misc.legal

averick N.Va. Judge Tosses Out DWI Cases That Presume Guilt By Tom Jackman Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, October 27, 2005; A01 A Fairfax County judge who believes Virginia's drunken driving laws are unconstitutional has begun dismissing

I need to get a change of venue out of P@nola Co. TX, because of the public corruption here. ----------------------- Also, from what people say, there are problems with the Judges, legal systems & corruption, in surrounding counties: Harrison, She

================================= Jabriol is well known on usenet as a sociopathic Jehovah's Witness troll. SOME BACKGROUND - WHAT AND WHO IS THIS "JABRIOL"? JABRIOL is a sociopathic usenet poster with a very long and vicious record of hurting

"Mr X" <Mr-X@privacy.net> wrote >>Below is the new url for the Vexatious Litigant website. Contributions >>and submissions welcome - please contact me through my main address >>a_baron[AT]ntlworld.com >> >>Terry Ewing take note. If you succeed in h

abriol is Antonio L Santana of Camden NJ. He's a Jehovah's Witness at the Walnut St. Spanish Speaking Congragation. All posts were traced to Jabriol's ISP at the time of archiving. Not one was found to be a forgery. Not one was denied by Mr Sant

On 26 Oct 2005 13:54:00 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >Since you have the transcript yourself, one can presume you can read. > >If you think there is some conspiracy here, it would behoove you and >Mr. Kaldis to inform the authorities so

On 26 Oct 2005 13:29:31 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >Interesting that you have suddenly stopped lying through your teeth. > >No denial that you posted on my blog as "Opinionated" in July. Not long >ago you swore up and down you never p

On 26 Oct 2005 12:36:22 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: >> 19 MAY 25, 2001, GROSS INCOME REPORTED WAS $64,187.56. >Aha! Just as I said...he would have been making at least twice your >original estimate of $30,000 w

On 26 Oct 2005 12:20:36 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: > >RetzQ wrote: >> PHOTOS OF LAUREN AND SARAH AND SARAH HAD ACTUALLY BEEN >> >> 2 CUT OFF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SO IT WAS ONLY LAUREN? >> >> 3

On 26 Oct 2005 12:12:33 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: > >RetzQ wrote: >> THERE WERE SOME PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF LAUREN >> >> 21 IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEPICT INJURIES TO HER THAT HE HAD >> >> 22 ATTRIBUTED

On 26 Oct 2005 12:06:48 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: > >RetzQ wrote: >> Stick to the subject, Ted. >Who the hell are you to tell Ted what to talk about? Given your love of ad hom. attacks, your giving Ted a pass is e

On 26 Oct 2005 12:04:26 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: > >RetzQ wrote: >> 14 WE DID OBTAIN A MEASUREMENT; HOWEVER, >> >> 15 BECAUSE OF THE STEEPNESS AND THE ROCKS AND THE TRAILS, I >> >>

James H. Hood wrote: > Because at nearly eighty years of age he might feel like relaxing? > > This brings to mind Thurgood Marshall's response when he was asked at a news conference the day after his retirement, "What's wrong with you, sir?"

On 26 Oct 2005 10:48:18 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: > >RetzQ wrote: >> FIRST LIE: >> >> Financial analysis (forensic accounting) done 1/2000-5/2001 (11 months >> before and 6 months after) and he was NOT arrested until

On 26 Oct 2005 10:41:55 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: > >RetzQ wrote: >> I have just finished reading the Grand Jury transcripts from THE PEOPLE >> V CAMERON JOHN BROWN, and the first and only word I can utter to >> describ

Loretta S sometimes Mom @@, We have been trying to get in touch with regarding Lauren. When are you going to pick her up already? It's been 10 months and no word from you! We don't know which is worse, having to hunt you down at every local

On 26 Oct 2005 10:30:53 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> wrote: >> When can I expect to hear from the AUTHORITIES? > >Whoa! Yet another meltdown! LOL! Exposing your lies is a meltdown? Your rationalization of this will make for

On 26 Oct 2005 08:33:57 -0700, betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >And Jeanne Storlie is what? > >NOT JUST AMAZED! LMAO! Odd that JA uses her Internet connection and E-mail address. -- Kent No todos los que ven tus obras ven tus virtudes.

On 26 Oct 2005 06:17:05 -0700, betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >Who is that picture of Ken? You? Kent? Whomever it is he looks like a >gentle giant, something about the eyes. That's Ted. The only plus I can give him in the picture is the shirt. I

On 26 Oct 2005 08:23:59 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > >Just Amazed wrote: >> Loretta Dillon is one sick person! No shame. > >And Jeanne Storlie is what? Well... She's tall. Is that worth anything? -- Kent No todos los

On 26 Oct 2005 04:49:14 -0700, betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >And this has what to do with the Cam Brown case, the ONLY >reason, according to you, that you are here? > >You failed reading comprehension didn't you Kent? Not at all. >The title

On 26 Oct 2005 06:49:39 -0700, betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >I have never posted on your blog, Vero just so you know. Also I have >never made claim that I was the most gorgeous creature to walk the face >of the earth unlike Loretta. Loretta has

On 26 Oct 2005 05:59:40 -0700, betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >I didn't ask for your trust Ken, nor do I expect it. Then please offer some verifiable evidence of the claims you've made. You claimed she's threatened people with various actions.

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:17:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >> Kent it is very obvious you know little to nothing about the real >> Loretta Dillon. > > If you don't mind my kibbutzing, it seems that "jusT ama

On 26 Oct 2005 04:24:48 -0700, betchinbanjo@gmail.com wrote: >Kent it is very obvious you know little to nothing about the real >Loretta Dillon. I all I need to know. Unlike some of you, I don't need to spend every possible moment tracking her

Now who is the lying liar? I corrected my calculations three posts down. How convenient that you OMITTED THAT FACT. I was definitely in the ballpark. Thank you very much.

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: RetzQ Date: 30 Jul 2005 19:44:04 -0700 Subject: Re: Ted's Worst Nightmare (was Re: Cam Brown's Trial Scheduled for Oct. 17 To: Ok, here is the child support calculator for California. It is based on

RetzQ wrote: > Just Amazed wrote: >> Loretta Dillon is one sick person! No shame. > And Jeanne Storlie is what? Who's Jeanne Storlie? I don't know anyone by that name. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

My parents attorney who did their living will sent them a letter stating that the pre-printed double power of attorney form for health care they signed in 1994 is no longer valid. Now they have to sign a new custom made document. My dad feels this isn'

RetzQ2 wrote: > I was speaking of net income. When I looked up the California child > support statutes I noted that they use NET income. > > Sorry about your poor memory. That comes with old age, I hear. And lying liars lie, I hear! 17. RetzQ

Larry wrote: > > First, the PA Supreme Court: "Nevertheless, the jury failed to convict > > Feaser of this charge. Therefore, allowing the Commonwealth to retry > > Feaser on a general homicide count would violate the highest interest > > protect

I think I would rather marry orturd than read this crappola.CH

I was speaking of net income. When I looked up the California child support statutes I noted that they use NET income. Sorry about your poor memory. That comes with old age, I hear.

Because at nearly eighty years of age he might feel like relaxing?

RetzQ wrote: > Interesting that you have suddenly stopped lying through your teeth. > > No denial that you posted on my blog as "Opinionated" in July. Not long > ago you swore up and down you never posted on my blog. Nope. Wasn't me Lowscum. >

Ken <jacksu@gmail.com> wrote: > Five month ago, my wife and I signed a contract to buy a house in a new > community which is still under construction now. We have put down 12k > for the deposit. Recently, we have decided not to buy the house. By > def

& So what do the Iraqis have........besides gasoline.......?? ~ they have rocks....... which are clearly WMD and should be taken out of Iraq.. """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" ~ Skip navigation U.S. NewsAfter the StormsThe Chang

hollaar@antitrust.cs.utah.edu (Lee Hollaar) writes: >And yet, the first Internet worm of any consequence infected DEC VAXen >running BSD 4.2, as well as Sun workstations running SunOS 3, which >also came from BSD. But not VAXes running Ultrix, which

-- **************************************************************************** *** "Hill's Peek": http://home.comcast.net/~email4hill/wsb/index.html

Kent Wills wrote: > On 26 Oct 2005 12:36:22 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> > wrote: > > >> 19 MAY 25, 2001, GROSS INCOME REPORTED WAS $64,187.56. > >Aha! Just as I said...he would have been making at least twice your >

~ * ~ _________________________________________________ Manner Gone By Creative Substances Of ~ Of TRADITION of FAMILY Of ~ Of _________________________________________________ ~ * Grief Journal * ~ A Powerful Self ~ Guided Journal Coping with the

Who is "Lundsford" (sic) and who is "David Horowitz?" Do you mean Mark Lunsford and Daniel Horowitz? If you are going to make scurillous allegations, at least get the names right. Daniel Horowitz may have indavertantly caused his wife's murder.

Kent Wills wrote: > On 26 Oct 2005 12:20:36 -0700, "Just Amazed" <theroadiesong@mn.rr.com> > wrote: > > > > >RetzQ wrote: > >> PHOTOS OF LAUREN AND SARAH AND SARAH HAD ACTUALLY BEEN > >> > >> 2 CUT OFF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SO IT WAS ONLY

>From the end Of the line on the A train @ Far Rockaway, You can run east maybe 4 miles before running out of boardwalk. There's another boardwalk by Brighton Beach but not sure how long." ~ CP "... where the sidewalk Ends ~ > ~ > ~ > ~ > ~ ~ ~