|
|
iamleppert@gmail.com writes:
>My employer has decided to award benefit hours before we actually
>"earn" them.
Allowing employees to go borrow against future earned vacation time,
usually up to some set limit, is not an uncommon practice.
>Along w
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 13 Jan 2007 20:28:21 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
>> Chris Hayes wrote:
>> > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
>> > > Chris Hayes wrote:
>> > > > Everyone knows
>>
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 13 Jan 2007 20:30:30 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Projection transference is a bad thing, Chris.
>> >
>> >That's exactly what you're doing, liar boy.
>>
>> How do you figure? I, and others, have
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 13 Jan 2007 20:46:16 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Larry wrote:
>> In article <1168748798.812785.212980@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Kent Wills
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:39:06 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <1168748798.812785.212980@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>> > As I understand it, on 12 Ja
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 13 Jan 2007 20:26:40 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:10:40 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
>> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Kent Wills wrote:
|
|
|
iam,
I tend to agree with Larry. You have received a notice of the new policy
and can stay or leave. But you can easily write or call your State's Dept of
Labor and get their opinion. I've never heard of making such a loan as being
illegal
|
|
|
In article <1168722849.172680.251240@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
iamleppert@gmail.com wrote:
> My employer has decided to award benefit hours before we actually
> "earn" them. Along with this is a threat if we leave before next year,
> and use o
|
|
|
In article <5m7iq21gj8hk8oplmcipsmbjoaqbcak6eh@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I understand it, on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:16:40 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <b84iq2pm8dkpsgl7n4vhi1qgco8fu70uri@4ax.com>,
> > Ke
|
|
|
iamleppert@gmail.com wrote:
> I should have clarified my original post by providing more detail.
>
>> You're saying that if the company does it, it *has* to be as a gift to
>> you.
>>
>> Why can't they do it the way they did it? As long as they ar
|
|
|
I should have clarified my original post by providing more detail.
> You're saying that if the company does it, it *has* to be as a gift to
> you.
>
> Why can't they do it the way they did it? As long as they are up front
> and everyone is aware o
|
|
|
Civil Gideon is a website to promote the right to fair and equitable access
to the courts. All citizens should be assured of due process and the rights
granted by the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights.
See civilgideon (dot) c
|
|
|
In article <9dtgq2dnpijenr00una9a5ad2laf9eeg35@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 15:38:39 -0800, mmbc99@aol.com
> wrote:
>
> >Hello. Recently I checked my credit file and noticed an open
> >col
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:03:15 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> He did that because he is a PATHOLOGICAL liar. It's the only
>> explanation that makes any sense. You point out he didn't spell
>> anything wrong and he call
|
|
|
How much money is involved? It might be cheaper to negotiate a
settlement of the debt or even pay it than to hire an atty.-Jitney
|
|
|
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
> On 12-Jan-2007, "jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > That's right, folks. Two disgraced Republican presidents used the FBI
> > > > to intimidate witnesses, recently discovered documents show.
> > >
> > >
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <1168748798.812785.212980@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:10:40 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
> > > <hayes12@fadmail.
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:17:07 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >> As I understand it, on 5 Jan 2007 20:12:46 -0800, hayes13@fadmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
>
|
|
|
PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
> Chris Hayes wrote:
> > PoliceExpert@Muchomail.com wrote:
> > > Chris Hayes wrote:
> > > > Everyone knows
> > >
> > > You should try harder, STALKER
> >
> >
> > I certainly will.
>
> O.K. STALKER!
So say
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <1168668640.056528.266990@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
> "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 02:52:14 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
> > > <hayes12@fadmail.c
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:10:40 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >> As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 02:52:14 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
> >> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
|
|
|
On 12 Jan 2007, "Kingcosmos" <waynelittle@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I signed a one year lease while living in Maryland . . .
> in 1996 . . . . left mid-way in 1997 and . . . mov[ed] out
> of state in 1998. I did not hear from the law firm I
> am now
|
|
|
Highly moral sodomites would never do such a terrible thing. This is
obviously a heterosexual conspiracy to portray the morally upright
homosexual community in a bad light.-Jitney
|
|
|
Which one will you reccomend?
theinccompany.com or http://www.mycorporation.com/dba/dbafaq.htm
Bob wrote:
> > Do we need a Federal Tax ID to open a US bank account from outside US?
>
>
> "Do I need a Federal Tax ID Number (EIN)[]?
>
> Legally, you
|
|
|
On 13-Jan-2007, Roy <aa4re@aa4re.ampr.org> wrote:
> > Stormin Mormon wrote:
> >> Unable to stop the demand, they go after the supply. Dumb.
> >>
> >> You think they're going after militias?
> >
> > There is very little reason why they would be s
|
|
|
lee hutch dixon jtn wrote:
> More great news, in NYC we keep lighting up.
>
Amen, brother lee!
If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you
to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.
- He
|
|
|
In article <b84iq2pm8dkpsgl7n4vhi1qgco8fu70uri@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Welcome to the club, Kent!
>
> When do I learn the secret handshake? :)
>
> >Although it's not that hard to gain entrance
> >- sooner or l
|
|
|
More great news, in NYC we keep lighting up.
_News Wire_ wrote:
> Smoke-free casino bill on tap
>
> Denver lawmakers to propose lifting gaming exemption
>
> By Joanne Kelley, Rocky Mountain News
> January 13, 2007
>
> Two state lawmakers have
|
|
|
In article <1168668640.056528.266990@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
"Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
> > As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 02:52:14 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
> > <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
|
|
|
Smoke-free casino bill on tap
Denver lawmakers to propose lifting gaming exemption
By Joanne Kelley, Rocky Mountain News
January 13, 2007
Two state lawmakers have agreed to sponsor legislation that would ban
smoking inside Colorado's mountain c
|
|
|
2 Mo. Boys Found, but Questions Remain
By BETSY TAYLOR 01.13.07, 5:23 PM ET
Investigators who made the incredible discovery of two kidnapped boys
in a tiny apartment turned Saturday from euphoria to some troubling
questions: What could have motivate
|
|
|
iamleppert@gmail.com wrote:
> My employer has decided to award benefit hours before we actually
> "earn" them. Along with this is a threat if we leave before next year,
> and use our "fronted" hours, we will end up owing the company and be
> billed fo
|
|
|
> Do we need a Federal Tax ID to open a US bank account from outside US?
"Do I need a Federal Tax ID Number (EIN)[]?
Legally, you are required to identify your business with one of two
numbers: either your Social Security Number or an EIN (Empl
|
|
|
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <betaxxx@earthlink.net> wrote
in news:1168711342.325199.126950@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> RD (The Sandman) spamlock wrote:
>> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <betaxxx@earthlink.net>
>> wro
|
|
|
My employer has decided to award benefit hours before we actually
"earn" them. Along with this is a threat if we leave before next year,
and use our "fronted" hours, we will end up owing the company and be
billed for those hours. In my view if the comp
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:16:40 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <b84iq2pm8dkpsgl7n4vhi1qgco8fu70uri@4ax.com>,
> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >Welcome to the club, Kent!
>>
>> When do I learn the secre
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:49:26 -0800,
nosellout123@yahoo.com wrote:
>Hello,
>My name is Bryan. I play poker for a living.
>
While I'm certain you are a troll with too much free time, my
daughter is sleeping, and my son is at that
|
|
|
Adam Albright <AA@ABC.net> wrote in
news:n88gq2lj1ru2v41kn99hmknp711053pehb@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:45:21 GMT, "Patriot Games"
> <Crazy_Bastard@Yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <betaxxx@earthlink.net> wrote
|
|
|
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <betaxxx@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:1168645413.530771.147330@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
>
> RD (The Sandman) spamlock wrote:
>> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <betaxxx@earthlink.net> wrote
|
|
|
"GeekBoy" <dadada@dooda.com> wrote in
news:45a818e3$0$7826$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.com:
>>>>>> The govt has taken away the RKBA from literally MILLIONS of
>>>>>> citizens because they have a dishonorable discharge from the
>>>>>> military or a c
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:17:07 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 5 Jan 2007 20:12:46 -0800, hayes13@fadmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Larry wrote:
>> >> In article <116
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:16:22 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 4 Jan 2007 04:48:55 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
>> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Larry wrote:
>> >>
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:15:16 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 3 Jan 2007 09:16:30 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
>> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >compuelf@gmail.com
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:14:39 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 3 Jan 2007 09:19:58 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
>> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Larry wrote:
>> >>
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:13:27 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on Mon, 01 Jan 2007 20:23:08 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> > Oh gee, here you are sp
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:12:03 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 9 Jan 2007 05:45:34 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
>> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> > >
>> >
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:57:03 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <1168668640.056528.266990@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
> "Chris Hayes" <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>> > As I understand it, on 12 Jan
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 22:10:40 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
<hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on 12 Jan 2007 02:52:14 -0800, "Chris Hayes"
>> <hayes12@fadmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> > > > BI
|
|
|
Your question is one that can only be determined in your case by a
judge.
You stated that "[t]his year I received yet another letter but I let it
slip by and now I received a writ of summons."
Regardless of your opinion of the statute of limitatio
|
|
|
"avgjoe" <mikelan1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168666656.35312 |
