misc.legal

"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-75388A.19114905122006@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <el504p019ps@news2.newsguy.com>, "richard" <don@john.son> > wrote: > >> In search of a wanted fugitive, bounty hunter "Dog" Chapman crossed the

Chris Hayes wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <1165255444.573140.175070@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > Larry wrote: > > > > In article <1165208663.633428.102800@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>, > > > >

Obwon wrote: > On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:26:48 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote: > > >On 2006-12-04 14:17:06 -0500, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> said: > > > >> On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 15:19:36 -0500, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 03

In article <1165360675.433406.87070@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>, tropicus@gmail.com wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <1165360280.310743.251490@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > > tropicus@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Larry wrote: > > > > In a

In article <4575fdab$0$3572$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <4575c20e$0$3567$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > > >> Larry wrote: > >>> In article

In article <1165360280.310743.251490@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, tropicus@gmail.com wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <4575f9fe$0$3568$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > > > > Tex wrote: > > > > "=> Vo

In article <4575fc4e$0$3570$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <4575f9fe$0$3568$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > > >> Tex wrote: > >>> "=> Vox Popu

In article <mhubn216udtmdfuh6a2acbpau58o6dmq7n@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > I have it on good authority that on 5 Dec 2006 07:38:39 -0800, > technovisionz@gmail.com wrote: > > >Ok gang, I am swiftly becoming confused by the

In article <4575f9fe$0$3568$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > Tex wrote: > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > > news:45759b9c$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net... > >>> Richest 2% own over half of worl

On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:30:17 -0500, BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >In article <x-B15C7D.14165405122006@news.west.earthlink.net>, > Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >> We live in an anarchy if each person gets to decide for him/herself >> whether

Chas wrote: > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote > > So if they're in that situation, and there is a gun, and a police > > officer in front of the car telling them to stop and attempting to > > apprehend them, I have no problem believing they'd try to run over

On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:04:48 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <rm1cn2pvd5qqq4duq4her1itaglrbot97n@4ax.com>, > Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote: >> And, IIRC, the main >> evidence against her was provided by someone who was basi

Chris Hayes wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <RgYah.1089$U81.87@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>, > > "Skeptic" <jreimer5@kc.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > Please explain why you think that undercover officers firing 50+ bullets, > > > unprovoked, at unarmed

Skeptic wrote: > Please explain why you think that undercover officers firing 50+ bullets, > unprovoked, at unarmed men could be anything but excessive force. Because it's not, What do you have ESP and access to all the facts? These perps make u

On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:10:33 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <8q3cn2l4reqeb6k7ja020qu31lcaov9ng5@4ax.com>, > Peter H. Proctor <drp@drproctor.com> wrote: >> Again, IIRC there was a lot of "he said, she said" here and the >> states main le

On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:14:55 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >Suppose the police have narrowed down a list of suspects to a group of 5 >people. They ask each for a DNA sample. 4 consent to give a sample, 1 >does not. > >Even before the results ar

For anyone interested in historical law cases (particularly in France), I've translated a number of cases from various Old Regime sources and am ever so slowly putting some on-line in an Old Regime Police Blotter at: http://www.chezjim.com/sundries/

drp wrote: > On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:30:17 -0500, BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> > wrote: > >> In article <x-B15C7D.14165405122006@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >>> We live in an anarchy if each person gets to decide for him

Tex wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:45764d45$0$3577$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Tex wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >>> news:457644fb$0$3571$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >>>> Tex wrote: >>>

"AYBABTU" <georgek@humboldt1.com> wrote in message news:georgek-743C95.07091702122006@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net... > In article <b6c0n2h8stih6spr22qen1gcq3kgqs1psk@4ax.com>, > emailaddress@ISP.com wrote: > >> What's Bigger than small claims court

<opmmp3@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1165341402.334405.302390@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com... > McGyver wrote: >> No. The clause refers to breach of the lease, not apartment rules. I >> suggest you not worry about whether there was a breach. T

Tex wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:457644fb$0$3571$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Tex wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >>> news:45763400$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >>> >>>>> Guess the

In article <el4mh0$jk5@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <x-1130C6.20174504122006@news.west.earthlink.net>, > Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >In article <el1pdv$fv8@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) > >wrote: > >

I suggest you trust your atty and stay out of the way. You don't seem like the most emotionally together person in the world either. Just because a person is found guilty doesn't mean he didn't do it.

On 3 Dec 2006 10:34:40 -0800, "nash" <SMNate@gmail.com> wrote: >Tim McNamara wrote: >> In article <42lch.409456$R63.64718@pd7urf1no>, >> "nash" <zwepytzkehillc9@jetable.net> wrote: >> >> > I donot fuccing care wise a$s. that was one article. Do yo

On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:16:57 -0600, Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: >In article <1165170976.467834.190100@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > "nash" <SMNate@gmail.com> wrote: > >> People do all sorts of wrong etiquette in this news group. >>

On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:37:38 -0500, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM> wrote: > >Well, "decimated" may be a bit too strong a term. It means "reduced by 90%". No, no. Not only no, but *@$#** no. Decimated means taking each tenth away, not leaving each tenth

Michael Price wrote: > => Vox Populi© wrote: >> Daniel Packman wrote: >>> In article <457595c5$0$3578$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, => Vox Populi© >>> <®> wrote: >>>> Daniel Packman wrote: >>>>> In article <456d7c45$0$10298$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, >>

In article <x-B15C7D.14165405122006@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > In article <fbebn2d5e4jlln70tlt247p538uihfv92e@4ax.com>, > drp <drp@drproctor.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:15:41 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >

Larry wrote: > In article <45763c38$0$5743$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>, > "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > >> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >> news:45763400$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> >>>> Guess there must be

In article <4575915b$0$3570$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > > >> BTR1701 wrote: > >>> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I have it o

In article <4575c25f$0$3570$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > drp wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:55:05 -0500, BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I don't see that misbehavior by a judge excuses t

In article <45758eb7$0$3581$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <45750676$0$3581$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > > >> BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In art

In article <45758e84$0$3578$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <4575092f$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > > >> BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In art

Tex wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:45763400$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net... > >>> Guess there must be many more stupid Cubans than Americans then. The >>> rafts only go one way. Why is that, chimpy? >> >> Cuban CR

<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message news:OE9dh.5263$oC.1401@trnddc04... > As well as a hypocrite for singling out someone who only RESPONDED, and > not > any other responder, much less the originator. What the @$#* are you blathering about, yo

<flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message news:_K9dh.5615$oC.474@trnddc04... > > On 1-Dec-2006, "William Black" <william_black@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:nX_bh.6677$ya1.6414@news02.r

My dear good friend Ed Conrad, Do you work for FBI or NSA as being accused in this thread. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.archery/msg/25acf8296d0b1b41... How many innocent americans did you murder and how many kids did you rape ?

In tx.guns "=> Vox Populi?" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > Mike Killebrew wrote: >> In tx.guns "=> Vox Populi?" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >>> RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>>> the heekster <heekster@iwxt.net> wrote in >>>> news:islpm2d17260nq6gbloq9hiuj7tq7o5rr6@4ax.c

and they all voted Liberal or Tory, the gatekeepers of the system go figure "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:45759b9c$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Richest 2% own over half of world's wealth >> >> Dharam Shourie in New

Tex wrote: > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message > news:456d8a32$0$10299$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >> Tex wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >>> news:456d8327$0$10304$815e3792@news.qwest.net... >>>> tropicus@gmai

BTR1701 wrote: > In article <4575915b$0$3570$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > >> BTR1701 wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >>> >>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>

BTR1701 wrote: > In article <45758e84$0$3578$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > >> BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article <4575092f$0$3576$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, >>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >>> >>>> BTR1701

BTR1701 wrote: > In article <x-B15C7D.14165405122006@news.west.earthlink.net>, > Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >> In article <fbebn2d5e4jlln70tlt247p538uihfv92e@4ax.com>, >> drp <drp@drproctor.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:15:41 GMT, Larry

=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote: > Daniel Packman wrote: > > In article <457595c5$0$3578$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, =3D> Vox Populi= =A9 > > <=AE> wrote: > >> Daniel Packman wrote: > >>> In article <456d7c45$0$10298$815e3792@news.qwest.net>, > > ...... >

I have it on good authority that on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:12:38 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> As I understand it, an attorney who is "licensed" (not the >> best word, but I can't think of a better one) to argue before the >> appellate bench