Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Koi-Lo admits she lies was Re: Regarding our trolls TROLL ALERT
TROLL ALERT Please remove all irrelevant NGs such as pond and aquaria groups from this jabber thread. Don't be his unwitting helper in ruining other NGs through cross-posting noise. Thanks............ ============================ "WhiteSkull" <


Re: At the Risk of Being Redundant - Re: CIVIL TRIALS WRONGFUL DEATH
On 10 Feb 2006 08:49:25 -0800, "CG" <realcountrygirl@hotmail.com> wrote: >Obviously Sarah wasn't in this for the money. Ted likes to trash Sarah >when it's convenient for him, yet he concedes Sarah did not have her >attorney negotiate a bigger sett


Re: Ken Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Reputation (such as it is) -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
n Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:25:54 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> These couple of points here need a little more elabouration: > > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>> 5) If


Re: Does Walmart discriminate against poor neighborhoods?
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:04:59 GMT, "Don" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote: >"Bob Ward" <bobward@email.com> wrote in message >news:17dou1tdrmc0p3rscv3m3hf3v27up7704t@4ax.com... > >> Perhaps not required, but they DO offer benefits: >> http://www.walmartfact


Re: Koi-Lo admits she lies was Re: Regarding our trolls
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:32:21 -0500, WhiteSkull <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote: >Koi-Lo wrote: >> <mike_noren2002@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:1139575581.023672.124470@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >> > Koi-Lo wrote: >> > >>


Re: Kaldis Kan't Klaim Kam Ain't a Kreep
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:17:14 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote: >Dane wrote: >> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:2tjnu1h3a8sspl1ifkco3krh039q9tf9no@4ax.com... >> >>>On 9 Feb 2006 08:18:22 -0800, "RetzQ" <loret


Re: Ted SCREAMING will not change the FACTS
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Lowrenta wrote: > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>> [...] The revelation that Cam never offered to pay for the funeral > > >> BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTT!!!!! LIE! BIG TIME LIE! But what


Re: Ted Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Sorry Bro-in-Law -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > [...] > > >>> and there was never any suspicion that she decided to take a running > >>> start to take a flying leap off a 40-meter high cli


Re: Protecting screenplay ideas
I'm curious as to why in the United States an unopened registered letter is considered usless? My Grandfather was a member of ASCAP. He and his orchastra arranged music for silent movies during the depression, worked for "RKO Radio Station", Ted Fio


Re: Protecting screenplay ideas
I'm curious as to why in the United States an unopened registered letter is considered usless? My Grandfather was a member of ASCAP. He and his orchastra arranged music for silent movies during the depression, worked for "RKO Radio Station", Ted Fio


Verbal notice - "not taken seriously"
Hello I am a British guy living in Cali and am unfamiliar with federal/state/local laws regarding property rentals, particularly with regard to notice. I am trying to give some advice to a friend but am a bit useless coz the rules in the UK obvio


Let's Play "GUESS THE WORDS BEHIND KALDISEASED'S ASTERICKS!"
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> But I can see what kind of person you are -- and it was already plainly > >> evident long before you ever commented on this case. > > > She's a sharp-looking blonde > > Psuh. I wouldn't f*** her with your d***.


Re: Protecting screenplay ideas


BUSH'S BOGUSITY
Intel pros say Bush is lying about foiling 2002 terror attack By DOUG THOMPSON 10 Feb 06 Outraged intelligence professionals say President George W. Bush is "cheapening" and "politicizing" their work with claims the United States foiled a planned te


Re: Ken Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Reputation (such as it is) -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
Dane wrote: > LMAO!!!!!! [...] I don't know what for. I am intimately acquainted with the situation. You are not. What is it that you think you know that I have missed? -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net


Re: Ken Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Sorry Hind End -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: [...] >>> and there was never any suspicion that she decided to take a running >>> start to take a flying leap off a 40-meter high cliff. >> Nor has there been any well-fo


Re: L.A. Stops Naming Police Officers Involved in Shooting
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote: > =BFm=FF=A7t=EB=AE=A6@n? wrote: > > In talk.politics.guns laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE > > <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >Have to protect those killer cops. > > > > > >http://www.newsday


Re: Ken Smith: Mendaciously Prevaricating Like There's No Tomorrow!
Wayne Delia wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> You don't have ANYTHING to add. SO SHUT THE F*** UP!!! > Ted's jesus says "Vanna, I'd like to buy a vowel." I once saw a bumper sticker in Australia: G_ F_CK Y__RS_LF Would You


Re: Loretta SCREAMING will not change the FACTS
Lowrenta wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> [...] The revelation that Cam never offered to pay for the funeral >> BBBZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTTTT!!!!! LIE! BIG TIME LIE! But what else >> should we expect from Ken Sm


Re: Bush vs. Gore: the triumph of Scholasticism?
Ken Smith wrote: > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote: > > Bush v. Gore, the 2000 decision that decided the first election of the > > current President, was the application of the US 14th Amendment > > formally, as opposed to substantively, in the Florida


Re: Some Questions in Palos Verdes
Dane wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Dane wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Cameron was far too shook up to talk to Sarah. But his mother did >>>> make the offer on his behalf, and was refused. >>> Too shook up to EVER cal


Re: Ted Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Baby-Kililn' Bro-In-Law -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> These couple of points here need a little more elabouration: > > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>> 5) If you presume (as Ted has asserted in the past, > > >> [Te


Re: Does Walmart discriminate against poor neighborhoods?
"Bob Ward" <bobward@email.com> wrote in message news:17dou1tdrmc0p3rscv3m3hf3v27up7704t@4ax.com... > Perhaps not required, but they DO offer benefits: > http://www.walmartfacts.com/newsdesk/wal-mart-fact-sheets.aspx#a26 > Health Care Coverage > Fa


Re: Ken Smith: Mendaciously Prevaricating Like There's No Tomorrow!
Kent Wills wrote: > On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:11:03 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >>>Do I have it right that Cam didn't even attend the funeral?!? >> >>No, you DON'T have it right. Cam was BARRED from attending the fune


Re: Ken Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Reputation (such as it is) -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
en Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> These couple of points here need a little more elabouration: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> 5) If you presume (as Ted has asserted in the past, >> [Ted has never asserted this.] >>> and iirc,


Re: Kaldis Kan't Klaim Kam Ain't a Kreep
Dane wrote: > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:2tjnu1h3a8sspl1ifkco3krh039q9tf9no@4ax.com... > >>On 9 Feb 2006 08:18:22 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >> >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>>> Do I have it right that C


More Unsubstantiated Rumors of Cam Brown's Devotion
According to one of the anonymous mutts at the kennel, Kamoron and Krazy Patty Kaldis filed for full custody of Lauren? Is this true? If so, I hope they got their money back from the shyster lawyer who took it. I don't believe it, and have never f


Re: last nights car accident...I'm new at this
The adjuster said she's paying for the accident; and i get a rental car. That was fast. Some things i learned as a newbie: (1) It's not always worth calling the police, and not required. In this case, it wasted an hour of my time waiting for the


Re: Ken Smith: Mendaciously Prevaricating Like There's No Tomorrow!
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > You don't have ANYTHING to add. SO SHUT THE F*** UP!!! Ted's jesus says "Vanna, I'd like to buy a vowel." WMD


Re: Need definition of debt and my responsiblities
"NEEDEF" <kalvin.b.lee@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1139533825.523989.323790@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > I've posted in other forums since I am not sure where it is most > appropriate. First time user of the groups.... > > > Thank you


Koi-Lo admits she lies was Re: Regarding our trolls
Koi-Lo wrote: > <mike_noren2002@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:1139575581.023672.124470@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Koi-Lo wrote: > > > >> But trolling itself is not against > >> the law > > > > That is not necessarily true any more.


Re: Muhammad is famous so famous people get cartoons about them~
'yop" = "you"


Re: Muhammad is famous so famous people get cartoons about them~
Oh i get it.. it doesn't matter because it doesn'T matter to yop. And since it doesn't matter to you, it doesn't matter. So why isn't it resolved by now?


Re: Muhammad is famous so famous people get cartoons about them~
Ae you saying that famous is as famous gets? You hollywood apologist you.


Re: Protecting screenplay ideas
In article <1139604672.663153.169940@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "candi" <nebsnitz@gmail.com> writes: >CJ, This is for you. > >>Write your ideas down on paper >>seal the envelope with tape >>sign over the tape and envelope >>go to the post office


Re: The REAL Character of Rancho Palos Verdes
Kent Wills wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:28:14 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >>These couple of points here need a little more elabouration: >>Ken Smith wrote: [snip] >>Ken doesn't understand what the appeal of


Re: Ted Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Baby-Killin' Bro-In-Law's Neck (was Re: The REAL Character of Rancho Palos Verdes
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> These couple of points here need a little more elabouration: > > Even in Aus, they don't spell "elaboration" that way (see, e.g., > http://econrsss.anu.edu.au/pdf/dawkins1.pdf). Spare us the ab


Re: Ken Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Reputation (such as it is) -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:K25Hf.10611$id5.9399@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > LMAO!!!!!! [...] > > I don't know what for. I am intimately acquainted with the situation. > Yo


Re: Protecting screenplay ideas
CJ, This is for you. >Write your ideas down on paper >seal the envelope with tape >sign over the tape and envelope >go to the post office and send it "REGISTERED" to yourself >Do not open it >Put it in a safe place >This is for your personal pr


Re: YouTube == Napster 2006
Google Beta User wrote: > Yup. > > It's been 'under the radar' so far, but it's blowing up. > > It'll probably become a pay-service type of community. > > But something else will come up, just as KazAA came about while Napster > was being shut d


Ted's Hypocrisy only Exceeded by his Mendacity
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > Because it would have been CAM'S MONEY paying for the funeral. Triple hearsay. Indamissible. Coming from you, not even credible. > > > Considering the animosity Cam held for his mother, > > What "animosity"? Th


Re: YouTube == Napster 2006
Yup. It's been 'under the radar' so far, but it's blowing up. It'll probably become a pay-service type of community. But something else will come up, just as KazAA came about while Napster was being shut down.


Re: YouTube == Napster 2006
it wont be around for long


YouTube == Napster 2006
C. In connection with User Submissions, you further agree that you will not: (i) submit material that is copyrighted, protected by trade secret or otherwise subject to third party proprietary rights, including privacy and publicity rights, unless yo


Re: Ken Will Say ANYTHING To Save His Reputation (such as it is) -- But He's ALREADY Lost!
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:m83Hf.10296$id5.3317@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis selected which issues he wanted to address, ignored some very important ques


Re: Kaldis Kan't Klaim Kam Ain't a Kreep
"Wayne Delia" <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote in message news:e03Hf.15$0s.12@trndny04... > Dane wrote: > > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:2tjnu1h3a8sspl1ifkco3krh039q9tf9no@4ax.com... > > > >>On 9 Feb 2006 08:18:22 -0800,


Re: The REAL Character of Rancho Palos Verdes
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:28:14 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >These couple of points here need a little more elabouration: > >Ken Smith wrote: > > > 5) If you presume (as Ted has asserted in the past, > >[Ted has never


Re: More Blather From Whack-Job Ken Smith
n Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:48:52 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:l2hnu1p1dtplksjkm1t5ejohuiutmoh5fb@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:39:42 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.co


Re: Bush vs. Gore: the triumph of Scholasticism?
spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote: > Bush v. Gore, the 2000 decision that decided the first election of the > current President, was the application of the US 14th Amendment > formally, as opposed to substantively, in the Florida recount. > > Some might s


Re: Kaldis Now an Eggspert on Child Support
On 9 Feb 2006 18:56:48 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> >> > Cam did not continue to pay the child support voluntarily, >> >> Nor would you have, were you in his place. >> >> > it was, in your very w