misc.legal

It's definitely slander. Slander is a false statement of fact to a third party, which subjects you to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule. Falsely accusing you of a criminal act (child abduction) is slander per se, you don't even need to prove special

anonymousx303@yahoo.com wrote: > He even told me what he wanted posted and where he wanted it posted. I LART sent. You really gotta stop abusing your Internet access priviledges.

On Sat, 06 May 2006 22:13:16 GMT, Secular Human <eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >Messalina wrote: >> AmerGovtCriminalsExposer wrote: >>> No need to nationalize american media. >>> >>> Currently the american media is nothing but a mouthpiece of am

Messalina wrote: > AmerGovtCriminalsExposer wrote: >> No need to nationalize american media. >> >> Currently the american media is nothing but a mouthpiece of american government blood thirsty christian perverts and terrorists. >> >> >> www.thirdwo

Name: Kent T. Wills Email: kentwills@yahoo.com Level: College City: North America or Europe Subjects: ESL classes (reading, writing, listening and speaking classes), ESP (Business), EIP, Language Acquisition Qualifications: BA in Journalism and M

Well... My name is Kent Wills. Despite my clearly Welsh name, I was born in Krakow, Poland. I came to the US in 1984 and quickly made my way to Chicago, Illinois where there are more Polish natives than anywhere else in the world

Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net! 212.101.4.254.MISMATCH!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de! newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com! border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com! local01

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >> Absolutely NOTHING new (which may not be unusual for Ken). >> Hey Ken, do you agree also with the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board, >> Federal District Judge Edward Nottingh

ent Wills <compuelf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:rq51b15391q1tgkdvffhblfek6ve4ujsd0@xxxxxxx: > >>Kent Wills <compuelf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in >>news:0fgua1hmhlisulotpnthi6kn4qjqbav81c@xxxxxxx: >> >>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:49:17 GMT, "Russell B.

ase Title: STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, Appellant. Date: 05/06/2005 Number: 31 / 04-0202 Decision: Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael=20 D. Huppert, Judge. Defendant appeals claiming ineffective

On Sat, 06 May 2006 19:22:03 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >She forces himself upon her. That should be "He forces..." though I suppose it could happen with lesbians. -- (º·.¸(¨*·.¸ ¸.·*¨)¸.·º) «.·°KENT°·.» (¸.·º(¸.·¨*

Ron, As you note the warranty does discuss abuse to the product. It's possible that you did abuse the product while removing the chip. But, as you point out, they have not examined the broken chip so it's difficult to ascertain how they decide

In article <ad9q52dq8pvn6b2ooe31vqksm03vh5kibd@4ax.com>, Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote: > >You mean the Washington Post and similar? Oh..sorry..they arent >conservative. Same operational princibles though as Pravda..and have >been for year

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Sekhmet wrote: > > > Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >>> [...] > > >> [...] > > > LOLOLOLOL Awesome spankage of Turd.. oops.. I mean, Ted. : P > > Yeah, Ken seems to get his rocks off

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> Women CANNOT be raped by their husbands -- BY DEFINITION! Women can > >> be ABUSED by their husbands, which is where the crime of forcing them > >> to engage

On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:28:19 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >Absolutely NOTHING new (which may not be unusual for Ken). > >Hey Ken, do you agree also with the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board, >Federal

On Sat, 6 May 2006 12:50:44 -0500, Sekhmet <bleep@blurp.com> wrote: >On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:19:28 GMT, in article ><AU47g.53743$eR6.7314@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. >Kaldis (kaldis@worldnet.att.net) laid themselves atop the

On Sat, 06 May 2006 13:45:03 -0400, WheatPenny <wheatpenny62@aol.com> wrote: >[Default] On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:19:28 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" ><kaldis@worldnet.att.net> climbed to the top of the minaret and sang >out: > >>Jude_Alexander wrote: >

On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:19:28 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Jude_Alexander wrote: > >Absolutely NOTHING, wishing perhaps only to say what is contained in the >subject line, i.e., that rape "is forced sex either way".

n Sat, 06 May 2006 15:29:55 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> Women CANNOT be raped by their husbands -- BY DEFINITION! Women can > >> be ABUSED by their husbands,

ERRATA "I can recommend that you tape them" should read "I can't recommend that you tape them." Freudian slip, I guess.

One way to get around the potential walkthrough dispute is, prior to suing, or talking about suing, call the person you spoke with before about a walkthrough and say you'd like to see the repairs, if the place hasn't been re-rented. Once you are talkin

"Gunner" <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote in message news:ad9q52dq8pvn6b2ooe31vqksm03vh5kibd@4ax.com... > On Sat, 06 May 2006 22:13:16 GMT, Secular Human > <eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > >Messalina wrote: > >> AmerGovtCriminalsExposer wrote: >

Again, Ernie's right about all of that. And I think I did more damage than good here. I wasn't trying to discourage you. I think you will win. And, as Ernie points out, there is no practical downside to you. I just wanted to prepare you for their d

Ken Smith wrote: Absolutely NOTHING new (which may not be unusual for Ken). Hey Ken, do you agree also with the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board, Federal District Judge Edward Nottingham, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, Colorado District Judge H.

"drejtesia" <nesfrank2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1146857212.404016.129110@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > Thanks! Our drive way is less than 9 ft and we hardly can store one car > each. I think I will take it easy and see how things will g

Jude_Alexander wrote: Absolutely NOTHING, wishing perhaps only to say what is contained in the subject line, i.e., that rape "is forced sex either way". Perhaps, but this is an incomplete answer. Rape might indeed be "forced sex", but forced sex w

the_blogologist wrote: > <EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote: >>In misc.survivalism the_blogologist <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote: >>>AmerGovtCriminalsExposer <AmerGovtCriminalsExposer@americangovt.org> >>>wrote: >>>>Rumsfeld denied lying and defend

ude_Alexander wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:445CB25C.6060001@it.com... > >>Jude_Alexander wrote: >> >>>"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message >>>news:w_17g.32071$Fs1.30762@bgtnsc05-news.ops.wor

On Sat, 6 May 2006 03:58:01 -0700, <usenet2006@THE-DOMAIN-IN.SIG> wrote: >In article ><1146852706.954473.231150@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, >rally2xs@att.net says... >> If the arguement were all simply academic, with no real harm coming out >>

Does doing carnage to the constituiton count in the violence column? - Richard Hutnik

Sekhmet wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> [...] >> [...] > LOLOLOLOL Awesome spankage of Turd.. oops.. I mean, Ted. : P Yeah, Ken seems to get his rocks off on it, what can I say? -- Theodore A. Kaldis

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Women CANNOT be raped by their husbands -- BY DEFINITION! Women can >> be ABUSED by their husbands, which is where the crime of forcing them >> to engage in sex against their will properly fits.

AmerGovtCriminalsExposer wrote: > No need to nationalize american media. > > Currently the american media is nothing but a mouthpiece of american government blood thirsty christian perverts and terrorists. > > > www.thirdworldtraveler.com > > ww

TODD72 wrote: > Hello group, > > I have posted on this same issue before. I have seen a lawyer and am > now in the process of retrieving my records to see what exactly is in > my arrest record. I am applying to state jobs and would like to > cla

In article <ecklein-4966C8.13032006052006@news.newsguy.com>, Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote: > In article <1146942223.819271.198200@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, > "SS" <ss.extposts@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So they have right to appeal

anonymousx...@yahoo.com wrote: > He even told me what he wanted posted and where he wanted it posted. I > never should have let him get me in this bind. > Of course the stuff he posted he'll be in trouble for and he posted her > name, address and ph

He even told me what he wanted posted and where he wanted it posted. I never should have let him get me in this bind. Of course the stuff he posted he'll be in trouble for and he posted her name, address and phone number in chat rooms. I told him he'd

Jude_Alexander wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> forevernitefan wrote: >>> I am also interested in Doug's blog(s), if only to read whether he >>> has changed or not. Maybe his wife became tired of supporting him >>> and he changed his c

Morton Davis wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:445BABC5.1090208@it.com... >>AmerGovtCriminalsExposer wrote: >> >>>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/04/cnna.mcgovern/index.html >>> >>>ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- Hecklers repe

When a certain person asked me to post some ads for his ex, I didn't have a problem with it. He said she was a real #@&@^ & pain the ass & wanted to cause her a little grief. Been there done that so didn't have a problem with it. She probably does dese

ude_Alexander wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:w_17g.32071$Fs1.30762@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... >>forevernitefan wrote: >> >>>I am also interested in Doug's blog(s), if only to read whether h

his is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060307090907020305040100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > forevernitefan wrote: > > > I am also inter

imothy wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >> I can see several immediate ones, right off the bat. Cell phones >>have limited range, which is why there are cells every ten miles or so. >> You couldn't keep a call going unless you had an effective range

forevernitefan wrote: > I am also interested in Doug's blog(s), if only to read whether he has > changed or not. Maybe his wife became tired of supporting him and he > changed his claim of "women cannot be raped by their husbands". or > maybe n

[Default] On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:19:28 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> climbed to the top of the minaret and sang out: >Jude_Alexander wrote: > >Absolutely NOTHING, wishing perhaps only to say what is contained in the >subject

In article <AU47g.53743$eR6.7314@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >forced sex within the context of marriage is NOT rape -- it is ABUSE. In what state? Please cite chapter and verse.

In article <1146942223.819271.198200@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, "SS" <ss.extposts@gmail.com> wrote: > So they have right to appeal to superior court? Which might work > against me since I would rather pay them off instead of going through > the

On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:19:28 GMT, in article <AU47g.53743$eR6.7314@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis (kaldis@worldnet.att.net) laid themselves atop the sacrificial altar, and recited a testicular dedication mantra, which wa