|
|
In article <hYudnQj197gcV2DYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> > I haven't heard any independent third party state that the police opened
> > fire without identifying themselves. Hav
|
|
|
In article <VLWdnYnetoEUVGDYnZ2dnUVZ_qSrnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> > I think they had the intent to neutralize the perceived threat against
> > them. If it could be done short of causing
|
|
|
In article <atWdndL7bP50AmDYnZ2dnUVZ_q6vnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> > I don't necessarily disagree with you here. But a lack of judgment is
> > not "intent to kill" - instead, it is, as t
|
|
|
"clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message
news:iucsv2h675odre58g2akeqo0rvls7bq6er@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:50:20 GMT, Tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.army.m>
> wrote:
>
>>So who do you say he was working for ?
>>And remember by your s
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 20:14:31 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
> In article <Qs-dneJtzYt0SWDYnZ2dnUVZ_rGinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>>>> so you figure they're doing target reassessment between
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 20:13:56 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
> In article <JLGdnYTyN8gOSWDYnZ2dnUVZ_qarnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>>> Do you think their intent changed along the way?
>>
>>
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 20:10:19 -0400, "Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> said:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>>> so you figure they're doing target reassessment between the odd dozens
>>> shots?
>> Of course they were. If not, they'd still be on that street, sh
|
|
|
In article <w%lLh.14043$tD2.9063@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.army.m> wrote:
>And remember by your standard the US could just shoot any Al Jazeere
>"journalists" we happen to find.
US warplanes bomb Al Jazeer
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 19:55:20 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
> In article <hYudnQj197gcV2DYnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>>> I haven't heard any independent third party state that th
|
|
|
"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174253716.000989.203800@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 18, 6:23 am, "tinydancer" <tinydancer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > "Bo Raxo" <crimenewscen...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
|
|
|
tinydancer wrote:
> "Bo Raxo" <crimenewscenter@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1174253716.000989.203800@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>
>>On Mar 18, 6:23 am, "tinydancer" <tinydancer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bo Raxo" <crimenewscen...@gmai
|
|
|
"Fred G. Mackey" <nospam@dont.spam> wrote in
news:s7WdnasUAbsOM2DYnZ2dnUVZ_rDinZ2d@comcast.com:
> foaddoc wrote:
>> "jellybean" <pegeen.long2@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1174064736.447266.117980@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
"Wayne H. Wilhelm" <wwilhelm@neonospam.rr.com> wrote in
news:45fdad64$0$4920$4c368faf@roadrunner.com:
> "° Shanghai Lil °" <Lilly@Shanghai.cn> wrote in message
> news:45fccf5a$0$16334$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
>> Wayne H. Wilhelm wrote:
>>> "S
|
|
|
On 2007-03-15 11:37:35 -0400, nospam@isp.com said:
>>
>
> One aspect of the actually "worse way" to make a "what to do?"
> decision about these matters is to continue not to report whether you
> have actually verified that the charges were dismis
|
|
|
In article <b5jev2t176rde806q2teprulb1ebfha468@4ax.com>,
del_grande_news@earthlink.net says...
> allenkirshner wrote:
>
> > Cadderly wrote:
>
> >> Yup, Google (a corporation 5 times bigger than Viacom) and its lawyers have
> >> destroyed Viacom'
|
|
|
In article <Xns98F27B1BD257CCB@217.160.217.58>, ro0t@parentsbasement.com
says...
> "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:1173800977.034341.285550@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com:
>
> > http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/13/news/companies/you
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 16:12:03 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
> In article <etk62o$8ga@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>> In article <x-15819D.15415218032007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>>> In article <45fd8063$0
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 15:45:40 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
>>>
>>
>> There was no threat- and nothing upon which to base a perception
>> sufficient to kill/wound people over.
>
> No threat? Before a single shot was fired Sean Bell had ran into one
>
|
|
|
On 2007-03-18 15:41:53 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
> In article <45fd8063$0$5819$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2007-03-18 00:05:22 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
>>
>>> In article <45fcab10$0$8925$4c368faf@ro
|
|
|
Tankfixer wrote:
> In article <etk11e$a47$1$830fa17d@news.demon.co.uk>,
> blackhole@nowhere.com mumbled
>> Tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <sq9qv297ojgobai1imuataqgnfdc31derj@4ax.com>,
>>> inuit@canoemail.com mumbled
>>>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:29:3
|
|
|
In article <etk78h$8qr@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <x-EA59BB.16130818032007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Do you really think these officers, none of whom had ever fired their
|
|
|
In article <etk78h$8qr@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <x-EA59BB.16130818032007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >In article <etk68j$8i7@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
> >wrote:
> >
|
|
|
Gene wrote:
>
> What a laugh. There you go again. Thinking with your faith instead of
> your brain. While you were in the military you were not issued a hand gun
> because yopu were issued a rifle. I was issued a hand gun for 25 years
> and qu
|
|
|
Fred G. Mackey wrote:
> Rodney Long wrote:
>
>>
>> If I felt like I did, I would buy one, I knew a store owner that had
>> one that needed it, 6 Hell's Angles came into his store, pulled a
>> knife on him,
>
> No doubt they were obtuse angles
|
|
|
In article <etk68j$8i7@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <x-0C62A0.15481718032007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >In article <etk0c8$77l@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
> >wrote:
> >
|
|
|
In article <etk62o$8ga@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <x-15819D.15415218032007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >In article <45fd8063$0$5819$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> > Slim <slim@pickins.com>
|
|
|
Cleared of rape after 18 years, now convicted of murder
Story Highlights
.. Steven Avery convicted of murdering photographer, Teresa Halbach
.. Avery faces mandatory life prison term
.. Avery spent 18 years in prison for a rape; later cleared by DNA t
|
|
|
"Ghent" aka Antonio Santana/Jehovahs Witness/sociopath<jabriol@hotmail.com>
wrote in message
news:1174253972.194397.305380@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
-------- sssssnipppppppppp---------
Hey Antonio Santana, CONGRADULATIONS!!!!!!!! You f
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:57:10 GMT, Tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.army.m>
wrote:
>> He would have to have done something to deserve it first and nobody
>> knows if he actually has done anything.
>What did Daniel Pearl do to deserve beheading ?
Danie
|
|
|
In article <etk0c8$77l@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <x-691684.11582518032007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >In article <etiofs$mah@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
> >wrote:
> >
|
|
|
In article <45fd80b1$0$5819$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> On 2007-03-18 11:58:26 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
>
> > In article <etiofs$mah@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
> >
> >> In article <x-9A4
|
|
|
In article <neudnfIMd4IEHWDYnZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> >> Seems to be a pattern of hysterical shooting.
> > You don't have any experience with guns, do you?
>
> <g>
> Lots
|
|
|
In article <45fd8063$0$5819$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> On 2007-03-18 00:05:22 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> said:
>
> > In article <45fcab10$0$8925$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> > Slim <slim@pickins.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
|
|
|
In article <etk11e$a47$1$830fa17d@news.demon.co.uk>,
blackhole@nowhere.com mumbled
> Tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <sq9qv297ojgobai1imuataqgnfdc31derj@4ax.com>,
> > inuit@canoemail.com mumbled
> >> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:29:36 GMT, Tankfixer <pau
|
|
|
Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in news:Xns98F78F955BA88VeebleFetzer@
216.250.184.7:
> In news:12vqk3u9susr07e@corp.supernews.com "SaPeIsMa"
> <SaPeIsMa@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Too bad for you that the meaning of "liberal" has been twisted o
|
|
|
In news:12vqk3u9susr07e@corp.supernews.com "SaPeIsMa"
<SaPeIsMa@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Too bad for you that the meaning of "liberal" has been twisted out of
> shape in the last 50 years the way the word "gay" has been changed in
> it's daily use
|
|
|
"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:12vqk3u9susr07e@corp.supernews.com:
>
> "Deadrat" <a@b.com> wrote in message
> news:fN3Lh.7278$JZ3.2111@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
>> "Jim Austin" <bja@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
>> news:117418227
|
|
|
SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:12vqjh33qsl34b4@corp.supernews.com:
>
> "Deadrat" <a@b.com> wrote in message
> news:yq3Lh.7274$JZ3.4034@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
>> "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:12vp0vhcr
|
|
|
Tankfixer wrote:
> In article <sq9qv297ojgobai1imuataqgnfdc31derj@4ax.com>,
> inuit@canoemail.com mumbled
>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:29:36 GMT, Tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.army.m>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <45fb90c8$0$16402$88260bb3@free.teranews.c
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> Well, all the police officers say they identified themselves - which is
> standard procedure, as well - yet you disregard them as simply covering
> for each other. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, no?
You
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> so you figure they're doing target reassessment between the odd dozens
>> shots?
> Of course they were. If not, they'd still be on that street, shooting!
Then why didn't they stop shooting when there was no aggressive res
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> Do you think their intent changed along the way?
Had to if they were doing target reassessment along the way-
Unless you think they just lit it up and kept firing till they ran out of
ammo, or something.
> Which is why
|
|
|
In article <45fd60a1$0$75591$dbd49001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
avdeelen.REMOFETHIS1@wanadoo.nl mumbled
> "Tankfixer" <paul.carrier@us.army.m> schreef in bericht
> news:QJ%Kh.13696$tD2.11540@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > In article <45fb90c8$0$1640
|
|
|
In article <sq9qv297ojgobai1imuataqgnfdc31derj@4ax.com>,
inuit@canoemail.com mumbled
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:29:36 GMT, Tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.army.m>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <45fb90c8$0$16402$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
> >Lilly@Shanghai.
|
|
|
"RichD" <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1173575074.313073.117400
@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:
> I would like to know, what extra powers do the
> police have, in a semi-public, semi-private environs,
> like a shopping mall? (alternatively,
|
|
|
On Mar 18, 3:37 pm, Pneuma Pelosi <frank.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:04:12 -0400, "Bill of Wright" <b...@nospam.con> wrote:
>
> >You're obviously a "dog person." And I'd bet my left nut you're also a gun
> >control
> >fanatic
>
|
|
|
On Mar 9, 11:30 am, "Hal Womack 3-dan" <hal.wom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Question: What's the highest dollar value which a U.S. court at any
> level has ever placed on a single human life or part thereof?
>
> ............................................
|
|
|
On 18 Mar 2007 10:22:19 GMT, Baron Sydney von Harbour Bridge
<Your@email.com> wrote:
>
>Head of the British judiciary Lord Falconer
>
No, he isn't.
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
> I haven't heard any independent third party state that the police opened
> fire without identifying themselves. Have you?
By definition, all the people inside the car are excluded- and even if the
officer identified himse
|
|
