|
|
I hope this complies with misc.legal laws and is legal.
Facts About Sexual Harassment. Amusing Video-Clip
http://www.jumpingpixels.com/harassment.html
regards, the defendant Hansi.
|
|
|
MacGirl wrote:
> In article <4401F5A2.2010603@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>> While I can't speak for anyone else here, I am certainly tired of
>>your pathetic, whiny act.
>
> Well, it's all your fault, Ken . . . we told you not
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:43:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snip to focus on this point]
>>>>>>>>>You even aspired to trade in and profit from such at one time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>We can only have a government of law
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:43:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snip]
>>>> Ask yourself this: Would you reasonably expect to get a fair hearing
>>>>before a judge who would lose his house if he ruled in your favor? And
|
|
|
It's called freespeech, you festering vat of pus. If you
don't like it, complain to your ISP and/or stay away from
my newsgroups. Hope this helps, you boring illiterate
trailer-dwelling troll. Have a nice day, you puppy-hurting
imbecile. Try to g
|
|
|
On 26 Feb 2006 12:07:11 -0600, Wm James
<wrjames.remove@spamreaper.org> in accordance with The Prophecy
scribed:
>On 25 Feb 2006 19:51:27 -0800, "Byron Rhodes" <byronrhodes@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by
|
|
|
Lowrenta wrote:
> [...] Even Cleveland in March (which is pretty crappy), [...]
Cleveland is ALWAYS "crappy". (Even Detroit is better, and Detroit is
NO prize.)
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
owrenta wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Lowrenta wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Say, weren't you supposed to be in Rio, enjoying Carnevalé right
>>>> now? What are you doing still here?
>>> How would you be privy to my itiner
|
|
|
Dan Holdsworth <dan1701usenet@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:slrne049l1.6ra.dan1701usenet@spc1-burn1-3-0-cust209.bagu.broadband.ntl.
com...
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:13:15 -0000, Paul Nutteing
> <nutteing@quickfindit.com>
> was popularly suppose
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:44:11 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:33:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:42:44 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:30:34 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:43:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:26:21 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>
|
|
|
n Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:42:02 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:50:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
|
|
|
John <John@spam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:46eh1qF9ko5aU1@individual.net...
>
> "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message
> news:46e58tFan5chU1@individual.net...
> >I watched the BBC program about this case broadcast
> > on 14 Fe
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:13:15 -0000, Paul Nutteing
<nutteing@quickfindit.com>
was popularly supposed to have said:
> I just wish I could be more thorough especially
> for co-ancestry factors but as much as I search
> this information its just not
|
|
|
Wife was issued a ticket for rolling thru a stopsign a 5mph. Ticket
was issued by a (smaller) town-of-xxxx officer with an appearance
date of Feb 13 2006. She appeared. They Didn't. The town offices
were closed in observance of Lincolns Birthday. She
|
|
|
In article <x-FD0D0C.22092226022006@news.east.earthlink.net>, Larry
<x@y.com> wrote:
> Intent? The best you can say for his intent is that he hoped she'd
> > fall.
That's my best guess, actually. But it's quite possible that when it
didn't happe
|
|
|
In article <x-FD0D0C.22092226022006@news.east.earthlink.net>, Larry
<x@y.com> wrote:
> > 2. According to the teachers at the preschool, Lauren was very upset
> > with having to go on a visit with her dad. She balked. She carried on.
> > The teachers
|
|
|
GHOUL-COW
FA-Q (sound it out) muah!
--
Mike from NH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike from NH's Profile: http://www.slashlegal.com/member.php?userid=88
View this thread: http://www.slashlegal.com/showt
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:48:44 -0600, "Tammy" <danwin@vfemail.net>
wrote:
>
><KenPisano> wrote in message
>news:nmc3029c9jqiqro41dmdubr9b19ls94rf4@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:46:08 -0600, "Tammy" <danwin@vfemail.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Earl
|
|
|
"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message
news:46e58tFan5chU1@individual.net...
>I watched the BBC program about this case broadcast
> on 14 Feb, 2006.
> Although I'd been aware of this case I'd not really
> taken any notice unti
|
|
|
Derek Potter <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:qsu302phae1s7jme70ogvhrc7vqfi51nol@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:03:01 -0000, "Paul Nutteing"
> <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote:
>
> >When this data didn't fit the other evidence
> >(Philip
|
|
|
<KenPisano> wrote in message
news:rqk4025vieah082ab9b0daeu99cpqn9q4t@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:48:44 -0600, "Tammy" <danwin@vfemail.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> ><KenPisano> wrote in message
> >news:nmc3029c9jqiqro41dmdubr9b19ls94rf4@4ax.com..
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:19:39 -0800, Byron Rhodes wrote:
>
> Suppedisne@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Byron Rhodes wrote:
>> > The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by Darrell A. Larose
>> > are on a mission to shut down http://www.FreeSpeech
|
|
|
Travis Jordan <no.one@no.net> wrote in message
news:oWmMf.94551$H54.39103@fe03.news.easynews.com...
> Travis Jordan wrote:
> > Paul Nutteing wrote:
> > > I watched the BBC program about this case broadcast
> > > on 14 Feb, 2006.
> >
> > Was this an
|
|
|
Rasta Khan wrote:
> You people have given his site more free publicity than he could ever hope
> for.
The full quote from Brendan Behan (d. 1964) is "There is no such thing as bad
publicity *except your own obituary.*" (emphasis mine)
Now, w
|
|
|
On 26 Feb 2006 11:19:39 -0800, [Byron Rhodes] said :-
>
>Suppedisne@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Byron Rhodes wrote:
>> > The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by Darrell A. Larose
>> > are on a mission to shut down http://www.FreeSpeechStore
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:03:01 -0000, "Paul Nutteing"
<nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote:
>When this data didn't fit the other evidence
>(Philip Chadwick could not have been the father etc),
>he revised his date span to 1960s to 1980s, don't you just lo
|
|
|
In fact, he had numerous opportunities to change his plans and keep her
safe.
On the drive there.
When he got to the playground. After she was done swinging on the
swings.
During the hike he could have had her turn around and come back.
"That's en
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
>
> Again, there's no dispute he didn't intentionally take her there. But
> this has no bearing on his intent to kill her - he may have wanted an
> outdoor place to take her, or a chanced for her to be more active than
> she would b
|
|
|
I find it highly doubtful that the prosecution or cops would or could
"manufacture" evidence against Brown.
All of the evidence is circumstantial, including the interpretations of
the cliffside via photos and people who are familiar with it. Includin
|
|
|
Travis Jordan wrote:
> Paul Nutteing wrote:
> > I watched the BBC program about this case broadcast
> > on 14 Feb, 2006.
>
> Was this an old broadcast that was being replayed? It seems that
> later information removed suspicion from Ms. Chadwick:
|
|
|
Paul Nutteing wrote:
> I watched the BBC program about this case broadcast
> on 14 Feb, 2006.
Was this an old broadcast that was being replayed? It seems that later
information removed suspicion from Ms. Chadwick:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_n
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
>
> I didn't note anything regarding his intent. I said bringing her up to
> that location seemed negligent, if not reckless.
Let's discuss "INTENT" based on the following facts as testified to the
grand jury and available in the
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:33:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>I find it profoundly immoral for one to impose
>>>>>>>>his religio
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:26:21 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>>>>You even aspired to trade in and profit from such at
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:30:34 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>[snipping for brevity]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>We have scripture to
|
|
|
am Bam wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:50:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>>>>>I no more understand
>>>>>>>>Susan's attraction to
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> RetzQ wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>
>>>Say, weren't you supposed to be in Rio, enjoying Carnevalé right
>>>now? What are you doing still here?
>>
>>How would you be privy to my itinerary, Toad?
>
> I woul
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> RetzQ wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>
>
>>>I don't know what he's talking about or whether its true, but how do
>>>you expect him to prove a negative?
>>
>>If I may butt in here.
>
> NO!!! STFU! Liar.
If you would
|
|
|
Do your @$#*ing job.
Everyone in NYC must OBEY the law,
Or so you say on
NY Channel 1.
Virginia H. Hooper
New York City
|
|
|
26 February 2006
Marc Hansen of NYC HRA APS
I am sure the NYC HRA has legal resources within it
domain, and I am sure HRA collaborates with NYC
legal authorities.
I am happy to cooperate in any way possible, regarding
the violations I have rep
|
|
|
n Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:50:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>>>>I no more understand
>>>>>>>Susan's attraction to her own gender as I d
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:33:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>I find it profoundly immoral for one to impose
>>>>>>>his religious will upon others
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:30:34 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>[snipping for brevity]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>We have scripture to reference.
>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:26:21 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Sam Bam wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:09:43 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>>>You even aspired to trade in and profit from such at one time.
>>>>>
>>
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> (Remember, I have a copy of the FAKED map, as well as a REAL map of
>> the area.)
> Do you? Can I see them?
Mmmmmm ... possibly. Can you send me a real email to which I can
forward them? You can
|
|
|
"Byron Rhodes" <byronrhodes@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1140925887.639226.292110@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by Darrell A. Larose
> are on a mission to shut down http://www.FreeSpeechStore.com but the
|
|
|
Greg Samson
<uwizATCLUESTICKDOTORG-REMOVETHISANDEXAMPLEDOTCOM@example.com> wrote in
news:46co3nFah0s0U1@individual.net:
> Byron Rhodes wrote:
>> The Usenet stalker gang of PUNKS and TROLLS led by Darrell A. Larose
>> are on a mission to shut down
|
|
|
"Mike from NH" <xmudslingerx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Mike.from.NH.23sta7@no-mx.slashlegal.com...
>
> There is a large tree at end my driveway where the sidewalk would be if
> there was one there, bordering my neighbors driveway. There is a
|
