Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.
"KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: >> now, here comes DOCTOR Condi and she does not imagine it! >> Not even on September 11! >> >> Now, Rewind again: " nobody could have imagined a plane being used as >> a weapon >> and being driven into one of o


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
Zen Cohen wrote: > McGyver wrote: >> Nothing. Its over. [...] > As a practical matter, that's usually true, but I've seen MNTs > granted where it was shown that a witness made material misstatements > of fact. Isn't that doable in CA? The


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:44399859.72F18BDF@worldnet.att.net... > Deadrat wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Jim Higgins wrote: > >>> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>> And you get your news from "reliab


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
Deadrat wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Jim Higgins wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>> And you get your news from "reliable" sources like Howard "I have a >>> scream" Dean whose theme song is Psychotic Reaction or the >>> Democratic National


Re: Law re loss due to fraud or negligence ?
< pjdd@rediffmail.com > wrote in message news:1144581866.600185.199200@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com ... > Although I live in India where the laws of other > countries don't apply, I'm curious to know how the > following issue would be dealt with in


Re: Duke U. Rape: Nuts & Sl*ts Defense
And Clinton never had sexual relations with that woman.. and Jennifer Wilbanks fiance had killer her just like Scott Peterson RIGHT??? RIGHT??? http://www.bulldukey.com


Re: Duke U. Rape: Nuts & Sl*ts Defense
And Clinton never had sexual relations with that woman.. and Jennifer Wilbanks fiance had killer her just like Scott Peterson RIGHT??? RIGHT??? http://www.bulldukey.com


Re: Duke U. Rape: Nuts & Sl*ts Defense
And Clinton never had sexual relations with that woman.. and Jennifer Wilbanks fiance had killer her just like Scott Peterson RIGHT??? RIGHT??? http://www.bulldukey.com


Re: Duke U. Rape: Nuts & Sl*ts Defense
And Clinton never had sexual relations with that woman.. and Jennifer Wilbanks fiance had killer her just like Scott Peterson RIGHT??? RIGHT??? http://www.bulldukey.com


Re: Duke U. Rape: Nuts & Sl*ts Defense
And Clinton never had sexual relations with that woman.. and Jennifer Wilbanks fiance had killer her just like Scott Peterson RIGHT??? RIGHT??? http://www.bulldukey.com


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message news:CKe_f.4475$Fp4.3377@trnddc01... > Nothing. Its over. The time for proving the defendant lied was at the > trial, at the time the defendant was testifying. .... As a practical matter, that's u


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in news:4439BCCF.FD72E97F@worldnet.att.net: > Mitchell Holman wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> What's the matter with Fox News? Can you point to ANY instances >>> where they have


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
Ken Smith wrote: > I am a Republican. In name only. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
Ken Smith asserted: > You have to understand that Ted is one of these Dominion Now > religious nutters. Not exactly. I'm not a doctrinaire theonomist or anything of that sort. But I recognise that a political system does not have the capability


Re: Laws For Stupid Parents
<Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message news:v9e_f.81514$9I5.13025@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... > > On 9-Apr-2006, "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote: > >> <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message >> news:0R9_f.89127$g91.37268@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com.


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
< Duraphatti06@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1144594237.821668.177410@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com ... > 1.Plaintiff takes Defendant to court. > > 2.Defendant submits very lengthy cross motion > > 3. Plaintiff able to prove Defendant made false


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
In article <4437D961.E5F927F@worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > >Joe Wilson ... "speaking the truth"??? GIMME A F***IN' BREAK! He's a >bigger mendacious prevaricator than even <you-know-who>. George Bush?


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in news:44397A36.106A45F6@worldnet.att.net: > > > What's the matter with Fox News? Can you point to ANY instances where > they have been dishonest? You mean like Bill O'Reilly invit


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:44396A59.AF9448FD@worldnet.att.net... > Jim Higgins wrote: > > > Ken Smith wrote: > > >> [...] > > > And you get your news from "reliable" sources like Howard "I have a > > sc


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
On 9 Apr 2006 07:50:37 -0700, Duraphatti06@yahoo.com wrote: Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer. If anyone with a law degree posts something that is in opposition to what I've posted, go with their advice over mine. >X-No-Archive:yes > >Hello >


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
"GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote in message news:4439693c$0$14903$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.com... > Apeal on basis of indigence I don't know how indigence would help him other than maybe not having to pay filing fees/costs. In any case, appella


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
<Duraphatti06@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144594237.821668.177410@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... > FYI - Much documentation (a lot from Defendant > herself) to show that Defendant made false > statements to the court - almost to an > unbeli


Re: question for Ken
On 09 Apr 2006 16:38:45 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >>Kent Wills wrote: >>> On 09 Apr 2006 04:41:38 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> >> [snipped to focus on this point]


Re: question for Ken
On 09 Apr 2006 16:38:22 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: [Various snips for brevity] > >>>>>No it doesn't justify murder and nobody has tried to justify murder. >>>>>You might as well ask if it justifies baking pies. >>>> >>>> Yo


Re: Laws For Stupid Parents
On 9-Apr-2006, "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote: > <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message > news:0R9_f.89127$g91.37268@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... > > > > On 8-Apr-2006, "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote: > > > >> It is said that there is no form


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
Jim Higgins wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> [...] > And you get your news from "reliable" sources like Howard "I have a > scream" Dean whose theme song is Psychotic Reaction or the Democratic > National Committee or Nancy Pelosi or Teddy "Chappaqu


Re: Canadian IP - Usenet poster says he's in US with broadband connection?
begin quotation from stuka_ju_1941@yahoo.com <stuka_ju_1941@yahoo.com> in message <1144330810.637965.246930@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> posted at 2006-04-06T13:40 > The IP addresses below are extracted from Canadian headers stamped by > sympati


Re: Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.
"KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message news:4i6_f.8058$gy2.7673@trnddc08... > > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:g_1_f.13857$tN3.13637@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... > > >> >> Hey this is great! Must really piss of


RE:Re: Beware of PRICE FIXING by seduction gurus
dious wrote: > > Gordon Roy Parker (0-11 in court) wrote: >>>> Thrasher Remailer wrote: >>>> >>>>> In an attempt to eliminate disruption caused by >>>>> this individual >>>> >>>> Keep in mind that if you speak up against certain >>>> people the w


Re: Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.
"Winston Smith, American Patriot" <FranzKafka@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV> wrote in message news:Xns97A09C5CBC113WSAP1960@207.115.17.102... >>>> >> Hey this is great! Must really piss of the socialist/communists >>>> >> lefties >>>> >> and anyone else


Re: Law re loss due to fraud or negligence ?
PJDD, Rather than look at the response of the legal systems in other countries to such a crime, it might be better for the victims to ask the government how it intends to aid or compensate the victims. Armed with that answer the victims may w


Re: question for Ken
Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On 09 Apr 2006 04:41:38 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > > [snipped to focus on this point] > >>>>>>>The evil of the anti-abortion ideology. >>>>>> >>>>>> So my taki


Re: question for Ken
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>Except perhaps that the fetus is gravely deformed or has other problems >>>>>>>>that would prevent it from having any


RE:Re: Beware of PRICE FIXING by seduction gurus


Re: Laws For Stupid Parents
On 8-Apr-2006, "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote: > It is said that there is no form of government that intrudes into your > daily > life most than a democracy. > I wouldn't go that far. > > <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message > news:8qS


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
Jim Higgins wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44390A14.20003@it.com... >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in >>>news:443863CB.7E49181B@worldnet.att.net: >>>>Mitchell Holman wrote


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
Zen, Thanks so much for the info. Plaintiff's attorney was willing to appeal, so maybe willing to file a MNT. I'll contact attorney tomorrow and see what happens. Very much appreciate your input, Dura


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
statements made in court as part of judicial proceedings are absolutely priveleged, but I'm about to bring an action myself to test the outer limits of that... a sworn statement made in front of a notary public... the sworn statements themselves co


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
Reply much appreciated, thanks, Dura


Re: question for Ken
Kent Wills wrote: > On 09 Apr 2006 04:41:38 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: [snipped to focus on this point] >>>>>>The evil of the anti-abortion ideology. >>>>> >>>>> So my taking advantage of the pro-choice belief system, >>>>


Re: Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia" <gw@h


Re: Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Bill Shatzer" <bshatzerNO@comcast.net> wrote


Re: => Breaking News: G aWol Bush authorized leak! = TRAITOROUS CRIMINALREPUGNIKKKAN SCUM !! <=
Mitchell Holman wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in > news:443863CB.7E49181B@worldnet.att.net: >>Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>>Ken Smith w


Re: Perjury misled court - what to do next?
<Duraphatti06@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144594237.821668.177410@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... > X-No-Archive:yes > > Hello > > 1.Plaintiff takes Defendant to court. > > 2.Defendant submits very lengthy cross motion > > 3. Plaintiff


Re: Laws For Stupid Parents
<Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message news:0R9_f.89127$g91.37268@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... > > On 8-Apr-2006, "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote: > >> It is said that there is no form of government that intrudes into your >> daily >> life most


Re: is this graffiti
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 21:30:51 -0400, blackjack <ktkovar@hotmail.com> wrote: > >is this graffiti > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >I know this is trivial but i would appreciate any help. I own a


Excellent article, columnist says men 18-25 are horrible people
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/opinion/09gurganus.html


Re: question for Ken
On 09 Apr 2006 04:41:38 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>On 08 Apr 2006 17:19:58 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >> >>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> rfischer@sonic.n


Excellent article, columnist says all teens are awful human beings
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/opinion/09gurganus.html


Re: Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.
"KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in alt.politics.bush: > > "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:g_1_f.13857$tN3.13637@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... > >>> >> Hey this is great! Must really piss of the socialist/communists