|
|
"Phil" <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in message
news:i2upv1hvcj9u9fv4emv13s2gjjh6f9kjk5@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:44:19 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
> <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>>It's not enough that he lied his way
>>i
|
|
|
It's not enough that he lied his way
into Iraq.
Now he wants to go after Iran.
If you had a chance to kill sHitler
in 1939, would you have done it?
Should someone take on Bu$h?
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0geqv1t2kvd1se4rjqrlk4lupkkjulaglr@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:40:20 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"CG" <realcountrygirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >
|
|
|
Paul Robinson wrote:
> Ray Gordon wrote:
>
>>> The idea that someone is going to be 'fooled' into breaking a law is
>>> nothing short of an outright insult on the intelligence and integrity
>>> of the reader.
>>
>>
>> When people are encourag
|
|
|
"Smiler" <youmustbe@joking.com> wrote in message
news:9d7Lf.43094$K42.26133@newsfe7-win.ntli.net...
>
> "Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
> news:1d812$43fbd976$18d64cf6$29277@KNOLOGY.NET...
> >
<snip>
> >
> > So incarc
|
|
|
"RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1140653597.937212.322600@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks, Dane. You always have the greatest LINKS!
>
You are welcome.
I'll try to start sharing more of them, then, as I find them.
|
|
|
An alternative would be for her to keep the accounts in her name, but make
them POD (Pay On Death) accounts and naming you and your sister as the
payees on death. There is a difference between naming you AND your sister
versus you OR your sister.
|
|
|
The car was believed to be a Volvo with blue lights in its radiator
grill.
Would anybody please tell me what does the last two words "radiator
grill" mean?
Which part of the car is?
|
|
|
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140658625_551@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:43FB8B39.A720EEDA@worldnet.att.net...
> > Dane wrote:
> >
> > > Theodore A. K
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:22:03 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Bill Rabkin wrote:
>
>> He's in jail because there's enough evidence to take this trial,
>
>Even though the "evidence" is manufactured. (Maybe you haven't be
|
|
|
pinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> > > > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> > > > > > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > > mc
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:18:40 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Dane wrote:
>
>>>> [ snip hollow howl ]
>
>>>> [ snip some bald faced allegations ]
>
>>> So sue me.
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:38:53 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Dane wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Dane wrote:
>>>> Theodore A.Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Lowrenta wrote:
>>>>>> Theodore A.Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>>> Ken
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:35:04 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> [the sort of mendacious prevarications that Ken always writes]
>
>Looks like Ken has REALLY lost it this time. I guess the Colorado Bar
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:52:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> If you simply went away, interest in the Camoron Brown murder trial
>would dry up in this NG. It will probably continue on Loretta's blog,
>but that's where things like this bel
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:50:30 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:49:20 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>[re: the Autopsy Report]
>>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
|
|
|
n Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:18:04 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:34:25 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:48:12 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
|
|
|
"CG" <realcountrygirl@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1140662877.140335.213650@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> It is 99% certain that Lauren landed in the inlet below the corner of
> IP nearest the archery range. Had she landed on the rock form
|
|
|
That Is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO COOL!
When's the movie coming out?
"J.Harold Rutabaga" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:86749dd6156627d032242f5668556265@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> BREAKING NEWS. Cheney/Libby compromises
|
|
|
Actually, Geragos suggested she took a running leap (trip):
Additionally, Dr Hayes did not conduct any experiments to determind the
trajectory of a child the same height and weight as Lauren tripping off
the cliff while running towards the edge.
(
|
|
|
mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> > mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> > > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> > > > > spinoza1111@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > > mcook@prodigy.net wrote:
> > > > > > > Ken
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>The idea that someone is going to be 'fooled' into breaking a law is
>>nothing short of an outright insult on the intelligence and integrity of
>>the reader.
>
> When people are encouraged to believe lies posted by a third pa
|
|
|
"Smiler" <youmustbe@joking.com> wrote in message
news:9d7Lf.43094$K42.26133@newsfe7-win.ntli.net...
> A paedophile molests a child, then thinks "I might as well kill the child,
> I can't get a longer sentence for murder than molestation. They're bo
|
|
|
"Smiler" <youmustbe@joking.com> wrote in message
news:Ik7Lf.15754$bw1.3439@newsfe2-win.ntli.net...
>
> "Koi-Lo" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> For some reason those who try to protect the pedophiles always minimize
>> the damage th
|
|
|
"RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1140653770.797084.305190@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> And I will be posting about the trial when it starts. I will have
> updates, analysis, court documents, summaries of testimony, and any
> ev
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
[snip]
>>>>>>They're not what killed her.
>>>>>
>>>>>But they DO relate to how she fell. And they UNDERMINE the
>>>>>"expert's" assertions.
>>>>
>>>>Do they?
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>
>>Not from where
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Bill Rabkin wrote:
>
>
>>He's in jail because there's enough evidence to take this trial,
>
> Even though the "evidence" is manufactured. (Maybe you haven't been
> paying attention.)
We have been. We just don'
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
[snip]
>>>>>The arrest was only made possible by the MANUFACTURED "expert's"
>>>>>report that the PROSECUTOR arranged for. And the charges were
>>>>>brought only after PERJURED testimony was presen
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>
>>>>[the sort of mendacious prevarications that Ken always writes]
>>>
>>>Looks like Ken has REALLY lost it this time.
>>
>>Wassamatta, Teddums?
|
|
|
Even many people who voted for Bush think he's a lousy president.
Harriet Miers. Fema mess. Now this deal.
Bush is not a conservative. I think he has a screw loose. Still
better than Kerry/Gore.
|
|
|
am Bam wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:34:25 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:48:12 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> [betwixt us]
>>
>>>>>>>>I don't see homosexuality as inherently wrong,
|
|
|
I'm sure the ban is welcomed by fetuses. However even with the current
Scotus, I think this would be shot down 6-3 or 7-2.
|
|
|
Sometime in the 80's or 90's the SSN became required, I thought this
was stupid and wrote my senator, he politely told me I was screwed.
|
|
|
If something is sent to you that you did not order, you can keep it.
Did you order this thing and they screwed up the price ?
The deliverer is probably on thin ice coming onto your property to take
something BACK.
|
|
|
Blogger is full of #@($, IMO, but I'm not a lawyer. As long as you are
clearly not pretending to be the other person you may be ok under 'fair
use', that is, you're showing the site in order to criticize it.
(Look up 'fair use', I'm zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:55:41 GMT, "Dan Grimes" <dgrimes@aol.com>
wrote:
>
>"Phil" <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in message
>news:i2upv1hvcj9u9fv4emv13s2gjjh6f9kjk5@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:44:19 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
>> <anonym
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:58opv19gp00ujjtcs9hm95ci62ljdsdqin@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:38:53 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Dane wrote:
> >
> >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:43FB8B39.A720EEDA@worldnet.att.net...
> Dane wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>>> Dane wrote:
>
> >>>> All that B
|
|
|
After this I will bow out, there is obviously no possible way for me to
say any thing that would sway Mr. Smith's stance, nor will he say any
thing to change mine. I am not upset, I never was. I have just been
attempting to do my job as a Christian. I
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Larry wrote:
[...]
>>>>>> So how did the lacerations get there? Did they just appear
>>>>>> spontaneously?
>>>>> Who cares?
>>>> The court.
>>> Why? Of what legal significance are they?
|
|
|
The New York Times, The Daily News, and The New York Post have all
condemned this deal as a major threat to national security.
Port Security Humbug
The Washington Post
February 22, 2006
YOU KNOW THERE'S something suspicious going on when multiple
|
|
|
Bill Rabkin wrote:
> He's in jail because there's enough evidence to take this trial,
Even though the "evidence" is manufactured. (Maybe you haven't been
paying attention.)
> because Cam has waived his speedy trial rights,
There was a bit of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Dane wrote:
>>> [ snip hollow howl ]
>>> [ snip some bald faced allegations ]
>> So sue me.
> Why bother? We're having too much fun laughing at your ridiculous
> whingeing.
Yes, people i
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> [the sort of mendacious prevarications that Ken always writes]
>> Looks like Ken has REALLY lost it this time.
> Wassamatta, Teddums? Can't deal with everyone taking turns
|
|
|
I like Bush and respect him. I have supported all his controversial
initiatives. He has gone bonkers over this port deal. There is no
logical reason to threaten safety by handing ports over to an Arab
company. Bush needs to wake up. All the Repu
|
|
|
In article <1140659712.825103.85640@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> richard1969@usa.com writes:
>Who was driving the car? You or the company?
>Let's say you are on business driving a company provided car and get
>involved in an accident.
>The company is
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:44:19 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>It's not enough that he lied his way
>into Iraq.
>
>Now he wants to go after Iran.
>
>If you had a chance to kill sHitler
>in 1939, would you ha
|
|
