Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

student losing lawsuit
An old college has filed a lawsuit on some money i owe them. i have tried my best to negotiate or come to a mutual agreement but they are not being responsive to anything. I am eligible to file for bankruptcy and that is what i intend to do if negotiat


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:32:54 -0500, Gary L Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:52:24 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote: > >> >>"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message >>news:dunkug


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Kent Wills wrote: >> >> >>> Well, you, being the total moron you are, had to bring my sister into >>> it, sharing private information, [...] >> >> In Kent's mind, publishing a link to a PUBLIC announ


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > > >>I'd like to know why Ted claimed Cameron's family retained Geragos. >>As it turns out, Patty is debt, trying to pay the bills. And why did >>Stuart need to loan her money? > > Kent, who's p*s


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is NOT a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > > >>Well, you, being the total moron you are, had to bring my sister into >>it, sharing private information, [...] > > In Kent's mind, publishing a link to a PUBLIC announcement that appears > in


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Kent Wills wrote: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:03:24 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>>[...] >>> >>> >>>>But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always >>>>entitled to


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is NOT a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Kent Wills wrote: > Well, you, being the total moron you are, had to bring my sister into > it, sharing private information, [...] In Kent's mind, publishing a link to a PUBLIC announcement that appears in a newspaper represents "sharing private i


Re: Defamation
"RayGordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:1141856535.422224.305960@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... >> To add insult to injury. He has not said one thing in regards to this >> tree... Therefore it is safe to assume guilty of all of the


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is NOT a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Kent Wills wrote: > I'd like to know why Ted claimed Cameron's family retained Geragos. > As it turns out, Patty is debt, trying to pay the bills. And why did > Stuart need to loan her money? Kent, who's p*ssing in your ear? Can you really trust


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation
"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message news:dunkug$nm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com... > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:06:45 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote: > >>Several questions are being raised about the New Jersey State Assembly.


Re: "Award" Nominated
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:16:31 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Lowrenta wrote: > >> Oh, and BTW, you know the book that Ted said that was bollocks and >> that nobody read? > >You mean #379,368 on Amazon? It's been av


Re: Kaldis the Knowledgeable Man
MacGirl wrote: [...] > Intels aren't selling as well as I think Apple had hoped. There's no future in PPC (except perhaps for machine control -- and X-Box). When Apple announced that they were dropping the PPC in favour of the Intel chip, IBM'


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is a CHILD-MURDERER!"
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:03:24 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always >>>entitled to the benefit of every doubt,


Re: Dual Citizenship is NO Citizenship!
"No, it is not by treaty. At least not where the US is involved." Quite right. That Mexicans can be dual-citizens of both Mexico and the U.S. is solely Mexican government issue; while Latin American, and especially Central American, countries follow


Re: "Award" Nominated
Lowrenta wrote: > Oh, and BTW, you know the book that Ted said that was bollocks and > that nobody read? You mean #379,368 on Amazon? > It was selected on the short-list of nominations for the Blooker > Award. > http://lulublookerprize.typep


Re: Dual Citizenship is NO Citizenship!
"I guess we are talking about two different things. One is based on bilateral treaties, while the other simply says something like "if you are a citizen of another nation, you cannot be a citizen here" and you have to give up your foreign passport."


Re: Some RIGHT BOLLOCKS From Kent Wills
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Lowrenta wrote: > > >>http://www.koalanet.com.au/australian-slang.html > > The Noosa site, eh? I've been to Noosa. Nice seaside town about an > hour and a half north of Brizzie. Not too far from the Crocodile > Hu


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > [...] > >>But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always >>entitled to the benefit of every doubt, whereas the accused is >>presumed guilty ... > > Let's not forget, those


Re: Some RIGHT BOLLOCKS From Kent Wills
Lowrenta wrote: > http://www.koalanet.com.au/australian-slang.html The Noosa site, eh? I've been to Noosa. Nice seaside town about an hour and a half north of Brizzie. Not too far from the Crocodile Hunter's zoo. > Ted, you need some new Aus


Re: Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS)
aylor wrote: > <snipped> > > I have represented clients in over a dozen civil trials, and yes, there are > some bad judges. However, the vast majority of judges are smart, fair, and > accomodating in their search for justice. On which plane


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Cameron Brown is NOT a CHILD-MURDERER!"
Ken Smith wrote: [...] > But let us not forget that under "Kaldis' Rules," the State is always > entitled to the benefit of every doubt, whereas the accused is > presumed guilty ... Let's not forget, those rules apply only to Ken Smith. (And t


Re: Is a screenshot from a tv show on a blog illegal?
<needin4mation@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1141777880.164759.268620@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > If I copy a show off of television on a DVD and then take a single > frame (a screenshot), give credit where the show came from, and then > p


Isn't this illegal? Filing lawsuit you believe you won't win?
<http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/08/fatherhood.suit.ap/index.html> [...] | Dubay is braced for the lawsuit to fail. | | "What I expect to hear [from the court] is that the way things are is | not really fair, but that's the way it is," he said i


Re: Some RIGHT BOLLOCKS From Kent Wills


Re: PattyGate: The Kaldis-Brown Konspiracy
Ken Smith wrote: > RetzQ wrote: > > Here are some very interesing public documents that reveal that > > Patricia Kaldis Brown, wife of accused child murderer, Cameron Brown, > > has had some financial difficulties. These documents also show that >


Re: WE CALLED IT... (3!)
Kurent wrote: > For all google cares, people can post Neo-Nazi garbage here, and say > that the Holocaust never happened. I'm sure that people would like to > sue, but again, THERE ARE NO GROUNDS!!! http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism


Re: Dual Citizenship is NO Citizenship!
sgallag: can you please explain the nature of the Israelis nationality? A former classmate told me that all israelis are also Americn citizens. -RFH


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation
>> New Jersey Assemblyman Peter Biondi (R) wants to ban anonymous online >> speech. Biondi has introduced a bill that would require Internet forum >> operators to register their users real names and addresses or face >> liability for defamatory posts.


Re: Thousands of Federal Court Cases Kept Secret
GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia <gw@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush: > Larry wrote: > >> In article <Xns977FB7B29E2C5WSAP1960@207.115.17.102>, >> "Winston Smith, American Patriot" >> <FranzKafka@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV> wrote: >


Re: WE CALLED IT... (3!)
On what charges are you sueing? Slander? Hate to break it to you buddy, but this is a public forum with psudonyms. If anyone of us were to meet you, we would not know who you are, and therefore, this is not damaging to your reputation. If you say t


Re: Dual Citizenship is NO Citizenship!
vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote: > Dual citisenship is by treaty. I think we have twelve such treaties > (Canada, UK, France, Switzerland, Ireland, Israel, Greece, Japan..) No, it is not by treaty. At least not where the US is in


Re: Dual Citizenship is NO Citizenship!
> Dual citisenship is by treaty. I guess we are talking about two different things. One is based on bilateral treaties, while the other simply says something like "if you are a citizen of another nation, you cannot be a citizen here" and you hav


Re: PattyGate: The Kaldis-Brown Konspiracy
Well, according to the Toad, it's a very tony neighborhood. Geragos likes to buy and sell property (he bought a building in Redwood City and then unloaded it shortly after the Peterson trial), so maybe he'll use that house as the pumpkin annex for his


Employement Agreement :
I came to US from India on H1B visa to a company A based at Michigan in August 05. I was promised that they I have many direct clients, But when I reached here I had to realize that it was not true. First one month company A didn't pay me and I had to


Re: PattyGate: The Kaldis-Brown Konspiracy
The Konspiracy is among the Kaldis Klan. They'd like us to believe that the Browns were financially stable and that Cam would have no motive to kill his daughter to get out of the $1,000 (nearly) per month child support obligation. Getting joint cus


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:52:24 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote: > >"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message >news:dunkug$nm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com... >> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:06:45 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote: >> >>>Sev


Re: Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS)
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS! A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law" as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and political liv


Re: Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS)
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS! A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law" as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and political liv


Re: Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS)
CONFLICT OF INTEREST Conclusion The extent to which lawyers will confront potential conflicts of interest is influenced by the size, type, and location of practice. For example, lawyers in specialized practice areas, or serv


Re: Kaldis Kan't Kreate
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/browse_frm/thread/0386a126bcd87ad1/a419e6d75120eacb?hl=en#a419e6d75120eacb A new thread to discuss "PattyGate."


PattyGate: The Kaldis-Brown Konspiracy
Here are some very interesing public documents that reveal that Patricia Kaldis Brown, wife of accused child murderer, Cameron Brown, has had some financial difficulties. These documents also show that Brown, himself, had some very sticky financial pro


Re: Is a screenshot from a tv show on a blog illegal?
GeekBoy wrote: > <needin4mation@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1141777880.164759.268620@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > > If I copy a show off of television on a DVD and then take a single > > frame (a screenshot), give credit where the show c


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:06:45 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote: >Several questions are being raised about the New Jersey State Assembly. > >1) How do these boobs get off thinking they can supercede federal >regulations? > Doesn't matter what they w


Re: Kaldis Kan't Kreate
Kent Wills wrote: > > I don't know. While I doubt he'd want to pay for it, I can > see someone from the Kennel sending a copy to Patty and Ted grabbing > it for a read as well. There is no way for me to know if this > happened, but I can see i


Re: Defamation
On 8 Mar 2006 14:22:15 -0800, "RayGordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: >> To add insult to injury. He has not said one thing in regards to this >> tree... Therefore it is safe to assume guilty of all of the above >> facts. > >Wrong. I filed suit


Re: Property division in NJ prior to divorce
>What is puzzling about this statement? The sentence is too long. The puzzling is the previous paraghraph "...if you are correct [..] self-answering". The construction of the sentence is complex and convoluted, harder to read than need be. Simple


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation
Peter J Ross wrote: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:32:54 -0500, Gary L Burnore > <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: > >> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:52:24 GMT, "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote: >> >>> "Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote


Kaldis Kan't Kreate
Kent Wills wrote: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:16:31 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >Lowrenta wrote: > > > >> Oh, and BTW, you know the book that Ted said that was bollocks and > >> that nobody read? > > > >You mea


Re: "Award" Nominated
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2006/03/08/going_by_the_blook.html An excerpt from the above article: One well known example of a blook is the "clandestine diary" written by Salam Pax, the Baghdad blogger, during the US-led invasion of Ir


Re: "Award" Nominated
http://people.aol.com/people/articles/reuters/0,23401,2006-03-08T202156Z_01_L08722372_RTRIDST_0_ENTERTAINMENT-MEDIA-BLOOKER-DC.html,00.html No, it's not nominated by Lulu. It was nominated by judges independent of Lulu. The Blooker awards made the


Re: NJ can't hold ISPs accountable for defamation