|
|
>>Because being British seems rather unpleasant! :-)
>
>
> :-/ I don't follow, It is pleasent because people can be British 100%
> even if they are not English etc 100%
That's correct, but we are not going to agree on the subject whilst we
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:mYydnepe-r0xn53eRVn-qA@comcast.com...
> "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote
>>> Geez- put up a sign if you don't like solicitors.
>>> What other fundamental civil rights do you find inconvenient?
>> In
|
|
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:53:55 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net>
wrote:
[...]
>>>
>> Pee on a wall? That should get you and the whole region in trouble.
>>
>> I Kings 14:10 Therefore, behold, I will bring evil upon the house of
>> Jeroboam
|
|
|
"Wayne Delia" <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote in message
news:LPTLe.871$286.174@trndny09...
> RetzQ wrote:
> > Wayne Delia wrote:
> >
> >>RetzQ wrote:
> >>
> >>>Free will trumps retribution.
> >>
> >>Not really; if one assumes God is perfectly omnis
|
|
|
claire.easthope@ntlworld.com wrote:
>>So why are you so keen on being 'British'?
>
>
> That is a meaningless question since I did not choose where I was born
> and how I was raised.
We are using the term 'British' in different ways.
>If yo
|
|
|
On 14 Aug 2005 11:54:23 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>According to CG's sleuthing, the autopsy report should be available
>when the trial starts. At this time, Detective Leslie is keeping the
>autopsy report on security hold; supposedly
|
|
|
----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"KRP>" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>DAVID THE DIPSHIT MOORE
>"freedom" <aboutken@KRPaboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:d09b9b52851d06ca4ad42e3a51723710@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BE
|
|
|
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating A
|
|
|
On 14 Aug 2005 11:51:38 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>Free will trumps retribution. Eventually, you have consequences, but
>the old law is dead. Any real Christian knows that there is no "divine
>retribution" in the New Testament. The ne
|
|
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:29:53 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net>
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:14:06 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>> From the profits from your book and movie deal? LOL!
>>
>> If such a bo
|
|
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:08:21 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net>
wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>
>>> Wayne Delia wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ted, your concept of the Holy Spirit is nothing more than a lying,
>>>> deceiving, serv
|
|
|
In article <1124068873.692394.198120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
jtnospam@yahoo.com wrote:
> Prescription monitoring signed into law by Bush:
>
> http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/breaking_news/12372982.htm
>
> Yes, it's for a good c
|
|
|
idle curiosity, chas - as a defender of religious free spech (and commercial
free speech too -- e.g. purveyors of lawncare) how telephone sales-friendly
are you? What about computer generated calls? If you make a distinction, why
would you extend more
|
|
|
KRP> wrote:
Kenny for the love of god, shut up already....
|
|
|
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3macjpF14vlbdU1@individual.net...
> nobody@spamcop.net wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 01:38:28 GMT, PaPaPeng <papapeng@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
[...]
> >
> > Wanna bet? There's a hell of a lo
|
|
|
Are we to believe the left that in all their meeting they did not plan terrorist acts?
|
|
|
On 14-Aug-2005, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
> to the best of my
> knowledge.
weasel words?
--
Everything in this message is simply my opinion.
If you don't like my opinions then killfile me.
Yeah, that means YOU!
--
Posted
|
|
|
"Explain this please???????????????????????
Is this what they used to call Second Wind?"
~ Rick
"... from witches, the vacuum wickedly
Springs."
~ Blackstone
"Heck, yeah ~ !
Don't get gutted. Don't get gut ~ wrenched.
Don't be a gutter ball. D
|
|
|
~ * Aretha's Best * ~
Respect
Think
Freeway of Love
Chain of Fools et al.
~ * ~
_____________________________________
~ * The Ghostbusters
Brain Fitness Gymnastics * ~
_____________________________________
~ * Facts * ~
The strongest musc
|
|
|
!You can report, too!
I sure did.
[... still waiting to hear from
NYU]
New York University Medical Center
Compliance Helpline
!You can report, too!
The NYU Medical Center culture promotes conduct that conforms to
Federal and State laws a
|
|
|
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in message
news:zSrLe.59938$B52.1485@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>
> On 13-Aug-2005, "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFETHIS1@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
>
> > > Any proof of your left-loon BS?
> >
> > Oh, name calling and lab
|
|
|
12 August 2005
Thomas Feurstein
Office of Compliance
NYU Medical Center
NY NY 10016
Mr. Feurstein:
For your information, in summer 2004, after numerous correspondences
directed at Mark Brady (Canco, Adler copied), and hearing no response,
I
|
|
|
some do, it has been in the past that a creditor had to appear in court
to chalange their bill.. often there were people sitting in court
waiting for each bankruptcy to see if thier clients, with an s were on
the list.
Yea, I got screwed over in 7
|
|
|
>>"Fuz" has nothing to do with anything "JJT" posts.
>
>
> wow.Tell us AGAIN what is stopping you from suing me..
Time limits in my cases against UPenn and LTSC, for one. Priorities.
Temporary ones.
> YOU have my address, my ph#, my contact in
|
|
|
<snip>
If and when something is filed with the court, I will respond to it then.
<yawn>
|
|
|
"John and Karen Gardner" <gardner1018@shaw.ca> wrote
>......I do think that both the American
> founding fathers and the slick bunch of politicoid carny barkers who
> crafted
> the Canadian Charter SHOULD HAVE recognized a basic right of
> non-moles
|
|
|
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote
>> Geez- put up a sign if you don't like solicitors.
>> What other fundamental civil rights do you find inconvenient?
> Inconvenient? There's more to it than being inconvenienced on a Saturday
> morning. They're looking fo
|
|
|
jtnospam@yahoo.com wrote:
>Yes, it's for a good cause (isn't it always?). No, it won't be abused.
>(and your check is in the mail, we'll build in safeguards, and we won't
>tell a soul. SS#'s will never be used for identification purposes, I'll
>retu
|
|
|
RetzQ wrote:
> Free will trumps retribution.
Not really; if one assumes God is perfectly omniscient, there's no
possibility of free will, since any choice is absolutely constrained to
the single option which God knows will be chosen. God can't be
|
|
|
On 14 Aug 2005 09:01:39 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Interested, frankly Idont care who you are in reality.
Moe, you lying hypocrite, you're ALWAYS trying to out people!
|
|
|
On 14 Aug 2005 07:57:45 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Don't flatter yourself, Sammie.
Why not, I've earned it!
>You are hardly " toasting: me.
Perhaps it is more of a flambe!
>Your
>pathetic attempts are so feebl
|
|
|
n 14 Aug 2005 08:14:38 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Begin paste
>*************
>437. Sam Bam Aug 11, 12:02 pm show options
>Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson, boulder.general, co.general,
>co.politics, misc.legal
>From:
|
|
|
>>>>Just conclusory allegations not made in the case.
>>>
>>> On the contrary, I stated I have the documentation and the court will
>>> have it as soon as my motions are filed if I am served.
>>
>>If and when something is filed with the court, I'll r
|
|
|
"Sarah Monroe" <gmspider@aol.com> schreef in bericht
news:_FILe.16527$rp.12783@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Screwed former employee wrote:
> > "barbaric practices like female
> > circumcision,"
>
> Not a Muslim custom and it's done mostly in Africa.
|
|
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:48:21 -0500, "Nicole Massey"
<nyyki@gypsyheir.com> wrote:
>So, why do we care about her? Is she here? I haven't seen her post anything.
>Does she have any relevance to providing support in this forum? If not, then
>why talk
|
|
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:21:25 GMT
"Willow Arune" <pangarune@shaw.ca> wrote:
You know of course I disagree with your characterisation of AJ but I
must say I am impressed that you removed the troll crossposts to respond
anyway.
:)
--mtsg
|
|
|
Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btopenworld.com> writes:
>>
>>>In terms of entropy, using the one million words in English
>>>1,000,000**20 = 1.e+120 (one hundred and twenty zeros in the number)
>>>using the 2000 words that people normally use
>>>200
|
|
|
Cracklin' wrote:
> "George" <firestone@hemisphere.com> wrote in message
> news:16ILe.7709$xW.262@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> > How would you like to have someone knocking on your door with someone
> > offering to share the message of Islam, Mormonis
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:14:06 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>> From the profits from your book and movie deal? LOL!
>
> If such a book and/or movie is made, I'll certainly pay for
> each. I have far too many histori
|
|
|
In general, Nicole, I agree...
....but every rule must have its exceptions.
Andrea was a member here at one time. So too was a woman named Theoni.
Then, as now, Andrea had her web site.
A matter arose where Andrea and Theoni differed. Instead
|
|
|
Prescription monitoring signed into law by Bush:
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/breaking_news/12372982.htm
Yes, it's for a good cause (isn't it always?). No, it won't be abused.
(and your check is in the mail, we'll build in safeguards,
|
|
|
I heard Andrea James maxed out her credit cards to pay for her sex
change operation (taking out cash advances up to her credit limit)
intending all along to file for bankruptcy after she got her new
pussy.
That is premeditation and it is a crime.
|
|
|
>>How much you want to bet he can never produce it (or "Fuz") even when sued
>>over it? He said "sue Fuz" but other than him being "Fuz" (let "Fuz"
>>stand
>>up for himself and prove otherwise), HE is the one claiming to have seen
>>this alleged "vi
|
|
|
>>Just conclusory allegations not made in the case.
>
> On the contrary, I stated I have the documentation and the court will
> have it as soon as my motions are filed if I am served.
If and when something is filed with the court, I'll respond to
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>> Wayne Delia wrote:
>>
>>> Ted, your concept of the Holy Spirit is nothing more than a lying,
>>> deceiving, servant of Satan.
>>
>> Wha-a-a-a-at?
>
> You read what he wrote. Your god is stri
|
|
|
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 20:45:10 GMT, Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 12:05:11 GMT, "Dave" <nofreeknway@uhuh.uhh> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Personally, I think an automated method might be better.
>>>
>>> They already have tags that th
|
|
|
George wrote:
> There is no civil right to disturb the sanctity of someones home.
> While it is not illegal to knock on someones door it is, at least,
> inconsiderate to downright nasty.
That is your personal opinion.
> I should not be required t
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:qOydnVcqYKOZzGLfRVn-tg@comcast.com...
> "George" <firestone@hemisphere.com> wrote
>> How would you like to have someone knocking on your door with someone
>> offering to share the message of
|
|
|
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 01:38:28 GMT, PaPaPeng <papapeng@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:44:45 GMT, "Dave" <nofreeknway@uhuh.uhh> wrote:
>
>>Oh please. Anti-theft methods have been in place for many years. False
>>alarms are so common that
|
|
|
"George" <firestone@hemisphere.com> wrote in message
news:16ILe.7709$xW.262@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> How would you like to have someone knocking on your door with someone
> offering to share the message of Islam, Mormonism, Judaism,
> Mohammedi
|
