misc.legal

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:20:19 GMT, "Barky Bark" <barkybark@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: |surely you jest.. they have email after email from him asking for his 'fix' |and they have the testimony from his dealer. | |Rush is getting off scot free here, du

Mark Ferguson wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 05:07:49 GMT, anti-censorship > <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote: > > >>Unlike some in this newsgroup > > > Which newgroup moron? > > news.admin.net-abuse.email > news.admin.censorship > misc.le

Mark Ferguson wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:51:51 GMT, anti-censorship > <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote: > > >>>Verbal assualt is still assault dick head. > > > Troll response : alt.usenet.kooks removed yet again, sigh, the spoon > fed s

Art Deco wrote: > Kadaitcha Man <@$#*-you.ya.cunt@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote: > > >>anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net>, the reprobate cordwainer, >>purged: >> >> >>>Chadwick Stone© wrote: >>> >>> >>>>X-No-Archive: YES >>>>an

Jessie C wrote: > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:05:29 -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote: > > >>($DAYJOB doesn't write pink contracts. Several network operators >>well-known to NANAE do write such contracts.) > > > Including Censorship k00k's much-vau

Kadaitcha Man wrote: > anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net>, the brainwashed bricker, > yelled: > > >>Your email address is phony. That calls the name into question as >>well. > > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! My email address is real. Does th

anti-censorship wrote: > anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote in message > <BIG4g.11377$eR6.6232@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>... > > >>I! Finally! Learned! How! To! Punctuate! > > More. Usenet. Abuse. BY! Anti! Spa

Kadaitcha Man wrote: > anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net>, the reprobate cordwainer, > purged: > > >>Chadwick Stone© wrote: >> >> >>>X-No-Archive: YES >>>anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony >>>dyD4g.

"Shmaryahu b. Chanoch" <omega.d21@gmail.com> wrote in message news:n7l752hdegh4bnl5fs3qlui6a8upjvl6ap@4ax.com... > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:37:59 -0700, Frank <frank@frank.spam> wrote: > > |On 29 Apr 2006 12:05:27 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy

"Shmaryahu b. Chanoch" <omega.d21@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ktj752tjes9crslf7gg2cq330n6f2uqpvp@4ax.com... > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:52:37 -0700, Frank <frank@frank.spam> wrote: > > |On 29 Apr 2006 10:32:15 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy

"Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:FCT4g.77632$dW3.19240@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > > "GeekBoy" <haha@hehe.com> wrote in message > news:445308ca$0$24437$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.com... >> >> "Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbc

well there you go. the state has interests, the individual has rights, and everything in Crim Pro is attempting to find a balance between the two.

> Except that is not the case here. More likely that the democrat prosecutor was > losing and wanted to save face. er, somehow I doubt that

surely you jest.. they have email after email from him asking for his 'fix' and they have the testimony from his dealer. Rush is getting off scot free here, due undoubtedly to his political pull and some $$$ bribes.

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:37:59 -0700, Frank <frank@frank.spam> wrote: |On 29 Apr 2006 12:05:27 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote: | |>Of course not. $30,000 is nothing to him. But again i ask you to |>consider

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:52:37 -0700, Frank <frank@frank.spam> wrote: |On 29 Apr 2006 10:32:15 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |<xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote: | |>> Either he takes this settlement or Rush spend 1 to 3 in the Florida pen. |>

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:26:17 GMT, "Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote: | |"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message |news:tb775254968lbqi7n6eucdni60d15sb3ti@4ax.com... |> Why is limbaugh paying $30,000?

opaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is a typical example of what Jews do: > Here are some quotes from Mein Kamph to get you by until the next time: If you haven't memorized this already, you are not worthy of your white skin and shoul

Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is a typical example of what Jews do: > Ich schwöre bei Gott diesen heiligen Eid, daß ich dem Führer des Deutschen Reiches und Volkes Adolf Hitler, dem Oberbefehlshaber der Wehrmacht, unbedingten Geh

In article <1146263526.878952.30130@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, "BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote: > Have a look at the first sentence of rule 45 of the rules posted above > in member resources by weis. > > http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/s

In article <1146256559.725156.221170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>, "BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote: > "Faulty conclusion. Chapter 40 describes, in part, how jurors are > summoned to court. It does not in any way lay out the method or > proce

In article <1146238897.989836.256120@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote: > Why don't all branches of government issue orders in its name? Why should they? > Aren't there Senate Bills and House Bills? There ar

In article <1146232729.752947.21110@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote: > Prospective jurors don't take oaths of office. They're not occupants > of an office. > > Agree. > > To become an occupant of an office t

Here is a typical example of what Jews do: JEWISH PRESSURE FROM PRO-ISRAELI LOBBY LEADS TO CANCELLATION OF RICHMOND MEETING Richmond, Virginia, February 19, 2003 E.U.R.O. National President David Duke was scheduled to speak this Saturday, Februar

MEXICO CITY, Mexico (AP) -- Mexico's Congress on Friday approved a bill decriminalizing possession of small quantities of marijuana, ecstasy, cocaine and even heroin for personal use, prompting U.S. criticism that the measure could harm anti-drug effor

JACKSONVILLE, FLA--- U.S. Senator Bill Nelson, the senior Senator from Florida, is seeking re-election in 2006. Records reveal Nelson's campaign received thousands of dollars in contributions in the years 2003 through 2005 from the principals of a J

anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote in message=0D=0A<hTR4g.14473$eR6.14003@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...= =0D=0A=0D=0A> I duzn't know how I gots here. Cheeeiit....

anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote in message=0D=0A<VLR4g.14435$eR6.9880@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...= =0D=0A=0D=0A> Why do black tires produce white smoke?

anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote in message=0D=0A<kHR4g.14408$eR6.9515@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...= =0D=0A=0D=0A> My face REALLY HURTS!!!!!

anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net> wrote in message=0D=0A<uBR4g.14376$eR6.8742@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...= =0D=0A=0D=0A> I am a dynamo in bed.

Yeah, this friend of mine, he gets into all these sorts of kicks. Right now he's like on a kick about not only the states but the government in general keeping track of us and trying to up the ante, so to speak in their favor. He talked about some cou

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:40:58 GMT, Shmaryahu b. Chanoch <omega.d21@gmail.com> wrote: >How? It is doubtful that this democrat prosecutor even has a case. > >Let this go to trial > >This is nothing more than typical left wing Stalinist tactics...

"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:tb775254968lbqi7n6eucdni60d15sb3ti@4ax.com... > Why is limbaugh paying $30,000? It's not a fine or restitution since > he was not found guilty of anything and didn't plead g

On 29 Apr 2006 12:05:27 -0700, "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote: >Of course not. $30,000 is nothing to him. But again i ask you to >consider if this happened to you. Pay for an investigation that did >NOT result in

Presently, Michigan is the only state in which drug companies are immune from civil liability for deaths and injuries caused by FDA-approved drugs. However, the Michigan legislature is considering a bill to rescind that immunity and bring the state on

thank you for your reply. m. "Frank" <frank@frank.spam> wrote in message news:1466525aqdo7r4ktf7l3co55519vd7fn70@4ax.com... > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:43:42 GMT, "medusa" <medusa569@verizon.net> > wrote: > >>After losing a law suit can an s

Frank wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:09:42 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE > <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >Why is limbaugh paying $30,000? It's not a fine or restitution since > >he was not found guilty of anything and didn't plead guilty

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote: > Why is limbaugh paying $30,000? It's not a fine or restitution since > he was not found guilty of anything and didn't plead guilty to > anything. Charges will be DROPPED in 18 months The state of Florida >

anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net>, the old-womanish marksman, promulgated: > I'm having a hard time swallowing this.

anti-censorship <anti-censorship@att.net>, the anile currier, goaded: > Toad-spotted booty-buffer with immense el presidente and slimy butt > yearns for oversized cax for dirty chicken-grabbing. Mail me at > <anti-censorship@att.net>

Pat, I am a Realtor, not an attorney, But here is my take on this. First, if your boyfriend were to sign the lease, it would have no impact on his credit report, except that the landlord might ask to check it, and that inquiry would be noted on the r

"Crusader george" <georgek@humboldt1.com> wrote > send hints to georgewk@humboldt1.com > or answer here. California. Just do it. The trick is to put one together that has any influence. One can do it alone. Write complaints about everything you

send hints to georgewk@humboldt1.com or answer here. California. -- I'm unfettered,unbound,triumphant,glorious& splendid

Yes, that's what I mean! The rights v. the interest of the state.

X-No-Archive: YES anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony 0yC4g.6174$Fs1.2753@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net > Chadwick Stone© wrote: > >> X-No-Archive: YES >> anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered

X-No-Archive: YES anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony FwC4g.6169$Fs1.5246@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net > Chadwick Stone© wrote: > >> X-No-Archive: YES >> anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered

Chadwick Stone© wrote: > X-No-Archive: YES > anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony > YlC4g.10230$eR6.2303@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net > > >>Chadwick Stone© wrote: >> >> >>>X-No-Archive: YES >>>anti-censo

Chadwick Stone© wrote: > X-No-Archive: YES > anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony > HhC4g.10209$eR6.8097@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net > > >>Mark Ferguson wrote: >> >> >>>On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:50:46 GMT,

X-No-Archive: YES anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony YlC4g.10230$eR6.2303@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net > Chadwick Stone© wrote: > >> X-No-Archive: YES >> anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered

Chadwick Stone© wrote: > X-No-Archive: YES > anti-censorship [anti-censorship@att.net] has entered into testimony > xtz4g.9428$eR6.703@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net > > >>Chadwick Stone© wrote: >> >> >>>X-No-Archive: YES >>>anti-censors