|
|
I Ms Individual Rights wrote:
> pack@users.forethought.net (Daniel Packman) wrote :
>
>> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>> .....
>>>> Phy
|
|
|
JD wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:17:27 -0600, => Vox Populi© in
> message<news:4525220d$0$3579$815e3792@news.qwest.net> wrote:
>> JD wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:52:56 -0600, => Vox Populi© in
>>> message<news:4524abcd$0$3571$815e3792@news.qwest
|
|
|
mea,
> Not long ago, I sent a message to this group indicating that when my
> wife attempted to bring forth a legal matter in small claims court, the
> other party did not show; he was represented, rather, by an attorney.
> Some members responded,
|
|
|
Grendel wrote:
> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>> Grendel wrote:
>>> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>>>> Daniel Packman wrote:
>>>>> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> => V
|
|
|
RD (The Sandman) wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in news:45257382$0$10303$815e3792
> @news.qwest.net:
>
>> Daniel Packman wrote:
>>> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net
|
|
|
Daniel Packman wrote:
> In article <45257e7f$0$10297$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> => Vox Populi© <®> wrote:
>> Daniel Packman wrote:
> .....
>>> Good point. There are cultural and political differences
>>> that set countries apart. But there is a tre
|
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:17:27 -0600, => Vox Populi© in
message<news:4525220d$0$3579$815e3792@news.qwest.net> wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:52:56 -0600, => Vox Populi© in
>> message<news:4524abcd$0$3571$815e3792@news.qwest.net> wrote:
>>>
|
|
|
Hello Group,
Every Father/Mother that has had blatant violations of due process in
family court should and needs to join this action.
This applies not only to family court, but every court that you have
had a violation of due process committed
|
|
|
Frank ess wrote:
[ ... ]
> My experience tells me the two-on-top system is more convenient for
> legal-size documents, which are longer than letter-size; I can't
> remember the last time I saw a document intended for filing in
> legal-size folder
|
|
|
thanks for all the responses ! im going to call my old boss bac
tomorrow and see if hes got anything that i can do maybe light duty o
something just so i can get back on my feet and send these attorney
some money so i can get on with my life ! might g
|
|
|
President asserts power to edit privacy reports
Bush defies Congress, says he has right to change Homeland Security
bills
The Associated Press
Updated: 5:01 p.m. CT Oct 5, 2006
WASHINGTON - President Bush, again defying Congress, says he has the
|
|
|
Nehmo Sergheyev wrote:
[ ... ]
> So why do lawyers continue to use the two-hole on top system?
It's not only lawyers, and the practice is on the way out. The main
reason for the use of folders and the on-top system that it's easiest
to manage
|
|
|
richard wrote:
> <newworldactor@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1160008269.376409.274890@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Hello,
> >
> > My friend runs a construction company that is getting attacked by
> > anonymous (all that is known is th
|
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:11:28 -0700, "Michael Snyder"
<msnyder@socmen.org> wrote:
>"Notebook" <no@no.no> wrote
>> > By the way, please don't add cross-posts to the newsgroup
>> > distribution.
>> >Original groups restored.
>>
>> x-posts restore
|
|
|
In article <45257e7f$0$10297$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
=> Vox Populi© <®> wrote:
>Daniel Packman wrote:
......
>> Good point. There are cultural and political differences
>> that set countries apart. But there is a trend of greater
>> availability o
|
|
|
no clue but interesting, I always figured it had to do with keeping the
papers straight for some reason, I mean when they are filed the top is on
the left hand side, Lee
Nehmo Sergheyev <nehmo54@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160077926.195654.237
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:45257312$0$10305$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
> Bama Brian wrote:
>> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>>> editor@netpath.net wrote:
>>>> => Vox Populi© wrote (to someone else):
>>>>> Do students willingly v
|
|
|
Stormmee wrote:
> no clue but interesting, I always figured it had to do with keeping
> the papers straight for some reason, I mean when they are filed the
> top is on the left hand side, Lee
> Nehmo Sergheyev <nehmo54@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
Neatly stacked firewood has to be well.. neatly stacked, and under cover and
screened off. Preferably away from buildings (bugs I guess). My lumber is
neatly stacked in separated piles with different dimensions. However, when
the bylaw guy show
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in news:45257382$0$10303$815e3792
@news.qwest.net:
> Daniel Packman wrote:
>> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> => Vox Populi©
|
|
|
>Further, he uses disbarred and discredited fools like you, Probert, to
>promote his anti-science agenda.
>www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm#Probert
That is a lie.
Aribert Deckers
~~~~
traurige Glückliche Aust
|
|
|
Lawyer: DNA linking Neil Entwistle to murder of his wife, baby is
'unreliable'
( He's dreaming. With the publicity of this case there will not be a
motion to dismiss, and there will be absolutely no suppression. The
publicity is so huge that no ju
|
|
|
In article <45257382$0$10303$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
=> Vox Populi© <®> wrote:
>Daniel Packman wrote:
>> One must remember that guns are part of a huge legal and illegal
>> international arms trade. Physically making guns difficult for
>> anyone
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi© wrote:
> editor@netpath.net wrote:
>> => Vox Populi© wrote (to someone else):
>>> Do students willingly volunteer to play hostage, rape victim and
>>> bullet catcher to armed psychopaths, eh you stammering hillbilly?
>> HOW MANY? D
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 5 Oct 2006 05:22:48 -0700,
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >No, what I don't see is a shred of evidence supporting your claim that
>> >the US Constitution applies to people NOT in the US.
>
>ROFL!!!! Backasswar
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 5 Oct 2006 05:13:02 -0700,
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> I have it on good authority that on 4 Oct 2006 17:42:51 -0700,
>> "Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> [snip to focus on
|
|
|
Daniel Packman wrote:
> In article <45257382$0$10303$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> => Vox Populi© <®> wrote:
>> Daniel Packman wrote:
>
>>> One must remember that guns are part of a huge legal and illegal
>>> international arms trade. Physically makin
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 5 Oct 2006 05:05:35 -0700,
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
>> >"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect
>> >union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the
|
|
|
Grendel wrote:
> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>> Daniel Packman wrote:
>>> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>>> .....
>>>>> Physically make them
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 5 Oct 2006 05:03:19 -0700,
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
>> The preamble to the Constitution has no legal significance.
>
>Says the Justice Larry? ROFLMAO
He's a prosecutor and as such, must follow t
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 5 Oct 2006 05:00:23 -0700,
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
>> >Here a great hint for you. When the President, Congress AND the SCOTUS
>> >agree, you can be certain there's something to it.
>> >
>>
>> At
|
|
|
he White House war criminal's "BIG LIE" program suffered a setback
recently, as British forces in Iraq reported zero arms traffic from
Iran into Iraq.
Dispelling a major Bush administration LIE that buttressed its weak and
faltering policy of FEAR a
|
|
|
On 5 Oct 2006, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote:
> "mea305" <mea305@aol.com> wrote: in message
>
>> Not long ago, I sent a message to this group indicating
>> that when my wife attempted to bring forth a legal matter
>> in small claims court, th
|
|
|
=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
> Grendel wrote:
> > =3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
> >> Daniel Packman wrote:
> >>> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> =3D> Vox Populi
|
|
|
Daniel Packman wrote:
> In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>> => Vox Populi© wrote:
> .....
>>> Physically make them very difficult to obtain by ANYONE,
>>> reducing the s
|
|
|
Bama Brian wrote:
> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>> editor@netpath.net wrote:
>>> => Vox Populi© wrote (to someone else):
>>>> Do students willingly volunteer to play hostage, rape victim and
>>>> bullet catcher to armed psychopaths, eh you stammering hillb
|
|
|
This landowner found a law. It is a local bylaw that prohibits visual
messes and building materials on the property for any length of time. It
reads in part:
" 15. UNSIGHTLY PREMISES
(1) No owner or occupier of land shall:
(a) c
|
|
|
"Ripped Off" <rippedoff@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qvlai214p19v6mcuvfcnor5irs0sr1r4d0@4ax.com...
>
>
> I live in the Dallas area and during a move last month, the moving
> company tried to rip me off by changing their
> not to exceed bid
|
|
|
Hah. I probably deserved that comment. And yeah, Type "A"'s are a problem
with me. Nah, I'm just an retired guy who's tired of dealing with idiots at
the property line (7 neighbours). I could have told the Bylaw guy to buzz
off but that would ju
|
|
|
I live in the Dallas area and during a move last month, the moving
company tried to rip me off by changing their
not to exceed bid to a fixed bid when it came to payment time.
Their original bid was labeled as "not to exceed", which they verbal
|
|
|
=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
> Daniel Packman wrote:
> > In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> =3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
> > .....
> >>> Physically make them very dif
|
|
|
"mea305" <mea305@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1160035229.876360.103810@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Not long ago, I sent a message to this group indicating that when my
> wife attempted to bring forth a legal matter in small claims court, the
|
|
|
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>I have it on good authority that on 2 Oct 2006 20:32:49 -0700,
>>"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>>> I love the US.
>>>
>>>And the terrorists as well, it would seem.
>>
>>
|
|
|
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:49:42 -0600, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>RichC wrote:
>> Ya think she can sue?
>> ******************************************
>> Woman Smoking While Pumping Gas Ignites Fire, Burns Self And Car
>>
>> POSTED: 6:30 am
|
|
|
majikmeatball@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip to focus on point]
>> If this is done and it is found that the claim is without
>>foundation, so be it. At least the law would have been followed.
>
> The law IS being followed,
You're missing the
|
|
|
The legal profession in America commonly uses the two-hole on top
system for binding their paperwork. The holes have a center to center
distance of 2 3/4 inches http://snipurl.com/y5pj. Most other
professions use the three-hole on side system.
I pre
|
|
|
Hi, my question is almost to difficiult to articulate.. to articulate.
Several years ago, encountered a latin phrase, which says in effect if
a contract requires one to do A, and doing A inherently excludes doing
B, then the contract is understood as
|
|
|
In article <1160053801.831967.53630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Grendel <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>=> Vox Populi© wrote:
......
>> Physically make them very difficult to obtain by ANYONE,
>> reducing the supply overall.
>
>AGAIN, how wo
|
|
|
On Oct 2, 2:42 pm, manw...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I bought this motel in November 2005. Recently I got a letter from
> Allied American credit that there was advertising bill for $1006.77
> from 2004/2005 that was not paid by the previuos owner and that a
|
|
