misc.legal

Ken Smith wrote: > Ted's position is that you shouldn't be having sex ... because, God > knows, he (http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/TED_AUS.jpg) > certainly isn't! Because God proscribes it out of wedlock. (Certainly NOT because of anyt

spartakus@my-deja.com wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Good! It's about freakin' time! > It sorta figures that Teddles "Tireiron" KKKaldis Personal invective noted. It's what one resorts to when he is unable to substantively refute

Jack Bauers Spunky Sidekick Ian J. Ball wrote: > I've always had a hard time understanding the anti-abortion position. Perhaps this website might help you: <http://tinyurl.com/9xxwy> Check it out and get back to me. -- Theodore A. Kaldi

MacGirl wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> The WHACK-JOB was asked to submit to a psychological examination by >>> the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board, after all. > There are a lot of factors that would require a psyc

<idiotcollins@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1140902958.505361.287190@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... > > www.hallsux.com > > What options do I have? TIA > > BC > That would depend on who you are. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Un

n Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:31:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Sam Bam wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:49:54 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >>>>> [snipping for brevity] > >>>>>>We have scripture to reference. >>>>> >>>>> That and a

Byron Rhodes wrote: > The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by Darrell A. Larose > are on a mission to shut down http://www.FreeSpeechStore.com but they > will never succeed. FSS is a site where all are free to express their > viewpoints,

[I'm top posting here because I just have this one thing to say-] Larry, that was very well stated, and informative as well. "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-B7BD54.19501225022006@news.east.earthlink.net... > In article <4400AB0A.433FB0F

am Bam wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:49:54 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>>> [snipping for brevity] >>>>>We have scripture to reference. >>>> >>>> That and a dollar won't buy you a latte at Starbucks. >>> >>>Or it will buy you a seat

jj wrote: > 2 mos ago I sold a 12 year old travel trailer. The buyer inquired and > I clearly stated that I had winterized the trailer myself as I had > done myself for the 9 years I owned it. 3 weeks after the sale the > buyer called me stating the c

In article <440117CB.9601D025@worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > Keeping virtual company with Ken is imminently better than keeping > > real-life company with a murderer > > "Murderer"? Excuse me? WHO are

Thelonius Q. Dorkbucket wrote: > Blow me, you pansy-ass butt-muncher. > > "Byron Rhodes" <byronrhodes@gmail.com> wrote in message > > ->me a big stoopid head<- Trying to mock American men doesn't work after you've been exposed trolling the DoD

Here's a really simple example. It didn't rain today. That's a negative. How do I prove that it didn't rain today? The grass is dry. There are no puddles. There isn't any water collected in garbage cans, etc. If it had rained, there would be evide

Larry wrote: > > I don't know what he's talking about or whether its true, but how do you > expect him to prove a negative? If I may butt in here. That is a specious argument. One can prove a negative. For example, if Ted really wanted to prove

On 25-Feb-2006, "Tammy" <danwin@vfemail.net> wrote: > > > I wouldn't want anyone I love having an abortion in Mexico. > > > > Perhaps. But coathangers and dubious drugs are worse. > > Yes, I have memories of a school mate found dead in a closet (

um IDK what happen. There was a error in my post. -- Johnny217818 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Johnny217818's Profile: http://www.slashlegal.com/member.php?userid=86 View this thread: http://www.slashlegal.c

Again my position is irresponsible teens should not be rewarded for their irresponsibility but punishing the teens also punishes the unborn who more often than not are treated like garbage instead of being loved and protected. The anti-abortionists fa

The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by Darrell A. Larose are on a mission to shut down http://www.FreeSpeechStore.com but they will never succeed. FSS is a site where all are free to express their viewpoints, no matter how controversial th

Early stage abortion (1st trimester) is not a pleasant thing, but I believe that it is totally a woman's choice and no one else's business. Late stage abortion (of which the website photo's showed) is not done lightly, by anyone. The only acceptable

In article <RV5Mf.8079$Zw.5144@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Ted's position is that you shouldn't be having sex ... because, God > > knows, he (http://home.ea

no worries. You can sue the father under the theory of "promissory estoppel," that is: 1) he made a promise to you 2) you relied on that promise 3) he backed out on the promise causing you financial harm Writing a bad check is not a crime! If the

In article <x-377FF5.20093825022006@news.east.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > > If an evaluation were truly necessary, one would have been administered > > whether or not he wished it. > > It was truly necessary for him to get his law lic

Hello, i'm just looking to understand this type of licence.. as far as i understand, i can use a library under this licence as long i give away my source code also.. but what happen if i need to use a library under this licence for a commercial applica

Larry wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> But that doesn't impugn Dr. Hayes' testimony, If Ken says it doesn't, that means that it probably does. >> because he wasn't paid an exorbitant amount to reach a foregone >> conclusion, I still thi

n Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:49:54 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Sam Bam wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:21:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>>Sam Bam wrote: >>>>On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:00:16 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >>>

Ken Smith <forget@it.com> writes: >The Chief Instigator wrote: >> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> writes: >>>spartakus@my-deja.com wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>Good! It's about freakin' time! >>>>It sorta figures t

In article <cB5Mf.460746$qk4.164188@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > MacGirl wrote: > > > Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >>> The WHACK-JOB was asked to submit to

MacGirl wrote: > In article <43FFC907.2020806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > > >>>The WHACK-JOB was asked to submit to >>>a psychological examination by the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board, after >>>all. > > There are a lot of factor

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> writes: >spartakus@my-deja.com wrote: > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Good! It's about freakin' time! > > It sorta figures that Teddles "Tireiron" KKKaldis >Personal invective noted. It's

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> >>>>>You don't know what it's like to have friends and relatives call >>>>>and try to give you advice on the basis of the

All: Old hands here might remember legendary theist Net-KOOOOOK Theodore A. ("Toad Anus.") Kaldis (if you don't, reference the dossier below). It seems that he has a little bit of a family problem: It seems that Toad's brother-in-law, Cameron

2BCl...@gmail.com wrote: > It will take a miracle to get the republicans out, since they control > the electronic voting tabulation process. They can "win" every time no > matter what. True. The Democrats haven't been electable in a decade. Try no

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>> > >>>>>>[the sort of mendacious prevarications that Ken always writes] >>>>> >>>>>Looks like Ken ha

It will take a miracle to get the republicans out, since they control the electronic voting tabulation process. They can "win" every time no matter what.

Some asshole thinks he's Ben Matlock and knows all the answers and tricks. What you're doing is perfectly legal. Caller asks if "Mr. Smith is there". You reply that the person just left and that he may be in jail. That satisfies the callers questions.

If you were my kid, you'd be spanked, whipped, tarred and feathered then grounded for a year. Not to mention the loss of your cell phone. Ok dumbass, you learned a good lesson or two here. Keep your mouth shut about having stuff like porn on your cell

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> You don't know what it's like to have friends and relatives call >>>> and try to give you advice on the basis of these LIES. >>> Truly, an *INT

You sold the item in good working order to the best of your knowledge. 3 weeks later buyer calls and demands you pay for repairs? Bull#@($. There's no telling what the buyer did with it before he called. Had he called within a couple of days, yeah may

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >>>>The WHACK-JOB > > [Ken Smith] > >>>>was asked to submit to a psychological examination by the Colorado >>>>Bar Examiners' Board, after all. So

Dane wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>>> [the sort of mendacious prevarications that Ken always writes] >>>> Looks like Ken has REALLY lost it this time. >>> Wassa

Dane wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> The WHACK-JOB [Ken Smith] >>> was asked to submit to a psychological examination by the Colorado >>> Bar Examiners' Board, after all. >> [...] > I can't speak for anyone n

Dane wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> (And don't look for Geragos to make a big media circus out of this >> case -- he DOESN'T need to. It is a STRONG case for the defence as >> it is.) > But, Ted! You promised! Remember? What did I

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > spartakus@my-deja.com wrote: > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Good! It's about freakin' time! > > It sorta figures that Teddles "Tireiron" KKKaldis > Personal invective noted. And warranted. > It's what o

Check your local laws. In most communities if someone's tree is encroaching on your property, you have the right to trim the branches back to the property line. Likewise have the roots that are breaking up your driveway removed. Hopefully the tree w

Dane wrote: > If, as you allege, the Hayes Report and the topographical maps relied > upon by him, a fatally flawed: > Why in the hell are you hiding them? Because the case hasn't been tried yet. > If you will notice the in free ken marsh sit

On 24-Feb-2006, "Jack Bauers Spunky Sidekick Ian J. Ball" <ienjball@yahoo.com> wrote: > I wouldn't want anyone I love having an abortion in Mexico. Perhaps. But coathangers and dubious drugs are worse.

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: > > > [A load of BOLLOCKS (like Ken Smith usually does)] > > Dane, trying to figure out what the "H-bomb" is by reading what I wrote > in 2004 isn't going to get you there. The H-bomb is MUCH bigger now >

In the area I live, people are certainly arrested for writing NSF checks which they don't make good. It's called 'theft by check'. The ultimate responsibility lies with the person who issued the check, post dated or not. If the money's not in the b