|
|
> I need passport photos and both parents have to show up in person with
> indentifcation to sign the passport identifcation
It sounds as if you aren't very far along in the process of getting this
passport despite the obvious need. Still, I'd
|
|
|
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" wrote:
> http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=18621&hed=Google+Loses+in+Belgium§or=Regions&subsector=Europe
>
>
> Google Loses in Belgium
>
> Google News loses case for breach of copyright laws in Belgiu
|
|
|
"Richard" <no_mail_valid@spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:_TGPg.4263$AP2.3680@fed1read10...
> I posted this in a moderated group and I have no idea why its not showing
> up:
>
> I'm in Arizona and I recently took my car in to have a DVD monitor
i
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:20:30 GMT,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>Pat Pritchett-Sophy wrote:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Pat Pritchett-Sophy wr
|
|
|
"Riki" <ebucher96@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1158634397.892212.41050@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Ok, we learned more as the day went by.
>
> * Another former employee who worked at the first nursing home with my
> girlfriend was told b
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> CG wrote:
>>>> They can't even spell Lauren's name correctly!!!
>>> Also, page 4, line 8 of the Grand Jury transcript mentions "Lauren Serene
>>> Key". Are you telling me that t
|
|
|
Pat Pritchett-Sophy wrote:
> Larry wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Pat Pritchett-Sophy wrote:
>>>>> They can't even spell Lauren's name correctly!!!
>>>> Also, page 4, line 8 of the Grand Jury transcript mentions
|
|
|
CG wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> CG wrote:
>>> They can't even spell Lauren's name correctly!!!
>> Also, page 4, line 8 of the Grand Jury transcript mentions "Lauren Serene
>> Key". Are you telling me that this spelling is incorrect?
|
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:33:02 -0400, "Ray Gordon, creator of the
\"pivot\"" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Cross posting removed.
>
>
>http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=18621&hed=Google+Loses+in+Belgium§or=Regions&subsector=Europe
>
>
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:33:02 -0400, "Ray Gordon, creator of the
\"pivot\"" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>
>
>http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=18621&hed=Google+Loses+in+Belgium§or=Regions&subsector=Europe
>
>
>Google Loses in Belgium
>
|
|
|
<g00glieelm0@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158631746.878146.320720@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> If you can practice law anywhere in the US after passing the bar exam
> in DC, what's the reason for taking a normal state exam? In
> Californi
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <1158631746.878146.320720@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> g00glieelm0@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > If you can practice law anywhere in the US after passing the bar exam
> > in DC, what's the reason for taking a normal state exa
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Pat Pritchett-Sophy wrote:
>
> > Larry wrote:
> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>> Theodore A$$hole Kaldis wrote:
> >>>> Pat Pritchett-Sophy wrote:
>
> >>>>> They can't even spell Lauren's name correctly!!!
>
> >>>> Also, pa
|
|
|
Ok, we learned more as the day went by.
* Another former employee who worked at the first nursing home with my
girlfriend was told by other nurses there that my girlfriend was fired
for other stuff that is not true. For example, giving patients wrong
|
|
|
If you can practice law anywhere in the US after passing the bar exam
in DC, what's the reason for taking a normal state exam? In
California, the test may actually be harder to pass than the DC test,
and being able to practice law in other states may
|
|
|
waltbrad wrote:
> JLS wrote:
> > <tonilou622@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:1158285766.239687.219020@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> > Nancy didnt do anything...it was the murdering little #@&@^ Mother who
> > thought she could come on
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" <Ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:EJidnQNG6bZjmpLYnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@pghconnect.com:
>>> Find the rest at the link.
>>>
>>>
>> so what does this have to do with seduction?
>
> Copyright issues affect inform
|
|
|
I posted this in a moderated group and I have no idea why its not showing
up:
I'm in Arizona and I recently took my car in to have a DVD monitor installed
by a local dealer that is part of a large nationwide corporation.
My car has a moonroof with
|
|
|
>
>Ray Gordon, creator of nothing wrote:
>> Google Loses in Belgium
>>
It's just grp-ie's way of convincing himself
he is not..what did the Judge say: an:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNIT
|
|
|
They were afraid she would walk, so they went for this instead.
"richard" <don@john.son> wrote in message
news:eekqpk03i2@news2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@antitrust.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message
> news:eekim0$q3e$1@antitrust.cs.u
|
|
|
>> Find the rest at the link.
>>
>>
> so what does this have to do with seduction?
Copyright issues affect information distribution and archiving on the
internet, and that affects what people read and how they read it.
--
Money is not "game
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>> Sarah lost her DAUGHTER, Teddie. And your sister put a spell on her.
>> My sister did no such thing. Because [presumably unlike you] my sister
>> does NOT practise witc
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills lied:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>> Never mind that Sarah *is* suffering from breast cancer. Could it be
>>>>> that your sister's little spell worked?
>>>
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
[...]
> Dog evidently broke Mexican law, and at least in Mexico, they still have
> the rule of law.
Psuh. Not if you can pay the requisite bribe demanded by the Federales
(whose [ahem] committment to the rule of law is VERY we
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Larry wrote:
[...]
>> There's really no difference. You have to abide by the laws of the
>> jurisdiction you're in.
> Unless you are the authorities ... in which case, you are above the law and
> beyond it. [...]
As,
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Larry wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>> Dog broke mexican law, and americans are saying "but he helped you out
>>>>> by arresting him". But by arresting him he broke mexican
|
|
|
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=18621&hed=Google+Loses+in+Belgium§or=Regions&subsector=Europe
Google Loses in Belgium
Google News loses case for breach of copyright laws in Belgium, without even
knowing it was sued.
September 1
|
|
|
Riki wrote:
> Can anything
> be done in a case like this?
If the first nursing home said something defamatory (note: it MUST BE
UNTRUE) and that is the reason that she was denied employment, then yes,
you would have a case for slander. A legal cla
|
|
|
"waltbrad" <waltbrad@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1158336405.510824.122850@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
[..]
> Would YOU please remember that nobody said she was force to go on the
> show?
So she went on voluntarily, you mean?
>
> Please rem
|
|
|
Mary Ann Hopkins <MAHopkins2007nospam@yahoo.com> writes:
>My goodness! Jonathan! I would think that you've read and
>participated in enough of this thread to know I am not looking to
>commit fraud or anything even remotely like that. I am looking to
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:49:51 GMT,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>
>>>> Sarah lost her DAUGHTER, Teddie. And your s
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:46:24 GMT,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills lied:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 17 Sep 2006 21:17:57 -0700,
triadiemus@yahoo.com wrote:
>I'm dating a russian girl who is here on a VISA until december. She is
>currently working in a mexican restaurant. I accidentally gave her a
>hickey and s
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:09:21 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sarah lost her DAUGHTER, Teddie. And your sister put a spell on her.
>>
>> My si
|
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:50:49 +0000 (UTC), jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us
(Jonathan Kamens) wrote:
>It is not "good common sense" to knowingly commit fraud
>against the government or anyone else. It is not "good common
>sense" to do something just because
|
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC), jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us
(Jonathan Kamens) wrote:
>I understand what you're saying about people just getting used
>to it, not having the time or energy to fight, not wanting to
>get blacklisted in their indu
|
|
|
A client X has listed several properties with Y. Under the terms of
their contract Y has exclusive right to sell the properties BUT there
is a clause that permits X to withdraw any of the listings for ANY
REASON and pay Y just $350.
X has delegated
|
|
|
Song from the Classics IV, will be the Boothbay 2007 herf theme song.
It's very befitting August 1969 a hot afternoon in NYC.
So join me in this time of melancholy thoughts of love and era long
ago.
So enjoy the posts tonight, where
|
|
|
Ray Gordon, creator of nothing wrote:
> Google Loses in Belgium
>
Maybe you should move to Belgium?
I for one would be happy to set up a fund raiser to get you the cash
for a one way ticket to Brussels.
If you want.
|
|
|
In article <450C52E2.2503B817@avenuecable.com>,
Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>tjab wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Larry wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>> And why hold back? If Cam was acquitted, it would never be useful in
|
|
|
riclanders@gmail.com wrote:
> David Martel wrote:
> > Trent,
> >
> > I think you need to get some advice from a lawyer who is familiar with
> > family law, divorce law, and if possible Mexican law. Your wife may divorce
> > you in Mexico rather
|
|
|
David Martel wrote:
> Trent,
>
> I think you need to get some advice from a lawyer who is familiar with
> family law, divorce law, and if possible Mexican law. Your wife may divorce
> you in Mexico rather than in the USA. You are correct about y
|
|
|
Mary Ann Hopkins <MAHopkins2007nospam@yahoo.com> writes:
>On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:05:47 -0600, "richard" <don@john.son> wrote:
>>Try this then, What they don't know can't hurt them or you.
>>You're entitled to the benefits, soak them for all you can get
|
|
|
Mary Ann Hopkins <MAHopkins2007nospam@yahoo.com> writes:
>The fact that it is so common and ingrained in company culture tends
>to weaken the shock and outrage factors...
But the fact that it is so common and ingrained is also what
should make it so
|
|
|
On 16 Sep 2006 12:32:55 -0700, tcreek@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi.
>
>I have been married to a Mexican national for about 2 years now. We
>recently
>had our first child which is now nearly five months old.
This is a civil matter. You need to obtain
|
|
|
triad,
She can be fired for this hickey. She can be fired for your obnoxious
phone call to her employer. Take her to the make up counter at any
department store and get something to cover the hickey. Bon appetit.
Good luck
Dave M.
|
|
|
Mr X <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:pPuG2DAyzlDFFwC+@privacy.net...
> In article <4n5sosF8v7nsU1@individual.net>, Paul Nutteing (valid email
> address in post script ) <nutteing@quickfindit.com> writes
>
> >article
> >http://www.guardian.co.u
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> But, what else should we expect from you? After all, you reject God's
> glorious Truth, that salvation and redemption for one's soul are to be found
> ONLY in the wonderful Name of Jesus Christ -- God's Son Whom He raised
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> forevernitefan wrote:
>
>
>>Sarah lost her DAUGHTER, Teddie. And your sister put a spell on her.
>
> My sister did no such thing. Because [presumably unlike you] my sister does
> NOT practise witchraft.
Sure,
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills lied:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>
>>>>Never mind that Sarah *is* suffering from breast cancer. Could it be
>>>>that your sister's little spell worked?
>>>
>>>No. There is no "spel
|
