|
|
"ChasNemo" <chasnemo@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1155511006.037793.84740@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Here's wishing a happy 80th birthday to El Pesidente Fidel Castro - the
Cuban patriot who has spent more than 60 of his 80 years battling
en
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 11:00:07 -0500, srelin50@_nospam_.com wrote:
> I just attended a small local fair in Wisconsin. No where on the
> grounds did they provide drinking water from the tap. A person had
> the choice of buying way overpriced bottled w
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:31:13 -0400, Need Some Advice wrote:
> I have an upcoming traffic court case and I had a question I was
> hoping someone may be able to help me with.
>
> The question concerns the ticket itself. There is a factual error on
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:37:33 -0400, googlant@gmail.com wrote:
> I signed a contract with a builder in Irvine, CA to purchase a new
> house that is currently being built. Due to the declining real estate
> market, I am thinking about cancelling the co
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:71a2e297mc6l4psce56h04o7gs5iqadqth@4ax.com...
>I have it on good authority that on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:50:44 -0600,
> "richard" <spambox@nospam.not> wrote:
>
>>
>>"RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net>
|
|
|
"Upopeznik" <baranyabashka@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155616431.182902.129500@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>I know that here (Massachusets), hiring porn actors for sex is legal
> while outright prostitution is not. Thus I have some questi
|
|
|
"Jobeth66" <amy.daley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155600567.623131.114030@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> How is a majority of the jury voting for a finding of murder (either
> 1st or 2nd degree) a repudiation of the prosecution at ALL?
>
|
|
|
"RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1155597792.249765.216760@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Supposedly, the votes were:
>
> 2 for manslaughter, 2 for 1st degree and 8 for 2nd degree.
So 100% of the Jurors were CONVINCED Cameron
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>> There is no "Schwarz law." You are totally insane, and have an overblown
>> sense of your own importance.
>
> Of course there is. And you are in violation of that and other laws
> too.
As I say when it comes to the cra
|
|
|
> This date is an important consideration. I assume you informed the
> bankruptcy lawyers of the exact timeframe and they still said
Yes.
> then I wouldn't even be in the civil court. If I were young, poor, and
> still in school, I wouldn't want
|
|
|
Dear legal group members;
I need on-line assistance in preparing a local Superior Court plea
motion to 'set aside' an illegal decision by a very notorious bottom feeding
debit scavenger in So. California, who apparently snuck behind my back (
ne
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>
> barbz wrote:
>> You're going to "allow" a lawyer to represent you? What are you gonna
>> pay him with, Babbles? Magic beans?
>
> If you pay me what you owe me for all the libel and defamation that you
> wrote about
|
|
|
"tmoody1" <tmoody1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155590805.317882.72710@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I had a contractor come out and do some drainage work on my property.
> The contract stated that he would not be responsible for anything
> d
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> Below is the child porn that is spammed over and over to harass me.
Having read it I must say that you need to learn how to read. There is
nothing in there regarding child porn. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. There is as
much child
|
|
|
"tmoody1" <tmoody1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155590805.317882.72710@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I had a contractor come out and do some drainage work on my property.
> The contract stated that he would not be responsible for anything
>
|
|
|
"Jobeth66" <amy.daley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155606075.559893.36000@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> richard wrote:
>> "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:1155597389.756101.56920@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> > T
|
|
|
GeekBoy wrote:
> "Upopeznik" <baranyabashka@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1155616431.182902.129500@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >I know that here (Massachusets), hiring porn actors for sex is legal
> > while outright prostitution is not. Th
|
|
|
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:J_2Eg.51$Ij3.50@news.cpqcorp.net...
>
ld show whether or not lanesplitting is, in and
> of itself, significantly more hazardous than simply sitting
> in congested traffic between la
|
|
|
I know that here (Massachusets), hiring porn actors for sex is legal
while outright prostitution is not. Thus I have some questions about
legality of intermediate stuff:
1) If I pay $500 to an escort supposedly for her time and she does
have sex w
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <ebrg0j03194@news3.newsguy.com>,
> "richard" <spambox@nospam.not> wrote:
>
> > "Jobeth66" <amy.daley@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1155606075.559893.36000@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > >
> > > richard wrote:
|
|
|
"Willy" <willyk@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:iU1Eg.12400$gY6.8404@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
>
> You're right Joey. But this is the guy that we see flying by us while
we're
> courteously waiting and wonder how they became so self servi
|
|
|
"P.Roehling" <Pete.Roehling@CUTOUTeee.org> wrote in message
news:12e1q6vhcnv5c80@corp.supernews.com...
> California looked at the question of splitting several years ago, and
> could find no evidence that demonstrated splitting was any more dangero
|
|
|
MarianneLuban@aol.com wrote:
> No, you didn't, not according to this case, if it still stands as good
> law.
>
> http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=2nd&navby=case&no=995018
Student wrote:
>>And how long ago was this debt
|
|
|
I have a friend, who has a Francis gas station + c-store.
Recently he has a credit card chargeback. The card is visa card, the
reason is No Authorization / Exceede floor limit (reason code 72). The
transacation was processed throught Magnetic-Stripe
|
|
|
The cases you point out go into detail of what constitute as the loan
as the issue is that the term "loan" is not defined thoroughly. In both
cases students won. In my case the case is even stronger because
various communication between the univerity a
|
|
|
RetzQ wrote:
> "The new trial was scheduled for October..."
Wellllllllllll, that gives Ted plenty of time to get his novel finished
<g>
>"...but we'll have to see if they can do it then. If Geragos stays on the case, they can probably retry
|
|
|
Hi...
Get more Legal info from www.infozul.com
|
|
|
student wrote:
> > (8) for an educational benefit overpayment or loan made, insured or
> > guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under any program funded in
> > whole or in part by a governmental unit or nonprofit institution, or
> > for an obl
|
|
|
> (8) for an educational benefit overpayment or loan made, insured or
> guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under any program funded in
> whole or in part by a governmental unit or nonprofit institution, or
> for an obligation to repay funds rec
|
|
|
student wrote:
> I was advised by multiple attorneys that with no assets or funds of my
> own the new bankruptcy laws will not affect me much. I did look into
> the matter myself and I do believe that I am still eligible for chapter
> 7 bankruptcy
|
|
|
I am being defamed and forged here wrote:
> My reponse to all the lies and defamation is a
> Song from Christina Aguilera
And inso doing, break copyright law for reproduction without the explicit
concent of the record company. Well done babbles. F
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>
> Playfullminx wrote:
>> Playfulminx,
>
> You are in violation of the Schwarz law. Before you continue to commit
> libel per se, you should google it and get an education.
Typical cult behaviour. If at first you don't
|
|
|
Lord Xenu wrote:
> Babbles seems to still be laboring under the misapprehension that I am a
> man. I am a woman, 24 years-old and have only been posting on ARS since
> April/May of this year. Of course, as you can see she is a few ants short
> of a
|
|
|
On 13 Aug 2006, "student" <ht97@hotmail.com> wrote:
> [ My demurrer was denied on the ground that it raised
> factual questions the determination of which required
> a trial including about whether the debt sued upon was
> or was not a book account
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> You don't know me. How do you know that I don't carry one if the
> hardest burden in the world?
How hard is to defend a cult Babs? You just make up some bull#@($ and call
it tech.
--
Wenn sie denken, dass die bildung te
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> Simkatu wrote:
> > Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > > SHUT UP, CHILD PORN SPAMMER, KOREY
>
> Below is the child porn that is spammed over and over to harass me. I
> will now archive that child porn each time you spam it again wi
|
|
|
RetzQ wrote:
> Supposedly, the votes were:
>
> 2 for manslaughter, 2 for 1st degree and 8 for 2nd degree.
>
> Pretrial conference Sept. 27th.
>
> Trial date of Oct. 11th.
>
Defense attorney Mark Geragos said he had hoped a new trial would b
|
|
|
"RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1155597389.756101.56920@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> The new trial was scheduled for October, but we'll have to see if they
> can do it then. If Geragos stays on the case, they can probably retry
|
|
|
richard wrote:
> "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:1155597389.756101.56920@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > The new trial was scheduled for October, but we'll have to see if they
> > can do it then. If Geragos stays on the case,
|
|
|
richard wrote:
> "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:1155597389.756101.56920@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > The new trial was scheduled for October, but we'll have to see if they
> > can do it then. If Geragos stays on the case,
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> Quaoar wrote:
> > Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> >
> > The Schwarz be with you, whomever you are! You are certainly not the
> > Babsie of old. Perhaps you've taken an emergency course in spoken
> > American English in the last
|
|
|
Quaoar wrote:
> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>
> The Schwarz be with you, whomever you are! You are certainly not the
> Babsie of old. Perhaps you've taken an emergency course in spoken
> American English in the last few weeks?
>
> Where is Babs? Wh
|
|
|
> You're permitted to present legal arguments, but you're not permitted
> to introduce evidence. That's probably why the judge denied your
> motion.
You are absolutely right. I wanted to present evidence because it was
not a matter of simple legal
|
|
|
"doubt") and, instead, by a preponderance of the evidence (assuming
> you had admissible evidence).
I think I have enough evidence to show.
> actually clear/specific about what you contend were the payment and
> durational terms of what you in a p
|
|
|
"Willy" <willyk@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:zk2Eg.8172$kO3.3979@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> But that said, admittedly we would all most likely agree that the majority
> of opinion is not necessarily always the right opinion. The public
|
|
|
"Willy" <willyk@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:yk2Eg.8171$kO3.4890@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> But even a discourteous driver like yourself would admit that 1 out of 50
> isn't exactly the best of statistics to use as a basis for your argum
|
|
|
Michael Pattinson wrote:
> The new page is very succinct and informative.
> M
>
BUMP past all caps title.
>
>
>
>
> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > HERE IS MORE OF MY DEFENSE AGAINST ANTI-DEMOCRATIC DEFAMER AND BANNER
> > WIKIPEDIA AND ANTI-SCIENT
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:44dcb3c2$0$3575$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>
> "Willy" <willyk@prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:Hi%Cg.6287$kO3.1231@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Timberwoof" <timberwoof.spam@infern
|
|
|
Would anyone by chance know of any resources that I can browse for
information on the Stalker - KA Band Radar Unit? I have a few hits
from Google but more advertisement sites the info sites.
Any info on this unit would be appreciated.
|
|