|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Guy wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>brique wrote:
>>>>Except commit perjury in front of a Grand Jury,
>
>>>Scooter didn't do that. The investigation found there was no underlying
>>>crime here. Even if he did
|
|
|
Newsgroups restored
Twittering One wrote:
>
> It is Abhorant to treat the detaninees
> as we have.
>
> Gross neglect, which in 2005, should not happen.
Apparently you have no knowledge of the subject so your
uninformed opinion is worse than
|
|
|
SS is still in prison, because of WHOM he killed...Palestine has offered to
take him, but the US won't let him go. If he had killed you or me, he would
have been out eons ago...
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:1132010439.978173.2
|
|
|
Hinckley tried to kill the Pres. of the US, hardly a typical case...if he
had shot Joe Schmoe, he would be out by now (see Sirhan, Sirhan)...
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:1132009220.464676.204550@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
|
|
> because many criminal defendants who are 90% underdogs do not get a very good settlement offer.
of course they won't: if they're going to lose, they're not going to
get a high settlement offer. the offer will be just good enough to
convince them to
|
|
|
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:32:01 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:26:55 -0600, discovery@jupiter.nul wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:22:52 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:45:17 -0600, discov
|
|
|
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:31:04 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>On 14 Nov 2005 13:48:52 -0800, "dperry" <dperry.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Mike Smith wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:45:17 -0600, discovery@jupiter.nul wrote:
>>>
>>> >Right.
|
|
|
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:39:38 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>On 14 Nov 2005 15:05:28 -0800, "dperry" <dperry.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Mike Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes... of course it was... in your fantasy land...
>>>
>>> Yes, of course...
|
|
|
"Andy MacAskill" <MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:Tj7ef.45$Rb.9@trndny07...
> Kris Baker wrote:
>
>>
>> "Andy MacAskill" <MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:dW4ef.462$Rb.68@trndny01...
>>
>>> nehmo54@hotma
|
|
|
because many criminal defendants who are 90% underdogs do not get a
very good settlement offer.
if you read my statement, you'll see that i never agreed that china's
system isn't worse than others; it is possible (and probably true) that
china reach
|
|
|
fredfighter@spamcop.net writes:
>It may be that
>Fitzgerals is going for the slam dunk charges only, so that Libby
>can start serving time as soon as opossible rather than being out
>on appeal.
Fitzgerald told us exactly what he's doing in his pres
|
|
|
it could be that every chinese is "guilty" of something because the
laws are so stringent.
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:44:25 GMT, Andy MacAskill
> <MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>
>>nehmo54@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>The laws regarding insanity and diminished capacity as a defense for a
>>>criminal charge in most ju
|
|
|
Deadrat wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Deadrat wrote:
>>> Whom did Wilson tell and when?
>> Everybody and their brother, it seems. From time immemorial.
> I'm willing to believe this, but it seems to whom? Could you tell us
> anyone
|
|
|
Michael Price wrote:
> If [Fitzgerald] runs true to form he's going to get Libby to crack and
> avoid spending 30 years in pokey in return for bigger fish.
Right bollocks! 30 years for being unable to accurately recall conversations
that took pla
|
|
|
Kris Baker wrote:
>
> "Andy MacAskill" <MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote in message
> news:dW4ef.462$Rb.68@trndny01...
>
>> nehmo54@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>> OTOH, some states have abolished entirely the defense of so-called
>> "insanity."
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:4378B199.EAEB4E08@worldnet.att.net...
> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
> > ladagency@intergate.com wrote:
>
> >> Fitzgerald could find no proof of mens rea, but dramatized a mo
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:48:07 GMT, Andy MacAskill
<MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:44:25 GMT, Andy MacAskill
>> <MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>>nehmo54@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>The
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:4378B26C.D9D06126@worldnet.att.net...
> Deadrat wrote:
>
> > Whom did Wilson tell and when?
>
> Everybody and their brother, it seems. From time immemorial.
I'm willing to be
|
|
|
"David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:WAudf.8440$AS6.5541@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> McGyver,
>
> I think he is entitled to his accrued sick leave pay if that is company
> policy. After that pay is expended and
|
|
|
"JOHN D" <jawnd393one@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kfPdf.11850$w85.693@trnddc02...
>
> <esnesnommoc@urthlynk.c0m> wrote in message
> news:qkafn1di7loattlf9v7aas6egmsrhbntjl@4ax.com...
>> On 13 Nov 2005, "JOHN D" <jawnd393one@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
|
|
That sounds bad. Could it possibly be exaggerated? If it were true, it would
certainly be sufficient grounds for getting rid of the ones at the top, not
just impeachment of the president, but of a whole bunch of federal
officials, both appointed and
|
|
|
If you own the property and the rental is month-to-month, give them the
proper number of days written notice, in proper form, and then evict. Make
sure the new tenants are not the type that attracts noisy vagrants. If the
tenant has a longer term
|
|
|
> our error in interpretation is in thinking that people are litigating merely to solve close calls and improve the judicial system. although ideal, this is not the case.
mr. smarty JD, if there is a 90% chance you will lose in court, why
bother to g
|
|
|
> basically, there is no reason to assume that a system of low conviction rate is intrinsically better than a high conviction rate.
dude, go explain that to all the innocent people sitting in chinese
jails (or executed)
because there was
some kind o
|
|
|
James A. Donald wrote:
> --
>
> He has not been charged with leaking classified
> information for political gain - or indeed charged with
> leaking classified information. The perjury charges are
> almost incomprehensible in the minutia that they
|
|
|
On 14 Nov 2005 09:49:40 -0800, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
>Mike Smith wrote:
>> On 14 Nov 2005 07:05:00 -0800, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Shardonay wrote:
>> >> discovery@jupiter.nul wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:19
|
|
|
"Andy MacAskill" <MacsLaw@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:dW4ef.462$Rb.68@trndny01...
> nehmo54@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> OTOH, some states have abolished entirely the defense of so-called
> "insanity." The same should be done for the def
|
|
|
nehmo54@hotmail.com wrote:
> The laws regarding insanity and diminished capacity as a defense for a
> criminal charge in most jurisdictions in United States is what's
> called the M'Naghten rule (named after a guy who killed a UK Prime
> Minister's
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:4378ACA9.30164A28@worldnet.att.net...
> brique wrote:
>
>> Except commit perjury in front of a Grand Jury,
>
> Scooter didn't do that. The investigation found there was no unde
|
|
|
There ARE a lot of money- sucking irresponsible types in the evacuee pool-my
city where I am typing this averages a murder/day pre-Katrina but has had
NONE in the past seventy something days!!
BUT what about the close to 200,000 others?My wife's 22
|
|
|
http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm
We're supposed to be treating our prisoners of
war with some fairness, and according to the
above Geneva Convention.
Think about being caged in Gitmo for three
years.
Think about being held in former So
|
|
|
--
On 13 Nov 2005 20:47:57 -0800, <nini_pad@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > Because Scooter Didn't Do Anything Wrong
"Michael Price"
> Yes he did. He committed perjury and obstruction of
> justice as well as leaking classified
|
|
|
Peter Principle wrote
(in article <9cudf.11466$3K6.3104@tornado.texas.rr.com>):
> X-No-archive: yes
> Randy Howard wrote:
>> And you seem to think that using more curse words per capita
>> than others bolsters your argument. Quite the opposite
>>
|
|
|
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Libby's defense team and the conservative pundits will surely
> continue to try to make the issues look complex and claim that
> the charges against Libby are the result of partisan politics,
> because that's wh
|
|
|
Peter Principle wrote:
>
> ...
>
> WHAT war? Had you an open mind you'd realize the FACT that Clinton DID NOT
> unilaterally invade Iraq, period. Bushco made that stupid choice alone. As
> Powell put it, the smirking chimp OWNS this nasty little w
|
|
|
Publlicus,
I doubt that Mr. Taylor can be specific since you were unspecific. If you
hire a lawyer that person will spend an hour or more of conversation and
questioning (for which you will be billed) to get a feel for the facts of
your case.
|
|
|
All we see is our own conciousness <g>
Welcome to you!
I suffer with low self esteem from time to time so I can see it clearly in
you via your very own specially marked out 'frequency' .....
"Net Cop" <invalid@invalid.nul> wrote in message
ne
|
|
|
Do not purchase server space from Globat web hosting service!
Globat.com practices what I consider to be unfair business methods. If
you sign up for a year, you will find that at the
end of that year, without so much as a renewal letter, they will
|
|
|
It is Abhorant to treat the detaninees
as we have.
Gross neglect, which in 2005, should not happen.
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Guy wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> brique wrote:
>
> >>> Except commit perjury in front of a Grand Jury,
>
> >> Scooter didn't do that. The investigation found there was no underlying
> >> crime here. Ev
|
|
|
Rodin wrote:
> Hitler as Enlightenment Intellectual: The Enduring Allure of Hitlerism
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hitler as Philosophe: Remnants of the Enlightenment in
> National Socialism, by Lawrenc
|
|
|
If you have a case in federal court against a government entity, you should
have a lawyer.
"Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131930149.384558.129410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks for your reply Taylor. Could you b
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Michael Price wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> Beebs wrote:
>
> >>> If Cheney's for torture, why not use it on Scooter?
>
> >> Because Scooter Didn't Do Anything Wrong
>
> > Yes he did.
>
> No he didn't.
|
|
|
"Don" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote in message
news:p16ef.123330$yS6.5880@clgrps12...
> That sounds bad. Could it possibly be exaggerated? If it were true, it
would
> certainly be sufficient grounds for getting rid of the ones at the top,
not
> just im
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:4378ACA9.30164A28@worldnet.att.net...
> brique wrote:
>
> > Except commit perjury in front of a Grand Jury,
>
> Scooter didn't do that. The investigation found there was no underl
|
|
|
On 14 Nov 2005 07:05:00 -0800, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
>Shardonay wrote:
>> discovery@jupiter.nul wrote:
>> > On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:19:22 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >
>> >
>> > Dubya promised that in addition to hi
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:05:47 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>On 14 Nov 2005 09:49:40 -0800, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
>>
>>Mike Smith wrote:
>>> On 14 Nov 2005 07:05:00 -0800, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Shardonay w
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:51:59 -0600, "DFW Dot"
<fromthose@highlightedones.com> wrote:
>
>If you'll allow yourself to be open minded, go back and read the interviews
>that Former President Clinton gave during the run up to the war. Mr.
>Clinton sa
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:22:52 GMT, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:45:17 -0600, discovery@jupiter.nul wrote:
>
>>Right. After you convince me of that, you only have the other 70% of
>>America that knows Bush is a traitor to co
|
