misc.legal

In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Sat, 27 May 2006 17:46:04 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >There's no weaseling out of this, Ken. The first expert's conclusion will prove a problem for Hum. It *might* be enough to

In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Sun, 28 May 2006 00:49:46 GMT, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Dane wrote: > >> He's not the slightest concerned about your kids, or any other kids, or he >> would be asking pointed questio

"Frank" <unlisted@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:J7neg.177850$bm6.88533@fed1read04... > >>> > "Everyone" disagrees with you Chuck .. LOL! >>> >>> Everyone? >> >> Yep. > > I agree with Chuck. It is necessary in our Republic for citizens to >

Pat Pritchett-Sophy lied: > According to Ted, every baggage handler at LAX including Cameron would fall > down each time they tossed luggage loading airplanes. Except that Ted never said any such thing. Baggage handlers at whatever airport do not

Pat Pritchett-Sophy wrote: > I believe it was Geragos who brings up the running leap in his 995 motion, > so he basically admits the injuries on Lauren don't support a slip/slide > down IP. Oh, you think? Just wait until testimony (should a trial

Lowrenta wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> The biomechanics of pitching are not germane, for reasons those who >>> understand pitching or biomechanics know. It's essentially a whipping >>> motion. >> It isn't the biom

The other day I made an online purchase, and the price that showed in the "shopping cart" did not match the price listed on the web site (the shopping cart price was lower - 50% lower). The retailer has since charged my credit card (the price shown in

Lowrenta wrote: > But, back to your defamatory allegations about my children and my > competence as a mother: > How am I "neglecting" them? [...] I hear that you've been a bad girl, breaking federal law. That's not going to help you when you

On 28 May 2006 17:15:32 -0700, Chris Morton <cmorton@newsguy.com> wrote: >In article <008k72hkfo5o6q57n6utujc55ro901boo4@4ax.com>, Adam Albright says... >> >>On 28 May 2006 14:09:05 -0700, Chris Morton <cmorton@newsguy.com> >>wrote: >> >>>In arti

in article 1148870762.267028.124840@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com, Chris Hayes at hayes12@fadmail.com wrote on 5/28/06 7:46 PM: > > BTR1701 wrote: >> In article <1148847782.499818.88130@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>, >> "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadma

BTR1701 wrote: > In article <1148847782.499818.88130@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>, > "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: > > Believe what you want. You obviously will anyway. > If that's your admission that you can't back up your claims

Michael Snyder wrote: > > "Bill Bonde ('The path is clear, though no eyes can see')" > <john.methuen@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:44785F97.29843293@yahoo.co.uk... > > > > > > laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote: > > > > > > http://

Deny it all you want. There it is; archived for all the world to see. Humantics Foundation had a fund to pay your legal expenses. "Ilena Rose" Jim Lord Porno poppy Zaffuto<ilena@san.rr.com> wrote in message news:id55u0dh4sm9lecobkubk711flrl0enq32@4

Kent Wills wrote: > In Accordance With The Prophecy, On 26 May 2006 17:16:41 -0700, > "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > > > > >Turd A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Lovely Loretta wrote: > >> > >> > And might I also add that your admissions of being CHE

"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote: > * * * >What I found odd was the long period of time before sentencing: the >sentencing phase doesn't start till (in a scary though probably >meaningless coincidence)

In article <008k72hkfo5o6q57n6utujc55ro901boo4@4ax.com>, Adam Albright says... > >On 28 May 2006 14:09:05 -0700, Chris Morton <cmorton@newsguy.com> >wrote: > >>In article <bjvj72t4rp4i6hgjelero2g5cb6nd0fk38@4ax.com>, Adam Albright says... >>> >>>On

In article <q1bk72tge5ij00sg5b2gjhhegujcda30uh@4ax.com>, CLICK@KNICKLAS.COM says... > >On 28 May 2006 14:08:07 -0700, Chris Morton ><cmorton@newsguy.com> wrote: > >>In article <4479FBDB.18A26BD2@hotmail.com>, Weasels Remember! says... >> >>>Keep t

In article <ouak7292b72iqou3rv1t9sahkgpi0eaiek@4ax.com>, CLICK@KNICKLAS.COM says... > >On 28 May 2006 14:07:16 -0700, Chris Morton ><cmorton@newsguy.com> wrote: > >>Ain't THAT the @$#*ing truth. > >You despise goosesteppers like you. --

Hi everyone: I bought a check for several hundred thousand dollars drawn by a title and escrow company and I think I might need some professional help enforcing it. For brevity, here is the key: P is the payee. B is the party the payee tra

Frank wrote: > "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:pQhcg.53879$CH2.29120@tornado.texas.rr.com... > >>"Chuck Wright" <cawrigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:1272tc1g4krrf4b@corp.supernews.com... >> >>>lazerblast wrote

Sherman wrote: >> >> I don't know about were you live, but around here the police and military >> are seriously out-of-control with these damn helicopters. They fly >> dangerously low and are incredibly loud. I can fully understand why this >> wo

=> Vox Populi© wrote: > Chuck Wright wrote: > >>lazerblast wrote: >> >> >>>On Sun, 21 May 2006 20:45:50 -0600, Chuck Wright <cawrigh@yahoo.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Safe food and buildings can be achieved >>>>without government interfe

Ken Smith wrote: > From what you have admitted sub rosa so far, I don't think they'd have all > that much difficulty in obtaining a new indictment [...] You also didn't think that Judge Nottingham would throw your case out, the 10th Circuit would

Ken Smith wrote: > From our vantage point That's just it. Your "vantage point" is VASTLY inferior to mine. You simply do not -- and indeed, at this point CANNOT -- see enough of the real picture to have any sort of informed opinion. It is only

In article <0_geg.177820$bm6.115265@fed1read04>, Frank <unlisted@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Bruce Watson" <anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net> wrote in message >news:1148782839.816354@irys.nyx.net... >> In article <uC6eg.177805$bm6.116106@fed1read04>, >> Frank <unlis

TURD A. Kaldis wrote: > Lowrenta wrote: > > > He was an athlete of sorts. This was not his first TOSS of something. The > > fact that he was a baggage handler won't be lost on the jury. > > If Hum wants to assert to the jury that he was actu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sMPfVc80kk&search=Baggage%20handlers Some footage of Cam and friends for your film Kaldis. The pre-LACoJail years. LOL!

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Dane wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Dane wrote: >>>>> I see words on a screen, but no explanation. >>>> It's not my fault that you have comprehension problems. >>> Oh, I remember no

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Lowrenta wrote: > > > But, back to your defamatory allegations about my children and my > > competence as a mother: > > > How am I "neglecting" them? [...] > > I hear that you've been a bad girl, breaking federal law

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=baggage+handler http://photomatt.net/2004/10/23/baggage-handlers/ Kaldis is always right and the rest of the world is just wrong.

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Pat Pritchett-Sophy lied: > > > According to Ted, every baggage handler at LAX including Cameron would fall > > down each time they tossed luggage loading airplanes. > > Except that Ted never said any such thing. Bagga

[Default] On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:36:00 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> climbed to the top of the minaret and sang out: >editor@netpath.net wrote: >> Convicted felons free pending sentencing is VERY common in the >> federal courts. Especiall

"Stephen Glynn" <nyeplm@trashmail.net> wrote in message news:4ds940F1bedflU1@individual.net... > The Todal wrote: >> "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote in message >> news:FcQdg.29$DT1.2687@news.uswest.net... >>> UK lawmaker says assassinating Blair woul

The question is when the harrasser is being harrassed ? You call police about loud neighbors and they claim they are are not hurting anyone. Keep in mind this might be a tennament. Another thing the part about being loud is for no reason just because t

Ken Smith wrote: > Dane wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Dane wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Dane wrote: >>>>>> I see words on a screen, but no explanation. >>>>> It's not my fault that you have comprehension problems.

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: > >>He's not the slightest concerned about your kids, or any other kids, or he >>would be asking pointed questions of how Cam's kid went flying off a cliff >>to her death in his presence. > > You're a SCU

Dane wrote: > "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message > news:1148758349.530400.287230@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >>Turd A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Lowrenta wrote: >>> >>>>[...] >>> >>>Why are you neglecting your kids? >> >>Tsk Tsk. You should

It's my understanding that a Writ of Attachment for a child who is physically with the non-custodial parent in violation of a court order must be served by an officer of the law. How much time to they (the police) have to carry out the service of the

=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote: > Defendario wrote: >=20 >>=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote: >> >><#@($, since flushed> >> >>Here you go, pinche: >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conviction >=20 >=20 > ROTFLMAO !! >=20 > Wikipedia as a Legal Citation ... L

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Dane wrote: >> >>>>But this is a dead issue. [...] >>> >>>It is anything BUT dead. If dealt with properly, the indictment should be >>>DISMISSED. >> >>We've already ex

Dane wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:4478A88B.5E7C8A19@worldnet.att.net... >>Dane wrote: [snip] >>>I think you ought to stick with your child murderer book. >> >>What "child murderer" book? I

Dane wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:44789453.279E9069@worldnet.att.net... >>Dane wrote: >> >> >>>But this is a dead issue. [...] >> >>It is anything BUT dead. If dealt with properly, the indictmen

Dane wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:4478A80D.24201EB5@worldnet.att.net... >>Ken Smith wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: [snip to focus on this point] >>Nah ... the Da Vinci Code is simply fic

WheatPenny wrote: > [Default] On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:36:00 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" > <vox@popu.li> climbed to the top of the minaret and sang out: > > > editor@netpath.net wrote: > > > Convicted felons free pending sentencing is VERY common in the

huck Wright wrote: > => Vox Populi© wrote: > > > Chuck Wright wrote: > > > > > Robert Broughton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Chuck Wright wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the 1000s of Food Service Health Deptarment regs, > > > > >

The first building codes were from the Code of Hammurabi. It was considered a barbaric application of an eye for an eye. ----Wikipedia---- Building codes have a long history. What is generally accepted as the first building code was in the Code o

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Dane wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Dane wrote: >> [snipped to focus on this discrete point] >>>>I see words on a screen, but no explanation. >>> >>>It's not my fault that you have comprehension problems. >