misc.legal

you must be a harvard reject. i cannot be seen conversing with you.

"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message news:9ua8121ma3e0js9ckdt83q6o7jk9p7g1ga@4ax.com... > On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 23:14:36 +0300, "Andrei Medvedev" <andy@au.ru> > wrote: > The issue of evaluating opposite testimonies only comes up in the > small m

> The jobs go to India or China due to low-wages = higher profits = period That's what eurotrash tell themselves to soothe their ego. That's what the eurotrash said about cheap japanese goods and labor 30 years ago. That's what the eurotrash also

dane, you are decidedly unimpressive. Bitter, angry, frustrated, yes. Impressive? Not at all.

13 Mar 2006, "Will" <westes@earthbroadcast.com> wrote: > What happens in California if all of the named trustees > are deceased at time of death of the person(s) with > the living trust? An interested person may apply for court appointment of a s

"George Jetson" <george@nospam.com> wrote in message news:4414431a$0$27795$6d36acad@titian.nntpserver.com... > > "Odious" <Odious@cox.net.nospam> wrote in message > news:peIQf.136046$0G.1692@dukeread10... >> >> "Meat Plow" <meat@meatplow.local>

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:42:33 -0600, Keith <Keith@nospam.com> wrote: >A contract that we signed last year has a term from 05/16/05 through >05/16/06, but the payment portion states that 12 payments will be made >starting on 06/16/05. All dates are re

On 12 Mar 2006 22:53:18 -0800, "CG" <realcountrygirl@hotmail.com> wrote: >Rich indeed. > >What a great way to shut people up about this case! Offer to send them >evidence (Larry) or talk about the case, but not on a public forum >(Ken) and voila!

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:09:02 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >CG wrote: >> Rich indeed. >> >> What a great way to shut people up about this case! Offer to send them >> evidence (Larry) or talk about the case, but not on a public forum >> (

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:00:58 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >> Until I bought the Rolex, I wore a cheap $10.00 watch I bought >> at Wal-Mart. It tells time just as well as the Rolex. And it has a >> stop watch :) > > If you have a cell

Larry wrote: > In article <1142307944.816519.59320@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, > fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote: > > ... > > > > However, AFAIk the Constitution does not guarantee to anyone > > a right to seal court records. > > Correct. An

"Steve (NYC)" <sdaniel13@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:1142268237.936009.16240@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > http://www.jdl.org.il/ > Ohh you're scaring people http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Desert-Eagle-chrome-p1030142.jpg

Thanks for all of your suggestions.

alt.anarchism removed from newsgroups header as a random act of sensibility. Larry wrote: > In article <1142060845.12844.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, > "brique" <briquenoir@freeuk.c0m> wrote: > > > Larry <x@y.com> wrote in message > > news:x-25D7A2.223

Bob Stock wrote: > On 13 Mar 2006 16:49:52 -0800, aachess@yahoo.com wrote: > > >What is the statue of limitations for statutory rape (consensual > >intercourse between a 22 year old male and a 16 year old female > >occuring 20 years ago) in missou

>>>A contract that we signed last year has a term from 05/16/05 through >>>05/16/06, but the payment portion states that 12 payments will be made >>>starting on 06/16/05. All dates are reflected on the agreement. >> >>What is the conflict? It appear

Sharx35 wrote: > Steve Horrillo wrote: >> I created a Yahoo group to help us exchange ideas to recover some of >> our losses due to the defuncked extended warrant company > > Those who are so idiotic as to BUY those bull#@($ extended warranties > do

opmc@health.state.ny.us 13 March 2006 Dear NYS Office of Physician Medical Conduct: I reported to you abuse and misconduct several weeks ago, and telephone your office, as follow-up, per your Official NYS website. I was told by the woman in

Either that or there are private companies that do it for a percentage of recovery. Depending on where the original order was filed, that agency might be overloaded and understaffed as many are--but it is probably the first place to check and go wit

Smiler wrote: > Reminds me of an English comedian of many years ago who said that he was once a > tour guide. > He used to tell the tourists that "All London brothels display a *blue* lamp"! Hehe! Sounds like something from ISIHAC. > Even mo

Morton Davis wrote: > So a 16 year old girl could conceivably set herself up "in business" and > nothing can be done legally to her or her clientel? In America, legal > prostitution is very limited. This is relatively new, as is the prohibition > o

Smiler wrote: >>Some details of that case are at http://www.johnbarber.com/legal1.html#lindi >>and much more information at http://www.sw5.info/morelaw.htm . >> > > Forgot about the Miss Whiplash case so you are right about tax, but I'm right >

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:20:00 +0300, "Andrei Medvedev" <andy@au.ru> wrote: >"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message >news:9ua8121ma3e0js9ckdt83q6o7jk9p7g1ga@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 23:14:36 +0300, "Andrei Medvedev" <andy@au.ru> >> wrote:

"Keith" <Keith@nospam.com> wrote in message news:808b1290k55r7ph223e0srcio5smc1qtb1@4ax.com... >A contract that we signed last year has a term from 05/16/05 through > 05/16/06, but the payment portion states that 12 payments will be made > starting o

>A contract that we signed last year has a term from 05/16/05 through >05/16/06, but the payment portion states that 12 payments will be made >starting on 06/16/05. All dates are reflected on the agreement. What is the conflict? It appears you are

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:42:22 +0000 (UTC), jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us (Jonathan Kamens) wrote: >Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> writes: >>A "question" with an arguable premise is not a question, but an >>assertion of the premise. Your premise is that po

What is the statue of limitations for statutory rape (consensual intercourse between a 22 year old male and a 16 year old female occuring 20 years ago) in missouri?

Often the reason a contraceptive is not 100% is due to operator error. One reason condoms are so low is due to this reason. My take on this is the old one, keep it in your pants if you don't want to suffer the consequences of not doing so. The child

On 12 Mar 2006, mercer2005b@yahoo.com wrote: >[ what usually is done if served as non-party witness > with pretrial deposition subpoena on short notice > and the proposed witness is ill or had conflicting > travel plans, etc.? ] > > I feel seding

David Martel wrote: > ravin, > > I doubt that expecting one parent to shoulder the burdens and expenses of > child rearing is a practical answer to this situation. Though it's not > explicit in the post it is likely that the earning capacity of

On 12 Mar 2006 19:10:59 -0800, mercer2005b@yahoo.com wrote: >No! I was just unwillingly subpoenaed, and I do not have any benefit >from this lawsuit. I am more worry that if something goes wrong, I may >get involved and be sued. I can't affort to hir

David Martel wrote: > The argument seems to be that contraception does work so if pregnancy > does occur it must be a willful act. This men's group is attempting to > bolster this belief by backing this case of deception on the part of the > woman.

Taylor wrote: > "doug" <googler2006@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1142213505.173434.79670@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > >>What is a conclusory statement? I looked it up in several online law >>dictionaries, and nothing comes up. I can gu

On 12 Mar 2006 18:52:51 -0800, "doug" <googler2006@yahoo.com> wrote: >Is this the Bob who was on lawschool list for so many years? (Good >guy)? I was on the list (this is back in the mid to late 90s). >If so, is law school list still active??

"doug" <googler2006@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1142213505.173434.79670@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > What is a conclusory statement? I looked it up in several online law > dictionaries, and nothing comes up. I can guess, but can someone

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:22:27 GMT, "David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote: > The argument seems to be that contraception does work so if pregnancy >does occur it must be a willful act. This men's group is attempting to >bolster this belief

http://www.jdl.org.il/

Sorry, I ascribed Mr. Esnes...'s post to Mr. Stock. Dave M.

A letter is appropriate in most cases but because time is of the essence here Mr. Stock's suggestion of a phone call sounds good. Your letter might be covered with flu virii, yuck. Dave M.

The argument seems to be that contraception does work so if pregnancy does occur it must be a willful act. This men's group is attempting to bolster this belief by backing this case of deception on the part of the woman. But the belief that cont

> >You left out the crucial information about an initial payment not >mentioned in the contract in your initial post. > >Forget about the dates and point out the number of payments. If >that doesn't work, a BBB complaint seems in order. > >

CG wrote: > Rich indeed. > > What a great way to shut people up about this case! Offer to send them > evidence (Larry) or talk about the case, but not on a public forum > (Ken) and voila! One more bonus: It saves time. I have too much to do

Kent Wills wrote: > On 12 Mar 2006 19:42:41 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > > >>> I have had clients who are centimillionaires, and for the most part, >>>they don't flaunt it; the very rich rarely wear Rolex watches. (I've >>>done a

skeptic wrote: >> It is estimated, for example, that famed and feared Mongol warrior >> Genghis Khan left his Y-chromosome in 1 out of 12 Asian men and 1 >> out of 100 worldwide. That means that he was > 800,000 times more successful in passing on his

CG wrote: > Rich indeed. > > What a great way to shut people up about this case! Offer to send them > evidence (Larry) or talk about the case, but not on a public forum > (Ken) and voila! At this point, I've said more about this case than I r

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:53:38 -0000, gordonb.q9ugz@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote: >>A contract that we signed last year has a term from 05/16/05 through >>05/16/06, but the payment portion states that 12 payments will be made >>starting on 06/16

mfarid1@yahoo.com wrote: > I bought a Toyota Corolla today from Toyota Of Richardson. They gave me > whole bunch of paperwork after 3 hours, all of which I signed after > reading little. I came home and found out on the Purchase Agreement > that the

An elderly aunt has a living trust and names as the trustee someone who is even more elderly. What are the laws concerning trustee succession in a living will? What happens in California if all of the named trustees are deceased at time of death o