|
|
cover wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:38:20 GMT, "Barky Bark"
> <barkybark@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> probably not the school but the family of the girl who did it would
>> certainly by civilly liable. Since you're not talking about hundreds (o
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:19:04 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
<lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>Andy Katz <amkatz@earthnospamlink.net> wrote:
>>On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:52:10 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
>><lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Bonus points: the kid was in
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:14:04 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
<lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>Andy Katz <amkatz@earthnospamlink.net> wrote:
>>There might be more to the story, or this might be yet another case of
>>zero tolerance run amok, supplanting judgment wi
|
|
|
"Frank" <unlisted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nKnhg.178600$bm6.158709@fed1read04...
>
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:qwkhg.26$vI1.1476@news.uswest.net...
>>
>> "Frank" <unlisted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> new
|
|
|
So where do you draw the line between a push and self defense. If a
person moves in your direction during a argument and you were push them
away. Can that still be considered assault? Also suppose you claim it
was not intentional? Should you be belei
|
|
|
In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 07:44:12 -0600,
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>> You do know, but lack the mental stability to admit it.
>> I don't KNOW that it was you who called, though I suspect it
>> was. I do KNOW t
|
|
|
In article <7lpb82ljfmnqm3aikpiuk7eub9fpbaq2gg@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> posted:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:09:21 GMT, usenet@mantra.com9cG7O3 or
> www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>
> >In article <s4ua825kpprkfd91f0po152
|
|
|
On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:38:20 GMT, "Barky Bark"
<barkybark@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>probably not the school but the family of the girl who did it would
>certainly by civilly liable. Since you're not talking about hundreds (or
>even tens) of thousa
|
|
|
In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 07:51:29 -0500,
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > So ... the trial that was never supposed to happen
>>
>> "Never supposed to happen" is RIGHT. Because the prosecutor has nothing
>but
|
|
|
In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:40:09 GMT,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>Solar wrote:
>
>> So ... the trial that was never supposed to happen
>
>"Never supposed to happen" is RIGHT. Because the pros
|
|
|
In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:15:05 -0600,
snickers <bar@mars.biz> wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:04:48 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:31:52 -0600,
>> snickers <bar@mars.b
|
|
|
I would have hoped I never would have to come to an online site askin
about legal opinions. However, at my new job something happened tha
just has me all in a bunch. Let me know what you all think. Keep i
mind this is truly to the best of my recollecti
|
|
|
In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:10:13 -0600,
snickers <bar@mars.biz> wrote:
>>>Helping cast out the demons is not without a human cost.
>>
>> And, of course, one should give over the deed to their home.
>> Yes, Lar$on once
|
|
|
In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:55:52 -0400,
jaijr <jaijr@comcast.net> wrote:
>1. Could i be sued for mismanaging the building ?Even though I gave it
>my best effort ?
Yes. This doesn't mean they'll win.
>2. Could I sue
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:18:44 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
> In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:55:45 -0500,
> "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"snickers" <bar@mars.biz> wrote in message
>>news:13e3d6ba13jvh$.19opcgcs9t
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:17:35 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
> In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:47:33 -0600,
> snickers <bar@mars.biz> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:02:17 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>> In Accordance With The Proph
|
|
|
"HolyCow" <pbphreak@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HolyCow.290ffz@no-mx.slashlegal.com...
>
Racial? Spanish are white people.
What 'race' is Hispanic? I think white also that that means someone from
Spain in Spanish.
So you are white..is
|
|
|
RetzQ wrote:
> I must be 90 years old by now.
>
You must be, because you sure look it! LHAT!
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:Lufhg.14$vI1.369@news.uswest.net...
>
> "Jim Higgins" <gordian238@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:128anq8n14o8d2c@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Roedy Green" <my_email_is_posted_on_my_websi
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:Lufhg.14$vI1.369@news.uswest.net...
>
> "Jim Higgins" <gordian238@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:128anq8n14o8d2c@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Roedy Green" <my_email_is_posted_on_my_websi
|
|
|
On 5 Jun 2006 14:40:52 -0700, LMadolora@gmail.com wrote:
>My mother's brother has been living with us for the past 18 years.
>He's recently been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic and refuses
>treatment. He has a couple incidents of physical viol
|
|
|
Kent Wills Wrote:
> In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:55:52 -0400,
> jaijr <jaijr@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >1. Could i be sued for mismanaging the building ?Even though I gav
> it
> >my best effort ?
>
> Yes. This doesn't m
|
|
|
In article <1149621608.856608.265560@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>The refusal of a bank to pay a check drawn on the bank, according to
>the terms on the check, constitutes dishonor of the check und
|
|
|
"Robert Broughton" <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote in message
news:e658ia$mle$1@venn.bc.ca...
> Phil #3 wrote:
>
>>
>> But Frank, self-reliance and self-determination carry with it the burden
>> of responsibility for one's decisions; something an
|
|
|
In article <0%hhg.40543$fb2.37186@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
Ms. Velveeta <lvelasquezNOSPAM@teacher.com> wrote:
>"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
>news:6j5hg.17024$bk5.6823@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>> Take them to small claims court.
>
>L
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:20:18 GMT, usenet@mantra.comVr94vmM or
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>In article <7lpb82ljfmnqm3aikpiuk7eub9fpbaq2gg@4ax.com>,
> Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> posted:
>
>> On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:09:21 GMT, use
|
|
|
"snickers" <bar@mars.biz> wrote in message
news:13e3d6ba13jvh$.19opcgcs9tzfg.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:04:48 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
>
> > In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:31:52 -0600,
> > snickers <bar@mars.bi
|
|
|
"Don Saklad" <dsaklad@nestle.csail.mit.edu> schreef in bericht
news:t16odx7ppjr.fsf@nestle.csail.mit.edu...
> Duesberg's Dismal Failure
> And why we should perhaps, just perhaps, be grateful for him!
> http://www.anaesthetist.com/icu/infect/virus/dues
|
|
|
Harold Buutz wrote:
> RetzQ wrote:
> > I must be 90 years old by now.
> >
>
> You must be, because you sure look it! LHAT!
You're an idiot and a troll, Butthead. Nobody cares what you think.
Also, your little prank failed, too. Sux to be you
|
|
|
Ronni wrote:
> Harold Buutz wrote:
>
> > Hey Retzy Ratnose, what's shakin'? Happy Birthday demon seed!
>
>
>
> You do realize that it's not Loretta's birthday, don't you?
>
> How's the weather up there?
How many birthdays a year do I get? I
|
|
|
"Robert Broughton" <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote in message
news:e5vonj$e76$1@venn.bc.ca...
> Chuck Wright wrote:
>
>>
>>> "It should be legal for a private
>>> maternity ward to permit smoking."
>>> -- Chuck Wright 5/22/06
>>
>> T
|
|
|
Phil #3 wrote:
>
> But Frank, self-reliance and self-determination carry with it the burden
> of responsibility for one's decisions; something antis can't get behind no
> matter how much they pretend to listen.
You have it completely backwards,
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:57:11 GMT, George Evans
<georgee3@earthlink.net> wrote:
>in article oMbhg.331$_p1.88@fe03.lga, MB at MickBarr@hotmail.com wrote on
>6/6/06 2:19 AM:
>
>> George Evans wrote:
>>
>>> in article 40m882lsqfqr3pe3s5hppgfrpahi2a4
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:11:15 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
>>This from a criminal like Kent Bradley Wills?
>
> I probably have gone over the speed limit a few times
It appears you have done more than that.
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:02:17 GMT, Kent Wills wrote:
> In Accordance With The Prophecy, On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:10:13 -0600,
> snickers <bar@mars.biz> wrote:
>
>>>>Helping cast out the demons is not without a human cost.
>>>
>>> And, of course, on
|
|
|
ken_g_worth@yahoo.com wrote:
>When the federal judge freed Wen Ho Lee from prison, he offered an
>apology, saying what happened to Lee has "embarrassed our nation and
>each of us who is a citizen of it." It behooves us all to remember why.
I had t
|
|
|
"btorvik2" <btorvik2@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4em2ltF1f5k3cU1@individual.net...
> Douglas Manz wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Smoking bans violate only a heavily addicted smoker's comfort.
>>> That's all. And I don't care.
>>
>
>
> I rarely smoke out
|
|
|
RetzQ wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>> Why in the @$#* would it matter, Ted?!?
>> Because he is OBSESSED with you.
>> I honestly believe he has a crush on you. No, this isn't a
>> joke. I do honestly believe it. It explains everything regardin
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
ken_g_worth@yahoo.com wrote:
<snip>
> ordeal. The five media companies -- the New York Times, the Los
> Angeles Times, the Associated Press, the Washington Post and ABC --
> announced in a joi
|
|
|
Harold Buutz wrote:
> Hey Retzy Ratnose, what's shakin'? Happy Birthday demon seed!
You do realize that it's not Loretta's birthday, don't you?
How's the weather up there?
|
|
|
Ms. Velveeta wrote:
> And anyhow, plenty of other banks provide the very same service
> without the fee.
Another good reason not to deal with W/F.
|
|
|
In article <TPSdnXR5J4RoSxjZnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@rcn.net>, Ming@Mongo.com
says...
> ken_g_worth@yahoo.com wrote:
> > OPEN FORUM
> > Why privacy matters -- the case of Wen Ho Lee
> > Tuesday, June 6, 2006
> >
> > Wen Ho Lee, the former Los Alamos nucl
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:09:21 GMT, usenet@mantra.com9cG7O3 or
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>In article <s4ua825kpprkfd91f0po1527aqi19cponp@4ax.com>,
> Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> posted:
>
>> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>>
>> >In
|
|
|
"John D. Goulden" <jgoulden@okcu.edu> wrote in message
news:e646ld01868@news2.newsguy.com...
> >I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer
> >writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. Isn't that check a
> >direct
|
|
|
"Taylor" <123@456.com> wrote in message
news:6j5hg.17024$bk5.6823@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
> "Ms. Velveeta" <lvelasquezNOSPAM@teacher.com> wrote in message
> news:AR3hg.46561$Lm5.39640@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>I am not a Wells Fargo custome
|
|
|
"Jim Kingdon" <kingdon@panix.com> wrote in message
news:p4wac8rxepi.fsf@panix5.panix.com...
>> I am not a Wells Fargo customer. Someone who IS a Wells Fargo customer
>> writes me a check on their Wells Fargo account. . . .
>> So how can they take a
|
|
|
>> In most states, it is legal for a bank to charge a fee to provide service
>> (including cashing a check drawn on that bank) to a non-customer.
>
> Do you happen to have citations to such laws?
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that in most
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:qwkhg.26$vI1.1476@news.uswest.net...
>
> "Frank" <unlisted@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:v%fhg.178579$bm6.99294@fed1read04...
>>
>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>> ne
|
|
|
I was managing an apartment building for an LLC from out of town.
The building is an old building and was in need of a lot of repairs.
The verbal agreement I had with the owner was that I would manage th
building for 5% of collected rent and that this
|
|
|
May 16, 2006
I have received your petition appealing the lack
of response of the Boston Finance Commission
(Commission) to your public records request of April
20, 2006. Massachusetts General Law provides an
aggrieved public record requester tw
|
|
