in the Family Aesop: "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." On September 27 the Wall Street Journal reported that the bin Laden fam


Re: Please show your support for Scott Peterson at this website
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:265te199el4483pnnp36v6710p3auj4aue@4ax.com... > On 31 Jul 2005 20:30:58 -0700, "Gary L. Burnore" > <garylburnore@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>The Death Penalty is wrong! >> >>http://www.ccadp.or


Re: Conditional Power of Attorney
"Joshua Heard" <jheard@nospammsn.com> wrote in message news:0iqHe.54470$0f.8813@tornado.texas.rr.com... > Absent any other facts, send a simple letter to George requesting that he > confirm that he is able and willing to act as attorney in fact. Put


Re: More irrelevant testimony in Baltimore
You're absolutely correct. How could these attorneys attempt to impugn the reliability of the lab techs or impeach their testimony? The important thing here is that children are dead. Have they forgotten that? The police themselves have testified


Re: Democracy needs to be defined
In article <1122868083.235947.277740@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote: > Democracy needs to be defined. It lacks an absolute definition. Democracy: 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.


Re: There is no right to smoke.
In article <v0xHe.83$646.9@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, Deadrat <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >reasons not to criminalize sin (like, say, gambling). Those reasons range >from ineffectiveness -- isn't that your bookie waving at you? -- to >insuff


Re: Are these normal issues with contractor's agreement?
Here are two links for buying AIA construction contract forms: http://www.stevensness.com/store/browse.cfm?searchType=category&category=53 http://www.thecontractorsgroup.com/aia-forms.htm "T-Jay" <TJ@TJLJLJ.LJ1> wrote in message news:


Re: "Is Pluto A Planet" Lawsuit?
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:35:05 -0400, jjt <jjt@jjtf.con> wrote: > > >>his need to post useless crap in here because he has no other means of >>getting attention. I can't believe I let my filter for him expire...


Re: There is no right to smoke.
In article <nttHe.27$646.9@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, Deadrat <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >And here is why the campaign against smokers will succeed, even when >it becomes repressive. I'm not a smoker, so these rules don't affect me. >I'm i


Re: There is no right to smoke.
In article <HYSdnRx57fR1rnPfRVn-vw@comcast.com>, Chas <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >They say the same thing about pornography, the scourge of illicit sex, the >curse of gambling, or drink, or durgs. Do you do "durgs"?


Re: There is no right to smoke.
In article <littlegreenmen-DEC5C7.04310001082005@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com>, Spirit&Opportunity. <littlegreenmen@nospammars.com> wrote: > >I've also found the most ardent anti smokers are those who have had a >history of heavy smoking and then quit.


Re: Are these normal issues with contractor's agreement?
"Doc" <docsavage20@xhotmail.com> wrote in message news:DUzHe.1590$ns.1172@newsread1.news.atl.earthlin k.net... > I'm in Florida working on getting post-hurricane repairs made to my house. > Any thoughts? > > Find another contractor. One who can


Re: Are these normal issues with contractor's agreement?
Don't be a fool. Don't sign the contract. The American Institute of Architects (I think that's their name) has a standard language contract form for large projects like yours. It covers just about all of the key issues, and isn't a one-sided ripo


Re: There is no right to smoke.
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote in message news:v8-dnbA-ocSeF3PfRVn-vg@comcast.com... > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote > > There are all sorts of good reasons not to criminalize sin. None of them > > applies to your blowing smok


Re: David Touretzky
anonymous.informer@gmail.com wrote: > FEDERAL GRANTS FUNDING RACISM AND BIGOTRY > http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/medianews/DavidTouretzky.pdf > INTRODUCTION: THE Q LIST AND BEGINNING OF LOGICS A lecture given on 10 November 1952 There i


Re: There is no right to smoke.
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote in message news:5sKdnTYtydPg4nPfRVn-pA@comcast.com... > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote > > There's nothing in the law that stops bars from keeping their vending > > machines. > > Seeing as you can


Re: Ted's Worst Nightmare (was Re: Cam Brown's Trial Scheduled for Oct. 17
On 31 Jul 2005 22:18:10 -0700, "interested" <jpinv@mn.rr.com> wrote: >Kent, I thought he lived in Ventura, but that is at the time he was >arrested. I believe it was Ken who said earlier that he lived on the >Peninsula at the time the event occurred


Re: CIA n NSA agents STOLE 5-6 thousand dollars from my home
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 19:50:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote: >CIA n NSA agent mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars cash from my home last year. Hey, they had to cover the cost of all those office supplies they took ho


Re: Please show your support for Scott Peterson at this website
On 31 Jul 2005 20:30:58 -0700, "Gary L. Burnore" <garylburnore@hotmail.com> wrote: >The Death Penalty is wrong! > >http://www.ccadp.org/scottpeterson.htm I don't have a problem with the death penalty in principle. The only problem I have with


Re: Ted's Worst Nightmare (was Re: Cam Brown's Trial Scheduled for Oct. 17
On 1 Aug 2005 01:58:20 -0700, "interested" <jpinv@mn.rr.com> wrote: >RetzQ. You must first prove that the child was killed by her father. >That may not be an easy hurdle. By placing himself at Inspiration >Point with his daughter he may have create


Nothing can justify a suicide attack
The revelation that the British intelligence services MI5 and MI6 not only had no advance warning of the terrorist attacks on 7 July, but even predicted a 'quiet summer' in the city - adding that, according to them, there was no terrorist cell with


Re: Ted's Worst Nightmare (was Re: Cam Brown's Trial Scheduled for Oct. 17
On 31 Jul 2005 17:53:49 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >Voluntary manslaughter - provoked (not applicable) >Involuntary manslaughter - put someone in danger - knowingly >(applicable in the very least - why not plead it out?) Cameron is


Re: Ted's Worst Nightmare (was Re: Cam Brown's Trial Scheduled for Oct. 17
On 1 Aug 2005 12:57:23 -0700, "moxie@az.com" <moxie@az.com> wrote: >Ken wrote: >>Once you get to Abalone Cove, the next trick is getting Lauren to the >>crime scene (http://home.earthlink.net/~19r anger57/rpv2004anarr.jpg) >>itself. > >Woah. I've


Re: London 1 - Al Qaeda 0
In article <1122928624.697347.204610@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> omarenoryt@aol.com writes: > > Cary Kittrell wrote: > > In article <1122657144.965708.181240@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> omarenoryt@aol.com writes: > > > Still blaming everyone for


Re: Justinian Re: How's this for career advancement....
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, jtnospam@yahoo.com wrote: > However, my recollection from my reading is that Justinian did some bad > > things, too, so don't step up right away to hand out awards or > attaboys. (snip) > > His wife was a real BITCH.-Jitney


Re: Justinian and Roman Law
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Rod Speed wrote: > Straydog <asdf@panix.com> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Straydog <asdf@panix.com> wrote >>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>> Straydog <asdf@panix.com> wrote >>>>>> Rod Speed wrote > >>>>>>>>> I always apply it to


Re: There is no right to smoke.
Bruce Watson wrote: > In article <vLOdndPBj5L-JnPfRVn-iQ@comcast.com>, > Chas <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>No- they pissed me off over 'polygamy'. Most of the other questions don't >>impact me at all- it's a matter of principle. >>'


Re: "If you make just one post today, somthing will happen that you will not like." - Faxhor@hushmail.com 1 Aug 2005
teema.taru@gmail.com wrote: >> Here is an interesting email from faxhor@hushmail.com, >> one of Keith Henson's dupes. >> >> "If you make just one post today, somthing will happen >> that you will not like." - Faxhor@hushmail.com 1 Aug 2005 >> >>


Re: Does copyright law really prevent a user from PRINTING/CONVERTING/MODIFYING a file?
"Hans Barnhofter" <hansb@barnhofter.com> wrote in message news:4rq04owz29ga$.13wrdt3izg38e.dlg@40tude.net... > This is very interesting so it would be nice to get a real legal opinion as > I am NOT a lawyer and I do NOT know or understand copyright


Re: Are these normal issues with contractor's agreement?
Edwin Pawlowski wrote: > "Doc" <docsavage20@xhotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > I've found a General Contractor who says they can do the work. They left > > an > > agreement with me to sign before they'll begin any contact with the > > Insurance


Re: "If you make just one post today, somthing will happen that you will not like." - Faxhor@hushmail.com 1 Aug 2005
teema.taru@gmail.com wrote: > Here is an interesting email from faxhor@hushmail.com, one of Keith > Henson's dupes. > > "If you make just one post today, somthing will happen that you will > not like." - Faxhor@hushmail.com 1 Aug 2005 > > - Anony


Re: David Touretzky: Federal Grants Funding Racism and Bigotry
Barbara is right. Tinyarmy does not know what he is talking about. Scientologists have exposed all sorts of 'extremists' in their publications. TinyArmy was too busy reading all the anti-scientology propaganda instead of taking a look for ITself.


Re: Ted's Worst Nightmare (was Re: Cam Brown's Trial Scheduled for Oct. 17
The "lying in wait" circumstances bump this up to a more sisnister act. If they can prove he set her up in a sort of "ambush" to get her to a place of this level of danger, he will do a long time in prison for that. I think it's a big mistake not


Re: Justinian and Roman Law
Straydog <asdf@panix.com> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Rod Speed wrote: > >> Straydog <asdf@panix.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Seamus wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:46:22 +0000, Ken Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>> Seamus wrote: >>>>>> On S


"If you make just one post today, somthing will happen that you will not like." - Faxhor@hushmail.com 1 Aug 2005
Here is an interesting email from faxhor@hushmail.com, one of Keith Henson's dupes. "If you make just one post today, somthing will happen that you will not like." - Faxhor@hushmail.com 1 Aug 2005 - Anonymous :) ================================


CIA n NSA mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars
CIA n NSA agent mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars cash from my home last year.


Re: Keith Henson's activities constitute terrorist activity
classified.agent@gmail.com wrote: > http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson_cn1.html > > CANADA ACTS TO DENY ANTI-RELIGIOUS TERRORIST SAFE HARBOR > > An apparent scheme by anti-religious extremist Keith Henson > to avoid incarceratio


This is in response a threat from one of Henson's dupes
ttp://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson_cn1.html CANADA ACTS TO DENY ANTI-RELIGIOUS TERRORIST SAFE HARBOR An apparent scheme by anti-religious extremist Keith Henson to avoid incarceration in the U.S. by seeking political refugee sta


CIA n NSA mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars
CIA n NSA agent mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars cash from my home last year.


CIA n NSA agents STOLE 5-6 thousand dollars from my home
CIA n NSA agent mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars cash from my home last year.


Keith Henson's activities constitute terrorist activity
ttp://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson_cn1.html CANADA ACTS TO DENY ANTI-RELIGIOUS TERRORIST SAFE HARBOR An apparent scheme by anti-religious extremist Keith Henson to avoid incarceration in the U.S. by seeking political refugee sta


Re: Antireligious Extremist Associates: Keith Henson and David Touretzky
ttp://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson_cn1.html CANADA ACTS TO DENY ANTI-RELIGIOUS TERRORIST SAFE HARBOR An apparent scheme by anti-religious extremist Keith Henson to avoid incarceration in the U.S. by seeking political refugee sta


Re: WANTED: Keith Henson - criminal fugitive
ttp://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson_cn1.html CANADA ACTS TO DENY ANTI-RELIGIOUS TERRORIST SAFE HARBOR An apparent scheme by anti-religious extremist Keith Henson to avoid incarceration in the U.S. by seeking political refugee sta


CIA n NSA agents STOLE 5-6 thousand dollars from my home
CIA n NSA agent mother @$#*ers STOLE 5 to 6 thousand dollars cash from my home last year.


Re: Keith Henson
ttp://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/henson_cn1.html CANADA ACTS TO DENY ANTI-RELIGIOUS TERRORIST SAFE HARBOR An apparent scheme by anti-religious extremist Keith Henson to avoid incarceration in the U.S. by seeking political refugee sta


Re: David Touretzky: Federal Grants Funding Racism and Bigotry
Well said...


Re: Justinian Re: How's this for career advancement....
I think a guy that hangs out on aus.legal (see the crossposting list). However, my recollection from my reading is that Justinian did some bad things, too, so don't step up right away to hand out awards or attaboys. On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Randy wrot


Re: David Touretzky: Federal Grants Funding Racism and Bigotry
TinyArm...@gmail.com wrote: > I must say one of my first exposures to Scientology was through > ReligiousFreedomWatch.com Haha! Liar. Do you think that makes the RFW to take the pages including your own pages off? As if you would not be a sock pu


Re: David