|
|
Dane wrote:
> Dane <quack@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Dane wrote:
>>>> I really hope this isn't that H-bomb that I have been anxiously
>>>> awaiting, I really do ...
>>> This is NOT the "H-Bomb". And your waitin
|
|
|
On 9 Feb 2006 08:18:22 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> Do I have it right that Cam didn't even attend the funeral?!? That
>> would be shocking! He would have to face Sarah, and he'd probably be
>> feelin
|
|
|
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:45:41 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>> That's Ok, Ken, I took up the slack for you. :)
>
> You guys sure did. The revelation that Cam never offered to pay for
>the funeral blows another major hole in Toad's "devot
|
|
|
n Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:39:42 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[various snips for brevity]
>> > > For those who don't want to wade through twenty more pages of Ted's
>> > > paranoid rambling
>> >
>> >It wasn't Ted who was asked to s
|
|
|
Dane wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> CG wrote:
>>> Please raise your hand if you believe Cameron continued to pay child
>>> support for 4-5 months after Lauren died willingly?
>> He had no choice.
I missed the "willingly" (which i
|
|
|
On 9 Feb 2006, "malibu.ron@verizon.net" <malibu.ron@verizon.net>
wrote:
> Without filing a suit how can you learn the amount
> of medical malpractice insurance a Dr. has in force.
> I am starting to discuss a settlement with an insurer
> and would
|
|
|
Dane wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> CG wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> We are aware that the accident put Sarah and her husband in a bit
>>>> of a financial bind with regard to funeral expenses for Lauren.
>>>> Whatever t
|
|
|
<exit88aac@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139509828.834396.44630@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks very much. I wouldn't have enough time for A, since i'm leaving
> in a few days (and don't
> know lawyers here). I did call the other g
|
|
|
en Smith wrote:
> [apologies -- my newsreader is on the fritz]
So get a decent newsreader.
> It seems that Ted Kaldishonest has been @$#*ing the dictionary again,
> as he appears oblivious of the generally accepted definitions of
> simple w
|
|
|
Bush v. Gore, the 2000 decision that decided the first election of the
current President, was the application of the US 14th Amendment
formally, as opposed to substantively, in the Florida recount.
Some might say that the formal application of "equal
|
|
|
On 8 Feb 2006 19:39:19 -0800, 19ranger57@earthlink.net wrote:
>>I can't wait for the Satanic Cult to make an appearance.
>
> I know! I know!! It was *SAN ANDREAS'* FAULT!!!
>
> Lauren was throwing rocks into the ocean, and by God, those rocks
|
|
|
On 8 Feb 2006 16:57:57 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>
>Dane wrote:
>> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> news:N4uGf.359624$qk4.193685@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> > Dane wrote:
>> >
>> > >
|
|
|
On 8 Feb 2006 16:45:46 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>> Cameron was far too shook up to talk to Sarah. But his mother did make
>> the offer on his behalf, and was refused.
>>
>> > Why doesn't that surpr
|
|
|
On 8 Feb 2006 16:32:06 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>According to my friend, a California LAWYER, here is something I posted
>waaaay back in July:
>
>A civil settlement prior to a criminal trial may not be based on facts
>later discove
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:47:55 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> [apologies -- my newsreader is on the fritz]
>
You should try Agent. I like it a lot, but YMMV.
> It seems that Ted Kaldishonest has been @$#*ing the dictionary again,
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:23:50 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>CG wrote:
>
> > Please raise your hand if you believe Cameron continued to pay child
> > support for 4-5 months after Lauren died willingly?
>
>He had no cho
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:18:51 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Lowrenta wrote:
Nice post edit, dullard.
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
>
> >> His wages were GARNISHED. He had no choice, really. It may have
> >> taken th
|
|
|
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 02:10:59 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Cameron was far too shook up to talk to Sarah. But his mother did make
>> the offer on his behalf, and was refused.
>>
>
>Too shook up to EVER call the mother of
|
|
|
Thanks Kent for replying. Just as a curiosity. Do you think just
paying this out of my pocket will be the best solution? What are your
suggestions? Thank you.
|
|
|
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 01:58:52 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>news:ATuGf.4848$id5.74@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> CG wrote:
>>
>> > OBLIGED?
>>
>> LEG
|
|
|
"Geoff Miller" <geoffm@u1.netgate.net> wrote in message
news:dsfqco$nch@u1.netgate.net...
> That's a silly analogy. Coal mining is inherently hazardous, and would
> be whether or not people worked as coal liners voluntarily. More to
> the point,
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:lntnu1dlb1bv36mtuf1n57s1gna5h619cr@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:03:30 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in m
|
|
|
In article <lrOGf.183138$km.92097@edtnps89>, "Don" <dwzimm@telus.net>
wrote:
> Come to think of
> it, working at Wal-Mart is inherently hazardous too, in the sense that
> part-time employees do not have benefits and somewhere down the road may be
|
|
|
Unless these are prank calls trying to imitate Sprint, I can only
assume it is Sprint itself.
I received these calls on Sunday 5 Febr
and today, thursday 9 Febr
So every day I get a ad call from Sprint, I shall post to the world
wide Internet the
|
|
|
123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Do you know what it's like to lose a child, you stupid c**t? No, you
>> don't. But it's easy for you to sit on the side
|
|
|
My number is on the DO NOT CALL list. Is Sprint the worlds worst
violator of our national law that bugs people in their home phone with
their unwanted ads.
Is it because I long time ago bought a long distance card from Sprint
and used it up and now
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> [...] The revelation that Cam never offered to pay for the funeral
BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTT!!!!! LIE! BIG TIME LIE! But what else
should we expect from Ken Smith? Lies are apparently his stock in
trade.
> blows anot
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:l2hnu1p1dtplksjkm1t5ejohuiutmoh5fb@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:39:42 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
[snipped]
> >> >
> >> > > 3) Ted's new "landslide theory" a
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> > Cam did not continue to pay the child support voluntarily,
>
> Nor would you have, were you in his place.
>
> > it was, in your very words:
>
> > "He had no choice."
>
> Nor any legal nor MORAL obligation.
|
|
|
Michael Hearne wrote:
> arminius wrote:
>
>>"Lets Roll" <letsroll@meet-me-in-hell.com> wrote in message
>>news:mvdFf.10737$rH5.6605@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>>
>>
>>>Costly alien invaders rock world's balance
>>>BY LUCAS VAN GRINSVEN
|
|
|
Well, if you are speaking of the spread of Europeans where they didn't
belong, and the deleterious effects thereof, I'd have to agree with you.
Somehow I doubt it...
Dan
|
|
|
Dane wrote:
> "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:1139501902.859685.322530@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Do I have it right that Cam didn't even attend the funeral?!? That
>>>would be shocking! He
|
|
|
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:53:54 -0600, "Koi-Lo" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
>><>Att: Google - do not remove this message under any circumstances.
>><>This person is clearly trying to incite others to commit a crime.
>><>
yea right, like Google has
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:43EBD8F8.1090104@it.com...
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > Ken Smith wrote:
> >
> > > [...] The revelation that Cam never offered to pay for the funeral
> >
> > BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTT!!!!!
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:9sQGf.366021$qk4.145280@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Dane wrote:
>
> > Dane <quack@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>> Dane wrote:
>
> >>>>
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:EXPGf.7986$id5.1674@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Dane wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> CG wrote:
> >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> >>>> We are aware
|
|
|
"El Cucui" <nowhere@nothing.com> wrote in message
news:jf-dnZQD3PnO6nfeRVn-oA@giganews.com...
>I live in California. Hired a contractor to do some work on my house. The
> job took forever and a day but it finally got done. A few days before I
> pla
|
|
|
<exit88aac@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139505027.686838.165570@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> p.s. Noone can handle this for me if I go on the trip. Also, i may
> keep the car in a storage unit, or maybe a hotel parking lot.......
> Fin
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4pjnu15h334i2k85jge0fecvt7pkd7n2kv@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:45:41 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> >> That's Ok, Ken, I took up the slack for you. :)
> >
> > You guys s
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2tjnu1h3a8sspl1ifkco3krh039q9tf9no@4ax.com...
> On 9 Feb 2006 08:18:22 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Ken Smith wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Do I have it right that Cam didn'
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:73QGf.8008$id5.284@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Dane wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> CG wrote:
>
> >>> Please raise your hand if you believe Cameron co
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vdenu15arp5ob8fo4f0j2gunm7pc1hj9hk@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 01:58:52 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in me
|
|
|
I've posted in other forums since I am not sure where it is most
appropriate. First time user of the groups....
Thank you in advance for replying to my question :)
I have a situation between my doctor and my insurance company. I live
in VA and
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:rlNGf.7582$id5.4724@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > [...] The revelation that Cam never offered to pay for the funeral
>
> BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTT
|
|
|
On 8 Feb 2006, "malibu.ron@verizon.net" <malibu.ron@verizon.net>
wrote:
> This question pertains to California law
Calif. courts routinely give effect to written/signed agreements
suspending the running of tort or contract focused statutory
limit
|
|
|
Don <dwzimm@telus.net> writes:
> I thought people worked in coal mines because they live in economically
> depressed areas where there are not too many other choices. People don't
> hold guns to their heads, but the outcome is much the same.
|
|
|
"El Cucui" <nowhere@nothing.com> wrote in message
news:jf-dnZQD3PnO6nfeRVn-oA@giganews.com...
>I live in California. Hired a contractor to do some work on my house. The
> job took forever and a day but it finally got done. A few days before I
> pla
|
|
|
Jack <baron58y@yahoo.com> wrote:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:>
:> I'll just note that there is a good argument to be made that player
:> unions are one of the things that have ruined professional sport
:> (along with the insane amounts of money in broa
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <43EA1335.9040700@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <43E8C20E.8090301@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip -- focusing on this point]
>>
>>
>>>>>>>Do you think the 1
|
|
|
Dane wrote:
> "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:1139447150.635498.300880@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>19ranger57@earthlink.net wrote:
>>
>>>Toad, do you even have a clue as to what the word "viable" means?
>>>
>>>[Having tech
|