misc.legal

Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8urnt1ltjt22fqi9rrcr3adtb1uc16b29d@4ax.com... > On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:26:46 GMT, "Susan L" > <sheeptramp@nospam.yahhoo.com> wrote: > > > > >Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote in message > >ne

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:07:16 -0800, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Lowrenta wrote: > > > Ted gave a big fat hint: > >> Newsgroups: misc.legal >> From: "Theodore A. Kaldis" >> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:50:55 -0800 >> Local

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:22:01 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: >On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:24:16 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>And when we're out, I notice men staring at her. I actually >>like it. It's a boost to my ego, b

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:26:46 GMT, "Susan L" <sheeptramp@nospam.yahhoo.com> wrote: > >Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote in message >news:jccnt192mvllgammeb816r1tgnu02v76nm@4ax.com... >(and repeated ad nauseum....) >> Liar, outed liar. > > >I lo

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:43:44 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Sunset Sam wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:24:16 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>And when we're out, I notice men staring at her. I actually >>>like i

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:22:00 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: >> You're the one who brought up the courtroom. Are you going to >>file a suit of some sort? > >Liar, outed liar. We already knew you were. You don't really NEED to tell us

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:22:00 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: >On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:06:51 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:27:47 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006

I would think the biggest problem is that your wife had a baby and neither of you know who the father is. I would make a paternity test step one. If the baby isn't yours, I'd make a divorce step 2. If the baby is not yours but decide to stick with

Lowrenta wrote: > A grand jury, as everyone notes, can indict a ham sandwich. We know that all too well. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

sianyde, Knowing that it was a windy day and that shopping carts were blowing everywhere you parked in the lot. You obtained a promise from a supervisor that the cart situation would be corrected. Some how a cart dents your car. First, why d

Lowrenta wrote: > As I already stated and you blithely ignored - nobody has been > arrested or charged with Julie Popovich's murder yet. That's not what the papers are saying. (Or did this news pass you by?) -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@wo

Lowrenta wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> This matter can be put to rest quite easily. Is the famous Dr. O on >>> Cameron's witness list? >> What's it to ya? Mind your own business. > It is our business. Is not. > It's a public

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:34:34 -0600, "Honest John" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote: >The gov't. has a secret project of crossing a Dildo and a Cruise missile, >called a "Diluise" mod-A. They're looking for volunteers and I referred >them to Earth

On 28 Jan 2006 17:28:53 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >Saleh was acquitted Friday of three counts of rape. > >Interesting... > >Thanks for the update. Today he was charged? That's rather timely. >We'll see if the charges stick. Chec

Deadrat wrote: >> >> Boy are you way off base. In the first place, he was acquitted of >> the charge >> of "felon in possession." Secondly, he lost a civil tort action >> which had >> bupkus to do with him being a felon, having a firearm, or anythin

Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote in message news:jccnt192mvllgammeb816r1tgnu02v76nm@4ax.com... (and repeated ad nauseum....) > Liar, outed liar. I look back fondly on the days when trolls were not stiltifyingly dull. This sam is one boring po

On 28 Jan 2006 14:40:45 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> >> For you, it often seems to equal 3, or 5 (or virtually any other >> figure >> than 4). For eaxample, who killed Julie Popovich? > >No one ha

ere is a rough first draft of a motion to quash the search warrant in the alleged planted evidence case recently posted by myself here. Do the issues presented reasonably offer grounds for the suppression of the evidence, and, more importantly, am I

On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:42:05 GMT, ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net promised to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth but instead wrote: >On 27 Jan 2006 12:27:01 -0800, roger61611@yahoo.com wrote: > >>No she can't, stupid. God you're a

Mary wrote: > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:GqzCf.22547$F_3.12246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... >>"Mary" <xxxxyyosugrad97330@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message >>news:YkyCf.303026$qk4.10101@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att

Sunset Sam wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:24:16 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>And when we're out, I notice men staring at her. I actually >>like it. It's a boost to my ego, because > > You're very shallow if your wife's

Liberals HATE_America!. wrote: > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:GqzCf.22547$F_3.12246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... >>"Mary" <xxxxyyosugrad97330@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message >>news:YkyCf.303026$qk4.10101@bgtnsc05-ne

Larry wrote: > In article <agtkt11ha4i2qbhds7pcvsfnrqc2l1b04j@4ax.com>, > Ivan Gowch <the_gowch@yahoo.com> wrote: >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:28:41 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >>==>In article <k79it1p0h33bgs0n4oths3kgu4ms9omos6@4ax.com>, >>==> Ivan Gow

arry wrote: > In article <43DA2C93.5000504@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Larry wrote: >>>In article <43D9949E.6090101@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>>>Larry wrote: >>>>>In article <k79it1p0h33bgs0n4oths3kgu4ms9omos6@4ax.com

Why not look around for another job, if it seems like a bad deal. I don't know the legal ramifications, but it sounds like you will not be given deserved chances for success. Or a tansfer within company? Or a discussion with union, if unionized?

Thank you for responding. Wage based and plenty of work but I am not getting a share. Personality conflict with dispatcher who neither has authority to termintate nor curtail work assignments within company. At 60 yrs. of age I have fewer options than

Hi everyone. Does anyone have any points and authorities which provide that one can use civil procedure in a criminal case when the criminal code is silent on a particular subject? Especially of use would be California authority. Thanks.

Do you receive a staff salary, or a wage based on assignment? In words, are you not receiving any income during this "latent period," or is the issue one that simply leaves you feeling as though you are getting the cold shoulder, so to speak, whic

<mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote in message news:1138456517.175693.219620@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > mailbox@cpacker.org wrote: > > > > > Dec 14; WFAA, Ch. 8 Dallas-Ft.Worth > > > [long url elided] > > > [sorry,

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:38:15 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:43:16 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: > >>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:26:50 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 27 Jan 2

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:16:58 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:42:27 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:22:43 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 27 Jan 2

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:24:16 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >And when we're out, I notice men staring at her. I actually >like it. It's a boost to my ego, because You're very shallow if your wife's appearance is a boost to your ego.

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:21:21 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:55:01 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:35:39 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 27 Jan 2

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:14:01 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:27:46 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:05:43 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 27 Jan 2

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:06:51 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:27:47 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:15:09 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 27 Jan 2

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:05:48 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:27:47 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:14:19 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>> Given Lindsa

"HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message news:11tl5qfb6qm0i79@news.supernews.com... > xSoldier wrote: > >> > >> In a rational society Mr. Nethercott would have received a reward. > > > > For breaking the law? You recall he was "convicted

There is no good rating system for attorneys. A few sites pre-screen their attorneys. www.legalmatch.com is the best of them with the highest concentration and variety of attorneys and the most consumer oriented. They are also the only referral pr

But wait... Gordo is still suing Google and claiming that by archiving his own public statements about being Jesus or saying he wants to marry a 13 year old girl or that he can crash the stock market at will or that he had a bondage session with M

It's also possible that Saleh did do it, but they better find a car he had access to where Julie's DNA or hair or something is found, or they have no case. The reservoir is aboug 15 miles from the area where she was last seen.

For those unaware of it, Gordon Roy Parker of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, alias Ray Gordon, is suing Google claiming that their caching and indexing of his website constitutes copyright infringement. He wanted to change the status of an e-book he

Ms. B. Haven wrote: > http://www.columbusdispatch.com/news-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/01/27/20060127-D1-03.html > > Explains the timing, anyway. Thanks, yes, I read that when doing a Google search. I still think something is fishy about th

"Mary" <xxxxyyosugrad97330@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:y9GCf.558235$zb5.121294@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:GqzCf.22547$F_3.12246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... > >

"Liberals HATE_America!." <libjqhjkst1@us3341.ddr> wrote in message news:43db0dec$1$3564$a82e6bb9@orc.meganetnews.com... > > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:GqzCf.22547$F_3.12246@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... > > > > "M

tell you the same thing as anybody else get a lawyer. You have so many things good and bad that need addressed by a lawyer that it would be good to get one. -- Mike Eaton <earthlovers123@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1138468927.939812.196890@

Here's an article on the rape trial: http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060128/NEWS01/601280303/1002

Saleh was acquitted Friday of three counts of rape. Interesting... Thanks for the update. Today he was charged? That's rather timely. We'll see if the charges stick.

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > It's not a non-sequitur. Lowrenta knows why it's relevant, but I > doubt > that she will tell you. Oh, it is an non-sequitur, because it has nothing to do with whether or not Dr. O is a defense witness in THE PEO