misc.legal

[quote="Randy Bauer"]I'm curious, Sam - what exactly IS your job? When I served on the Executive Board, I darn well did think it was my duty to help balance the budget -- and we did. I didn't suggest that it was the duty of the Finance Committee Chai

"Millhaven" <millhaven@intergate.com> writes: > As a baby my penis was horribly mutilated by my parents without my > permission or any regard for the consequences on my future. This has > affected my enjoyment of sex and masturbation as well as my ab

Randy Bauer and the Finance Committee [quote="tanstaafl"][quote="samsloan"][quote="tsawmiller"] [quote="SusanPolgar"] The USCF needs the expertise of Randy Bauer. He would be a good asset for the USCF. This election should not be about partisan po

"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns98E0DE44BFBE4riemann1850yahoocom@207.217.125.201... > "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in > news:7aedna9QvqJyaEbYnZ2dnUVZ_s2vnZ2d@cablespeedwa.co

As I understand it, on 23 Feb 2007 14:47:22 -0800, "Millhaven" <millhaven@intergate.com> wrote: >As a baby my penis was horribly mutilated by my parents without my >permission or any regard for the consequences on my future. This has >affected my en

As I understand it, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:32:02 -0800, Karma Ghia <georgek@aol.com> wrote: >Can anything you say be used against you? Of course. Heck, you and I could have a conversation and anything either of us said can be used against us.

As I understand it, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:24:53 -0800, "RealFreedom" <RealFreedom@earth.com> wrote: [...] > > > >Kent Wills, > >You MUST be an FBI/NSA PSYCHOPATH since you knew his internet account is >with SBC/AT&T even though his headers

In article <PdNDh.1437$MV7.360@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>, Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: > Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote in news:ecklein- > > > > However, if you flaunt the building codes to the point that a judge > > <advance apology>

s I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:41:42 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <45DC6836.CA2DF4E@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> [...]

As I understand it, on 23 Feb 2007 06:42:59 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >On Feb 22, 12:13 pm, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kal...@avenuecable.com> >wrote: >> hamburger helper wrote: >> > When I was four, I thought paste tasted good. >> >>

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:13:01 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >hamburger helper wrote: > >> When I was four, I thought paste tasted good. > >I'm inclined to believe that eating paste causes brain dama

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:31:07 -0600, "hamburger helper" <nothing@nothing.com> wrote: [...] >>>No, it is USEFUL to do so. >> >> No contradiction there. It's also immoral. Still no contradiction, >> if you lack a conscience. >>

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:32:33 -0600, "hamburger helper" <nothing@nothing.com> wrote: [...] >> Larry, from what I understand, the prosecutor has visited this particular >> individual and intends to call him as a witness at the re

As I understand it, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:13:49 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Citizen Bob) wrote: >On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:38:28 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >>Everyone who has >>chimed in on the subject has taken the same position I have > >Liar. Who

As I understand it, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:30:35 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Citizen Bob) wrote: >On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:33:52 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >>> You know NOT whereof you speak. > >>Ted, its dishonest. There's no way around it. Even if the

As I understand it, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 01:33:52 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] > >> The endorsement by this person remains up simply because it reflects what his >> sentiments at one time were. > >But that's not what the site says, and its

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:11:46 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >tjab wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> The endorsement by this person remains up simply because it reflects what >>> his senti

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:48:24 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: [...] > >> Ted, I think most of the people reading this are going to find your >> dishonesty on this matter far more significant than the

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:56:52 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] > >It doesn't matter what the backroom politics are. > >If I support a person/position/cause, and permit the use of my >name/likeness in support of that perso

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 03:40:46 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <45DD0EE8.1A558E81@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> tjab wrote: >> >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> hambur

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:32:56 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >tjab wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> hamburger helper wrote: > >[...] > >>>> It's indefensible to keep his name on the "supp

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:06:19 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >hamburger helper wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> tjab wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> tjab wrote: > >[...] > >

As I understand it, on 21 Feb 2007 13:23:48 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >On Feb 21, 3:57 pm, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kal...@avenuecable.com> >wrote: >> tjab wrote: >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> >> Never. >> > Never asked, or ne

As I understand it, on 21 Feb 2007 13:25:02 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <45DC6836.CA2DF4E@avenuecable.com>, >Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >> >>But what else do they have besides a "hunch", or their "gut"

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:41:42 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >[...] > >>> Larry, admit it, if you caught a [presumably non-police] witness telling a

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:26:07 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <45DB9E4B.4FDAA830@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> [..

As I understand it, on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:20:11 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >[...] > >>> Whether it did or not, apparent perjury has been presented to the Grand >>>

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:29:35 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [snips for brevity] >> >> Whether it did or not, apparent perjury has been presented to the Grand Jury, >> tainting the proceedings -- and this testimony has been rec

As I understand it, on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:45:49 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Dane Metcalfe wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> See: <http://www.freecambrown.org/Brothers> > >[From the website] > >> "

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:10:21 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> tjab wrote: >>>> Larry wrote: > >>>>> Why? In my office, we have a saying - we take th

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:00:03 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >tjab wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> tjab wrote: >>>> Larry wrote: > >>>>> Why? In my office, we have a saying - we take the

As I understand it, on 21 Feb 2007 13:05:33 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <x-1F5136.20415220022007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >> >>Why? In my office, we have a saying - we take the cases as we find >>t

As I understand it, on 21 Feb 2007 21:44:04 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>>> Too bad this ain't Noo Yoak. >> >>> There's no right to a speedy trial in California? >> >>They have a hearing every couple of months where the defenda

As I understand it, on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:37:04 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > There's no right to a speedy trial in California? >> >> They have a hearing every couple of months where the defendants waives that >> right until the next

As I understand it, on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:27:30 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> RetzQ wrote: > >>>> Wow! Great place to take a 4-year old child. Nice shots. > >>> Is

As I understand it, on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:31:07 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <45DB398B.A40FAD79@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> RetzQ wrote: >> >> > Wow! Great place to take a 4-year old

As I understand it, on 20 Feb 2007 13:41:51 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >On Feb 20, 1:10 pm, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kal...@avenuecable.com> >wrote: >> RetzQ wrote: >> > Wow! Great place to take a 4-year old child. Nice shots. >> >>

As I understand it, on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:10:19 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >RetzQ wrote: > >> Wow! Great place to take a 4-year old child. Nice shots. > >Isn't it? Here's another couple of shots, taken at a loca

As I understand it, on 20 Feb 2007 04:50:28 -0800, "RetzQ" <lorettas2@cox.net> wrote: >Wow! Great place to take a 4-year old child. Nice shots. > >If Brown's case hinges on whether or not there was a rock on which he >allegedly sat that he may or m

On Feb 22, 3:30 pm, "CliffB" <f...@gosympatico.ca> wrote: > On Feb 22, 6:08 pm, "Just.some.guy" <return.em...@address.not.valid> > wrote: > > > > > > > "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com> wrote in messagenews:1172184685.110792.277260@s48g

In article <georgek-C81D5B.14320223022007@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Karma Ghia <georgek@aol.com> wrote: > Can anything you say be used against you? Of course. Anything you say to _anyone_, including posting to this news group, can be use

As I understand it, on Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:47:43 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >See: http://www.freecambrown.org/Brothers So Cameron lied to Dept. Brothers when he claimed he was sitting on a rock. We already know C

Let's say someone graduated from an unaccredited law school in California, and then tried and failed to pass the CA bar exam. And, they never passed any bar exam or similar in any other states or countries. Is it proper to call them an "attorney" or

As I understand it, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:40:20 GMT, Gunner <gunner@lightspeed.net> wrote: >On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:46:05 -0800, "RealFreedom" ><RealFreedom@earth.com> wrote: > >> >>"Gunner Asch" <gunner@nospam_lightspeed.net> wrote in message >

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:15:46 +0100, "user@mail.com" <user@mail.com> wrote: >Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in >news:5mjpt2tlcbvaiqvf8v8ilr66677dupsocb@4ax.com: > >> Don't forget that with fifty wives come fifty mother-in-laws. > >Your mother-

<craig@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message news:1172256904.441859.52120@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > My son, in an attempt to explain why he was speeding and > possibly to get a reduction, Just for #@($s and giggles, why was it exactly that you

<craig@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message news:1172256904.441859.52120@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > My son got a speeding ticket a few weeks ago in a small village in > upstate NY. Was it Princetown or Tupper Lake?

On Feb 23, 8:04 am, "foaddoc" <whatareyoulook...@muttonhead.com> wrote: > "angel" <onta...@30gigs.com> wrote in message > > news:1172245094.416758.150230@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > > > My wife and I rent a room in a condo from a landlor

As a baby my penis was horribly mutilated by my parents without my permission or any regard for the consequences on my future. This has affected my enjoyment of sex and masturbation as well as my ability to form and maintain relationships with the oppo