misc.legal

On 3 Aug 2006, , WCJ <nospam@bogus.fake.com> further said re. her elderly mother she says has been in effect held captive by her older abusive brother residing in her mother's house: > << much snippage >> > > Yes, it is very complicated, and I lef

>> >KFI-640 is having a big ol' fun time about the "Please Don't Die" >> >witness not showing up before the defense rested. Attempts to >> >investigate the identity shows the witness might not even exist. Geragos >> >should have lead off with that witn

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D27621.5080909@it.com... > PLMerite wrote: >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message >> news:44D23541.2080509@it.com... >>>PLMerite wrote: >>>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message

On 3 Aug 2006 17:55:27 -0700, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote: >Some years ago at a company meeting I was told that in Maryland >it is not legal for a prescription drug benefit plan to require that >prescriptions be filled or refilled by mail. T

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:09:18 GMT, WCJ <nospam@bogus.fake.com> wrote: >Undisclosed@sources.org wrote: >>>Yes, it is very complicated, and I left out a LOT of facts in order to >>>keep it as brief as possible. Among the issues I didn't mention: Drug

PLMerite wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D23541.2080509@it.com... >>PLMerite wrote: >>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message >>>news:44D1FB1F.9060608@it.com... >>> >>>Moron. >>> >>>Bottom line: >>> >>>People

ohn P. wrote: > "Ken Smith" wrote in a message > >>>Hmmm. Let's ram a plane into a building >> >> A C-130 recently did precisely that in Teheran. > >>>and does anyone except the conspiracy theorists >>>expect that NOT to have a significant effe

John P. wrote: > "Ken Smith" wrote in a message >>Can you hit the first story of a building at ~400 mph, and what about the >>ground effects that make such a low angle of attack difficult if not >>impossible? > > Would those be the same groun

Taylor Kingston írta: > > My dictionary does not have the word "ethimology." Do you mean > etymology, the study of word origins? > Yes, of course, you are right. Excuse me for my poor spelling.

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 02:00:19 GMT, Orator <Orator@troll.bridge.net> wrote: [...] >Is Seth saying that the State law has no application for local >governments in the US? Why doesn't the State law apply without the need >to "adopt" it? It simply doe

I have it on good authority that on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:37:31 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >wcrapkin@lycos.com wrote: >>>From the Daily Breeze about the jury visiting inspiration point >> >> (At one point a passing motorist yelled out his

I have it on good authority that on 3 Aug 2006 15:51:42 +0200, bill <bill@lost.man> wrote: >In article <1154610002.790083.161210@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, lorettas2@cox.net says... >> http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/articles/3481796.html >> >

gilgames írta: > << > I beg to differ. The legal term "fajtalankodás" stands for all kinds of > sexual acts except intercourse, including but not limited to > homosexuality. So, according to the paragraph at issue, even mutual > masturbation betwe

Kent Wills wrote: > I have it on good authority that on 2 Aug 2006 17:39:04 -0700, "RetzQ" > <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > >> Clearly, Geragos did a terrible job defending his client. > > Status quo. > >> He didn't >> advocate his innocence t

I recieved a check from my previous landlord for deposit return. I am going to be taking her to small claims court for some of the money she withheld. Is it OK to cash the check that she has given me and sue for the difference or does cashing the che

"richard" <spambox@nospam.not> wrote: > "DLJ" <DLJ@comquat.com> wrote in message > news:f0g2d290vp2tto93q3ufqn8qqclj1vi9j4@4ax.com... > > White House Proposal Would Expand Authority of Military Courts > > By R. Jeffrey Smith > > Washington Post Staff

DLJ <DLJ@comquat.com> wrote: > White House Proposal Would Expand Authority of Military Courts > By R. Jeffrey Smith > Washington Post Staff Writer > Wednesday, August 2, 2006; A04 FUCKING FASCISTS! That is all I can say! Bush and his croanies are

how does one go about copyrighting or protecting a name from someone else using it ? If I use a name I simply made up on a business card or website , what's to stop someone else from using it ? Let's say I have the name Atlantis Plumbing on a business

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D275EF.6010708@it.com... > John P. wrote: >> "Ken Smith" wrote in a message > > >>>Can you hit the first story of a building at ~400 mph, and what about the >>>ground effects that make such a lo

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D27618.4030804@it.com... > John P. wrote: >> "Ken Smith" wrote in a message >> >>>>Hmmm. Let's ram a plane into a building >>> >>> A C-130 recently did precisely that in Teheran. >> >>>>and do

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/dockets.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=312161 September 5, 2006. If the lower ruling is not overturned, all hell will break loose, as ISP immunity for defamation will have perished in California. -- "Google ma

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D1FB7C.2090607@it.com... > Scout wrote: >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message >> news:44CF7DFD.9090002@it.com... >>>John P. wrote: >>>>"Ken Smith" wrote in a message >>> >>> [Dr. Jon

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D1FB1F.9060608@it.com... > Scout wrote: >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message >> news:44CF7F08.5050903@it.com... >>>John P. wrote: >>>>"Ken Smith" wrote in a message >>>> >>>> >>>>

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D23541.2080509@it.com... > PLMerite wrote: >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message >> news:44D1FB1F.9060608@it.com... >> >> Moron. >> >> Bottom line: >> >> People who know what airpla

In article <earl7901tsc@news2.newsguy.com>, "richard" <spambox@nospam.not> wrote: > "DLJ" <DLJ@comquat.com> wrote in message > news:f0g2d290vp2tto93q3ufqn8qqclj1vi9j4@4ax.com... > > White House Proposal Would Expand Authority of Military Courts >

http://www.randi.org/jr/082605charles.html#16 SCIENTOLOGY GETS TAX FUNDS Back a month ago, the media noted that our administration has chosen to support a dangerous and vindictive "religion," L. Ron Hubbard's "Scientology" farce. Margarita Lopez, a Ma

Thanks again to Charlie for this KFI update. CG was in court today. She will give more detail later. SF: Mr. Hum stood from behind the podium, very clear voice, strong, very organized. He pointed out from the get go that clearly this was a circu

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:13:03 GMT, gilgames <GlgAs@netscape.net> wrote: ><< >I beg to differ. The legal term "fajtalankodás" stands for all kinds of >sexual acts except intercourse, including but not limited to >homosexuality. So, according to the

"richard" <spambox@nospam.not> wrote in message news:earmri020cb@news2.newsguy.com... > > "Dane" <quack_deala@hotmaol.com> wrote in message > news:1154493890_29449@sp6iad.superfeed.net... > > Damn!!! > > > > http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story

"Mark-T" <mark-t2@lycos.com> wrote in message news:1154637336.229748.124540@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >I currently face a thorny case, but have not yet seen an > attorney, so this forum will have to do for now... > > At my arrest, I co-operat

"Mark-T" <mark-t2@lycos.com> wrote in message news:1154636116.261341.262910@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >I am facing a charge, where I am plan to plead not guilty > (because it's true), but on the surface it does not look > good, you might say

thank for the info regards <a href=http://www.freewebs.com/rockie2323/>game</a> <a href=http://www.gamestotal.com/>Free MMOG</a> <a href=http://uc.gamestotal.com/>Free MMORPG</a> <a href=http://www.geocities.com/iibm2323>free</a>

Hello, I'm in Canada and am wondering if it's legal to form a sports betting club. I would get a group of people together worldwide over the Internet, and we would pool funds and I would place bets on sports. Would it be legal if I did this? Als

wcrapkin@lycos.com wrote: > He's going to have a tough time getting the state supreme court to > reconsider. the state supreme court has already reviewed his case > from top to bottom once and appellate judges rarely reverse themselves. > He's j

gilgames írta: > > The BTK is from the 1970-'s and the sexual division was intercurse and > 'fajtalankodas'. This later now is converted to 'fornication', but on > that timne this meant homosexual acts. I beg to differ. The legal term "fajtalan

He's going to have a tough time getting the state supreme court to reconsider. the state supreme court has already reviewed his case from top to bottom once and appellate judges rarely reverse themselves. He's just going to have to wait and take th

Mark-T wrote: > Immediately following a crime, the police can detain suspects > for questioning, and make arrests, with probable cause. > > My question concerns other circumstances. What are > the powers and limitations on this 'detain' thing? > >

<< I beg to differ. The legal term "fajtalankodás" stands for all kinds of sexual acts except intercourse, including but not limited to homosexuality. So, according to the paragraph at issue, even mutual masturbation between an adult and an uderage

Undisclosed@sources.org wrote: >>Yes, it is very complicated, and I left out a LOT of facts in order to >>keep it as brief as possible. Among the issues I didn't mention: Drug >>addiction, an arrest for terroristic threats against his ex-wife and

Alex W. wrote: > "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message > news:FwbAg.14805$PO.13117@dukeread03... >> Alex W. wrote: >>> "Chip Hicks" <bite@medot.com> wrote in message >>> news:TjVzg.305353$Mn5.114764@pd7tw3no... >>>> "sin nombre" <nada@no.whe

Some years ago at a company meeting I was told that in Maryland it is not legal for a prescription drug benefit plan to require that prescriptions be filled or refilled by mail. Where would I look to verify or disprove that? -- FF

RSmith wrote: > "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message > news:_rbAg.14800$PO.12236@dukeread03... >> PRSmith wrote: >>> "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message >>> news:E4Vzg.14728$PO.9072@dukeread03... >>>> PRSmith wrote: >>>>> "sin

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:06:08 GMT, WCJ <nospam@bogus.fake.com> wrote: >nospam@isp.com wrote: >>> This is a very complicated issue, but I'll try to keep >>> things as brief as possible; we're in SoCal. > >> Assuming you've fairly summarized the reali

PLMerite wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:44D1FB1F.9060608@it.com... > > Moron. > > Bottom line: > > People who know what airplanes look like saw a Boeing 757 crash into the > Pentagon on September 11, 2001. > > Pe

ohn P. wrote: > "Ken Smith" wrote in a message > > >>>If you saw Bowman on the street drinking a cup of coffee, you'd probably >>>drop some change in the cup. >> >> Now, THAT was *TOTALLY* uncalled-for, John!!!!! > > ... nothing here is call

PRSmith wrote: > "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message > news:EAbAg.14810$PO.8628@dukeread03... >> PRSmith wrote: >>> "Chip Hicks" <bite@medot.com> wrote in message >>> news:jYUzg.305332$Mn5.57321@pd7tw3no... >>>> "PRSmith" <prsmith@housto

Larry wrote: > In article <1154570852.759159.49370@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: > >> Thanks to Charlie for taking notes during the KFI broacast today: >> >> SF: Field trip day. It went very smooth, they thoug

PRSmith wrote: > <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote in message > news:g2cAg.49821$u11.16299@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com... >> On 1-Aug-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote: >> >>> .rr.com... >>>> On 1-Aug-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com>

Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Aug-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote: > >> .rr.com... >>> On 1-Aug-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> On 1-Aug-2006, "PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>

Robert Broughton wrote: > sin nombre wrote: > >> Robert Broughton wrote: >>> sin nombre wrote: >>> >>>>> And if >>>>> someone goes onto private property and steals a TV set, he or she gets >>>>> prosecuted (and likely jailed) for burglary. >>>>