|
|
ugh Bychakakov wrote:
> IMPEACHMENT: The wonder is WHY the U.S. media is so reluctant to even
> use the term. Historians will be asking why not (?) during the
> lifetimes of all living mortals!
>
The publishers/owners are in bed with the Neocons?
|
|
|
flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
> On 27-Nov-2006, "montgomery_scott2001@yahoo.co.uk"
> <montgomery_scott2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > My apologies to Joe SpareBedroom...
> >
> > I need to send Mike Weeks fleeing from yet another discussion on the
> >
|
|
|
<montgomery_scott2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1164927448.051591.8480@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Acccch! So I'm being forced to stick to a topic withoot drifting off on
> tangents?????
>
> Have y'seen the photos I jyperlinked t'you J
|
|
|
I've had 3 packages come in the last two weeks that makes me suspicious
that my mail man/woman is trying to look through my mail. One box the
corner was roughed up enough to look inside, the next there was a cut
in the box large enough to peek through
|
|
|
"Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1164924168.700589.292920@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> "Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1164918512.070199.222160@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com..
|
|
|
In article <x-BA5B56.21532630112006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> In article <ekmrdi$6q3@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
> wrote:
>
> > In article <x-DBD42D.21124829112006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
> > Larry <x@
|
|
|
In article <x-3ABEF6.21563930112006@news.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> In article <142um295g3eie35i6r7p6uugd2tgqgf7hl@4ax.com>,
> drp <drp@drproctor.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:23:39 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail
|
|
|
In article <nqvum21eflj13sag2aupimrt94945ndaqd@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:52:12 -0500,
> BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <jqetm2p8iq4sl3b50blbh
|
|
|
----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
REALIZING THAT THE 'Spiritual I.Q. Test' which I authored
and posted beginning March 9th this year was written well-
below the high standards of most readers' vastly superior
intellect, particularly the "genius" Ath
|
|
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR200...
FEMA Told to Resume Storm Aid
Judge's Ruling May Affect Thousands On the Gulf Coast
By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 30, 2006;
Th
|
|
|
>What's the difference between email spam and snail-mail spam? Does the
>government think snail mail spam is ok because they are getting paid to
>deliver it? I just don't get it.....
Yes, government thinks snail mail spam is ok. Somewhere I have a
|
|
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cTHbh.6635$ya1.4930@news02.roc.ny...
> "William Black" <william_black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:eknhd5$nof$2@news.freedom2surf.net...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea
|
|
|
On 30 Nov 2006 13:02:50 -0800, "montgomery_scott2001@yahoo.co.uk"
<montgomery_scott2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
NOBODY CARES!!!
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 30 Nov 2006 17:20:08 -0800,
wcrapkin@lycos.com wrote:
>http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061130/NEWS02/611300403/1025
I don't see a reversal, but I can see an appellant court
ordering
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <RgYah.1089$U81.87@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>,
> "Skeptic" <jreimer5@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > Please explain why you think that undercover officers firing 50+ bullets,
> > unprovoked, at unarmed men could be anything but exces
|
|
|
"William Black" <william_black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:eknhd5$nof$2@news.freedom2surf.net...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:JoHbh.6631$ya1.828@news02.roc.ny...
>> "Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wr
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:00:08 -0600,
Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:31:58 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>In any case
>>>there are lots of dodges-- Bogus "con
|
|
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:52:56 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:35:53 GMT, arizona@râlant.org wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:26:20 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Well... It may be "too soon to tell", but t
|
|
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JoHbh.6631$ya1.828@news02.roc.ny...
> "Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1164919187.739017.32230@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>>
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:59:38 GMT,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <nqvum21eflj13sag2aupimrt94945ndaqd@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote
>> >
>> >What is so hard about waiting until a person has be
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:37:37 -0600,
Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:06:55 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> For all the LEOs knew at that point, a crime had been
|
|
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:53:36 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>I have it on good authority that on 30 Nov 2006 10:01:47 -0500,
>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>Kent, perhaps you don't realize that Swift's "A Modest Proposal" was
>>i
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:58:52 -0600,
Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:00:34 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Carrying around $30,000.00+ in cash is suspicious, ex
|
|
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:31:58 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>In any case
>>there are lots of dodges-- Bogus "confidential informants", as in the
>>recent shooting of the old lady in Maryland., "The dog indicated
>>drugs" etc..
>
|
|
|
<caterbro@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1164861075.473335.23960@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Aiki Apostate wrote:
> > Snip>>>
> >
> >
> > > Why do you conflate physical work with intellectual knowledge?
> >
> > they are functionally
|
|
|
"Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1164919187.739017.32230@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> "Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1164918001.325519.70010@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
|
|
|
"Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1164918512.070199.222160@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> <montgomery_scott2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:1164849425.796613.35560@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.c
|
|
|
"Mike Weeks" <micoma@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1164918001.325519.70010@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> deemsbill@aol.com wrote:
>> sherwindu wrote:
>> > If you look at the logs on your posting, it says the Liberty spotted
>> > explosions
|
|
|
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use f
|
|
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:06:24 -0700, "Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net>
wrote:
>Of course, I've known far more that tried to shoplift and got caught-
>they're lucky if the police are called. Others trying to stay behind
>overnight; police called to
|
|
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:00:34 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Carrying around $30,000.00+ in cash is suspicious, except in
>the afore mentioned example (and a few others).
Again, to many LEO's being of the Negro persuasion is also
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:03:44 -0500,
"Mike T." <noway@nohow.not> wrote:
>
>"Yoofer" <yubbers9@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1164902968.660923.147170@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Now, do you see why corpora
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:43:36 -0700,
"richard" <don@john.son> wrote:
>
>"JamesDorset" <JamesDorset@firstcoastinternet.org> wrote in message
>news:pan.2006.11.30.15.30.54.407879@firstcoastinternet.org...
>>I travel a
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:30:55 -0600,
JamesDorset <JamesDorset@firstcoastinternet.org> wrote:
>I travel a bit and during those times my mail really adds up. In a month,
>I can collect a stack of mail maybe 5 inches thi
|
|
|
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:06:55 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
> For all the LEOs knew at that point, a crime had been
>committed. Because of the daughter's claim of ignorance regarding why
>mom was bring the money, the LEOs certainly h
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 30 Nov 2006 06:58:18 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > Has ANYONE ever seen anything by Vox poopsie that ISN'T a personal
>> > attack?
>> >
>> > Come on, folks, vox never contribut
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 30 Nov 2006 09:39:00 -0500,
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
[...]
>>And most people would much rather have the convenience of credit cards,
>>debit cards, checks, electronic bill payments, and the like.
>
>And
|
|
|
have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:48:49 -0600,
drp <drp@drproctor.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:20:06 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Like it or not, carrying $30,000.00+ in cash *is* suspicious.
>>Whi
|
|
|
<wcrapkin@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1164936008.051094.320190@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061130/NEWS02/611300403/1025
>
nonlegl personal opinion.
As I read the story, an
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 30 Nov 2006, tip@cotse.net wrote:
> Resident dunce, Ken Pangborn of http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com gets
>shot down in virtually any "discussion" he participates in because he
>is so slow and stupid, but the cu
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:52:12 -0500,
BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>In article <jqetm2p8iq4sl3b50blbhsvbqv3a91jg8o@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have it on good authority that on
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:41:46 -0800,
"Scott E." <seckelman@comcast.net> wrote:
[...]
>> Interesting. You think like the Polzi. Simply being a part
>> of a certain demographic group is reason enough. People like y
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:46:37 -0600,
drp <drp@drproctor.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:23:39 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>I have it on good authority that on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:39:48 -0600
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on 30 Nov 2006 10:01:47 -0500,
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
[...]
>>>Repeating my "Modest proposal": Black people documentably commit
>>>more crimes than white folks. Under your argument, just being
>>>bla
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:35:53 GMT, arizona@râlant.org wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:26:20 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Well... It may be "too soon to tell", but they're
>>going to need a better story than what we've been
>>hearing o
|
|
|
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.or
|
|
|
"Lowly Christian" <meek.shall.inheret@the.earth> wrote in message
news:6c603bbe4121fdab0c560661ca5e5cf8@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
(snip utter nonsense)
you are a complete lunatic and should be watched c
|
|
|
On 28 Nov 2006 12:10:54 -0800, shotgunmess@hotmail.com wrote:
>I live in Ohio. I have a rental property that my 2 sisters and I
>inherited when our father died. We established an account for the
>house, which is under my SSN. I receive all the 109
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:39:19 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>On 2006-11-28 20:55:46 -0500, wcrapkin@lycos.com said:
>
>> http://www.nypost.com/seven/11282006/postopinion/editorials/a_reasonable_fear_editorials_.htm
>
>Would
>>
>you expect
|
|
|
President Bush seems to be divorced from reality about Iraq. Can Congress
demand that he go under an evaluation by a psychiatrist? Could Cheney and Bush
be impeached to remove them from office without a criminal offense being
committed?
|
