|
|
On 29 Jan 2006 12:27:45 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>
>> Indeed I did. But, Loretta darling, this describes YOU (even though I
>> doubt that you are able to perceive it). It is DEFINITELY not me. No
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:50:04 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>> I'd have to be cursed with single digit maturity to need the use of a
>>> spouse or date's physical appearance as MY own ego boost.
>>
>> "Need" has nothing to do with it.
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:47:45 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>> I hope never to have my ego in need of spousal bolstering.
>>
>> Okay, so you're single.
>
>I'd have to be cursed with single digit maturity to need the use of a
>spouse
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:02:19 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>> So he's not trophy dating, eh?
>>
>> Neither is Kent (nor am I, for that matter).
>
>Never said you were.
You implied I was.
>
>>>
>>> Gotta url for a look at hi
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:50:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>> So he's not trophy dating, eh?
>
> Neither is Kent (nor am I, for that matter).
Lindsay frowns on my dating other women :)
She has granted me permission to have an affair w
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:24:51 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>> Does he trophy date?
>>
>> Some would call second wife Laura his trophy wife: young enough to be
>>his daughter and certainly, not the sharpest tool in the shed -- but not
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:17:50 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>> Bob Larson.
>>
>> Does he trophy date?
>
> Some would call second wife Laura his trophy wife: young enough to be
>his daughter and certainly, not the sharpest tool in the
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:49:20 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>O
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:47:44 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:20:51 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006
|
|
|
On 29 Jan 2006 10:51:15 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>http://www.halcyon.com/jmashmun/npd/index.html
>
WHOA! If I didn't know better, I would think someone was
writing about Ted exclusively. I must now rethink my comment about
not
|
|
|
On 29 Jan 2006 09:08:26 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>Not only is Ted disingenuous about the facts of this case, he is
>selective about his convictions.
>
>For example, what happened to Ken in Colorado was perfectly acceptable.
Ted
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:39:15 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net>
wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>>I realize you are somewhat envious of my life,
>>
>> I don't know what's to be envious of. I know what your life i
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:58:05 -0800, Theodore A. Kaldis
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Regarding the subject:
>
>> You are the one called Toad.
>
>By whom? A veritable alky?
If you call yourself Toad, it does me no
|
|
|
I heard on NY Channel 1
that she woke up, walked out of the hospital,
called a friend,
WHO SUED THE SHIT OUT THEM.
Unfortunately,
she was left partially blind and disabled,
but she is alive.
|
|
|
In article <1138565792.441032.222720@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Drew" <drew@everyoneshosting.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I am in TX. Where is the best place to find
> this information?
findlaw.com is a good source. As well as a
|
|
|
In article <43DD29F5.5060004@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <1138501384_3821@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> > "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am not a lawyer in your jursidiction, and I don't r
|
|
|
On 29-Jan-2006, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
> I've had credit card companies pitch services to me in the middle
> of a relative emergency (calling to report a lost card - in my case a
> card chewed up by a subway ticket mach
|
|
|
I've had credit card companies pitch services to me in the middle
of a relative emergency (calling to report a lost card - in my case a
card chewed up by a subway ticket machine) and when I call to renew
(activate) my card. In the case o
|
|
|
On 29-Jan-2006, anonymous@tattle.xyz wrote:
> There seems to be a new Chase phishing scam, which might have started
> today. The website seems to be named chase-ssl4.com and seems to be a
> roadrunner account in Herndon, VA. 71.68.12.41 seems to
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:50:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sunset Sam wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:17:50 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
|
|
|
Sunset Sam wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:17:50 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <
|
|
|
Lowrenta wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> It was to the extent that Ken failed to receive a licence to practise
>> law under existing rules in effect for attorney licencing in
>> Colorado. Ken, of course, objects that they singled him out fo
|
|
|
On 26 Jan 2006 04:24:09 -0800, mailbox@cpacker.org wrote:
>It's the law in Texas that
>if medical care is "not beneficial,"
>you can be disconnected from
>life support even if you are
>conscious and say you want to live, and
>your relatives want
|
|
|
cynicalhedonist wrote:
> Nothing really new from cams circle of friends, everyone is just still
> waiting to see what happens.
Are they getting a laugh out of the Toad? The poor guy left the
plane of sanity years ago, but now, he's so far gone
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:17:50 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sunset Sam wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> [...]
> You're not perfect, but you come close.
I know.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
Sunset Sam wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:20:51 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.o
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>Regarding the subject:
>
>>You are the one called Toad.
>
> By whom? A veritable alky?
Once a hard-drinking frat-rat, always a hard-drinking frat-rat?!?
Okay, so you have a point: Exhibi
|
|
|
RetzQ wrote:
> Here are just a few symptoms that I have noticed Ted has from reading
> his posts for the last 6 months:
>
> *The most telling thing that narcissists do is contradict themselves.
>
> **When you ask them which one they mean, they'll
|
|
|
cynicalhedonist wrote:
> Not to mention that ted is living in Egypt. He is in denial.
Sure you're not mistaking him for Aswan Dam?
Good to hear from you again, Bill. What news from Cam's circle of
friends?
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:31 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sunset Sam wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:05:05 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:43:44 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:47:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sunset Sam wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:20:51 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>>>On Sa
|
|
|
Sunset Sam wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:05:05 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:43:44 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:24:16 GMT, Kent Wills <
|
|
|
Sunset Sam wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:20:51 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:53:35 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Lowrenta wrote:
>
>
>> <http://www.halcyon.com/jmashmun/npd/index.html>
>
>>This is a very useful web site about narcissism. I think you will
>>recognize many of Ted's traits in here. There are many, many
>>narcis
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <1138501384_3821@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
> "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am not a lawyer in your jursidiction, and I don't represent you or the
> defendants in this case. These are just my thoughts, for di
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>I realize you are somewhat envious of my life,
>
> I don't know what's to be envious of. I know what your life is REALLY
> like.
He knows what it's REALLY like, because he's observed it up clos
|
|
|
There seems to be a new Chase phishing scam, which might have started
today. The website seems to be named chase-ssl4.com and seems to be a
roadrunner account in Herndon, VA. 71.68.12.41 seems to be the ip of
the roadrunner account.
I tried to not
|
|
|
In article <1138563685.001556.95810@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Drew" <drew@everyoneshosting.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a high school senior. Our prom will be held in a few months and
> our entire class is planning an after prom party at a bea
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:41:25 -0800, Drew wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a high school senior. Our prom will be held in a few months and our
> entire class is planning an after prom party at a beach house where we
> will hang out and then spend the night wit
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
>
> An indictment doesn't mean a great deal, given the low
> standard required.
It only means a great deal to Ted when it's about an accused who isn't
a relative.
>
> >
> >Anyway, the way that you talk about the Cameron Bro
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:05:05 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sunset Sam wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:43:44 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sunset Sam wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:24:16 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:39:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:20:51 GMT, Sunset Sam <lucy@romona.org> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:53:35 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 28 Jan 2
|
|
|
On 29 Jan 2006, wheels78@yahoo.com wrote:
> I'm living with my girlfriend in the state of Calif
> and she qualifies for my workplace health insurance
> coverage under the domestic partners law.
The she qualifies for such benefits might suggest bu
|
|
|
n article <1138501384_3821@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
I am not a lawyer in your jursidiction, and I don't represent you or the
defendants in this case. These are just my thoughts, for discussion
purposes.
>
|
|
|
In article <fmbDf.72680$PY6.2940@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>,
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote:
> > Doggonnit, I tried to learn Chinese, and I wish I could, but I'm just
> > too old.
> Doggonnit....welcome to the 21st century.
How about
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> It was to the extent that Ken failed to receive a licence to practise
> law under existing rules in effect for attorney licencing in Colorado.
> Ken, of course, objects that they singled him out for retribution, but
|
|
|
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:41:31 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>
>>>>You still don't know what you're talking about.
>>>
>>>Where it matters, we do.
>>
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
[snipped all the Colorado Bar stuff zzzzzzzzzzzz]
> Oh, I don't know about that. Saleh will have his day in court. But are
> you trying to suggest that you somehow know more than the authorities in
> Franklin County,
|
|
