|
|
In article <fqh142h3mn9ah3m12jgqjqk01ofhhcb3vr@4ax.com>, a@b.c wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:26:22 -0000, gordonb.6t3kz@burditt.org (Gordon
> Burditt) wrote:
>
> >If FICO took factors into account that lenders KNEW violated Federal
> >anti-discr
|
|
|
there's a federal statute whereby you can sue those companies that have put
wrong information on your credit report and refuse to take it off even after
you've shown them that it's false. I believe you can get up to $30,000 in
punitives plus actual da
|
|
|
i,
I just wanted to let you know that if you turn off your computer, and
shut it down, all the way, and unplug it, when all the juice or
electricity is out of it, then steadily press on the "ctrl" or
'Control' key, and plug your computer back in and
|
|
|
I have three simple questions. First, a (fairly) brief summation of facts is
necessary:
Indian Housing Agency filed FED action in small claims court against Indian
Home purchaser.
12 O.S. - 1148.6 states that, in a FED action,
In all cases
|
|
|
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:01:33 +0000, Gordon Burditt wrote:
>>> I disagree. It is up to you to make sure that the information is
>>> *FAVORABLE TO YOU*, not accurate. You are under no obligation to
>>> correct errors you believe are in your favor.
>
|
|
|
> Any ideas? I'm open to any suggestions, including, at this point,
> dirty tricks.
Sue each one of them in small claims court demanding the necessary action or
monetary damages if they do not comply. If the evidence you claim you have
is legit,
|
|
|
Known net-stalker "ReelMcKoi" aka JABRIOL <ReelMckoi@mailinator.com>Antonio
L Santana/Camden NJ
cong of Jehovah's Witnesses wrote in message
news:1145153762.542806.80900@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com.../SNIP!
Again: You forgot to add that you're
|
|
|
"Zod" aka JABRIOL known sociopathic net-stalker<zodriol@gmail.com> Antonio L
Santana/Camden NJ congragation of Jehovah's Witnesses wrote in message
news:1145105641.294562.74220@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> --
>
>
> What is his victim name?
|
|
|
Secular Human <eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in
news:j3b0g.116192$_c.74144@tornado.tampabay.rr.com:
> Chief wrote:
>> "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote in news:443e9cf1$0$14913$a82e2bb9
>> @reader.athenanews.com:
>>
>>> "Chief" <Chief@polyglot.co
|
|
|
I'm sorry to hear about your ID theft problem.
In article <1145136373.129305.308250@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"saltbeet" <SALTBEET@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> some of the creditors and collection agencies insist the charges are
> valid.
Though
|
|
|
In article <fqh142h3mn9ah3m12jgqjqk01ofhhcb3vr@4ax.com>, a@b.c
says...
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:26:22 -0000, gordonb.6t3kz@burditt.org (Gordon
> Burditt) wrote:
>
> >If FICO took factors into account that lenders KNEW violated Federal
> >anti-disc
|
|
|
>> But what if FICO has trouble parsing the information that indicates
>> whether an account is open or closed?
>
>It's not that hard to "parse" the information. There isn't much
>discrepancy or grey area between "open" and "closed."
But there of
|
|
|
>I'm always suspicious of a company whose business model depends on
>deep secrecy.
Do you think Secret Sauce contains people? Does the current formula
for Coca-Cola contain cocaine? Do you think it's prudent for a
safe manufacturing company to m
|
|
|
There is a thing known as the "Fair Debt Collection" law which spells
out what you, the debtor, is/are required to do and that. One item I
found interesting is the fact you can tell the collection agency not to
contact you any more and they have to com
|
|
|
>> Scores aren't divined out of thin air. Each of the three major credit
>> bureaus have their own scoring system, and they use their own credit
>> report data to come up with your score. Your "credit score" is simply a
>> representation of one of
|
|
|
Chief wrote:
> "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote in news:443e9cf1$0$14913$a82e2bb9
> @reader.athenanews.com:
>
>> "Chief" <Chief@polyglot.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97A496374C7E5RetiredApachePilot@216.77.188.18...
>>> "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com>
|
|
|
In article <epi142l4n6ep0gdj7sb7plect2dublg4qt@4ax.com>, a@b.c wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:53:18 GMT, Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net>
> wrote:
>
> >denied. It wouldn't outlaw FICO outright, just say that creditors
> >couldn't use or cite a
|
|
|
<nataliemreed@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145080521.043300.63350@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> OK, let me clarify some things that I guess I didn't in my previous
> post. Let me start by saying that I appreciate all of your help. Kent,
> wh
|
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:02:46 -0000, gordonb.nfkie@burditt.org (Gordon
Burditt) wrote:
>I disagree. It is up to you to make sure that the information is
>*FAVORABLE TO YOU*, not accurate. You are under no obligation to
>correct errors you believe a
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-FF4E0E.23170914042006@news.east.earthlink.net...
> The bad lenders probably would, just like poor credit risks complain
> about FICO. Those recognized as being quality lenders would love the
> system, just
|
|
|
"bandage" <cbandage@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1145041631.948974.177980@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I work for "Company A" , that requires that I have an internet
> connection at my home.
> "Company A" reimburses me for for the monthy cost
|
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:07:16 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>If you owe the original amount, you should pay it. It's your
>debt, and ethically, paying it is the right thing to do.
No it isn't, all you will do is pay off a former deb
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0h1425ithi36dau8mcd8g4sgnemo3omru@4ax.com...
> On 14 Apr 2006 16:14:04 -0700, hoalili@myway.com wrote:
>
>>I recently moved to a new address. A collection agency found out my
>>new address an
|
|
|
Permanency is basically when an injury impacts your life in a
significant way, even though you're able to return to work in your
pre-injury capacity. For example, say you had a rotator cuff tear,
that required surgery. After the surgery & physical th
|
|
|
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/
|
|
|
\roger61611@yahoo.com wrote:
> 99.99% probability your cable company agreement forbids this.
Why would they forbid it, especially if the customer has a business
grade connection?
|
|
|
I have a lot of bad items on my credit report, due to ID theft. It
took me a long time to discover it ("my" address had been switched to
other addresses), so some accounts got sold to collection agencies.
So I did what I assumed was the right thing:
|
|
|
aturally Bush is taking up for his failed SECDEF!
In his best-selling book, "American Theocracy," Kevin Phillips asserts,
"There's something about oil that makes high officials lie."
Certainly, Rummy, along with Bush and Cheney, and many other
adm
|
|
|
. Bids for vending Boston City Council stenographic
services should be held instead of using the same
ensconced service that doesn't even use the latest
technology.
. It would be a good idea to have th
|
|
|
http://peterborre.com
http://friendsofdanryan.com
|
|
|
Wm James wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2006 08:57:39 -0700, "Fred the Red Shirt"
> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Wm James wrote:
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> >Being in uniform when captured is NOT a requirement to qualify for
> >> >POW status if the c
|
|
|
"Ernie Klein" <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:ecklein-07C89D.21531814042006@news.west.earthlink.net...
> Exactly. That's why why I took exception to what you said above: "Your
> "credit score" is simply a representation of one of your c
|
|
|
axel@white-eagle.invalid.uk wrote:
> In uk.legal Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> Thirdly, there is no conceivable benefit to the security services or
>> the Government in *hiding* the fact that they had achieved such a
>> suc
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2006 16:14:04 -0700, hoalili@myway.com wrote:
>I recently moved to a new address. A collection agency found out my
>new address and sent a bill to me. I called the agency; they said that
>they have been trying to contact me over past 4 ye
|
|
|
"Travis Jordan" <no.one@no.net> wrote in message
news:to70g.508600$fe6.418094@fe01.news.easynews.com...
> \roger61611@yahoo.com wrote:
>> 99.99% probability your cable company agreement forbids this.
>
> Why would they forbid it, especially if the
|
|
|
Going back over 30 years on Lexus, searching all free speech cases from
all federal district and appellate courts :
Public nudity AND freedom of speech OR free expression: 120 hits
KKK: 76
Nazi: 30
Flag Burning: 22
Economic or employ
|
|
|
t was a short two months ago I began writing my book about the
cesspool of corruption in the Florida Judiciary. The book took root
after a meeting of concerned citizens in Pompano Beach, Florida on
February 1, 2006.
After hearing legal nightmares w
|
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:53:18 GMT, Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net>
wrote:
>denied. It wouldn't outlaw FICO outright, just say that creditors
>couldn't use or cite a FICO score to deny credit unless the exact source
>of the FICO score was reveale
|
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:26:22 -0000, gordonb.6t3kz@burditt.org (Gordon
Burditt) wrote:
>If FICO took factors into account that lenders KNEW violated Federal
>anti-discrimination laws, they would be required by law to stop using
>their services. They
|
|
|
In the post 9-11 and Internet crime era, the Age of Compliance is upon
us. Does consolidating resources help to reduce costs and increase
effectiveness?
http://fraudwar.blogspot.com/2006/04/does-teamwork-make-sense-in-age-of.html
|
|
|
On 9 Apr 2006 08:57:39 -0700, "Fred the Red Shirt"
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>Wm James wrote:
>> ...
>> >
>> >Being in uniform when captured is NOT a requirement to qualify for
>> >POW status if the captive is a regular member of the Ar
|
|
|
<without_lace@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145050701.950549.138620@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> well heres another part of it...the night the police came here it wasnt
> a 911 call...jimmy called a hotline cause he thought i had taken so
|
|
|
In article <x-BA2E95.23523514042006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> In article <ecklein-DA0D38.20415614042006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > In article <x-81D6A6.23153714042006@news.
|
|
|
In article <ecklein-DA0D38.20415614042006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article <x-81D6A6.23153714042006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <ecklein-DA86D3.19381014042006
|
|
|
In article <x-81D6A6.23153714042006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> In article <ecklein-DA86D3.19381014042006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > In article <x-E9B2D7.20325314042006@news.
|
|
|
In article <1240mee5jg3v83@corp.supernews.com>,
gordonb.6t3kz@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote:
> >> What if a hate organization decides to carry their fight to the credit
> >> arena by buying a major credit bureau and changing its score model to
|
|
|
In article <FGY%f.53401$K11.16411@clgrps12>, "Don" <dwzimm@telus.net>
wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
> news:x-269992.21061314042006@news.east.earthlink.net...
> > In article <5d9042pdojsibt5qquegflt0lgouqiiuoq@4ax.com>, a@b.c wrote:
|
|
|
In article <ecklein-DA86D3.19381014042006@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article <x-E9B2D7.20325314042006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <nsgu3218rncl4jqt609fnuqigapff
|
|
|
In article <x-E9B2D7.20325314042006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> In article <nsgu3218rncl4jqt609fnuqigapff9bl5f@4ax.com>, a@b.c wrote:
> > Do companies that
> > check our credit tend to disclose what score system they use?
|
|
|
>> What if a hate organization decides to carry their fight to the credit
>> arena by buying a major credit bureau and changing its score model to
>> discriminate against the people they hate? Clearly that would violate
>> a lot of laws and would not
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-269992.21061314042006@news.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <5d9042pdojsibt5qquegflt0lgouqiiuoq@4ax.com>, a@b.c wrote:
> Well, for starters, think about what he said. FICO sells their product
> to lender
|
