misc.legal

Larry wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Larry wrote: >>> Theodore A.Kaldis wrote: >>>> Larry wrote: >>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>> I don't think they're going to manage to convict this innocent >>>>>> person. And I don't think they

Hi all, I had an accident last July (05), where I stopped short, and hit the car in front. The hit was very light, I barely left a mark on the cars bumper in front of me. We exchanged details, and all that, however, when I was inspecting the dama

RetzQ wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >> While I definitely prefer brunettes (reference Lindsay's >>picture if you need proof), she does look good for a blond. And the >>years have been good to her. >> They've been REAL good to Lin, but that's a topic

Kent Wills wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:30:45 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >>Dane wrote: >> >> >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> >>>>Dane wrote: >>>> >>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Wayne De

Deadrat wrote: > <wdoe999@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1140155463.789408.12830@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Thanks for the replies. It seems most are similar, see below for > > comments. > > > > Deadrat wrote: > > > <wdoe999@yahoo.c

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:06:13 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> Why should I lie? > >> Good question. > >Indeed. Ergo, I'm not lying. Nice snipping. You could

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:02:29 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> [The same thing twice] > >>> Do you like repeating yourself? > >> *YOU* certa

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:04:17 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> [...] you have most certainly libelled Det. Leslie, accusing him of >> commission of a felony. > >No I didn't. Jeff Leslie LIED to the

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:57:52 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>>> I suspect Ted was real

You (and others) keep repeating "outcomes matter" with no reason why they matter. I'm human, and I also have the knee-jerk reaction of thinking that someone intent on murder has done something "worse" if he succeeds. But we need to protect people fro

NYC XYZ wrote: > Hooray -- even if I do have an acquaintance in the Bronx office. > > http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/16/nyregion/16suit.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Intriguing. It's time that we finally did away with the abomination of judicial and

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:55:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Lowrenta wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> >>>>I'M HAVING YOU ON, YOU SOD! >>> >>>You're "having us on" you sod, about Cam Brown being pre

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:43:13 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >"The Great" Dane wrote: Oh great, now Dane's ego is going to inflate to such a size that there will be no dealing with him. Oh well. To help keep him in c

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:34:38 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Lowrenta wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> I'M HAVING YOU ON, YOU SOD! > >> You're "having us on" you sod, about Cam Brown being prettier than me,

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:30:45 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Dane wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Dane wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Wayne Delia wrote: >>>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>

Larry wrote: > In article <1140064191.887491.17290@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > wdoe999@yahoo.com wrote: > > > I notice that criminal charges always seemed to be based on the random > > outcome of a crime rather than the act itself. How could

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:21:16 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: > >>>> So far most of what Ken has discussed is accurate since it comes >>>>

mcook@prodigy.net wrote: > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote: > > Quit your whining. You knew that you were making up the facts, and you > got caught. Instead of debating the issue, you started with this BS. > > You lost, get over it. You claim to be

Thanks for the replies. It seems most are similar, see below for comments. Deadrat wrote: > <wdoe999@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1140064191.887491.17290@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > I notice that criminal charges always seemed to be

The Department of Homeland Security and the NCSA are making predictions for 2006: http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/02/internet-crime-predictions-for-2006.html

arminius wrote: > > So when wages drop to $9.00 an hour American truck drivers will simply find > higher paying jobs. it takes a while to get over something you have invested time in no matter who you are and what you lost yep You can tell t

Damn. Have you ever heard of spell check...or propwe grammar? william greathouse wrote: > you know thay get raped not from how thay dress thats only a littel part > of it thay get raped and killed bye guys that went over the ege why did the > g

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>Why should I lie? > >>Good question. [Whether it is attempting to deceive with your absurd >>Aussie affect or lies about your alcohol consumption, you seem to spew

According to the Web sites from California criminal defense attorneys and observation of many murder trials (and, like Dane, many books on true-crime), the defense strategy QUOTE "is a product of a defendant and defense attorney fitting together the

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > >>[...] you have most certainly libelled Det. Leslie, accusing him of >>commission of a felony. > > No I didn't. Jeff Leslie LIED to the Grand Jury when he said he found > only a few photographs

Blow me, Virginia. "Galileo Been" <galileo_been@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1140093586.577358.245840@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... ~> constant blithering <~

>I notice that criminal charges always seemed to be based on the random >outcome of a crime rather than the act itself. The outcome is not entirely random but has to do with many of the details of the act itself. >How could the legal >community

Paul Nutteing wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4720328.stm > Mr Burnham said the figures showed there was a "clear public > benefit" to keeping the samples and the existing policy was > justified. > > "Inclusion on the database does n

California has enacted a lot of legislation on identity theft. One part of this legislation requires that corporations disclose the theft of personal information from databases to their customers. Other similiar laws are being considered and have been

x-no-archive: yes I thought there was a 7 year limit, under DPA? They seemed keen to bin (possibly incriminating) stuff, relating to the Soham murder..

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:MB%If.29$uV6.14@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com... > >> I notice that criminal charges always seemed to be based on the random > >> outcome of a crime rather than the act itself. How could the legal

"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:oj0Jf.20837$7y1.1994@tornado.texas.rr.com... > No. At most, Cheney was negligent, so the statute would not apply. > > Is criminally negligent, by definition, different from negligent? ----== Po

"Candy Ellison" <candyvbtv@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:x7aJf.64856$bF.50418@dukeread07... > Damn. Have you ever heard of spell check...or propwe grammar? > > > william greathouse wrote: > > you know thay get raped not from how thay dress th

"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1140141523_1409@sp6iad.superfeed.net... > > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message > news:x-437DEF.20294416022006@news.east.earthlink.net... > > In article <43F5114D.5FB6910E@worldnet.att.net>, >

"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-437DEF.20294416022006@news.east.earthlink.net... > In article <43F5114D.5FB6910E@worldnet.att.net>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > > Larry wrote: > > > > > Theodore A. Kaldis

"Wayne Delia" <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote in message news:b28Jf.2838$U2.1@trndny08... > Kent Wills wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:30:45 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > > > > >>Dane wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Th

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:gev9v19rtqt5crsndc2lml3iv3lbfmp6ao@4ax.com... > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:43:13 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >"The Great" Dane wrote: > > Oh great, now Dane'

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:43F49AA3.CE537534@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Dane wrote: > >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>> Wayne Delia wrote: > >>>>> Theodore

Short answer: No. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Why should I lie? > Good question. Indeed. Ergo, I'm not lying. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Ken Smith wrote: > [...] you have most certainly libelled Det. Leslie, accusing him of > commission of a felony. No I didn't. Jeff Leslie LIED to the Grand Jury when he said he found only a few photographs of Cameron with Lauren. In fact, he fou

"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:QsQIf.15907$UN2.1468@tornado.texas.rr.com... > > "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message > news:u9JIf.18875$CZ4.13424@trnddc05... >> "Reggie" <rdupard@nospam.com> wrote in message >> news:ZdDIf

"A Veteran for Peace" <georgek@humboldt1.com> wrote in message news:georgek-E242E3.04541916022006@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net... > If you die and there are no relatives, no will and you own property. > what happens to that prop.? The property goes

"Travis Jordan" <no.one@no.net> wrote in message news:pLOIf.104059$0Z6.96932@fe01.news.easynews.com... > JethroUK© wrote: > > company want to close my local dept (converting it to more office > > space) - they offered me a transfer to another dept

My father recently passed away and his will stated that his estate should be divided equally between my brother and me. My brother was appointed as the executor of the estate based on my fathers wishes. He did not have a trust set up so it is my unders

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:dt229r$74g@rac1.wam.umd.edu... > In article <11v92919flvn70a@corp.supernews.com>, > Don Staples <dstaples@livingston.net> wrote: >> >>"GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia" <gw@hotmail.com> wrote i

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >> > >>>>[The same thing twice] >>> >>>Do you like repeating yourself? >> >>*YOU* certainly do, ANUStasous. > > And you call ME a "stalker"???