|
|
An old college has filed a lawsuit on some money i owe them. i have
tried my best to negotiate or come to a mutual agreement but they are
not being responsive to anything. I am eligible to file for bankruptcy
and that is what i intend to do if negotiat
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:32:54 -0500, Gary L Burnore
<gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:52:24 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message
>>news:dunkug
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, you, being the total moron you are, had to bring my sister into
>>> it, sharing private information, [...]
>>
>> In Kent's mind, publishing a link to a PUBLIC announ
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>
>>I'd like to know why Ted claimed Cameron's family retained Geragos.
>>As it turns out, Patty is debt, trying to pay the bills. And why did
>>Stuart need to loan her money?
>
> Kent, who's p*s
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>
>>Well, you, being the total moron you are, had to bring my sister into
>>it, sharing private information, [...]
>
> In Kent's mind, publishing a link to a PUBLIC announcement that appears
> in
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:03:24 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>>>But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always
>>>>entitled to
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Well, you, being the total moron you are, had to bring my sister into
> it, sharing private information, [...]
In Kent's mind, publishing a link to a PUBLIC announcement that appears
in a newspaper represents "sharing private i
|
|
|
"RayGordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:1141856535.422224.305960@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>> To add insult to injury. He has not said one thing in regards to this
>> tree... Therefore it is safe to assume guilty of all of the
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I'd like to know why Ted claimed Cameron's family retained Geragos.
> As it turns out, Patty is debt, trying to pay the bills. And why did
> Stuart need to loan her money?
Kent, who's p*ssing in your ear? Can you really trust
|
|
|
"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:dunkug$nm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:06:45 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote:
>
>>Several questions are being raised about the New Jersey State Assembly.
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:16:31 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Lowrenta wrote:
>
>> Oh, and BTW, you know the book that Ted said that was bollocks and
>> that nobody read?
>
>You mean #379,368 on Amazon?
It's been av
|
|
|
MacGirl wrote:
[...]
> Intels aren't selling as well as I think Apple had hoped.
There's no future in PPC (except perhaps for machine control -- and
X-Box). When Apple announced that they were dropping the PPC in
favour of the Intel chip, IBM'
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:03:24 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always
>>>entitled to the benefit of every doubt,
|
|
|
"No, it is not by treaty. At least not where the US is involved."
Quite right. That Mexicans can be dual-citizens of both Mexico and the
U.S. is solely Mexican government issue; while Latin American, and
especially Central American, countries follow
|
|
|
Lowrenta wrote:
> Oh, and BTW, you know the book that Ted said that was bollocks and
> that nobody read?
You mean #379,368 on Amazon?
> It was selected on the short-list of nominations for the Blooker
> Award.
> http://lulublookerprize.typep
|
|
|
"I guess we are talking about two different things. One is based on
bilateral treaties, while the other simply says something like "if you
are a citizen of another nation, you cannot be a citizen here" and you
have to give up your foreign passport."
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Lowrenta wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.koalanet.com.au/australian-slang.html
>
> The Noosa site, eh? I've been to Noosa. Nice seaside town about an
> hour and a half north of Brizzie. Not too far from the Crocodile
> Hu
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always
>>entitled to the benefit of every doubt, whereas the accused is
>>presumed guilty ...
>
> Let's not forget, those
|
|
|
Lowrenta wrote:
> http://www.koalanet.com.au/australian-slang.html
The Noosa site, eh? I've been to Noosa. Nice seaside town about an
hour and a half north of Brizzie. Not too far from the Crocodile
Hunter's zoo.
> Ted, you need some new Aus
|
|
|
aylor wrote:
> <snipped>
>
> I have represented clients in over a dozen civil trials, and yes, there are
> some bad judges. However, the vast majority of judges are smart, fair, and
> accomodating in their search for justice.
On which plane
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
[...]
> But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always
> entitled to the benefit of every doubt, whereas the accused is
> presumed guilty ...
Let's not forget, those rules apply only to Ken Smith. (And t
|
|
|
<needin4mation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1141777880.164759.268620@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> If I copy a show off of television on a DVD and then take a single
> frame (a screenshot), give credit where the show came from, and then
> p
|
|
|
<http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/08/fatherhood.suit.ap/index.html>
[...]
| Dubay is braced for the lawsuit to fail.
|
| "What I expect to hear [from the court] is that the way things are is
| not really fair, but that's the way it is," he said i
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> RetzQ wrote:
> > Here are some very interesing public documents that reveal that
> > Patricia Kaldis Brown, wife of accused child murderer, Cameron Brown,
> > has had some financial difficulties. These documents also show that
>
|
|
|
Kurent wrote:
> For all google cares, people can post Neo-Nazi garbage here, and say
> that the Holocaust never happened. I'm sure that people would like to
> sue, but again, THERE ARE NO GROUNDS!!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism
|
|
|
sgallag: can you please explain the nature of the Israelis nationality?
A former classmate told me that all israelis are also Americn
citizens.
-RFH
|
|
|
>> New Jersey Assemblyman Peter Biondi (R) wants to ban anonymous online
>> speech. Biondi has introduced a bill that would require Internet forum
>> operators to register their users real names and addresses or face
>> liability for defamatory posts.
|
|
|
GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia <gw@hotmail.com> wrote in
alt.politics.bush:
> Larry wrote:
>
>> In article <Xns977FB7B29E2C5WSAP1960@207.115.17.102>,
>> "Winston Smith, American Patriot"
>> <FranzKafka@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV> wrote:
>
|
|
|
On what charges are you sueing? Slander? Hate to break it to you
buddy, but this is a public forum with psudonyms. If anyone of us were
to meet you, we would not know who you are, and therefore, this is not
damaging to your reputation. If you say t
|
|
|
vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
> Dual citisenship is by treaty. I think we have twelve such treaties
> (Canada, UK, France, Switzerland, Ireland, Israel, Greece, Japan..)
No, it is not by treaty. At least not where the US is in
|
|
|
> Dual citisenship is by treaty.
I guess we are talking about two different things. One is based on
bilateral treaties, while the other simply says something like "if you
are a citizen of another nation, you cannot be a citizen here" and you
hav
|
|
|
Well, according to the Toad, it's a very tony neighborhood. Geragos
likes to buy and sell property (he bought a building in Redwood City
and then unloaded it shortly after the Peterson trial), so maybe he'll
use that house as the pumpkin annex for his
|
|
|
I came to US from India on H1B visa to a company A based at Michigan in
August 05. I was promised that they I have many direct clients, But
when I reached here I had to realize that it was not true. First one
month company A didn't pay me and I had to
|
|
|
The Konspiracy is among the Kaldis Klan. They'd like us to believe that
the Browns were financially stable and that Cam would have no motive to
kill his daughter to get out of the $1,000 (nearly) per month child
support obligation.
Getting joint cus
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:52:24 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote:
>
>"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message
>news:dunkug$nm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:06:45 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote:
>>
>>>Sev
|
|
|
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law" as a curious, antiquated
institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer
mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and
political liv
|
|
|
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law" as a curious, antiquated
institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer
mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and
political liv
|
|
|
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Conclusion
The extent to which lawyers will confront potential conflicts of interest is
influenced by the size, type, and location of practice. For example, lawyers
in specialized practice areas, or serv
|
|
|
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/browse_frm/thread/0386a126bcd87ad1/a419e6d75120eacb?hl=en#a419e6d75120eacb
A new thread to discuss "PattyGate."
|
|
|
Here are some very interesing public documents that reveal that
Patricia Kaldis Brown, wife of accused child murderer, Cameron Brown,
has had some financial difficulties. These documents also show that
Brown, himself, had some very sticky financial pro
|
|
|
GeekBoy wrote:
> <needin4mation@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1141777880.164759.268620@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > If I copy a show off of television on a DVD and then take a single
> > frame (a screenshot), give credit where the show c
|
|
|
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:06:45 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote:
>Several questions are being raised about the New Jersey State Assembly.
>
>1) How do these boobs get off thinking they can supercede federal
>regulations?
>
Doesn't matter what they w
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
>
> I don't know. While I doubt he'd want to pay for it, I can
> see someone from the Kennel sending a copy to Patty and Ted grabbing
> it for a read as well. There is no way for me to know if this
> happened, but I can see i
|
|
|
On 8 Mar 2006 14:22:15 -0800, "RayGordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>> To add insult to injury. He has not said one thing in regards to this
>> tree... Therefore it is safe to assume guilty of all of the above
>> facts.
>
>Wrong. I filed suit
|
|
|
>What is puzzling about this statement?
The sentence is too long.
The puzzling is the previous paraghraph "...if you are correct [..]
self-answering". The construction of the sentence is complex and
convoluted, harder to read than need be. Simple
|
|
|
Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:32:54 -0500, Gary L Burnore
> <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:52:24 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote:
>>
>>> "Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:16:31 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Lowrenta wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, and BTW, you know the book that Ted said that was bollocks and
> >> that nobody read?
> >
> >You mea
|
|
|
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2006/03/08/going_by_the_blook.html
An excerpt from the above article:
One well known example of a blook is the "clandestine diary" written by
Salam Pax, the Baghdad blogger, during the US-led invasion of Ir
|
|
|
http://people.aol.com/people/articles/reuters/0,23401,2006-03-08T202156Z_01_L08722372_RTRIDST_0_ENTERTAINMENT-MEDIA-BLOOKER-DC.html,00.html
No, it's not nominated by Lulu. It was nominated by judges independent
of Lulu.
The Blooker awards made the
|
|
|
|