misc.legal

"SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote in message news:uQtzg.11$kO3.10@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... > > "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:TGmzg.34925$Cn6.34805@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> >> "SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote in messa

Ken Smith" wrote in a message >> We have the explanation why the buildings collapsed. It was rather >> obvious to anyone who watched the events unfold live. Planes crashed into >> the buildings. The jet fuel in the planes exploded into huge firebal

"Mr Hanky" <MrHanky@Southpark.Dis> wrote in message news:Xns9811A71A22C0BVoiceFreedomfreedomn@66.150.105.47... > "SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote : > >> Adopt a highway. Then you could actually do something >> positive about >> your claimed conc

"RichC" <rcacace@{REMOVE_TO_REPLY}swfla.rr.com> wrote in message news:dKqzg.8690$Wi.4102@tornado.tampabay.rr.com... > > "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote in message > news:TGmzg.34925$Cn6.34805@tornado.texas.rr.com... >> >>> The process i

In article <jgkeegan-32D1E5.15102220072006@individual.net>, james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >continuing his 15-year old misrepresentations, In article ><e9ohvl$rcd$1@reader2.panix.com>, > sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> In

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=110&invol=516 ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= Ea

On 31 Jul 2006 04:42:00 -0000, EditorialStaff <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote: >Thom E. Geiger wrote: >> >> Has anyone read his miserably pathetic answer when I >> submitted to the court his public threat to subpoena >> the identity of t

Robert Broughton wrote: > sin nombre wrote: > >> PRSmith wrote: >>> <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message >>> news:wLczg.46133$u11.32914@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >>>> On 30-Jul-2006, nizo1@verizon.net wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Vox's point is valid

Robert Broughton wrote: > sin nombre wrote: > >> Robert Broughton wrote: >>> Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: >>> >>>> Anti-smokers keep pushing smokers farther outside, and now they >>>> complain about butts. Give me a break. >>> If you were to open

Robert Broughton wrote: > sin nombre wrote: > >> Robert Broughton wrote: >>> SB wrote: >>> >>>> I do, however, >>>> feel the need for an ashtray. >>> In other words, you want to be accommodated. >> Just as non-smokers do. The difference is he i

Question to the attorneys: Isn't complying with discovery VERY important? If the documents asked for are too hard to get or unreasonable should the other side not be notified before the deadline for the production of documents/ interrogatories comes a

"Ken Smith" wrote in a message >> Not to rag on you Bill.... but, Jeezus, am I the only person who can get >> to the Google site? The same questions come up repeatedly, and are >> answered repeatedly > It's more that the answers aren't compell

"SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote in message news:YStzg.12$kO3.8@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... > Adopt a highway. Then you could actually do something positive about your > claimed concern about litter. Stop throwing your cigarette butts out the w

Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 31-Jul-2006, sin nombre <nada@no.where> wrote: > >>>>>> Vox's point is valid, though the way he presented it is >>>>>> poor. >>>>>> Smokers often throw their cigarette butts on the ground. >>>>>> While I've >>>>

Chip Hicks wrote: > "Robert Broughton" <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote in message > news:eam2vn$asv$1@venn.bc.ca... >> SB wrote: >> >>> I do, however, >>> feel the need for an ashtray. >> In other words, you want to be accommodated. >> >>> This i

PRSmith wrote: > <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message > news:ETxzg.39468$vl5.8943@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >> On 30-Jul-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> Vox's point is valid, though the way he presented it is >>>>>>

Ken Smith wrote: > Jon H (Jon Hans, of Breckenridge) wrote: > > This is Ted's response to my last attempt (fourth) to get my letter > taken off... (from just last week) Didn't Ted say that nobody asked him to remove any of their letters from

PRSmith wrote: > "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message > news:tvyzg.168386$k%3.23265@dukeread12... >> PRSmith wrote: >>> <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message >>> news:wLczg.46133$u11.32914@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >>>> On 30-Jul-2006,

PRSmith wrote: > <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message > news:XWxzg.47204$u11.34391@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >> On 31-Jul-2006, "RichC" <rcacace@{REMOVE_TO_REPLY}swfla.rr.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Stop throwing your cigarette butts out the window

PRSmith wrote: > <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message > news:YXxzg.47205$u11.24869@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >> On 31-Jul-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> The process is quite simple. Rotate the butt between >>>>>> th

Scout wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44CE29AA.5060804@it.com... >>John P. wrote: >>>"Ken Smith" wrote in a message >> >> [snipped to focus on this specific point] >> >>>>>As for how the passport would make it out of the

PRSmith wrote: > "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message > news:9yyzg.168389$k%3.111108@dukeread12... >> PRSmith wrote: >> >>>> Now, I don't blame businesses for taking advantage of the >>>> situation and saving a little money by not having

"Ken Smith" wrote in a message >> Falling debris, major fire and visible evidence hours before that the >> structure was seriously compromised. > It's a mantra with these guys, Bill. Damn truth just keeps repeating itself over and over again. I

Ken Smith" wrote in a message > I'm trying to show that there are variations on this simple theme -- > and that this was definitely a situation in which the steel should not > have been destroyed. I've already agreed with you that it might have

"SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote : > Adopt a highway. Then you could actually do something positive about > your claimed concern about litter. > The smokers should be forced to do it, when they get caught littering! I've seen some of the assho

"SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote : > The littering boloney is more than just a ridiculous complaint, it is > part the larger plan to promote the continual harassment of smokers > and create more specious justification for additional regulation. I >

Jon H (Jon Hans, of Breckenridge) wrote: I was Cam's friend for many years. For a long time I could not believe that one of my best friends could be capable of commiting such a horrible crime against his own child. I was a strong advocate for

In article <eam91t$2qa$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-9B27FE.20534231072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <eam7bj$4mf$1@reader2.panix.com>, >

In article <eam8th$p4a$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-BBD25C.20552531072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >stop trying to dodge seth. you got caught lyin

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44CE4C57.9070903@it.com... > Scout wrote: >> "Bill" <bill@null.inv> wrote in message >> news:ih9zg.7327$Wi.4194@tornado.tampabay.rr.com... >>>In article <7MWdnde4v_omclHZnZ2dnUVZ_qednZ2d@comcast.com

In article <eam71u$ns3$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-BF8CDC.20213531072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >In article <eam6mh$lkr$1@reader2.panix.com>, >

sin nombre wrote: > PRSmith wrote: >> <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message >> news:wLczg.46133$u11.32914@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >>> On 30-Jul-2006, nizo1@verizon.net wrote: >>> >>>>> Vox's point is valid, though the way he presented it is

In article <eam7bj$4mf$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-583F13.20193131072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >kevin kelly: > >> > > >> >"Hey Seth you are

Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > > On 30-Jul-2006, Robert Broughton <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote: > >> > >> > Anti-smokers keep pushing smokers farther outside, and now they >> > complain about butts. Give me a break. >> >> If you were to ope

sin nombre wrote: > Robert Broughton wrote: >> Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: >> >>> Anti-smokers keep pushing smokers farther outside, and now they >>> complain about butts. Give me a break. >> >> If you were to open your ears and listen, you wo

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:ealmqa$evo@rac3.wam.umd.edu... > In article <ealeug02luu@news3.newsguy.com>, richard <spambox@nospam.not> > wrote: >> >>"Don Saklad" <dsaklad@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote in message >>news:t16wt9ul6

sin nombre wrote: > Robert Broughton wrote: >> SB wrote: >> >>> I do, however, >>> feel the need for an ashtray. >> >> In other words, you want to be accommodated. > > Just as non-smokers do. The difference is he isn't seek legislation to

"harvey" <harveydawabbit@msn.com> wrote in message news:1154395111_2181@dscnews2.dcccd.edu... > On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified: > "Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of the requirements

Adopt a highway. Then you could actually do something positive about your claimed concern about litter. -- SB "RichC" <rcacace@{REMOVE_TO_REPLY}swfla.rr.com> wrote in message news:dKqzg.8690$Wi.4102@tornado.tampabay.rr.com... > > "PRSmith" <p

<bfryhover@email.com> wrote in message news:1154398323.707432.277100@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > > I have contracted with a company to build a pool for me. They > submitted for a permit with the city (in AZ) and it was sent ba

> I could see where they would a filter/pump as a "Structure". How can the filter/pumb be considered a structure ? This is how I read it: the filter and pump are the "appertenances" to the pool ("all structures housing appurtenances thereto...").

"PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:TGmzg.34925$Cn6.34805@tornado.texas.rr.com... > > "SB" <benson@hedges.net> wrote in message > news:H8hzg.3906$TV.3645@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... >> The littering boloney is more than just

Texas Bankruptcy Question: If you and your wife own a free and clear rural Texas homestead of 25 acres and a house (that a Designation of Homestead has been filed), and the county tax records show the 25 acres and house as your homestead, and you AL

ohn P. wrote: > "Ken Smith" wrote in a message > > >>>Not really. All that was sold to China was some steel scrap. From what >>>I've seen of investigations where explosives are suspected, they are >>>looking for evidence of the explosives and th

In article <eam6mh$lkr$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-D353BF.20115031072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > > More nonsense, continuing to fail to answer w

In article <eam3cs$698$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <jgkeegan-32D1E5.15102220072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > >kevin kelly: > > > >"Hey Seth you are claimi

On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified: Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring customers? Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with antenna required to be recertified by l

continuing his 15-year old obsession and misrepresentations, In article <eam3cs$698$1@reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) whined: > In article <jgkeegan-32D1E5.15102220072006@individual.net>, > james g. keegan jr. <jgkeegan@gmail.

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:49:38 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > I don't know about you, but I'd expect that an old "interceptor >pilot" like Bob Bowman would know what he is talking about when it comes >to the ability of Hani Hanjour to effec