|
|
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142723090_12255@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
> news:V10Tf.25974$g91.16733@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>>
>> "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:04:49 GMT, Yosemite Sam wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:36:47 -0600, Lady Libertarian
> <Lady_Libertarian@FreeWorld.xxx> wrote:
>
>>Bars aren't in public moron, they're SUPPOSED to be private
>>property.
>
> They're eng
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:Duidna4MhOaf5oHZnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
>
>> Given how often my e-mailbox was penetrated by invitations to buy
>> herbal weight-loss remedies and to come see the amazing things li
|
|
|
>He can't file a criminal complaint. I never did what he accuses me of.
Wanna call my bluff? I have called U a child molesting coward for over 4
yrs now. Tell everyone, what is stopping U from doing ANYTHING about my
big mouth, which can prov
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:YYudnRIwgIfcFIHZRVn-gg@pghconnect.com...
>>> Answer to whom? His audience?!? Of course, he does -- that is in
>>>the nature of speech. I just don't think that his lawsuit against
>>>Googl
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:3cOdnV3nJ5dm5oHZRVn-sg@pghconnect.com...
>>> Based on the material below, I rather doubt that I will. USENET has
>>> its share of fruits and nuts -- as long as he doesn't act on his sexual
|
|
|
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142710648_11507@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
> news:UrYSf.32984$UZ5.20598@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>>
>> "Paul Knight" <knightp@execpc.com> wrote in messa
|
|
|
Thank you, Mark.
That wraps it up for this off the wall guy.
His has problems.
"Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:ZH%Sf.45$jw.21@fe09.lga...
> Robert wrote:
>> "Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wro
|
|
|
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142709664_11481@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
> news:BrXSf.25446$g91.9390@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>> If Dane wishes, I can address this more properly.
>>
|
|
|
>> How about when he threatens one's family..? He did so to MY folks,
>> including telephone calls traced back to him.
>
> File a criminal complaint. File suit, if you have to. For the most
> part, threats are not protected speech.
He can't f
|
|
|
>>> Because with Napster, a third party publishes to the internet.
>>
>>As does Google.
>>
>>>This is
>>> material the author intentionally published to the internet. Also, he
>>> maintains that if someone quoted his USENET postings
>>
>>Actually,
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:36:07 GMT, esnesnommoc@urthlynk.c0m wrote:
[...]
>This does not tell a reader of your postings whether there is now a
>state per se prohibition against septic tanks for a one-family
>residence on the land and, if so, when that
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote :
>
> "Chuck Wright" <cawrigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:121nv3lgk9l9r97@corp.supernews.com...
>> Mr Hanky wrote:
>>> What's the latest on the bar smoking ban? Did it ever pass?
>>
>> The forces of
|
|
|
"Robert" <Robertsnospam2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ps2dnb8NoLg5_YHZRVn-gQ@got.net...
>
> "Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in
>> > But you do NOT judge doctors who write prescriptions without a license.
>>
>> If the unl
|
|
|
"Robert" <Robertsnospam2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:La-dnTAv99lw9IHZRVn-pw@got.net...
>
> "Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in
>
>> >> I discuss standard of care which should always far exceed whatever the
>> >> law requ
|
|
|
>>
>>Any attempt to say otherwise, is a flat lie.
>
> The first one he mentioned is confidential. Presumably he
> can't mention any more than that.
> If he settled it out of court, it's dismissal makes sense.
I didn't say the settlements were r
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:26:43 -0500, Ray Gordon wrote:
>
>> Given how often my e-mailbox was penetrated by invitations to buy
>> herbal weight-loss remedies and to come see the amazing things little Suzy
>> could do with farm animals, I don't see
|
|
|
> File a criminal complaint. File suit, if you have to. For the most
>part, threats are not protected speech.
I called the local Police in Parker's
area, have records of such actions, and
the local Police who took my call KNEW
whom I was sp
|
|
|
"Chuck Wright" <cawrigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:121nv3lgk9l9r97@corp.supernews.com...
> Mr Hanky wrote:
>> What's the latest on the bar smoking ban? Did it ever pass?
>
> The forces of evil are about to achieve victory,
> and ban will ta
|
|
|
>> Each of the young women named was an Olympic-class gymnast, and
>> all were under the online harrassment of Gordon Roy Parker. You
>> really expect us to believe that you have no idea who these people
>> were? Are you older than 14?
>
>I am 50 a
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 01:02:10 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>> Answer to whom? His audience?!? Of course, he does -- that is in
>>>>the nature of speech. I just don't think that his lawsuit against
>>>>Google is total
|
|
|
One again the lowlife tobacco sucking scumbags get kicked to
the filthy gutter where they belong.
Score:
Bruce Watson - 100
Scumbag Smokers - 0
Statewide Smoking ban has a clear path
Governor to sign
By Jim Hughes Denver Post Staff Writer
|
|
|
Kevin Smith <spam@mail.here> said and asked:
{ I own and either I or my predecessor owners have
paid all taxes assessed to date on a N.Y. parcel of real
property purchased by my family in 1950 when that
land was not affected by any building r
|
|
|
"Anonymous" <nobody@invalid.org> wrote in message
news:470b1d2073fadc7f2b6d380adef0a888@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net...
> PATRIOT II is a copy, almost
> verbatim, of the 1965 Soviet
> Internal Security Enhancement Act.
Sources? Cites?
|
|
|
"Paul Knight" <knightp@execpc.com> wrote in message
news:121ojkfluvidiab@corp.supernews.com...
>> A&M Records (as an example of one of the companies that sued Napster)
>> didn't originally offer their phonorecords as downloads for free on the
>>
|
|
|
"HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
news:6H0Tf.25981$g91.5142@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>
> "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1142723090_12255@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> >
[snipped for brevity]
> >
> > Sorry, I wasn't t
|
|
|
Anonymous User wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:17:07 -0800, gpsman wrote:
>
> > Never sign a contract for pest control services other than for wood
> > destroying organisms. Even the good companies would like to have you
> > on a contract because th
|
|
|
Excuse me, but minors cannot buy prescription medication in the USA.
Only the parent can. Obviously, nobody held a gun to the heads of
these parents when they personally forced feed their child these toxic
medications.
The parents should be prosecu
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:29:41 GMT, "David Martel"
<marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Kevin,
>
> Ok, it sounds as if you have done your homework, the lot is unbuildable.
>I'm surprised that composting systems or holding tanks aren't allowed but
>I
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:41:24 GMT, "GeekBoy" <GeekISme@geeker.com>
wrote:
>
>"Kevin Smith" <spam@mail.here> wrote in message
>news:0pbl12pg1itlha94vk9q8hvctjp161l995@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:15:56 GMT, "GeekBoy" <GeekISme@geeker.com>
>
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 02:14:42 GMT, "Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com>
wrote:
>
>On 16-Mar-2006, hrewh_jhjkhjkh@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Recently I was arrested for residential entry. The circumstance was
>> that I was extremely intoxicated and in a
|
|
|
"HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
news:0NMSf.31585$UZ5.5661@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>
> "Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
> news:lKGdnQHKO_EaDIbZRVn-rQ@pghconnect.com...
>>>>> Gordon wants to make sure that the world knows he
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:pl0o121dle144i0svlrmrq33310gjdbj2s@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:49:33 -0500, "Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Because with Napster, a third party publishes to the inter
|
|
|
"HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
news:BrXSf.25446$g91.9390@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
> If Dane wishes, I can address this more properly.
>
> "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1142698998_11291@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>>
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:441C0844.8010207@it.com...
> HeeroYuy wrote:
>> "Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
>> news:w6ednbhY0fOZDIbZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
>>
>>>>> I'm not persuaded that his c
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:25:52 -0600, "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> > And why should he be obliged to do so? Not everyone has a Ph.D. in
>> > computer science -- most IT jobs go to India these days, anyway.
>>
>> I'm beginnin
|
|
|
On 18 Mar 2006 16:27:05 -0000, EditorialStaff
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> EditorialStaff wrote:
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/rvfrk
>>>
>>> From: IownNique@hotmail.com
>>> Subject: Ray Gordon vs. The
|
|
|
If Dane wishes, I can address this more properly.
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1142698998_11291@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>
> "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
> news:WhVSf.25426$g91.23562@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>>
>
|
|
|
>> Answer to whom? His audience?!? Of course, he does -- that is in
>>the nature of speech. I just don't think that his lawsuit against
>>Google is totally frivolous, or that his speech -- as abhorrent as it
>>may be -- is undeserving of protectio
|
|
|
Robert wrote:
> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:o1%Sf.61379
>
>>> Done right means attacking supply and demand. Evidently you are more
>>> interested in supply and don't care about those demanding.
>>> Why didn't they sue
|
|
|
Robert wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in
>>> But you do NOT judge doctors who write prescriptions without a license.
>> If the unlicensed doctor had done a proper exam, and not over the phone,
>> there is a remote possi
|
|
|
"HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
news:V10Tf.25974$g91.16733@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>
> "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1142709664_11481@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> >
> > "HeeroYuy" <h@h.h> wrote in message
> > news:Br
|
|
|
"ECRIA Public Mail Buffer" <ngs@ecria.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to obtain a copy of the records from an ISP
sometimes, depending what you think you mean by possible
> - specifically a copy of a web site which we believe has been
> illegally
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:27:30 -0500, "Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com>
wrote:
>>> Answer to whom? His audience?!? Of course, he does -- that is in
>>>the nature of speech. I just don't think that his lawsuit against
>>>Google is totally frivolou
|
|
|
I know that "account stated" is a contract, either express or implied
one, but I need a reference/ case to prove that it is so. Could someone
help?
I am also a little puzzled as to what constitute as an "account" and
what constitute as a "contract".
|
|
|
>> Based on the material below, I rather doubt that I will. USENET has
>> its share of fruits and nuts -- as long as he doesn't act on his sexual
>> fantasies, it isn't a crime.
>
> That's the ONLY reason, to date, Gordon hasn't been committed ye
|
|
|
> Based on the material below, I rather doubt that I will. USENET has its
> share of fruits and nuts -- as long as he doesn't act on his sexual
> fantasies, it isn't a crime.
Where was it estabilshed that I ever wrote what you are referring to?
|
|
|
Gordon Roy Parker babbled:
>
> "Google maintains the USENET" - The Honorable R. Barclay Surrick,
> Eastern District of PA Judge From Parker v. Google, E.D.Pa.
> #04-cv-3918
>>
>> That is only PART of ONE sentence from the Judge. Gordon is being
>>
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> EditorialStaff wrote:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/rvfrk
>>
>> From: IownNique@hotmail.com
>> Subject: Ray Gordon vs. The Magnificent Seven (3 of 4)
>> Date: 1998/09/18
>> Message-ID: <36028CE7.1D73@hotmail.com>
>> Content-Transf
|
|
|
> Given how often my e-mailbox was penetrated by invitations to buy
> herbal weight-loss remedies and to come see the amazing things little Suzy
> could do with farm animals, I don't see that Ray's fiction
Hope you're not referring to me, becaus
|
|
