Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Habeas Corpus Murdered, Few Notice
I have it on good authority that on 1 Oct 2006 19:03:11 -0700, "Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote: > >Kent Wills wrote: >> I have it on good authority that on 1 Oct 2006 01:20:38 -0700, >> majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote: >> >> > >> >Borked Pseu


Re: Habeas Corpus Murdered, Few Notice
On 1-Oct-2006, gordonb.gvc3i@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote: > >How do you id a terrorist? Got terrorist tattooed on his bum? > > A terrorist is a person who has been CONVICTED of a type of crime > (such as use or attempted use of weapons of


Re: Mark Foley prosecution based on federal law?
"Zarlot531" <xyzer@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1159758095.442237.128790@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > On this ABC webpage: > > http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/09/exclusive_the_s.html > > > they describe how Mark could be pros


Re: freedom of the press
ishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>>>> Yes, I'm sure you are a sicko tinyDick. >>>>> >>>> Been /hard/ at work for 25+ years, and no size complaints yet. >>>> >>> Your height? LOL. >>> >>


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> No. I oppose oppression and ethnic cle


Re: Habeas Corpus Murdered, Few Notice
>How do you id a terrorist? Got terrorist tattooed on his bum? A terrorist is a person who has been CONVICTED of a type of crime (such as use or attempted use of weapons of mass destruction, mass murder, etc.) classified as a terrorist crime. Unfort


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>>> I'm not a boi, BishopPunk. > >>>> > >>> Sure you are asswipe. > >>> > >> Debate down at your level now, BishopBitch? > >> > > > > Right down there with ya DefendoPrick > > >


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>>> Why not? Al-J is considered to be a quite reliable and moderate source >>>> for news from the Middle East. Where do you think CNN and AP get their >>


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > > >> No. I oppose oppression and ethnic cleansing. I have the virtue of > >> consistency, BishopPunk. Your heroes, t


Re: 9/11 was an inside job
On 1-Oct-2006, Joe <beercritic@FAKE.com> wrote: > >I didn't say Clinton created ECHELON, I said he greatly expanded it with > >those voice recognition super-computers. There's probably 300 of them > >across the US. > > So, what has the Squinty C


Re: 9/11 was an inside job
Jake wrote: > The way secrets are kept in government, with all the leakers and an > anti-administration congress and press that would love to disclose a > conspiracy, if there was one, that would mean the Democrats are just as > involved. Oh ya,


Re: Bradbury Goes from Selective Editing to Outright Details of Jew Crooks - Repost
Gord McFee wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:49:15 GMT, in > <7ba0i2dja7o70mqv114vrgtcq3c8l1fmnh@4ax.com>, panPiotrGlownia > <panPiotrGlownia@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote: > > > Sure looks like Bradbury is now working for the US Government!! > > Why


Re: Bradbury Goes from Selective Editing to Outright Details of Jew Crooks - Repost
Gord McFee wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:49:15 GMT, in > <7ba0i2dja7o70mqv114vrgtcq3c8l1fmnh@4ax.com>, panPiotrGlownia > <panPiotrGlownia@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote: > > > Sure looks like Bradbury is now working for the US Government!! > > Why


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > : > > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > > >> : > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> On 1-Oct-2006, Josh Mile


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > No. I oppose oppression and ethnic cleansing. I have the virtue of > consistency, BishopPunk. Your heroes, the NeoConmen, do not. So Saddam was not ethnic cleansing with his chemica


Re: Ex husband shouldn't receive half for house?
> My father lent my husband and me an interest free loan for $72,000 in 1987 > to buy our house (cost, $75,000), which is now paid off. Our monthly > payments were $400 (applied to principle only). I am now getting a > divorce. > The house is worth


Re: Poll Finds Broad Approval of Terrorist Torture
"JustinW" <nope_no_address@here.com> wrote > These people are not human beings, they are a throwback to another era. > An era we can do without. What 'era' is that, Justin? And why would we want to 'do without' that 'era', whatever era that might


Re: Bounty Hunter Arrested?
> Estrella wrote: > > This Luster was caught with a suitcase of drugs to rape women in his > > room. He had a book with the names of woman he was going to hurt. > > > > Anyone out there (i.e. Vox) who says one bad word against Dog, then > > not to


Re: Ex husband shouldn't receive half for house?
I have it on good authority that on Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:36:24 -0500, "Jane" <jane_s5432@yahoo.com> wrote: [...] >1) The house should be valued at less than FMV > Let's pretend that you weren't getting divorced, but were selling the house. Wou


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: >>> >>>> http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ECD352BE-6B8F-449F-8F97-C7AB0DC08A94.htm >


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>> Yes, I'm sure you are a sicko tinyDick. >>> >> Been /hard/ at work for 25+ years, and no size complaints yet. >> > > Your height? LOL. > My manh


Re: Bradbury Goes from Selective Editing to Outright Details of Jew Crooks - Repost
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:49:15 GMT, in <7ba0i2dja7o70mqv114vrgtcq3c8l1fmnh@4ax.com>, panPiotrGlownia <panPiotrGlownia@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote: > Sure looks like Bradbury is now working for the US Government!! Why? Is he undercover in the fede


Ex husband shouldn't receive half for house?
My father lent my husband and me an interest free loan for $72,000 in 1987 to buy our house (cost, $75,000), which is now paid off. Our monthly payments were $400 (applied to principle only). I am now getting a divorce. The house is worth $150,000; my


Re: => GUN NUTTER Invades School, Takes Hostages, MURDERS 16-yr-old girl ! <=
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in news:451ff12e$0$3577$815e3792@news.qwest.net: > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in >> news:451ecbba$0$10299$815e3792 @news.qwest.net: >> >>> RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>>> "=>


Re: => GUN NUTTERs tend to be dumber than average <=
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in news:451ff047$0$3578$815e3792 @news.qwest.net: > RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in >> news:451eccb3$0$10298$815e3792@news.qwest.net: >> >>> RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>>> "=>


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >> http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ECD352BE-6B8F-449F-8F97-C7AB0DC08A94.htm > > does not count defendoBoob. > Why not? Al-J is considered to b


Re: Woman's transfusion was like 'rape'
Talk about blow things out of proportion though. The subject Woman's transfusion was like 'rape' is a lot over the top. The women needed a blood transfusion, the hospital gave her one and saved the woman's life! - end of...... ----------------


Re: Poll Finds Broad Approval of Terrorist Torture
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:42:38 +0000, Bishop wrote: >> That leaves you supporting a criminal regime. No more no less. Revel >> in it while you can. When this trash get 'round to destroying the rest >> of civilized principles, I hope you and yours


Mark Foley prosecution based on federal law?
On this ABC webpage: http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/09/exclusive_the_s.html they describe how Mark could be prosecuted based on federal laws. I didn't know there was a federal law that dealt with simple "sex-talk" chat between those w


Re: GOOD NEWS: Smoking Ban DEVESTATING
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:e410i2hu7pet651vvntco88hoi4d532ilo@4ax.com... > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 10:40:12 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> > wrote: > > >> By year's end, he said, the place will have lost about $100,000.


Re: 9/11 was an inside job
"the_blogologist" <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote in message news:1hmhsi5.x0tpkn1u7uk7nN%nobody@nowheres.com... > <Strabo@flashlight.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:07:45 -0700, nobody@nowheres.com >> (the_blogologist) wrote: >> >> >tjab <tj


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No. I


Re: 9/11 was an inside job
<Strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message news:fvmth213930mb0gqq0k5vvd53bhb8dhrgm@4ax.com... > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:07:19 GMT, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately" > <derjda@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>"the_blogologist" <nobody@nowheres.com> wrote in messag


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > : > > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> On 30-Sep-2006, 2711 Dead <zepp22112711@fin


Re: Poll Finds Broad Approval of Terrorist Torture
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:55:12 +0000, Bishop wrote: > > Well that leaves you in the usual minority kookism society of the U.S. > buttwipe. That leaves you supporting a criminal regime. No more no less. Revel in it while you can. When this t


Re: Poll Finds Broad Approval of Terrorist Torture
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:56:56 +0000, Bishop wrote: > > Let's see if I have your logic correct here chasie..... > > You don't believe in "torture", but nuking people is okay? > > LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > What an idiotic hypocrit. Nuking to


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, JustinW <nope_no_address@here.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> You should be ashamed. That you aren't


Re: GOOD NEWS: Smoking Ban DEVESTATING
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 10:40:12 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >> By year's end, he said, the place will have lost about $100,000. >> Afternoon and nighttime bar business has especially suffered. >Adapt or perish, moron. It's the Capital


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>>>>> I'm not a boi, BishopPunk. >>>>>> >>>>> Sure you are asswipe. >>>>> >>>> Debate down at your level now, BishopBitch? >>>> >>> Right down there wi


Re: 9/11 was an inside job
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > >According to lib-loons, he was a GREAT man! > >How dare you say such a thing!!!!! > > Whether you liked Bill or not, you have to admit the 90's were the best of times - unlike the past 6 years which have b


Re: 9/11 was an inside job
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:16:55 GMT, Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > >On 1-Oct-2006, Joe <beercritic@FAKE.com> wrote: > >> >I didn't say Clinton created ECHELON, I said he greatly expanded it with >> >those voice recognition super-computers. There's p


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: >>> >>>> No. I oppose oppression and ethnic cleansing. I have the virtue of >>>> consiste


Re: Habeas Corpus Murdered, Few Notice
Kent Wills wrote: > I have it on good authority that on 1 Oct 2006 01:20:38 -0700, > majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote: > > > > >Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote: > >> Habeas Corpus Murdered, Few Notice > >> > >> Now that Congress, at the behest of > >>


Re: rj_tray tobacco-sucking maggot
rj_tray wrote: > Chicken P, how do you commute? What that got to do with indoor SMOKING? >If you do so via an internal combustion engine, you are contributing to global >warming, micro-soot > contamination, & acid rain formation. Yep. > I


Re: Number of U.S. Military Personnel Slaughtered (Officially acknowledged) In America's War 2705
USA IS WONDERFUL wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:39:40 -0400, Defendario > <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >> awesome_usa@fastmail.fm wrote: >>> Defendario wrote: >>>> USA IS WONDERFUL wrote: >>>>> Islam Will Replace Collapsing Amerikan Empire w


Re: freedom of the press
"Defendario" <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote in message news:4oaedeFdqe29U2@individual.net... > Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > There are laws of a higher character, namely treaties like the UN Charter OMG, you actually take that useless debat


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > On 1-Oct-2006, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote: > > > >>> On 30-Sep-2006, 2711 Dead <zepp22112711@finestplanet.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> On 30-Sep-2006, Danzig <tyatcak@telus.net>


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >> : >>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: >>> >>>> : >>>>> On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: >>>>>


Re: freedom of the press
On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > > On 1-Oct-2006, JustinW <nope_no_address@here.com> wrote: > > > >>> You should be ashamed. That you aren't tells me you are no better than > >>> any of the terrorists in the middle e


Re: freedom of the press
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote: > On 1-Oct-2006, Defendario <Defendario@netscape.com> wrote: > >> No. I oppose oppression and ethnic cleansing. I have the virtue of >> consistency, BishopPunk. Your heroes, the NeoConmen, do not. > > So Saddam was