|
|
Truncat wrote:
> We all have issues and some of us more serious than yours, it would have
> been polite if you had
> not used all capital letters in your tittle and article.
You don't know me. How do you know that I don't carry one if the
harde
|
|
|
X-No-Archive: Yes
"formerlyfooled" <formerlyfooled@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> It is a shame, and it will back flash on Wikipedia. I will post this on
>> Usenet. It is not my reputation that will go down, it is that of
>> Wikipedia.
>>
>>
|
|
|
X-No-Archive: Yes
"Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in message
Q: What is Barbara's normal tactics for dealing with people she does not
like?
A: Barbara attacks anyone and everyone who she disagrees with - which is a
common
|
|
|
Michael Pattinson wrote:
> The new page is very succinct and informative.
> M
Of course, Michael, you like any defamation on me, what do you want
here anyway? I thought have a date with Johnny Craig? Troll or roll
away.
Re: WIKIPEDIA BLOCKED
|
|
|
X-No-Archive: Yes
"I am being defamed and forged here" <StilllovingMarty@myway.com> wrote in
message
<Kook rant snipped>
Waaaaaaaaaaah!
Why don't you file a lawsuit against them, you lunatic? LOL!
Barbara Schwarz: Terrorizing Usenet (Upda
|
|
|
The new page is very succinct and informative.
M
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> HERE IS MORE OF MY DEFENSE AGAINST ANTI-DEMOCRATIC DEFAMER AND BANNER
> WIKIPEDIA AND ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY HATE TROLLS AS TILMAN HAUSHERR AND GLEN
> STOLLERY.
>
>
> He
|
|
|
HERE IS MORE OF MY DEFENSE AGAINST ANTI-DEMOCRATIC DEFAMER AND BANNER
WIKIPEDIA AND ANTI-SCIENTOLOGY HATE TROLLS AS TILMAN HAUSHERR AND GLEN
STOLLERY.
Here is my proposal for the article
Barbara Schwarz want to be left alone. She has a right of
|
|
|
n article <1YidnVlY2pVcMUfZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@pghconnect.com>
"Ray Gordon" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>
> >>Poor Girlyman.
> >>
> >>Susan must be SO proud!
> >
> > Proves my point again. Is that all you have, Guido? BTW, she's been
> > proud of me
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz
You recently posted that you did not like the information about
yourself over on the barbaraschwarz page at WIKIPEDIA. You cannot have
it both ways.You need to chill out, too. You are abusing this group
with the Kory K name scre
|
|
|
http://www.gosleepgo.com/local/1.jpg
Get it?
http://www.cruel.com/
http://www.cruel.com/weblog/18143/big-brother-mocking-you
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 N
|
|
|
HUT UP, CHILD PORN SPAMMER, KOREY
HERE IS MORE FROM "MY" WIKIPEDIA TALK PAGES. I AM STILL BANNED. LOL! I
DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS CHRISO GUY WAS THINKING TO BAN ME. IT WILL JUST
FLASH BACK ON HIM. HE IS THE ANTI-FREE SPEECH PERSON, AN ENEMY OF THE
U=2ES
|
|
|
Babs, you are just one crazy person.
It's sad, actually, how mentally disturbed you are and that you can not
realize it and get some help.
At first, glancing at your long winded cap posts I was all like "who
gives a #@($"? But, even reading throu
|
|
|
Lord Xenu wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> "Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in message
NOTE THAT THE PERSON WHO POSTS WITH LORD XENU ON USENET IS HABITUAL
OFFENDER KOREY JEROME KRUSE. AFTER HE SAW ME POSTING WITH POSTING ID
VIVAL
|
|
|
marcus@stkittsnevischess.org wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
> > sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) writes:
> > > The age of consent in Hungary is 14 as specified by Section 201
> >
> > Assuming this post is really from Sam, would he care to explain why he
|
|
|
A Mom wrote:
> If I had drug and alchohol rehab as a juvenile can that prevent me from
> getting diversion on my 1st DUI in Oregon?
>
According to what I read at http://snipurl.com/uw9d sections 813.215
through 813.220 I can see nothing to preve
|
|
|
HAHAHAHA WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND YOU MIGHT THINK ABOUT THAT WHEN
YOU ATTACK AND DEFAME OTHERS....GOOD FOR WIK. !
Lord Xenu wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> "formerlyfooled" <formerlyfooled@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>
> >> It is a shame,
|
|
|
I am being defamed and forged here wrote:
> I just learned that Wikipedia administrator ChrisO blocked me from my
> Wikipedia article. All I posted is that putting my private information
> on Wikipedia is a violation of my privacy and laws. My defame
|
|
|
I am being defamed and forged here wrote:
> I just learned that Wikipedia administrator ChrisO blocked me from my
> Wikipedia article. All I posted is that putting my private information
> on Wikipedia is a violation of my privacy and laws. My defame
|
|
|
POST THE TALK PAGES ON USENET. MY RESPONSE IS WRITTEN IN CAPITAL
LETTERS.
==Barbara Schwarz blocked==
In view of Barbara Schwarz's repeated and egregrious violations of
other users' privacy on this talk page, her personal attacks on other
users a
|
|
|
> Assuming you are referring to a U.S. bankruptcy court filing (you have
> made any number of references to other countries and to "cross-border"
Yes, it is a US bankruptcy since the foreign plaintiff has proceded to
file a case in US courts. They di
|
|
|
I just learned that Wikipedia administrator ChrisO blocked me from my
Wikipedia article. All I posted is that putting my private information
on Wikipedia is a violation of my privacy and laws. My defamers and
harassers as Tilman Hausherr and Korey Jero
|
|
|
> less to trial? Had you made such a motion, there would have had to be
> a hearing on it, during which you would have certainly had the
> opportunity to argue on your motion.
I asked for dismissal. There was a hearing. For the statute of
limitatio
|
|
|
"Dane" <quack_deala@hotmaol.com> wrote in message
news:1155448696_17931@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> Houston v. Roe, 177 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding California jury
> instruction 8.81.15, addressing special circumstance lying in wait, does
> not
|
|
|
All that is covered thank you noting I am not involved in any litigation.
<%= Clinton
"richard" <spambox@nospam.not> wrote in message
news:ebm1q601k1g@news3.newsguy.com...
>
> "clintonG" <csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> wrote in me
|
|
|
On 13 Aug 2006, "student" <ht97@hotmail.com> further wrote in part:
> I think, the weak point for the plaintiff is that they
> have the original lender who is a big compnay with
> many divisions, they have debt collector A and debt
> collector B and
|
|
|
"Robert Broughton" <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote in message
news:ebjgu3$v12$1@venn.bc.ca...
> Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
>
> >
> > On 9-Aug-2006, Robert Broughton <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > Here's 1 dumbo quote: "Th
|
|
|
student wrote:
> > being sued [it matters!] and the date the debt was incurred, someone
> > might have
>
> Marianne, I knew these facts. I had already checked the dates. I had
> even filed a demurrer but because of the complexity of the argument I
|
|
|
If I had drug and alchohol rehab as a juvenile can that prevent me from
getting diversion on my 1st DUI in Oregon?
|
|
|
"sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message
news:2DaDg.15652$PO.12683@dukeread03...
> Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
> > On 9-Aug-2006, Robert Broughton <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
> >
> >>> Here's 1 dumbo quote: "The smoking gestapo has bee
|
|
|
Does anybody know what the average graduation rate is for law students?
I went to law school about 2 years ago and didn't do too well. I think
I had writer's block for the entirety of my one and a half years of
enrollment. I don't think the problem
|
|
|
Robert Broughton wrote:
> barking pumpkin wrote:
>
>> sin nombre wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And what if the "litterer" was not on public property? Do we also cite
>>> and fine those on private property?
>> This is an interesting question - one I don't kn
|
|
|
> Are you quite sure that those lawyers you consulted about the
> dischargeability factor knew the facts about the debt--and still told
> you it was dischargeable?? If so, on what grounds?
Apologies Marianne I forget that my case is not straightforw
|
|
|
duh@practical.org wrote:
> (Oddly, too, you seem to be suggesting that this mini-contretemps has
> dragged on over a number of years and so you raise at least the
> possibility of a statute of limitations defense although you report
> neither the
|
|
|
> being sued [it matters!] and the date the debt was incurred, someone
> might have
Marianne, I knew these facts. I had already checked the dates. I had
even filed a demurrer but because of the complexity of the argument I
was told to go over it at
|
|
|
barking pumpkin wrote:
> sin nombre wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> And what if the "litterer" was not on public property? Do we also cite
>> and fine those on private property?
>
> This is an interesting question - one I don't know the answer to.
Act
|
|
|
Paul Rubin wrote:
> sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) writes:
> > The age of consent in Hungary is 14 as specified by Section 201
>
> Assuming this post is really from Sam, would he care to explain why he
> brought up the subject out of the blue like
|
|
|
wcrap...@lycos.com wrote on Fri, Aug 11 2006 2:32 pm:
> http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/15252495.htm
You offer that as a statement of fact but it's under review by the Fish
& Wildlife Service. A property rights zealot wants to delist bald
|
|
|
student wrote:
> > marketable is reflected in seizable assets of yours that would be
> > applied to satisfying a judgment not just for the principal sum plus
> > interest thereon but also for (perhaps quite considerable?) such
> > additional sums.
|
|
|
barking pumpkin wrote:
> sin nombre wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> And what if the "litterer" was not on public property? Do we also
>> cite and fine those on private property?
>
> This is an interesting question - one I don't know the answer to.
>
> Wha
|
|
|
sin nombre wrote:
>
>
> And what if the "litterer" was not on public property? Do we also cite
> and fine those on private property?
This is an interesting question - one I don't know the answer to.
What if someone were to toss garbage out
|
|
|
http://www.madcowprod.com/08082006.html
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms -
|
|
|
> it not for your, in effect, warning them to the effect, "Plaintiff and
> plaintiff's counsel better be better prepared than you (only possibly?
> probably? certainly?) would not have been if defendant hadn't taken
> the discovery tack he chose (witho
|
|
|
> a) You are a foreign grad student living in the US and are not a
> citizen
True.
> b) You owe money to a foreign college that you previously attended
True.
> c) You already have considerable credit card debt and became so
> over
|
|
|
Frank wrote:
> "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message
> news:2DaDg.15652$PO.12683@dukeread03...
>> Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
>>> On 9-Aug-2006, Robert Broughton <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Here's 1 dumbo quote: "The smoki
|
|
|
Chip Hicks wrote:
> "sin nombre" <nada@no.where> wrote in message
> news:2DaDg.15652$PO.12683@dukeread03...
>> Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
>>> On 9-Aug-2006, Robert Broughton <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Here's 1 dumbo quote: "The s
|
|
|
student wrote:
> >Wouldn't you have been better off to set out the specific details of the case here and >then >ask if you are "proceding" correctly, yourself, under that set of circumstances?
>
> Yes, I want help but I learnt my lesson of trying to
|
|
|
PRSmith wrote:
>>>
>
>
> What advice, Alex? You suggested that I practice what I preach. I do. I
> don't smoke and I strictly limit my exposure to ETS.
And yet you patronize businesses that allow smoking. What's your
definition of s
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <44de5e92$0$500$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> "=3D> Vox Populi=A9" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
> > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:7ihsd25adk32ldti7ut01duec967inmosp@4ax.com...
> > >I have it on good
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on 11 Aug 2006 16:12:54 -0700,
> "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
> >> "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1154899801.2
|
<
