Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
Larry wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> Ken got screwed over. It's pretty easy to see. >>> So then what is Ken's remedy? >> To take the matter through every possible legal channel until


Re: President Bush may nationalize American media
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote in message news:329e4$445ee024$45035f0d$18967@msgid.meganewsservers.com... > > "AmerGovtCriminalsExposer" <AmerGovtCriminalsExposer@americangovt.org> > wrote > in message news:445ea954$0$2369


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > > If OUR Kent had been convicted of burglary -- this is an Iowa Supreme > > Court decision -- wouldn't he be sitting in jail right now, as we > > speak? Wouldn't he have spent a significant amount


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
On Sun, 07 May 2006 22:46:34 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <1trs525ff2a7d59vioemtlm84q2n6pmib5@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:24:36 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" >> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wro


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
n Sun, 07 May 2006 22:45:49 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <c4qs52hch816rpcuvi790gfhjehej911ci@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:51:19 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <445DDC80.8


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!atl-c05.usenetserver.com! news.usenetserver.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net! teal.octanews.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com! 216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nnt


Re: President Bush may nationalize American media
"AmerGovtCriminalsExposer" <AmerGovtCriminalsExposer@americangovt.org> wrote in message news:445ea954$0$23699$a8266bb1@reader.corenews.com... > > "Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote in message > news:b5257$445e63d0$45035f0d$15409@


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
ath: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU! news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news.astraweb.com! newsrouter-eu.astraweb.com!proxad.net!news.clara.net! wagner.news.clara.net!195.245.201.10.MISMATCH!monkeydust.news.cla


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
ath: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com! border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn11feed! worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!3fa071cb!not- for-mail Message-ID: <440A7226.ACEE0F52@worldnet.att.net> Fr


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
In article <1trs525ff2a7d59vioemtlm84q2n6pmib5@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:24:36 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >Kent Wills wrote: > > > > > Ken got screwed over.


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
In article <c4qs52hch816rpcuvi790gfhjehej911ci@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:51:19 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > > >In article <445DDC80.8090107@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > > > >> Theod


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de! not-for-mail From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.fan.bob-larson Subject: Re: Kaldis Update -- "7-9-1-0-6-6-8!" Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:08:52 -0600


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 18:03:04 -0400, WheatPenny <wheatpenny62@aol.com> wrote: >[Default] On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:43:50 GMT, Kent Wills ><compuelf@gmail.com> climbed to the top of the minaret and sang out: > > >> I don't think people in the correctio


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de! individual.net!not-for-mail From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.friends Subject: New Camera Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:51:03 -0600 Organization: Vast Right Wing C


Re: Hey Ted, Fucking Your Dictionary is STILL Rape!!!
On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:54:20 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >> >> > [A RIGHT load of BOLLOCKS] > >ROIGHT! Roight BOLLOCKES! Shrimp on the Barbie! G'day, mate! Foster's? > Foster


Re: student suspended for sex sues school
On 7 May 2006 09:00:10 -0700, "Bill Rabkin" <ienjball@yahoo.com> wrote: >http://www.newsobserver.com/100/story/436659.html > >I think the school is on solid legal ground here. He signed a form >that says when he's off school property he still has


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
ath: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!atl-c05.usenetserver.com! news.usenetserver.com!pink.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!news- out.octanews.net!teal.octanews.net!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com! border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com! loc


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:20:21 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>>> Absolutely NOTHING


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Well... My name is Kent Wills. Despite my clearly Welsh name, I was born in Krakow, Poland. I came to the US in 1984 and quickly made my way to Chicago, Illinois where there are more Polish natives than anywhere else in the wo


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:24:36 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > > > Ken got screwed over. It's pretty easy to see. > >So then what is Ken's remedy? To take the matter through every possible legal


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:51:19 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <445DDC80.8090107@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> > skylexicon wrote: >> > >> > > Case Title: STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRAD


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
From: AHWE...@prodigy.com (Kent Wills) Subject: RE: Best Pizza -- Central Iowa Date: 1997/11/15 Message-ID: <64j8o9$1204$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 289694747 Distribution: world References: <346bd3bc.13512260@news.avalon.net>


Fat Man
From: AHWE...@prodigy.com (Kent Wills) Subject: Re: This NG will NOT die Date: 1998/07/10 Message-ID: <6o4c88$4ilc$1@newssvr04-int.news.prodigy.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 370109778 Distribution: world References: <6o39as$9oh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6o3eae$d


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 20:49:48 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>> skylexicon wrote: > > >>>>> Case Title: STATE


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de! individual.net!not-for-mail From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.friends Subject: Re: Proper introduction Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:58:12 -0600 Organization: Vast


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
From: "Ron" <x...@xXx.xXx> Newsgroups: alt.consumers.free-stuff References: <Xns938387543815Enone@207.225.159.8> <20030524110545.05521.00000268@mb-m04.aol.com> <bao21j$1npkp$1@ID- 171630.news.dfncis.de> Subject: Kent B. Wills is a Criminal Date: Sa


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
From: "Ron" <x...@xXx.xXx> Newsgroups: alt.consumers.free- stuff,alt.hackers.malicious,alt.usenet.kooks Subject: Kent B. Wills is A shadow of Ron (Sock) Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:38:07 -0700 Lines: 83 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-News


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de! individual.net!not-for-mail From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.friends Subject: Re: I'm back in Iowa Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:28:10 -0600 Organization: Vast Ri


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu! cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com! newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net! stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED! not-for-m


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de! acc0c5e6.ipt.aol.COM!not-for-mail From: y6g11 <y...@aols.com> Newsgroups: alt.consumers.free-stuff Subject: How's Kent Wills Doing? Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:13:03 -0700 Lines:


Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!atl- c03.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!ALLTEL.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not- for-mail From: "Citizen_Cain" <noem...@askplease.invalid> Newsgroups: ia.talk.misc,alt.pizza.delivery.drivers,rec.ar


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu! headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!216.40.198.22!not-for- mail From: Anonymous Poster <i...@usenet4all.com> Newsgroups: alt.consumers.free-stuff Subject: Re: Kent Will


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
In article <445DDC80.8090107@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > skylexicon wrote: > > > > > Case Title: STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, > > > Appellant. > > > > > Date: 05/06/2005 > >


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> skylexicon wrote: >>>>> Case Title: STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, >>>>> Appellant. >>>>> Date: 05/06/2005 >>>>>


Re: Security deposit dispute for rental unit
Good Evening Shawn: I live in Southern California, and this type of circumstance happens frequently to tenants who are not informed about the particulars of the Landlord-Tenant Act. Your comments indicate that you followed the law as specified. I


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Heidi Graw wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> The misguided idea that a wife can somehow be "raped" by her >>>> husband has its origins in modern feminism, and it serves two >>>> funda


Re: Hey, Jude! (was Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Ken Smith wrote: > Ken Chaddock wrote: >> I can't say what Theodore A. Kaldis' underlying reason is for >> bringing forward this argument Someone mentioned that Doug Gilliland had expressed a similar belief, and I only sought to clarify the


Re: Security deposit dispute for rental unit
Do not be discouraged by the possibility of you winning in Small Claims Court, and then the landlord files an appeal. When it comes to the return of security deposits in California, the law leans towards tenants if they follow the law as defined. It


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
Kent Wills wrote: > Ken got screwed over. It's pretty easy to see. So then what is Ken's remedy? (Aside from whinging interminably on USENET, and filing useless actions that are essentially nothing more than exercises in futility [to say nothin


Re: Security deposit dispute for rental unit
Good Evening Shawn: I live in Southern California, and this type of circumstance happens frequently to tenants who are not informed about the particulars of the Landlord-Tenant Act. Your comments indicate that you followed the law as specified. I


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> Absolutely NOTHING new (which may not be unusual for Ken). >>>> Hey Ken, do you agree also with the Colorado Bar Ex


Re: Hey Ted, Fucking Your Dictionary is STILL Rape!!!
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > > [A RIGHT load of BOLLOCKS] ROIGHT! Roight BOLLOCKES! Shrimp on the Barbie! G'day, mate! Foster's? > Sorry Ken, you've lost this one (and I suspect that you know, but are > loathe to admit it).


Re: Some Background on Ken Smith's Case
On Sun, 07 May 2006 15:13:26 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > >> Absolutely NOTHING new (which may not be unusual for Ken). > > >> Hey Ken, do


Re: Ken Smith is a Sore Loser Who Cannot Admit His Mistakes (was Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 13:36:45 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >[The sort of equivocal blather that Ken normally writes ...] > >Ken, the long and short of it is that I well and truly have you on this >


Re: Ted Kaldis is a Sore Loser Who Cannot Admit His Mistakes (was Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > [The sort of equivocal blather that Ken normally writes ...] > > Ken, the long and short of it is that I well and truly have you on this > issue, and that you cannot admit it. Hey, I "well and tr


Re: I agree with you entirely, Jude (was Re: Hey, Ken Rape is forced sex either way
On Sun, 07 May 2006 14:36:12 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > skylexicon wrote: > > >> Name: Kent T. Wills > >Not "Kent _B._ Wills"? The OP is posting anything s/he can find about any Kent Wi


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 12:44:12 -0400, WheatPenny <wheatpenny62@aol.com> wrote: >> If OUR Kent had been convicted of burglary -- this is an Iowa Supreme >>Court decision -- wouldn't he be sitting in jail right now, as we speak? >> Wouldn't he have


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 16:18:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >> Oh, I don't know about that. How many "Kent Bradley Wills's" can there >> be in Ankenny, Iowa? > > Think *real* hard, Ted -- I know that logic isn't your strong suit. > > I


Re: WOMEN _CANNOT_ BE RAPED BY THEIR HUSBANDS
On Sun, 07 May 2006 14:48:37 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> skylexicon wrote: > > >>> Case Title: STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, > >>> Appellant


Re: President Bush may nationalize American media
"Gunner" <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote in message news:gt1r525nslavjbpmp2clvfi5e7siqn1hdp@4ax.com... > On 6 May 2006 19:48:15 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >>In article <ad9q52dq8pvn6b2ooe31vqksm03vh5kibd@4ax.com>, >>Gunner <gunner@lig


Re: President Bush may nationalize American media
"Gunner" <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote in message news:ad9q52dq8pvn6b2ooe31vqksm03vh5kibd@4ax.com... > On Sat, 06 May 2006 22:13:16 GMT, Secular Human > <eelder1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > >>Messalina wrote: >>> AmerGovtCriminalsExposer wrote: >>