misc.legal

On 3-Oct-2006, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >For you terrorist-loving goobers and Bush hating morons: > > > >THE PRESIDENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT > >MILITARY OPERATIONS AGAINST TERRORISTS AND NATIONS SUPPORTING THEM > > > >Th

Scott Nudds wrote: > AmeriKKKa cliams the right to murder 100,000 innocent Iraqi Civilians > in order to "free" them from the tyranny of Saddam. > > I recognize the right of anyone else to murder 100,000 innocent > AmeriKKKan Civilians in order to "f

Peter Webb wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:4522cd87$0$10302$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Peter Webb wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >>> news:45229b5b$0$25778$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >>>>

In article <1159914554.368396.316690@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>, "bessie" <bessiejunejoad@yahoo.com> wrote: > Coco wrote: > > Rouz wrote: > > > Akneigh Wombuster wrote: > > > > . . .bunch of nonsense about impeachment snipped > > > > > > Geor

Cynic wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:08:52 +0100, "Harry the Horse" > <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> Whatever makes you believe that? I have never heard of any smoker >>> opposing the introduction of non-smoking areas in pubs and >>> r

Erik Hoffer wrote: > Williams wrote: >> By Charlie Brennan, Rocky Mountain News >> October 3, 2006 >> >> A Denver-area man filed a lawsuit today against a member of the >> Secret Service for causing him to be arrested after he approached >> Vice Pr

Williams wrote: > By Charlie Brennan, Rocky Mountain News > October 3, 2006 > > A Denver-area man filed a lawsuit today against a member of the Secret > Service for causing him to be arrested after he approached Vice > President Dick Cheney in B

"JustMe" <7btq2ag02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:1159926001.781402.145640@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Sheesh, at least ya could follow the instructions. > FOLLOW OUR INSTRUCTIONS FIRST ALT.TEST IDIOT

"namesnotbob" <adamtanderson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1159912135.789104.195340@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... >I am currently negotiating with collection agencies. I have herd horror > stories of collection agencies withdrawing more than is

> Bush and Nobel Prize do not go together. I think a person has to have > read at least one book to win a Nobel Prize. Thanks for a good laugh. > If they give a Nobel Prize for blowing up frogs with M-80's and > shooting extinct birds and torturing wil

> George H. W. Bush clearly earned a Nobel Prize for his success in the > First Gulf War. George W Bush clearly has earned a Nobel Prize for > his success in the Second Gulf War. This is really funny. Great satire, guy.

> The 14th Amendment applies to ALL in US Custody. You don't > have to like it, but you do have to accept it. > You are free to lobby for an Amendment removing the right of > due process for non-US citizens in US custody. I don't know how well > y

Who are these people? Who are these useless hanks of bone and fat that call themselves Senators of the United States? Let’s call them what they really are, let’s speak the truth about what they’ve done with their votes on the bill to enshrine Bu

On tonight's show Ms. Grace has Mark Foley tried convicted, and hung even before any formal charges are prepared. Ok so why don't we all send her some rope so she can do it herself? Mark Foley stepped down from his job after allegations by ABC repo

On 3 Oct 2006 14:23:12 -0700, "Rouz" <rouzblue@yahoo.com> wrote: >>Akneigh Wombuster wrote: >> . . .bunch of nonsense about impeachment snipped >George Bush's record in Afghanistan and Iraq: >Innocent people murdered by Saddam: 2,000,000 >Inno

"Robert Broughton" <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote in message news:efv1jb$6td$2@venn.bc.ca... > Seth Breidbart wrote: > >> In article <1159871568.32176.0@proxy01.news.clara.net>, >> Harry the Horse <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>To

"Peter Webb" <webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:452322a6$0$5110$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:4522cd87$0$10302$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Peter Webb wrote

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:03:48 GMT, " krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >> But Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfwitz, Rove, Card, and yes, even >> Cringin' Colin Powell must also face the charges that any w

I have it on good authority that on Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:06:17 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <idl5i2po4lthf95coi5aitalmddm0ri5ce@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> SCOTUS has upheld that all in U.S. custody are gran

I have it on good authority that on Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:06:46 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <2sl5i2df0r97vs89uth2ddpf0lt5di2h3o@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have it on good authority that on 3 Oct 2006 04:09:0

In article <VNCUg.7859$OE1.7107@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>, <Bishop@OnTheBoard.com> wrote: > >On 3-Oct-2006, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >> >For you terrorist-loving goobers and Bush hating morons: >> > >> >THE PRESIDENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHOR

"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:45229627$0$25778$815e3792@news.qwest.net... > editor@netpath.net wrote: >> Ever know anyone actually in a school where ANYONE "went postal?" > > So unless you know a victim of crime or violenc

"Akneigh Wombuster" <lilhornie@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1159903092.571950.233970@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > But Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfwitz, Rove, Card, and yes, even > Cringin' Colin Powell must also face the charges that any wa

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >>To be honest, I would have found the requirement to provide non-smoking >>areas with appropriate air extractors, to have been a sufficient compromise. >Providing

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:13:06 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >>So long as there are a reasonable number of non-peeing establishments >>that do not allow you to do so, then I have no problem with your >>fetish. I'll simply steer

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:03:17 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >I like to take a big greasy #@($ after a good meal, so using smoker's "logic" >I therefore have a right to #@($ any damn where and any damn time I desire Using the prohibiti

what about gross incompetence...

Robert Wagner wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:08:24 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> > wrote: > >> Cynic wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth >>> Breidbart) wrote: >>> >>>>> To be honest, I would have found

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:48:56 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >RichC wrote: >> Tough life being a smoker these days. >> ************************************ >> >> >> Workers at an Aberdeenshire supermarket sacked for breaching company

Sheesh, at least ya could follow the instructions.

Frank wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:45229b5b$0$25778$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Frank wrote: >>> "RichC" <rcacace@{REMOVE_TO_REPLY}swfla.rr.com> wrote in message >>> news:3rtUg.27734$YA5.15@tornado.tampabay.rr.com

Frank wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:4522cd87$0$10302$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Peter Webb wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >>> news:45229b5b$0$25778$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >>>> Fran

aklon3@attbi.com wrote: > => Vox Populi© wrote: > >> So the current Gun laws DON'T work, do they? > > we've been telling you that for years. So they need newer, tougher ones, eh?

Cynic wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:56:17 +0100, "Mike" <not@here.thank.you> wrote: > >>>> I am doing myself harm, but I do not accept that passive smoking >>>> presents a health risk. An annoyance in some cases yes. > >>> I am not a doctor, n

Cynic wrote: > On 3 Oct 2006 08:44:36 -0700, "Willy" <bbapwilson@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >>> I am doing myself harm, but I do not accept that passive smoking >>> presents a health risk. An annoyance in some cases yes. >> >>I am not a doctor, nor h

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:08:52 +0100, "Harry the Horse" <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Whatever makes you believe that? I have never heard of any smoker >> opposing the introduction of non-smoking areas in pubs and >> restaurants. So long a

In article <1159871568.32176.0@proxy01.news.clara.net>, Harry the Horse <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: >To be honest, I would have found the requirement to provide non-smoking >areas with appropriate air extractors, to have been a sufficient

In article <cs55i2tot4v5tibrnqg0mvn19rqpkmcmbe@4ax.com>, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:56:17 +0100, "Mike" <not@here.thank.you> wrote: >>Question to the smokers. You are quite free to smoke as it gives you >>pleasure

Cynic wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:32:44 +0100, "Harry the Horse" > <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>To be honest, I would have found the requirement to provide non-smoking >>areas with appropriate air extractors, to have been a suffici

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:56:17 +0100, "Mike" <not@here.thank.you> wrote: >>> I am doing myself harm, but I do not accept that passive smoking >>> presents a health risk. An annoyance in some cases yes. >> I am not a doctor, nor have i access to any r

In article <b9o4i2lkq7foeg1o0gs1s4rq3e0r4urd1j@4ax.com>, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On 3 Oct 2006 06:01:17 -0700, "Willy" <bbapwilson@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >>> Yes, and you could go to a restaurant and refrain from having your >>> dessert

Seth Breidbart wrote: > In article <1159871568.32176.0@proxy01.news.clara.net>, > Harry the Horse <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>To be honest, I would have found the requirement to provide non-smoking >>areas with appropriate air extrac

Cynic wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:15:30 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth > Breidbart) wrote: > >>>To be honest, I would have found the requirement to provide non-smoking >>>areas with appropriate air extractors, to have been a sufficient >>>

On 3 Oct 2006 08:44:36 -0700, "Willy" <bbapwilson@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> I am doing myself harm, but I do not accept that passive smoking >> presents a health risk. An annoyance in some cases yes. > >I am not a doctor, nor have i access to any rese

"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message news:lRaUg.22893$gF3.1761@trnddc02... > "Danny Dot" <don't.mail.me@no.way> wrote in message > news:vtDTg.1179$5o5.875@tornado.texas.rr.com... >>I just got a divorce and my wife got a portion of my IRAs

I have it on good authority that on 3 Oct 2006 14:48:55 -0700, "namesnotbob" <adamtanderson@gmail.com> wrote: >I am currently negotiating with collection agencies. I have herd horror >stories of collection agencies withdrawing more than is authorized

"Willy" <bbapwilson@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:1159892176.726501.25480@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > Mike wrote: >> Question to the smokers. You are quite free to smoke as it gives you >> pleasure and I will put up with your output/r

"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:h7h4i2dtg4igs7d0h51ndhjsuja6vs7n7h@4ax.com... > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:32:44 +0100, "Harry the Horse" > <HarryAtTheStable@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>To be honest, I would have found the requirement t

"Willy" <bbapwilson@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:1159890275.946488.165560@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > Cynic wrote: >> >> I am doing myself harm, but I do not accept that passive smoking >> presents a health risk. An annoyance in so

The IRS has refused me due process and is taking actions requiring a court order (per RRA98) without one. Any Lawyers interested?