|
|
<websurf1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1146022764.889752.180310@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> GeekBoy wrote:
>>Don't know what state it was in, but some states have "speed trap" laws.
>>It
>>other words the police must be visible when they
|
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:51:43 -0400, "<0>" <<0>@<0>.com> wrote:
>
>I have a problem with another guy with whom I share the title on a car in
>Va. He isn't paying his part of the bill (the car is still under lien by
>the bank.) I know you can't just
|
|
|
Having a disagreement. After receiving a settlement from an insurance
company for hail damage, is it wrong, i.e. fraud, to not repair the
vehicle?
Seems to me that it is not fraud. What would be fraud is if you
attempted to submit another claim fo
|
|
|
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> This, along with the "Large Print Edition" roads which enable the
> elderly to continue driving long past their expiration dates, is why I
> will never again travel to Florida.
A group of Florida senior citizens were sitti
|
|
|
Abe wrote:
> Do not go faster than 9 mph over the speed limit, ever, and this will
> never be an issue again.
I would not recommend going 24 in a 15 mph school zone here in Florida.
|
|
|
ameijers wrote:
> "Travis Jordan" <no.one@no.net> wrote in message
> news:rIs3g.91360$BL7.20352@fe09.news.easynews.com...
> > spdnomo wrote:
> > > Was I better off slowing down like I
> > > did and letting him catch up to me or should I have made
|
|
|
In article <q4ks42h3uno56m5ojp0ijhq5ptjqt9fhq3@127.0.0.1>, spdnomo
<nms@spdnomo.car> wrote:
>We were all doing over 90 mpg on the interstate in the middle of nowhere.
>I'd say the fastest ones must have been going over 100, as they were
>blasting pa
|
|
|
"Travis Jordan" <no.one@no.net> wrote in message
news:rIs3g.91360$BL7.20352@fe09.news.easynews.com...
> spdnomo wrote:
> > Was I better off slowing down like I
> > did and letting him catch up to me or should I have made a run for it
> > and then s
|
|
|
Mark-T wrote:
>
> Bible John wrote:
> > Its strange why employment is "At Will" (except for those with
> > contracts or those in labor unions) while education is not.
> >
> > This means that I have to do a number of things to a) get fired form my j
|
|
|
"Alex Rodriguez" <adr5@columbia.edu> wrote in message
news:e2lp3q$nrl$12@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu...
> If you were going that fast and it took him that long to catch up with
> you, you should have simply said it wasn't you. Once the cop loses sig
|
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:51:43 -0400, "<0>" <<0>@<0>.com> wrote:
Go to DMV and say you did a bit of fraud?? Or the same at the Bank???
That's pissing on your own boots. Go read the original bill of sale.
Was his name on it or not. Was a there a subs
|
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 05:31:19 -0700, "traci" <without_lace@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>what kind of time is a person looking at when they are charged with
>domestic battery 3 times in 4 months but not convicted on 2 counts? If
Was he tried on the other two co
|
|
|
arachnid wrote:
>Here in Texas it doesn't matter if you're going 20 mph over
>the speed limit, if cars are stacking up behind you they can get you
>for obstructing traffic.
>Then, if you were well over the speed limit and the cop's just having
>a s
|
|
|
Dr. Dave Cash, a religious minister who knew Shelby Roberts very well,
and even attended church with her and was also my jailer, immediately
posted a response to what I wrote.
Here is his interesting posting and my response:
--- In amherst-va@yaho
|
|
|
GeekBoy wrote:
>Don't know what state it was in, but some states have "speed trap" laws. It
>other words the police must be visible when they catch you speeding, and not
>hiding behind some sign or something.
That's a speed trap????? That's common
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:41:48 -0700, Abe <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Do not go faster than 9 mph over the speed limit, ever, and this will
>never be an issue again. If you have to block traffic in the slow lane
>to do it, so be it. No cop will ever ac
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:30:32 GMT, "Travis Jordan" <no.one@no.net>
wrote:
>In Florida running from a law enforcement officer is a felony called
>"fleeing and eluding". If they can the LEO just gets the tag and puts
>it in their system, and then if t
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:52:04 GMT, "ameijers"
<aemeijers@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>And if you piss them off, they WILL put a BOLO on the plate. You gotta stop
>to take a leak sometime.
Do the words "Trucker Bomb" mean anything to you?
--
What th
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:01:50 +0000, spdnomo <nms@spdnomo.car> wrote:
>traffic offense by mail from the east coast. All this got me to
>thinking: what would have happened if instead of slowing down I had
>just kept on going. He would have never bee
|
|
|
"spdnomo" <nms@spdnomo.car> wrote in message
news:q4ks42h3uno56m5ojp0ijhq5ptjqt9fhq3@127.0.0.1...
> Some time ago I was driving cross country from the west coast to the
> east coast. While I'm normally a pretty safe driver and observe the
> speed
|
|
|
The reason sellers list eBay items at 99 cents with a $10 shipping
charge is because this allows them to pay extremely low eBay fees.
This is okay with me. What is not okay is for them to send used and
broken items when they are advertised as "NEW".
|
|
|
Horrible, Monstrous Woman is Finally Dead
The Lynchburg News & Advance reports, "Shelby Jean Harris Roberts, 67,
went home to be with the Lord on Friday, April 21, 2006". I have news
for them. She is not going there. How can a woman who committed eve
|
|
|
spdnomo wrote:
> Was I better off slowing down like I
> did and letting him catch up to me or should I have made a run for it
> and then slowed down once I lost him?
Where I live the cops have a 'no chase' policy. If you won't pull over
for them i
|
|
|
Some time ago I was driving cross country from the west coast to the
east coast. While I'm normally a pretty safe driver and observe the
speed limits and the rules of the road, this time I found myself in
one of those <don't know what to call them> th
|
|
|
"NeoTruthSeeker" Antonio L Santana aka Jabriol <truth@nobody.net> babbled in
message news:%En3g.3127$yI1.2966@trnddc04...
> Ð.Ô.C wrote:
>>
>> "NeoTruthSeeker" <truth@nobody.net> wrote in message /
>> ssssnnniiiipppppppppp!
=====================
|
|
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
> I stopped reading right there. No one FORCES you to speed, you gutless
> coward. You don't have to follow the crowd.
You stopped reading right there? LMAO. Wouldn't matter if you did or
didn't, consid
|
|
|
"TODD72" <mooredd_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145949523.316674.244260@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks again.
>
> You have been really helpful. I want a future with the state and
> local agencies (not necessarily in Alabama) in
|
|
|
Hi, I live in Manhattan, in a rent stabilized apartment in a 100 unit
building. I've lived there for 4 years and have always been a good
tenant. Paying rent on times most of the time (never more than 1 week
late). Have a dog. Take good care of ev
|
|
|
"spdnomo" <nms@spdnomo.car> wrote in message
news:q4ks42h3uno56m5ojp0ijhq5ptjqt9fhq3@127.0.0.1...
> Some time ago I was driving cross country from the west coast to the
> east coast. While I'm normally a pretty safe driver and observe the
> speed
|
|
|
>Some time ago I was driving cross country from the west coast to the
>east coast. While I'm normally a pretty safe driver and observe the
>speed limits and the rules of the road, this time I found myself in
>one of those <don't know what to call them
|
|
|
where was it?
is it possible your tag was different enough (color, etc.)
from those in his own state that it would have been simple
to peg you as an out-of-stater from the point he was
taking radar/laser?
|
|
|
If you were going that fast and it took him that long to catch up with
you, you should have simply said it wasn't you. Once the cop loses sight
of your car, there is no way for him to know when he came up behind you
that yours was the car that he s
|
|
|
O,
Have you tried to buy out his share of the car? I doubt that a court will
just give you the car if he contributed to the downpayment, upkeep, and
monthly payments. It sounds as if you have had the use of this car and he
has received nothing
|
|
|
The newspapers and journals are full of information about warrantless
wiretapping and eavesdropping. What many people do not realize is that
the type of eavesdropping occurring for national security purposes is
vastly different than the real world of
|
|
|
The newspapers and journals are full of information about warrantless
wiretapping and eavesdropping. What many people do not realize is that
the type of eavesdropping occurring for national security purposes is
vastly different than the real world of
|
|
|
wayne_s_noches@yahoo.com wrote:
> If he were a Muslim, these same people who are so staunchly defending
> Koresh would be as strongly condemning him.
>
> Bottom line, Koresh was a TERRORIST who killed Federal agents who were
> trying to serve a la
|
|
|
the_blogologist wrote:
>
> Since when is burning kids justified in any circumstance?
>
> What kind of crime scene preservation leaves only a concrete slab?
>
Kept the investigagers and newspapers out until they bulldozed the
ground to mak
|
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006, "Brian" <BrownTiger@gmail.com> explained further:
>> [Why can't you] stop your neighbor's encroachment
> by putting up an "acceptable" height of fence[?]
>
> We want privacy fence. She does babysitting, and her
> property always
|
|
|
GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia wrote:
> FED UP wrote:
>
>
>> Chimpboy you dumb ignorant asshole.
>> Even Janet "the butcher of Waco" Reno admitted that the child
>>molestation charges
>> against Koresh were wrong.
>
>
> No she did
|
|
|
GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia wrote:
>
> Koresh the kiddie (Bleep) deserved to burn, and burn he did.
Along with the kiddies he was alleged (After they were burned) to have
molested. There was never any evidence provided to support the
|
|
|
After reading the nonsense on your website, I would say that
you do not deserve children (for example, you are perverted).
Also we are only hearing your side of the story. I'm sure
the "monster" had her side as well.
- CF
|
|
|
Charlië wrote:
>
> "NeoTruthSeeker" <truth@nobody.net> wrote in message
> news:CKe3g.6024$BO2.5117@trnddc02...
>> Prominent Bethelite wrote:
>>
>>
>> She is going to find out tomorrow.
> =====================================
> Here's one you ca
|
|
|
Ð.Ô.C wrote:
>
> "NeoTruthSeeker" <truth@nobody.net> wrote in message
> news:CKe3g.6024$BO2.5117@trnddc02...
>> Prominent Bethelite wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, just a by the way! Jabriol, the smartest of the online JW's, is
>>> not bluffing. It is a crim
|
|
|
Moments before taking that leap of faith into the pond Jabriol aka Antonio L
Santana/Camden NJ
<NeoTruthSeeker> at <truth@nobody.net> was heard opining:
SNIP!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zhavriol" aka Jabriol <zodriol@gmail.com>
SOLI
|
|
|
Seems like it.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14424795.htm
|
|
|
"spdnomo" <nms@spdnomo.car> wrote in message
news:q4ks42h3uno56m5ojp0ijhq5ptjqt9fhq3@127.0.0.1...
> Some time ago I was driving cross country from the west coast to the
> east coast. While I'm normally a pretty safe driver and observe the
> speed
|
|
|
My friend needs to check from whom the incoming calls on her husband
cell phone are from. Cingular doesn't state the number, just that it is
"incoming". She was told to get the court order.
How can she get such a court order?
Scenario is this:
|
|
|
spdnomo wrote:
> Some time ago I was driving cross country from the west coast to the
> east coast. While I'm normally a pretty safe driver and observe the
> speed limits and the rules of the road, this time I found myself in
> one of those <don't
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:55:36 -0700, "arminius" <richard
norton@cybertrails.com> wrote:
> The IRS and Social Security Administration know of possibly
>millions of cases in which illegal workers use someone else's Social
>Security number to get a job
|
|
|
<0> wrote:
> I have a problem with another guy with whom I share the title on a car in
> Va. He isn't paying his part of the bill (the car is still under lien by
> the bank.) I know you can't just walk into DMV and ask to take someone else
> off, bu
|
|