Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Could my Survey be Incorrect
Difjb, We really can't tell whether your new survey is correct. You seem to indicate that you had a survey done 2 years ago that places some of a neighbor's structures on your property. You don't say whether these structures were on your prope


RE: Bar Exam without Law School
I think that if an individual can pass the test for their license & pass without schooling...it should be allowed.I know of many individuals (including attorneys) who have their degree & have as much common sense as a rock! I have had MANY offers from


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
I don't know anything about UK law or the contract obligations of your bank or the credit card company. The other posters might all be right for all I know. All I want to tell you is you need a new bank. I don't mean change banks for all your acc


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
n article <1168084835.387878.132150@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>, hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceEx


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
In article <1168083871.791616.150310@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > >


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
In article <1168083494.645424.268240@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <1168056766.530402.67360@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>, > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > Larry w


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
In article <1168083443.100621.171190@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <1168056629.891593.275540@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>, > > "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: >


Re: Problem with Incompetent Slumlord
Thanks much to Jonathan for some new insights into possible solutions for me, the OP (name change due to not having my own regular net connection) I will do some more research on the law. Last time this issue came up with another landlord I had a ha


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3s50q299ipumqu5685dhd3pmc9c0ht7ajq@4ax.com... > On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:06:52 -0000, "Peter Crosland" > <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >>joshidm@gmail.com wrote: >>> On 6 Jan, 09:28, "Peter Croslan


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
j> Today I received reply from Credit Card Company that had I not received j> the goods in first place they would sent my complaint to Visa j> International and tried to get my money back. But for non-refund I can j> only take legal action on my own


Re: Bar Exam without Law School
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:46:57 GMT, angel wrote: >I think that if an individual can pass the test for their license & pass without >schooling...it should be allowed.I know of many individuals (including attorneys) >who have their degree & have as muc


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:06:52 -0000, "Peter Crosland" <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >joshidm@gmail.com wrote: >> On 6 Jan, 09:28, "Peter Crosland" <g...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>> How much was the transaction for? If it was £100 or more the credit >>> card


Re: The truth that more of us must grasp (if we are to survive as a species)
On 6 Jan 2007 09:50:49 -0800, maxhemust@yahoo.com wrote: >The truth that more of us must grasp (if we are to survive as a >species) is that contrary to what they would have us believe, the USA >has traditionally been violently opposed to popular dem


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > >


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > >


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Poli


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Poli


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Poli


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Poli


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Poli


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Poli


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > hayes13@fadmail.com wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > >


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Larry wrote: > > > > > > > In article <1167547


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > PoliceExpert


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > arizona@r=E2l


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Larry wrote: > > > > > > > In article <116754


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > Larry wrote:


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Chris Hayes wrote: > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote: > > > > > > Chris Hayes wrote: > > > > > > > arizona@r=E2


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
In article <1168074424.956715.290770@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, joshidm@gmail.com wrote: > I purchased 4 items from http://www.m-99.co.uk/. > > One item I kept but three items I had to return, and returned them > within a day by recorded deli


Re: Proof of a check
<josh@phred.org> wrote in message news:MPG.2008a89c7cf68dd79896e5@newsgroups.comcast.net... > In article <iounh.14$rz3.11@trnddc03>, Greyprof@msn.com says... > >> Depends on what court. If you are headed for small claims court then >> yes, >> you


Re: Do you think police used excessive force in the groom shooting?
Larry wrote: > "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote: > > > > Try again, liar boy. > > Try what? Calling you dumb? OK. Hayes, you're dumber than the average > troll. You're even dumber than most trolls. > > Yet, somehow, you didn't spell a


Re: Bush admin. to open mail without a warrant
GeekBoy wrote: > <retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:83urp2lrbebfmrls4nnugfdvikolrsp633@4ax.com... > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:42:37 -0800, <josh@phred.org> wrote: > > > > >>In article <459DFE4D.5C94@despam.autobahn.mb.ca>, > >>het@despa


Re: Treasury Dept. Says United States Insolvent
nospam@nospam.com wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:20:12 -0800, in misc.consumers.frugal-living > <josh@phred.org> wrote: >> A 400% >> *deficit* would be spending $120,000 more than you earn every single >> year. > Ok so how much does the US mak


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:17:13 -0000, "Peter Crosland" <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >roybennet@fsmail.net wrote: >> I don't think the DSR allows you to send back part items from an order >> and keep the rest without the suppliers permission but of co


Could my Survey be Incorrect
I had a land survey done two years ago when we were tearing down our old house to make way for a new modular home. We live in an older neighborhood & the original land surveys were what we all considered correct. The new survey was a full survey to


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
roybennet@fsmail.net wrote: > joshidm@gmail.com wrote: >> I purchased 4 items from http://www.m-99.co.uk/. >> >> One item I kept but three items I had to return, and returned them >> within a day by recorded delivery. >> >> Waited 3 weeks for refun


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
> "Peter Crosland" <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:459f82cc$0$8720$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... > .... > >> You can insist that the credit card company process a charge back >> which means that the company not only have to refun


Re: Bush is now officially a dictator
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 02:30:02 GMT, Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote in alt.atheism > >On 2-Jan-2007, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: > >> > >> >those who oppose will be "absorbed" >> > >> >morbius >> > >> : >> >> Huh? > >You forgot t


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
At 09:28:00 on 06/01/2007, Peter Crosland delighted uk.finance by announcing: > > I purchased 4 items from http://www.m-99.co.uk/. > > > > One item I kept but three items I had to return, and returned them > > within a day by recorded delivery. >


Re: Treasury Dept. Says United States Insolvent
Rene <ReneW@invalid.address> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >>> New report projects federal expenditures >>> at four times the gross domestic product >> Another bare faced lie. You cant compare the total claimed >> commitments into the future with a sin


Re: Hooray! Our CLONES Are Coming! Our CLONES Are Coming!
Sir Frederick wrote: > They should go for several new replacement species. Posthumanism will probably become a necessity for surviving in a resource-ravaged, polluted, hothouse or icehouse world. The protesters of augmentation / diversification will


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
"Peter Crosland" <g6jns@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:459f82cc$0$8720$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... ..... > You can insist that the credit card company process a charge back which > means that the company not only have to refund th


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
joshidm@gmail.com wrote: > On 6 Jan, 09:28, "Peter Crosland" <g...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> How much was the transaction for? If it was £100 or more the credit >> card company is liable. As for Visa International that is poure >> b******t as you don't h


Re: Treasury Dept. Says United States Insolvent
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:20:12 -0800, in misc.consumers.frugal-living <josh@phred.org> wrote: > A 400% >*deficit* would be spending $120,000 more than you earn every single >year. Ok so how much does the US make compared to what it spends every


Re: Hooray! Our CLONES Are Coming! Our CLONES Are Coming!
They should go for several new replacement species.


The truth that more of us must grasp (if we are to survive as a species)
he truth that more of us must grasp (if we are to survive as a species) Some in this group are on the side of, and regularly defend those who think it's ok to drop tens of thousands of bombs on cities of 5 million or more (like Baghdad), to kill an


Re: Credit Card Co vs Online Retailers
> I purchased 4 items from http://www.m-99.co.uk/. > > One item I kept but three items I had to return, and returned them > within a day by recorded delivery. > > Waited 3 weeks for refund into my Credit Card Account. > > Not hearing from m-99.co.u


Hartley Patterson
Hi! Yeah, I'm having a hard time figuring out how to make that link intuitive. The thing is that Wikipedia has a standard list of templates to be used in this sort of situation, so ''usually'' we're supposed to stick to those. (Perhaps not always?) I f


Hartley Patterson
Hi! Yeah, I'm having a hard time figuring out how to make that link intuitive. The thing is that Wikipedia has a standard list of templates to be used in this sort of situation, so ''usually'' we're supposed to stick to those. (Perhaps not always?) I f


Hartley Patterson