|
|
"richard" <don@john.son> wrote in message
news:eg0mkg031ir@news2.newsguy.com...
>
> What makes you believe a mobile home is NOT real property?
In the states I am familiar with, a mobile home on wheels (vice a permanent
foundation) is personal
|
|
|
Michael Snyder wrote:
> "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote in message
> news:45248bca$0$25786$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> Then promising to pay a prostitute for sex, then
>> reneging on payment afterwards, would also be Rape.
>>
>> Or promising not to cu
|
|
|
"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message
news:ZD_Ug.23027$Pk2.22629@trnddc08...
> "Dale" <dalerrassportnospam@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:_rXUg.1828$H7.446@edtnps82...
>> Hi. I am a west coast Canadian and have a rather intriguing que
|
|
|
Dale wrote:
> Yes, it all gives me pause for thought. I usually get along with
> (almost) everyone.
>
> As I said, the neighbour had approached me to "tidy" up the back
> patch of property: immediately. When I told him that he had no
> complaints
|
|
|
Hi. I am a west coast Canadian and have a rather intriguing question to
ask.
On the back undeveloped portion of our ½ acre lot we have building materials
stored (lumber left over from the recent renovation of our house, and some
garden compost).
|
|
|
Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> Stick a fork in the Torturer-in-Chief. He's done:
>>
>> U.S. European Commander Confirms Quotes in Book
>>
>> By Thomas E. Ricks
>> Washington Post Staff Writer
>> Thursday, October 5, 2006; Page A18
>>
>> One of the
|
|
|
The Physician's Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) is suing
seven fast-food restaurant chains including McDonald's and Burger King
for serving what they claim to be carcinogenic chicken.
In a suit, filed on September 28th, the PCRM claims that
|
|
|
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is suing a
Pro-Cuts hair salon in Bellmead, Waco for racial discrimination.
The suit, filed on behalf of stylist Lois Hall - the salon's only black
employee - claims that the Pro-cut manager mad
|
|
|
OK, I edited the background image and changed font color to black.
Please come back.
richard wrote:
> <sun.rise.2.watu@xoxy.net> wrote in message
> Black backgrounds with dark text never made a good sales pitch,
> Small print hard to read.
|
|
|
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> I've always been sympathetic to drivers who say it's no one's business
> whether they wear a seat belt or not but consider these points.
>
> 1.) If the driver loses control, a seat belt keeps him in plac
|
|
|
"Dale" <dalerrassportnospam@telus.net> wrote in message
news:_rXUg.1828$H7.446@edtnps82...
> Hi. I am a west coast Canadian and have a rather intriguing question to
> ask.
>
> On the back undeveloped portion of our ½ acre lot we have building
|
|
|
Then promising to pay a prostitute for sex, then
reneging on payment afterwards, would also be Rape.
Or promising not to cum in her mouth, then doing so,
would also be rape, especially if she said "stop" just
before the happy ending.
Offshore Edd
|
|
|
Nick Hull wrote:
> In article <1159933678.538794.177270@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "GeorgeWashingtonAdmirer@adelphia.com" <guybannister58@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> I've introduced legislation that would amend the Constitution and end
>> automatic bir
|
|
|
Previously quiet and hushed movement to organize felons is now starting
to launch. Funding is nearly secured from China and the forward prongs
of the movement are beginning. It will begin with culture and arts and
move into coordinated movement of peop
|
|
|
Aren't YOU glad now that you voted KKKon$ervative?
CONSERVATIVES VS. LIBERALS: THE NATURE OF THE BEAST
It all began a hundred thousand years ago on a ledge in front of a
cave. A female homo sapiens walked by, attracting the attention of
a male. Th
|
|
|
JeffC wrote:
> I was recently convicted of driving on a revoked license 7th offense
7th ?!
Idiots like you deserve to be pedestrians forever.
> in TN. I'm now on 11/29 probation, reporting to an outsource probation
> company called Maximus.
|
|
|
McGyver wrote:
> "Dale" <dalerrassportnospam@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:_rXUg.1828$H7.446@edtnps82...
>> Hi. I am a west coast Canadian and have a rather intriguing
>> question to ask.
>>
>> On the back undeveloped portion of our ½ acre lot
|
|
|
Will you please quit calling a mobile home a trailer?
A trailer has a license plate and is towed behind your personal vehicle.
A mobile home has no license plate and can not be towed behind your personal
vehicle.
If that were the case, I wouldn't nee
|
|
|
"another MickG" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:4523cb68@212.67.96.135...
> Hi All,
>
> Could any of you legal people explain to me why I may
> be held responsible for this.
>
> Scenario
>
> This happened during rush hour in Oxford d
|
|
|
"namesnotbob" <adamtanderson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159979081.177433.179910@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>I read this on a arizona legislature page
>
> http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/12/00501.htm&Title=12&D
|
|
|
Call your local housing authority as well as building inspectors. Probably
even health inspectors.
From your description, it may be that repairs suited to the local building
codes for habitation must be complied with.
All landlords are required to f
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 4 Oct 2006 17:42:51 -0700,
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:
[snip to focus on this point]
>> > Yes, but not speedy trial. AFTERF The war, they have every right to due
>> > process.
>>
>> Major combat o
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 4 Oct 2006 17:34:09 -0700,
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> I have it on good authority that on 3 Oct 2006 04:09:02 -0700,
>> "Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Larr
|
|
|
<newworldactor@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1160008269.376409.274890@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Hello,
>
> My friend runs a construction company that is getting attacked by
> anonymous (all that is known is thier first name and city) po
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:452452e1$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
Vox - you definitely are on a warpath. Have a lover's spat with Hank?
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:45:13 -0700, Robert Broughton
> <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>
>>>>It clearly is desirable by the MAJORITY of society who seek, support
>>>>and pass such bans on Public Smoking.
>>>
>>> So if the majori
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:43:54 -0700, Robert Broughton
> <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>
>>> I rather look at the research findings
>>
>>Good idea. You shouldn't have to look very hard the find the list of 43
>>known carcinogens
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:39:45 -0700, Robert Broughton
> <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>
>>> Why do they think economic theory gives a @$#* about human health or
>>> welfare?
>>
>>They don't, but I appreciated "Cynic"'s admission
|
|
|
8ackgr0und N015e wrote:
> According to Tenet (as noted in his testimony to the 9/11 commission)
> he told Condi about serious warning signs in July 2001. He claims she
> blew him off.
>
> She claims she would never have ignored such dire warnings.
>
|
|
|
AlanG wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 01:09:53 -0600, "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote:
>
>> Cynic wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:03:17 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like to take a big greasy #@($ after a good meal, so using
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 01:09:53 -0600, "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote:
>
>>> Using the prohibitionist's logic, due to the fact that I don't want
>>> you #@($ting next to me, I have the right to prohibit #@($ting
>>> anywhere in public premise
|
|
|
"brokeguy" <parish@nctc.com> wrote:
> I live in kentucky. I recieved in the mail today a notice
> of a judgement lien to attatch all real property in which i
> have a interest . . . because of a hospital bill . . . i owe them
> over 4,000 dollars b
|
|
|
Sylvia Else wrote:
> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>
>> RichC wrote:
>>
>>> Ya think she can sue?
>>> ******************************************
>>> Woman Smoking While Pumping Gas Ignites Fire, Burns Self And Car
>>>
>>> POSTED: 6:30 am EDT October 2, 2
|
|
|
Frank wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:45243773$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> Frank wrote:
>>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>>> news:4523da46$0$3570$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>>>> Frank wrote
|
|
|
but nobody forces you to breath - - asshole
Notebook wrote:
> Peter Webb wrote:
>
>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>> news:4522cd87$0$10302$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>>
>>> Peter Webb wrote:
>>>
>>>> "=> Vox Po
|
|
|
Robert Broughton <rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>>> Why do YOU think market forces have not worked?
>>
>> Why do they think economic theory gives a @$#* about human health or
>> welfare?
>
>They don't, but I appreciated "Cynic"'s admission that
|
|
|
"Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote in message
news:45234a6a$0$10308$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
> Peter Webb wrote:
>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>> news:4522cd87$0$10302$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>>> Peter Webb wrote:
>>>> "=> Vox
|
|
|
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:46:17 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 01:22:46 -0600, "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote:
>
>>Why do they think economic theory gives a @$#* about human health or
>>welfare?
>
>Why do you think th
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 4 Oct 2006 14:45:32 -0700,
sweetnsexyluv4u@yahoo.com wrote:
>My sister and I both rent an apartment in a two family house. My sister
>rents the first floor and I rent the second floor. We both have
>children, My s
|
|
|
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 01:09:53 -0600, "Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote:
>Cynic wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:03:17 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I like to take a big greasy #@($ after a good meal, so using
>>> smoker's "logic" I
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Mickey wrote:
> > Kent Wills wrote:
>
> [betwixt them]
>
> >>>> New to America? Due process is one of the rights listed in
> >>>>the Constitution.
> >>>
> >>>New to the Constitution? It is granted ONLY to people ON US soi
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:47:53 GMT, Ken
> Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>>
> >>>We need to return to literacy tests.
> >>>If we can require ID to vote, we ought to be able to requi
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Mickey wrote:
> > Fafnir wrote:
> >
> > So, we have ALL 3 branches of our government in concurrence on this
> > issue, and yet the pinheads still yodel that it is wrong. And then tehy
> > tell me that *I* need to learn the law
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on 3 Oct 2006 04:09:02 -0700,
> "Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Larry wrote:
> >> In article <1159845969.751487.316900@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> >> "Mickey" <mickeyb@comca
|
|
|
Hello,
My friend runs a construction company that is getting attacked by
anonymous (all that is known is thier first name and city) poster(s) on
the net (he is clean with the BBB). Stuff on this "blog" style
website is exaggerated, misleading, and
|
|
|
"namesnotbob" <adamtanderson@gmail.com> wrote:
>"When a person against whom there is a cause of action is without the
>state at the time the cause of action accrues or at any time during
>which the action might have been maintained, such action may b
|
|
|
Kent Wills Thank you so much for your replay!
> When were they installed? While improbable, it's possible
> they were installed in the 1950's, at which time they were legal. In
> the 50's years since, I'm sure the building has been owned by pe
|
|
|
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:39:45 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>> Why do they think economic theory gives a @$#* about human health or
>> welfare?
>
>They don't, but I appreciated "Cynic"'s admission that market forces didn't
|
|
|
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:43:54 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>> I rather look at the research findings
>
>Good idea. You shouldn't have to look very hard the find the list of 43
>known carcinogens in tobacco smoke.
And w
|
|
|
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:45:13 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews2@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>>>It clearly is desirable by the MAJORITY of society who seek, support
>>>and pass such bans on Public Smoking.
>>
>> So if the majority of people want non-smok
|
|