misc.legal

In article <1174865910.929365.303360@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, k_flynn@lycos.com wrote: > proffsl wrote: > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I invite anyone reading this

In article <1174863319.933689.220730@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > Quote something I have said in the past that you believe is a lie. > > You've been shot between the eye

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:eu2b87$lgg@rac2.wam.umd.edu... > In article <IeCdnYGOtMV2EpnbnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@comcast.com>, > R Sweeney <DockScience@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message >>news:etfu4h$k

In article <1174861616.644377.170030@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > k_fl

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message news:45fda79a$0$16281$88260bb3@free.teranews.com... > tjab wrote: >> In article <Q8Cdnbz6qPjqLmHYnZ2dnUVZ_syunZ2d@comcast.com>, >> R Sweeney <DockScience@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> "° Shanghai

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:etk731$8pv@rac2.wam.umd.edu... > In article <UdWdnWt_Q-dCA2DYnZ2dnUVZ_oSnnZ2d@comcast.com>, > R Sweeney <DockScience@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message >>news:etio48$m

In article <1174861566.612922.321630@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I invite anyone reading this to look in

In article <1174861028.975163.230500@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The bogus quote from the bogus court case proves that out. > > I have long ago admitted t

"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-D55893.13062325032007@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <460696eb$0$16276$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>, > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > >> Scout wrote: >> > <John-Fewell@hotmail.com>

On Mar 25, 11:01 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You have been dismissed for LYING. How would PROFFY know a lie? Because he LIES all the time. He has NEVER told the truth even ONCE. For instan

On Mar 25, 10:53 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > k_fl...@lycos.com wrote the truth at all times. > > You have proven me, PROFFY, to be the most inept LIAR of all > LOSENET since my lies were so transparent. Proffy, you dismissed yourse

On Mar 25, 10:51 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > You have proven me, PROFFY, to be the most inept LIAR of all > LOSENET since my lies were so transparent. Proffy, you dismissed yourself with all your LIES.

On Mar 25, 10:49 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > k_fl...@lycos.com wrote the truth at all times. > > You have proven me, PROFFY, to be the most inept LIAR of all > LOSENET since my lies were so transparent. Proffy, you dismissed yourse

On Mar 24, 9:15 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com" wrote: > > > > Only idiots like yourslef would spend their time on usenet looking for > > > spelling errors. > > >

On Mar 25, 10:46 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > k_fl...@lycos.com wrote the truth at all times in proving PROFFY as the LIAR > > You have been dismissed for TELLING THE TRUTH because I,PROFFY, > cannot stand the light of TRUTH. Thank

On Mar 25, 10:44 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I, Proffy, admit to being the proven LIAR. PROFFY is DISMISSED as the LIAR that he is, completely proven and irrefutable.

On Mar 25, 10:44 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > > Quote something I have said in the past that you > > > > believe is a lie.

On Mar 24, 10:00 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > As I understand it, on 24 Mar 2007 07:27:07 -0700, > > "PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com" <PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > >> > > > or are you going to cvontinue > > >> > >

On Mar 25, 10:41 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > > > You LIAR. > > You are a fantastic gentleman who proved me wrong, I admit.. I am dismissed. Thank you, PROFFY the PROVEN LIAR.

Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in news:7bpd03tqrkgs2n2huah20cs4uq781dtqvi@4ax.com: > As I understand it, on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:06:24 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> > wrote: > >>> Why would a gift be income? >> >>Why wouldn't it be? Do you know w

On Mar 25, 10:39 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > K_flynn once again proves he's an habitual liar. > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/grou

On Mar 25, 10:19 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > How could I have ever forgotten? When I provide evidence > > > that you and Larry are bald face l

In article <popd03pj6u0jmgvou6obe9b5j0bpuq2mch@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > As I understand it, on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:50:24 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> > wrote: > > >In article <56np33F2afrvqU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. J

In article <7bpd03tqrkgs2n2huah20cs4uq781dtqvi@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > As I understand it, on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:06:24 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> > wrote: > > >> Why would a gift be income? > > > >Why wouldn't it be? Do y

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have been dismissed for LYING.

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is *NO* evidence that *anyone* has lied in the links > you've supplied. You have been dismissed for LYING.

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have been dismissed for Lying.

On Mar 24, 5:12 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > John-Few...@hotmail.com wrote: > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > "PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com" wrote: > > > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: >

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have been dismissed for Lying.

k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > You have been dismissed for Lying.

On Mar 24, 2:21 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > John-Few...@hotmail.com wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > "PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com" wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > "PoliceExp...@Mu

Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > You have been dismissed for LYING.

k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > You have been dismissed for LYING.

On 25 Mar 2007 11:28:44 -0700, "Darren" <darrenli516@yahoo.com> wrote: >My father passed away recently. >His estate consists only of his house, which is in Texas. He had no >cash at all upon his death. >My brother and I are the heirs, and according

On Mar 24, 1:55 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > John-Few...@hotmail.com wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > "PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com" wrote: > > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.co

k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > You have been dismissed for Lying.

k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > You have been dismissed for LYING.

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have been dismissed for lying.

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > You have been dismissed for Lying.

Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > > > Quote something I have said in the past that you > > > believe is a lie. > > > > You've been shot between the eyes, and yet you deny > > t

k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > > You LIAR. You are a Liar. You are dismissed.

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > K_flynn once again proves he's an habitual liar. > > > > > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/5333840fb192d941 > > There is

On Mar 24, 8:38 pm, Arif Khokar <akhokar1...@wvu.edu> wrote: > PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2:33 am, Arif Khokar <akhokar1...@wvu.edu> wrote: > >> PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com wrote: > >>> On Mar 20, 12:24 am, Arif Khokar <akhokar1..

On Mar 24, 1:43 pm, "Ed Pirrero" <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 23, 9:49 pm, hadily6...@yahoo.com wrote: > > > You > > shouldn't post fictional information if you don't know what you're > > talking about son. > > Talk about usenet irony, L

As I understand it, on 25 Mar 2007 12:27:08 -0700, k_flynn@lycos.com wrote: >On Mar 25, 12:43 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> The word of Liars is worth more than the evidence their Liars???? > >Absolutely not!! And of course, that me

Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in news:4606E353.70544EA5@hate.spam.net: > Deadrat wrote: >> >> Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in news:4605557A.5704D240 >> @hate.spam.net: >> >> <contentless rant snipped> >> >> You have tre

n Mar 24, 12:49 pm, Nate Nagel <njna...@roosters.net> wrote: > hadily6...@yahoo.com wrote: > > On Mar 24, 12:18 pm, Nate Nagel <njna...@roosters.net> wrote: > > >>hadily6...@yahoo.com wrote: > > >>>On Mar 24, 10:37 am, "PoliceExp...@Muchomail.com"

As I understand it, on 25 Mar 2007 12:03:21 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: [...] >> > K_flynn once again proves he's an habitual liar. >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/5333840fb192d941 >> >> Ummm,

As I understand it, on 25 Mar 2007 11:56:07 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: [...] >> > > K_flynn once again proves he's an habitual liar. >> > > >> > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/5333840fb192d941 Ther

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > How could I have ever forgotten? When I provide evidence > > that you and Larry are bald face liars, well, that's not > > evidence because you and Larry say that