misc.legal

In article <aQ7eg.5965$No1.2109@attbi_s71>, trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > > In article <cmah72hshkl8npba7v69jf3r63rpnnpav1@4ax.com>, > > Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote: > > > > > >>On Sat, 27 May 2006 14:55:22 -0

Vox Populi" <vox@popu.li> wrote news:w2Odg.55$wn2.11601@news.uswest.net... > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> God created man, and man sinned and lost fellowship with God. So it is today that >> many worship false gods. > > Like the repugnant murderou

"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message news:slrne7h1li.1946.usenet@goodwill.io.com... > If the object is really to protect kids from having their lives > ruined, this does not seem to me to be an optimal outcome. The object,

Sue the co-purchaser for the unpaid contribution plus half of all maintenance and insurance costs, etc. Win. As a judgment creditor, attach the defendant's interest in the land. Buy that interest at auction. The money you pay as buyer goes to yo

"Voss" <voss_grose@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1148584461.846634.120750@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >I have 2 to debts from 1998 that were basically identitfy theft back > when identify theft was very new. I contested the items, but they

BTR1701 wrote: > In article <1148723407.612552.20750@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: > > > BTR1701 wrote: > > > In article <1148624844.942625.59060@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > > "Chris Hayes" <h

> Thanks. What is you practice area? I'm almost exclusively appellate. Wow, I didn't have an exclusive anything when I started out. Whatever the person on the other end of the phone wanted, that's what I did. These days, I mostly practice in elder ca

Prissy Chrissie the Moron <cmorton@spews_lies.nut> whined at: > > David Johnston says, in reply to: > > >BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> babbled fictionally about how: .. ... > >>>And guns do make people safer. My sister is alive today because >

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:72dc72t433djhqc75ekbea8g3gagh5k9oa@4ax.com... > On Thu, 25 May 2006 14:20:23 GMT, "Theodore A. 'Electric Beer-boy' > Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >Ken Smith wrote: > > > >> Th

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478F4D2.54ABFF04@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> Nah ... the Da Vinci Code is simply fiction PRETENDING to be based on > >> fact. > >

Odds that they might jump bail? High enough so it seems risky for them to be let free, in my uninformed opinion. They both still have a lot of dough left over even after posting $5M in bail (and shelling out millions more for lawyers' fees.) Skill

Geragos an "embarresment to the legal profession." http://crankygreg.blogs.com/crank_gregs_view/2005/08/mark_geragos_lo.html ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsg

"The Todal" <deadmailbox@beeb.net> wrote in message news:4dro4bF15gg4hU2@individual.net... > .. Here, the lawmakers are Mr Blair and his close > coterie of loyal cabinet colleagues. The members of parliament are merely > whip-fodder. > > > e

"Norm" <normgrant999@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:vc_dg.195495$7a.132035@pd7tw1no... > > "Sage" <Sage@nv.netcom.com> wrote in message news:YqRdg.103 > >>> Eventually none. What is left is those one would expect to find on a >>> smokers NG. Ju

"Frank" <unlisted@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:vqYdg.177746$bm6.65739@fed1read04... > > "Sage" <Sage@nv.netcom.com> wrote in message > news:YqRdg.103$eB3.33@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> >> "Phil #3" <faas@mindspring.com> wrote in m

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478F3B2.ECF3CE39@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > He's not the slightest concerned about your kids, or any other kids, or he > > would be asking pointed questions of how

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478F460.2BA9AD9E@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Dane wrote: > > >>> But this is a dead issue. [...] > > >> It is anything BUT dead.

SCANDAL~NEW~? ~ MORAL OBLIQUITY~? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the jobs that they do one might expect~That they all would just Want to be~HONEST~sort of~$90,000 in a Freezer~? cool~ >>>>>> hardy indicates a serious state of mind it seems~? ~

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478F217.65A9E082@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Dane wrote: > > >>> I see words on a screen, but no explanation. > > >> It's not my fa

Lowrenta wrote: > However, I find it unlikely that any literary agent would touch your prose > with a 10-foot pole, Screenplays don't go to literary agents and don't require much prose. > or your story about Ken, which is (no offense to Ken)

"Pat Roller" <dontmailme@here.com> wrote in message news:Xns97D0BC6EA4198patacake@62.253.170.163... > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in news:q5%dg.42$Q73.4069 > @news.uswest.net: > >>> UK lawmaker says assassinating Blair would be justifiable

Lowrenta wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> You will probably make enough of that to pay for the K-Y Jelly Cam ought >>> to need for his nightly ass-reamings by Bubba -- especially, after I sued >>> your ass for twice ever

Lowrenta wrote: > Turd A. Kaldis wrote: >> Lowrenta wrote: >> Why are you neglecting your kids? > Tsk Tsk. You should fire your surveiller who is watching my place. He > should have told you that my kids aren't here. So has Child Protective

"thedarkman" <A_Baron@ABaron.Demon.Co.UK> wrote in message news:1148756252.719830.27690@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > This is a manufactured controversy like with that Imam, whose name > eludes me for the moment. They asked him if he would repor

Dane wrote: > I see words on a screen, but no explanation. It's not my fault that you have comprehension problems. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Lowrenta wrote: > [...] Why are you neglecting your kids? -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Dane wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> [blah, blah, blah ... no point in being specific, his rap never changes] >> Ken, an idea just came to mind earlier this morning. I'm going to write a >> screenplay about a somewha

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken, an idea just came to mind earlier this morning. I'm going to write a >> screenplay about a somewhat "flaky" law school graduate who gets asked to >> submit to a psychological examination after

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Dane wrote: >>> But this is a dead issue. [...] >> It is anything BUT dead. If dealt with properly, the indictment should be >> DISMISSED. > We've already explained why it wasn't. [...] W

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Dane wrote: >>> When did Federal District Courts quit hearing Constitutional Violations? >> When they are entwined in matters over which they don't have subject >> matter jurisdiction (though this

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Because, last I looked, Ken has problems of his own -- as he is STILL >> _NOT_ a lawyer in Colorado. > But I do have a J.D. and passed a state bar, [...] And was asked by the Colorado Bar Examin

Ken Smith wrote: > If I only had a dollar for every lie told by a prosecutor to a court, I > could buy out Bill Gates out of petty cash ... ShEEsh! So why are you pissing into the wind with your case? -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.at

6 years ago, i hurt my back at work.I was given a choice to take a lump sum payment and no future care or lifetime care without a lump sum payment. I choose to take lifetime care. I have decided to leave my job due to my back and now my feet since my

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478A80D.24201EB5@worldnet.att.net... > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >> Ken, an idea just came to mind earlier this morning. I'm going to write a > >>

"RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message news:1148758349.530400.287230@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Turd A. Kaldis wrote: > > Lowrenta wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > Why are you neglecting your kids? > > Tsk Tsk. You should fire you

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:44789453.279E9069@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > But this is a dead issue. [...] > > It is anything BUT dead. If dealt with properly, the indictment should be > DISMI

"Bruce Watson" <anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net> wrote in message news:1148778816.61424@irys.nyx.net... > In article <YqRdg.103$eB3.33@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>, > Sage <Sage@nv.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>Today at a casino I pointed out an area for Non

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: > >>But this is a dead issue. [...] > > It is anything BUT dead. If dealt with properly, the indictment should be > DISMISSED. We've already explained why it wasn't. The judge didn't seem to think

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: > >>Point to be considered: > >>Did the first 'expert" conduct any experiments or otherwise refer to any >>type of scientific data, > > He necessarily must have had to. Otherwise, how could he possibly r

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > [CA Evidence Code:] > >> 939.7. The grand jury is not required to hear evidence for the >> defendant, but it shall weigh all the evidence submitted to it, and >> when it has reason to believe

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>That's what the trial judge said. Geragos appealed, as the trial judge >>>>>didn't even consider the scientific objection

=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote: > tjab wrote: >=20 >>Anybody know? >=20 >=20 > Technically they are not "convicted" yet, they haven't been > sentenced. > Oh no. The fraudsters are convicted, but await sentencing. Kennyboi's bond is what? 5 mil

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >>[blah, blah, blah ... no point in being specific, his rap never changes] Translated, Ted lost, and doesn't even have a substantive rebuttal. Here's what he snipped (it's easy to tell who's who):

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478B666.DDFEADF3@worldnet.att.net... > Lowrenta wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>> You will probably make enough of that to pay for the K-Y Je

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478A88B.5E7C8A19@worldnet.att.net... > Dane wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > >>> [blah, blah, blah ... no point in being specific, his rap never

Dane wrote: > But this is a dead issue. [...] It is anything BUT dead. If dealt with properly, the indictment should be DISMISSED. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:4478A6AC.2B4FB4D9@worldnet.att.net... > Ken Smith wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Dane wrote: > > >>> But this is a dead issue. [...] > > >> It is anything BUT de