|
|
=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
> PTravel wrote:
> > "GeekBoy" <dadada@dooda.com> wrote in message
> > news:45773142$0$3504$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.com...
> >>
> >> "richard" <don@john.son> wrote in message
> >> news:el5q0912ep4@news2.newsguy.com...
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:00:54 GMT,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <457797d4$0$25785$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>> > In article <45778d95$0$25780$815e3792@
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:20:08 GMT,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <45778d95$0$25780$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>>
>> In 2003 Cuba had the lowest HIV prevalence in the Ameri
|
|
|
In article <x-0308C4.22372806122006@news.west.earthlink.net> Larry <x@y.com> writes:
>In article <45773933$1@news.cadence.com>,
> pxhxz@cadence.com (Pete nospam Zakel) wrote:
>> In article <x-AC7FAE.23044705122006@news.west.earthlink.net> Larry <x@y.co
|
|
|
Mitch wrote:
> In article <r8oen21tc3biq70ah0722foc88g9rht5fn@4ax.com>, Kent Wills
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> He should be thrown in Mexican prision and the key thrown away.
>>>
>>
>> Life in prison for violating Mexico's bounty hunter la
|
|
|
atrick Moraz wrote:
> => Vox Populi© wrote:
>
>> Patrick Moraz wrote:
>
>
>>>> Depends on the child, as in the scenario stated above.
>
> Yer 'scenerio' can't exist, so please stop hallucinating.
>
>
>>> So you can read the future, or have Peab
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <45778d95$0$25780$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>>
>> In 2003 Cuba had the lowest HIV prevalence in the Americas and one
>> of the lowest
>> in the world.
>
>
> Vox, if we all pooled m
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <45778d58$0$25781$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> I have it on good authority that on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:45:24 -0600,
>>> JamesDorset <JamesDorset@firstcoastinte
|
|
|
All that being said......I'm way way way off topic so I'll cease and desist
with apologies.
A.A.
|
|
|
Whip wrote:
> Do you know what is a spiritual prostitute?
Some whore your pathetic god hires when he need to get off ...
>
>
> "Tex" <tropicus@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45763c38$0$5743$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "=
|
|
|
"compubyte" <compubyte0417@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AbSdnZbkPJ0TwerYnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> doing something illegal and someone dies as a result, you deserve to go
>> to jail.
>>
>
> Last I knew. driving and using a cell phone
|
|
|
PTravel wrote:
> "GeekBoy" <dadada@dooda.com> wrote in message
> news:45773142$0$3504$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.com...
>>
>> "richard" <don@john.son> wrote in message
>> news:el5q0912ep4@news2.newsguy.com...
>>>
>>> <jgillis81@hotmail.com> wrote i
|
|
|
PTravel wrote:
> "richard" <don@john.son> wrote in message
> news:el5q0912ep4@news2.newsguy.com...
>>
>> <jgillis81@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1165333635.663557.243240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
>>> On my way to work I saw a Korean re
|
|
|
Don one-if-by-land@concord.com said:
> The voters got a good look at the republicans trying to impeach Clinton and
> what happened, the reps took both houses and the whitehouse.
>
Not true. They already had both houses and barely managed to win the
|
|
|
compubyte wrote:
>>doing something illegal and someone dies as a result, you deserve to go to
>>jail.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Last I knew. driving and using a cell phone WASN't Illegal . .
>
>
It is in New York & Connecticut (and something like
|
|
|
X-No-Archive
Yet another small claims question but this is a bit different... After
a criminal case agreement, a person we have on tape as damaging our car
was court ordered to pay restitution. Otherwise, she will have records
of her arrest and prop
|
|
|
Tex wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:4576e492$0$3575$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> Tex wrote:
>>> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
>>> news:45765253$0$3569$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>
|
|
|
Tex wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:4576e529$0$3581$815e3792@news.qwest.net...
>> NonPartisan'@ThinkForYourself.net wrote:
>>> On 5 Dec 2006 15:14:03 -0800, tropicus@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> => Vox Populi© wrot
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:45:24 -0600,
> JamesDorset <JamesDorset@firstcoastinternet.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:37:46 -0600, richard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Should Mr. Chapman be forced to sp
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <45773373$0$25788$815e3792@news.qwest.net>,
> "=> Vox Populi©" <vox@popu.li> wrote:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>>> In article <el504p019ps@news2.newsguy.com>, "richard" <don@john.son>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In search of a wanted fugi
|
|
|
GeekBoy wrote:
> "richard" <don@john.son> wrote in message
> news:el5q0912ep4@news2.newsguy.com...
>>
>> <jgillis81@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1165333635.663557.243240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
>>> On my way to work I saw a Korean re
|
|
|
On 2006-12-06 11:11:07 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>
> slim wrote:
>> On 2006-12-06 02:28:31 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
>> <PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>>
>>>
>>> Obwon wrote:
>>>> O
|
|
|
On 2006-12-06 10:56:36 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>
> slim wrote:
>
>>> Skeptic wrote:
>> So why did the cops let the bouncer walk, even though they suspected
>> him of carrying a gun?
>
> What pr
|
|
|
On 2006-12-06 10:39:42 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>
> slim wrote:
>> On 2006-12-05 00:49:07 -0500, "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Remember: it's not a crime if you're wear
|
|
|
On 2006-12-06 10:21:14 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
> Chris Morton wrote:
>> In article <1165387649.493569.180820@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>,
>> PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>> Skeptic
|
|
|
On 2006-12-06 10:39:42 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>
> slim wrote:
>> On 2006-12-05 00:49:07 -0500, "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Remember: it's not a crime if you're wear
|
|
|
On 2006-12-06 10:39:42 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>
> slim wrote:
>> On 2006-12-05 00:49:07 -0500, "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Remember: it's not a crime if you're wear
|
|
|
COP 101
1) When anyone is shot, the first thing you say is "the shooter
identified himself."
2) Its "us versus them" and we win every time.
--
- Slim
|
|
|
compubyte wrote:
> > doing something illegal and someone dies as a result, you deserve to go to
> > jail.
> >
>
> Last I knew. driving and using a cell phone WASN't Illegal . .
>
> In a nutshell. IT WAS AN ACCIDENT. and to say people who drive a
|
|
|
PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
> Chris Hayes wrote:
> to this thread. It shows
> > > > > your true agenda and true character.
> > > >
> > > > You're new to this Usenet thing, aren't you?
> > >
> > > Am I? You appear to be the one with the psyc
|
|
|
PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
> Chris Hayes wrote:
> > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
> > > Chris Hayes wrote:
> > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
> > > > > Chris Hayes wrote:
> >
> > Yup. The nym you're using never posted before to
|
|
|
In article <AbSdnZbkPJ0TwerYnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"compubyte" <compubyte0417@hotmail.com> writes:
> .. I haven't hit anyone yet. . OH WAIT.. I think it's because I CAN
> MULTITASK..
So you think. Maybe you've just been lucky.
http
|
|
|
"Stuart Grey" <stuart.grey@mapson.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:57ednRDKkMVc6fLYnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> wegona_befree@yahoo.com wrote:
>> The Indictment: United States v. George W. Bush et al.
>> ...
>>
>
> I'd like nothing more t
|
|
|
David E. Powell wrote:
> Vince wrote:
>> flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>>> On 27-Nov-2006, Vince <firelaw@firelaw.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> renaborney@aol.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mind starting a seperate thread on SMN with your data and conclusions?
>>>>> I'
|
|
|
On 6 Dec 2006 16:32:28 -0800, "David E. Powell"
<David_Powell3006@msn.com> wrote:
>Vince wrote:
>> flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>> > On 27-Nov-2006, Vince <firelaw@firelaw.us> wrote:
>> >
>> >> renaborney@aol.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Mind starting
|
|
|
On 5 Dec 2006 23:00:45 -0800, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> wrote:
>
>Chas wrote:
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> > So if they're in that situation, and there is a gun, and a police
>> > officer in front of the car tellin
|
|
|
On 6 Dec 2006 07:56:36 -0800, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> wrote:
>
>slim wrote:
>
>> > Skeptic wrote:
>> So why did the cops let the bouncer walk, even though they suspected
>> him of carrying a gun?
>
>What probab
|
|
|
> doing something illegal and someone dies as a result, you deserve to go to
> jail.
>
Last I knew. driving and using a cell phone WASN't Illegal . .
In a nutshell. IT WAS AN ACCIDENT. and to say people who drive and use a
cell phone should be
|
|
|
On 5 Dec 2006 22:47:29 -0800, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> wrote:
>
>Skeptic wrote:
>> Please explain why you think that undercover officers firing 50+ bullets,
>> unprovoked, at unarmed men could be anything but excess
|
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:32:32 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>On 2006-12-05 12:08:20 -0500, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> said:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:26:48 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2006-12-04 14:17:06 -0500, Obwon <ob110ob
|
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:47:53 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>On 2006-12-06 02:28:31 -0500, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
><PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> said:
>
>>
>> Obwon wrote:
>>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:26:48 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> w
|
|
|
On 5 Dec 2006 23:28:31 -0800, "PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com"
<PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com> wrote:
>
>Obwon wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:26:48 GMT, slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 2006-12-04 14:17:06 -0500, Obwon <ob110ob@att.net> said:
|
|
|
On 6 Dec 2006 13:42:11 -0800, pxhxz@cadence.com (Pete nospam Zakel)
wrote:
>My understanding of the case is that Martha's lie was inconsequential, even
>if in fact she did lie -- a finding that I'm not totally convinced of.
Martha probably did not
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:45:24 -0600,
JamesDorset <JamesDorset@firstcoastinternet.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:37:46 -0600, richard wrote:
>
>>
>> Should Mr. Chapman be forced to spend time in Mexican jail for
|
|
|
This Machice Kills Liberals wrote:
[usual crap]
Which "machice" do you suppose Danny is talking about? Is this
washed-up wreck of an ex-Bushevik now reduced to ripping off slogans
from that notorious Communist, Woody Guthrie?
|
|
|
Ed Pirrero wrote:
> Mark Hickey wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I prefer the 6' (2m) plus bike lanes here in the Phoenix
> > Arizona east valley over a foot less width left of the auto
> > demarcation. But for some strange reason, some cyclists can't i
|
|
|
Al Bundy wrote:
> It was probably dark at the time, but that calls for more care from the
> driver and is not the slightest reason to cut her a break.
If you read the article, it seems to have been in broad
daylight and there was a witness.
|
|
|
See my other domains at www.barristersites.com
|
|
|
"Ed Pirrero" <gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote:
>Mark Hickey wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I prefer the 6' (2m) plus bike lanes here in the Phoenix
>> Arizona east valley over a foot less width left of the auto
>> demarcation. But for some strange reason,
|
|
|
She need |