|
|
"Larry (Scratch)" <Scratch@Tigard.OR.com> wrote in message
news:dcadnda7gZ9EvKrZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
> Bill Shatzer wrote:
>> Good American wrote:
>>
>>> This news must be upsetting for the Democrats and Osama and the Aclu
>>> and anybody else s
|
|
|
lein wrote:
>
....
> We're talking about sigint during a time of war from a known enemy. Be
> it cell phone signals, satelite, microwave, etc.
>
> In 1942, if Hitler starts calling people in New Jersey, do you think
> FDR gets a warrant to g
|
|
|
Trailer-park Sam wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:49:49 -0700, Bill Shatzer
> <bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Peace and justice,
>
> War and oppression,
Trailer-park Sam would be serving in Iraq, but he's only 15 years old.
--
There a
|
|
|
KRP wrote:
>
.....
> >> >Intercepting communication from known enemies during time of war,
> >> >originating outside the country is not "unreasonable".
> >>
> >> In fact it's just a good defense protocol.
> >
> >
> > It did wonders for the R
|
|
|
KRP wrote:
>
>...
> >> In fact it's just a good defense protocol.
> >
> > With a warrant, yeah. Otherwise it is un-American.
>
> Rewind moron to 9-11. Then get a crowbar to pry your head out of your
> ass.
>
Rewind, you moron. 9-11 was
|
|
|
On 7 Apr 2006 08:26:52 -0700, "Fred the Red Shirt"
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>Crossposted to misc.legal, where it is on-topic.
>
>Wm James wrote:
>> On 6 Apr 2006 23:11:35 +0100, jfh@avondale.demon.co.uk (John F Hall)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In
|
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:49:49 -0700, Bill Shatzer
<bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote:
>Peace and justice,
War and oppression,
|
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:04:04 -0700, Bill Shatzer
<bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote:
>Peace and justice,
War and oppression,
|
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:35:06 -0700, Bill Shatzer
<bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote:
>Peace and justice,
War and oppression,
|
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:29:25 -0700, Bill Shatzer
<bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote:
>> In 1942, if Hitler starts calling people in New Jersey, do you think
>> FDR gets a warrant to gather intelligence from the call?
>
>Then tap -Hitler's- phone.
W
|
|
|
Yosemite Sam wrote:
>
> On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:49:49 -0700, Bill Shatzer
> <bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >Peace and justice,
>
> War and oppression,
Alzheimer?
You have repeated that more than 20 time now!
|
|
|
KRP wrote:
....
> > Ok, Sam.
> > Give us your opinion, instead of your usual moronic insults.
> > Should the 4th ammendment be deleted?
> > Should the whole Bill of Rights be deleted?
>
> "The choice is not between order and liberty. It is bet
|
|
|
is this graffiti
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know this is trivial but i would appreciate any help. I own a
pressure washing business. Typically when I'm in a neighborhood, I will
pressure wash
|
|
|
n Sat, 08 Apr 2006 19:38:08 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:38:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>On 08 Apr 2006 05:28:20 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
|
|
|
"Bill Rabkin" <ienjball@yahoo.com> wrote
> In the wake of the Duke scandal commentators have said that their
> unruly behavior is about elitism, that it's a bunch of privileged white
> kids who feel they're above the law and can do whatever they want w
|
|
|
On 08 Apr 2006 17:19:58 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
>>>>>Kent W
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:443863CB.7E49181B@worldnet.att.net:
> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>>> [...]
|
|
|
"Carmen" <carmensrt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144511135.609332.33240@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Under those circumstances neither do I. It's just recycling. There's
> a finite amount of gold on the planet.
>
> Carmen
I dunno. My
|
|
|
It is said that there is no form of government that intrudes into your daily
life most than a democracy.
<Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message
news:8qSZf.84386$UZ5.11998@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
> WASHINGTON (AP) -- Trying to shrink the grow
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:38:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>On 08 Apr 2006 05:28:20 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>"Spartakus" <spartakus
|
|
|
<a@b.c> wrote in message news:6buf32dd9kddm40ephq5k8juugkh012u38@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:29:40 GMT, Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
> But it doesn't hurt smart parents who do have control over their kids,
> does it? Who does it hurt? The o
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
> People do rob banks. Many of them don't get caught. Many of those
> who get caught aren't punished severely enough. How is this relevant
> to a discussion of whether bank robbery is legal?
Calling a man a po
|
|
|
On 8-Apr-2006, a@b.c wrote:
> >As if we don't have enough laws trying to control peoples' lives, here
> >comes another one. Written solely for stupid parents who have no
> >control over their kids.
>
> But it doesn't hurt smart parents who do ha
|
|
|
> He is a habitual liar and prevaricator. He lacks a moral center. He is
> unfit to be President.
He's unfit to run a Walmart Automotive repair shop.
|
|
|
Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>> Why did you edit this part out, Teddums?
>>>>> thereby exposing one of the largest clandestine operati
|
|
|
In the wake of the Duke scandal commentators have said that their
unruly behavior is about elitism, that it's a bunch of privileged white
kids who feel they're above the law and can do whatever they want with
impunity. It certainly is that, but I thin
|
|
|
In article <fd-dnZWiEoknaarZRVn-iA@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> >> Then why send them to a dentist?
> > An abundance of caution. Even if they snapped out, if one of the
> > defendants got a sl
|
|
|
In article <1144517017.489344.253840@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Carmen" <carmensrt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <QTBG5QVH38815.7390046296@reece.net.au>,
> > - <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > > >Government lawyers t
|
|
|
Ron Olin wrote:
>>He is a habitual liar and prevaricator. He lacks a moral center. He is
>>unfit to be President.
Yet you canot document any of his lies.
>
>
> He's unfit to run a Walmart Automotive repair shop.
>
Yet he's the best presi
|
|
|
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:21:10 -0400, "Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com>
wrote:
>If one engages in commercial disparagement (not protected speech), then
>litigation is often very appropriate.
>
Are you accusing me of doing that, Mr. Parker? Don't
|
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:40:33 GMT, Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
>"We are removing access to all junk food from EVERYONE because
>there are a few obese morons out there that can't control themselves.
>So the rest of you......too bad."
Junk food is a
|
|
|
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Trying to shrink the growing waistlines of children,
lawmakers want to expel soda, candy bars, chips and other junk food
from the nation's schools.
As if we don't have enough laws trying to control peoples' lives, here
comes anoth
|
|
|
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
>>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> Ted and I rarely agree, but on this we do. If the
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2006 07:46:17 -0700, spartakus@my-deja.com wrote:
>> >>>Except perhaps that the fetus is gravely deformed or has other problems
>> >>>that would prevent it from having any kind of life.
>
>> >> And that justifies murdering the child?
>
>>
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2006 07:42:31 -0700, spartakus@my-deja.com wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> >> Ted and I rarely agree, but on this we do. If the baby can be
>> >> nearly delivered (
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:4437D961.E5F927F@worldnet.att.net:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>> [...]
>
>> Why did you edit this part out, Teddums?
>
>>>> there
|
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:38:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On 08 Apr 2006 05:28:20 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
>>>>>Ke
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:mIKdnTPL15C4hqXZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pghconnect.com...
>>>I agree with you for once ray the pua industry is pretty
>>>commericalized.
>>>
>>>Neil Struass is just trying to sell books and Mystery
|
|
|
"Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dwBZf.7136$yy4.1984@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
> "EvilOppressorOfConservatives"
> <Shakespeare'sFool@ThisMachineKillsFascists.edu> wrote in message
> news:q7-dnRhoIJsoMavZRVn-rg@adelphia.com.
|
|
|
In article <otKdnXplseS8darZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> > The prosecutors have said when they requested the siezure orders that
> > they didn't know the gold caps were permanen
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2006 07:55:20 -0700, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote:
>Relevant Snips from Bill's article on another pair of baby killers:
>
>
>>
>> "It's either murder or an accident. We say murder," prosecutor Ed
>> Parkinson said outside court.
>
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2006 00:20:22 -0700, "lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com>
wrote:
>No you don't, it's not a criminal matter. You have no right to privacy
>when you receive instant messages from your pal Osama. Just like your
>granddaddy, who didn't have a ri
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Lowrenta wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>That's probably one of the reasons Hum et al took the DP off the
>>table.
>
> Hum didn't take the Death Penalty off the table. The decision wasn't
> his to make -- if it were, this wou
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2006 00:53:53 -0700, "lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com>
wrote:
>Overseas mail has always been subject to search, ever since there was
>overseas mail.
True only of packages. First class mail requires a warrant.
>And when in a time of w
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>[...]
>>
>>Why did you edit this part out, Teddums?
>
>>>>thereby exposing one of the largest clandestine operations we had
>>>>-- which took *de
|
|
|
>>I agree with you for once ray the pua industry is pretty
>>commericalized.
>>
>>Neil Struass is just trying to sell books and Mystery charges 1,000
>>dollars a workshop.
>>
>>Didnt you used to agrue on here with mystery Ray?
>
> It doesn't matte
|
|
|
Lowrenta wrote:
[...]
> That's probably one of the reasons Hum et al took the DP off the
> table.
Hum didn't take the Death Penalty off the table. The decision wasn't
his to make -- if it were, this would STILL be a capital case.
> A capita
|
|
|
In article <QTBG5QVH38815.7390046296@reece.net.au>,
- <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >Government lawyers tried to confiscate the gold tooth caps from the
> >mouths of the two men, saying the dental work qualified as seizable
> >assets.
>
> Dam
|
|
|
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:00:35 -0600, "Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net>
wrote:
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>> Oh, and 4., The President is not our "mother."
>
>yessir-
>Everybody acts like this is recent and some sort of surprise.
>The Mult
|
|
|
Bill Rabkin wrote:
> I gather you're already preparing your response to the Cam Brown
> verdict, if one is needed.
I didn't know that a response needs to be presented for a dismissal of
all charges.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.
|
